Management of Temporal Bone Trauma

CHAPTER 145 Management of Temporal Bone Trauma




Key Points















Pathophysiology


The temporal bones are pyramidal structures in the thick bone of the skull base and consequently require a great force to fracture. The force of lateral impact required to fracture the temporal bones of fresh cadavers is estimated at 1875 pounds.4 The fractures take the path of least resistance, which is along the structurally weakened points, such as the various foramina that perforate the skull base.


The temporal bone houses or encapsulates many important structures, including the facial nerve, cranial nerves IX through XI, the cochlea, the labyrinth, the ossicles, the tympanic membrane, the carotid artery, and the jugular vein. Any of these structures can be injured with a fracture of the bone. Fracture of the temporal bone can violate dura, resulting in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) fistula, meningitis, and brain herniation. In addition to neurotologic manifestations of involved structures within the temporal bone, associated intracranial injuries, such as epidural or subdural hematomas, cerebral edema, post-traumatic encephalopathy, and elevated intracranial pressure, may occur. Neurotologic symptoms can also result from shearing strain within the brain tissue with disruption of vessels, axons, synapses, and dendrites.5


Sixty percent of temporal bone fractures are categorized as open fractures, presenting with bloody otorrhea, brain herniation, or CSF draining from the ear canal, eustachian tube, or penetrating wound site.3 Eight percent to 29% of temporal bone fractures occur bilaterally.3,6,7



Classification


Temporal bone fractures have traditionally been divided into transverse and longitudinal categories on the basis of the relationship of the fracture line to the axis of the petrous ridge.8 This classification has given way to a new scheme that classifies fractures by whether they disrupt or spare the otic capsule (the bone that houses the cochlea and the semicircular canals) (Figs. 145-2 through 145-4).3,9





Fractures that spare the otic capsule typically involve the squamosal portion of the temporal bone and the posterosuperior wall of the external auditory canal. The fracture passes through the mastoid air cells and the middle ear and then fractures the tegmen mastoideum and tegmen tympani. The fracture proceeds anterolateral to the otic capsule, typically fracturing the tegmen in the region of the facial hiatus. Otic capsule–sparing fractures typically result from a blow to the temporoparietal region.


Otic capsule–disrupting fractures pass through the otic capsule, generally proceeding from the foramen magnum across the petrous pyramid and the otic capsule. The fracture often passes through the jugular foramen, the internal auditory canal, and the foramen lacerum; these fractures do not typically affect the ossicular chain or the external auditory canal.10 Otic capsule–disrupting fractures generally result from blows to the occipital region.


Longitudinal fractures reportedly make up 70% to 90% of temporal bone fractures, with the remaining 10% to 30% categorized as transverse.814 In two large series using the newer classification scheme, only 2.5% to 5.8% of fractures disrupted the otic capsule,3,15 suggesting that many fractures that are oriented perpendicular to the petrous ridge do not actually cross the otic capsule. Many of the otic capsule–disrupting fractures are actually oriented in the longitudinal plane.15


The rationale for changing the classification scheme is to focus on the functional sequelae and complications of temporal bone fractures as opposed to merely describing the anatomic orientation of the fracture. Fractures that disrupt the otic capsule almost always result in a sensorineural hearing loss, although there are reported exceptions.16 Otic capsule–sparing fractures tend to have conductive or mixed hearing loss,3 whereas otic capsule–disrupting fractures have a much higher incidence of facial nerve paralysis (30% to 50% vs. 6% to 14%).3,15 In addition, Fisch17 reported a much higher incidence of nerve disruption in fractures involving the otic capsule. There is a twofold to fourfold increase in CSF fistula in otic capsule–disrupting fractures as well as a much greater risk of intracranial injuries.3,15 These fractures may also carry a higher risk of delayed meningitis due to an inability of the otic capsule enchondral bone to remodel and heal.18,19 Pollak and colleagues19 reported the case of a 51-year-old man who died of meningitis after having suffered an otic capsule–disrupting fracture during childhood. The histopathology of his temporal bone revealed pus in the middle ear extending through an unhealed fracture line across the otic capsule, and the fracture line contained a loose fibrous tissue. The membranous bone along the tegmen has the capability to heal, whereas the enchondral bone of the otic capsule does not. Fractures through the otic capsule generally partially fill with fibrous tissue and potentially seal with periosteal bone reaction on the surface of the otic capsule (Fig. 145-5).19



