Fig. 15.1 Plot of the spherical equivalent prediction error (D) by the difference in central corneal thickness between the expected (VisuMax read-out lenticule thickness) and the observed change measured by…
Fig. 22.1 An example of the presenting website of one of the authors. According to a “local hero” principle, the surgeon is presented first. Two other points are emphasized at…
Fig. 12.1 Anterior segment photography of an eye 3 months post 130 μm SMILE procedure. Anterior segment optical coherence tomography and Optical Quality Analysis System (OQAS) (Visometrics SL, Terrassa, Barcelona)…
Fig. 7.1 Appearance of a LASIK-treated eye 10 years post-op. Superficial punctate keratitis is clearly visible after fluorescein staining Fig. 7.2 Eyes underwent small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and LASIK 1…
Fig. 10.1 The superior incision had an anticlockwise radial tear with a subsequent epithelial ingrowth. One year after surgery the ingrowth remained stationary without any effect on visual performance of…
Study method Preop. Sph.eq. refraction (D) N (eyes) Follow-up (months) Refractive outcome Regression Visual outcome 2-line loss in CDVA Hjortdal et al. [6] Prospective −7.19 ± 1.30 670 3 80 %…
Fig. 17.1 Electron microscopy and ImageJ analysis – overview pictures (a, bar = 50 μm) were taken to select areas with cross cut collagen fibres. A single keratocyte can be detected in…
C≤0.25 D 0.25 D < C ≤0.5 D 0.5 D < C ≤0.75 D 0.75 D < C ≤1 D 1 D < C ≤1.25 D 1.25 D < C ≤1.5 D 1.5 D < C ≤2 D 2 D < C ≤3 D 3…
Fig. 25.1 Injection 2 % Lidocaine with Bicarbonate using 25 gauge spinal needle into area of lacrimal fossa and middle turbinate Fig. 25.2 Local anesthetic injection into the middle turbinate…
Fig. 22.1 The piezoelectric console Fig. 22.2 Control panel on the console Each of this can have a range from 1 to 5 (low power to high power). D1 is…
