Fig. 54.1 Rhythm discrimination by one listener. The dashed line at d′  =  1 indicates the criterion for threshold rhythm discrimination (From Middlebrooks and Onsan 2012) Acuity was somewhat coarser…

Fig. 31.1 (a) Example rate vs ILD function. Distributions of half-max ILD (b), ILD dynamic range (c), and rate-ILD slope (d) for low (<4 kHz)- and high (>4 kHz)-frequency ICC…

Fig. 52.1 Examples of the waveforms (top row) and schematic plots of the spectrograms (bottom row) of the stimuli for the conditions RF (left column), CM (middle column) and CD…

Fig. 45.1 The two noise tokens used in the SSA experiments. (a) Waveforms of the first 30 ms of each of the two tokens. (b) Power spectra of the two…

Fig. 59.1 Temporal coherence model. The mixture (sum of one male and one female sentences) is transformed into an auditory spectrogram. Various features are extracted from the spectrogram including a…

Fig. 16.1 Percentage of correct responses in the melody-discrimination task. Error bars show 95 % confidence intervals 2.3 Discussion The results suggest that tones above 6 kHz can elicit a…

Fig. 46.1 Two principal components were extracted, each consisting of a single frequency profile (left) and corresponding spatial maps for both subject groups (right). The first component (PC1, top) summarized…

(32.1) with parameters n  =  4, φ  =  π/2 and a  =  1, b  =  1.018, leads to a basilar-membrane impulse response (BM IR) description for the human auditory filter….

Fig. 56.1 Seating layout of the virtual restaurant Speech reception thresholds (SRTs) were measured using an adaptive method similar to that used by Hawley et al. (2004) in which listeners…

Fig. 48.1 Sketch of stimulus configuration in the frequency domain Twenty-one listeners (21–47 years, mean 25 years, 12 females) participated in the study. None of the listeners had a history…