In addition to the predictive value for various complications and comorbidity, categorizing the fractures according to whether they are otic capsule sparing or disrupting guides the indications for surgical interventions for CSF fistula and facial paralysis as well as the surgical approach to be used in their repair.


Temporal bone fractures in the pediatric population differ somewhat from those in adults. There is a higher incidence of intracranial complications (58%) and a lower incidence of facial nerve paralysis (3%) in children.20



Evaluation


It is uncommon for temporal bone fractures to occur in isolation; consequently, the initial evaluation and management is focused on the emergent life-threatening issues of securing an airway, controlling hemorrhage, evaluating the neurologic status, and stabilizing and evaluating the cervical spine. The neurotologic examination assesses facial nerve function in the emergency department as early as possible, particularly before the administration of muscle relaxants, as discussed below. The ear examination focuses on the condition of the auricle, the ear canal, the tympanic membrane, and the middle ear.


The auricles are inspected for lacerations and hematomas. Lacerations are closed after thorough cleaning and débridement of exposed cartilage. Hematomas are drained, and pressure bolsters are sutured in place to close the dead space and prevent a recollection of blood. Untreated, the auricular hematomas result in an auricular chondropathy, which is also called “cauliflower ear.”


The ear canal is inspected for fractures along the roof, CSF otorrhea, the degree of hemorrhage, and the presence of brain herniation. The ear is examined as aseptically as possible. Blood and cerumen in the ear canal should never be débrided with irrigation. After stabilization and transfer, the ear can be carefully examined with the aid of an operating microscope. Typical findings include fractures along the scutum and roof of the external auditory canal and tympanic membrane perforations. Hemotympanum or bloody otorrhea is almost invariably present (Figs. 145-6 to 145-8).





The ear canal is not packed initially unless packing is required to control significant hemorrhaging. If profuse hemorrhaging cannot be controlled with packing, the patient is taken to either the operating room for carotid ligation or the angiography suite for balloon occlusion.


When severely traumatized ear canals are identified, particularly in the presence of a penetrating injury, the patient is at high risk of stenosis or cholesteatoma formation. Although the ear canal is not stented acutely, it is imperative that the problem be identified and the patient followed closely. Early intervention with stenting at the onset of the stenosis can effectively prevent a problem that is much more difficult to address once the stenosis is mature.


The integrity of the tympanic membrane is assessed. Traumatic tympanic membrane perforations generally heal spontaneously; consequently no acute intervention is entertained.


The neurotologic examination should also note the presence or absence of nystagmus and the type of nystagmus. Peripheral vertigo generally manifests with horizontal or rotatory nystagmus and is suppressible with visual fixation. Central vertigo may present with vertical or direction-changing nystagmus that fails to suppress and may even enhance with fixation. The most common type of vertigo after head trauma is benign paroxysmal position vertigo, which manifests with transient rotatory nystagmus with the Halpike maneuver.21 The nystagmus occurs with the affected ear down. There is a 2- to 10-second latency followed by 10 to 20 seconds of rotatory nystagmus; the nystagmus is fixed in direction and is fatigable. Central vertigo induces direction-changing nystagmus, which has no latency and is not fatigable. Interestingly, the incidence of vertigo does not closely correlate with the severity of the trauma.22


The vast majority of posttraumatic vertigo cases resolve spontaneously. If the symptoms persist after discharge, an electronystagmogram can be obtained on an outpatient basis. A fistula test, which consists of applying positive and negative pressure in the ear canal with a pneumatic otoscope, is also not performed in the acute setting. The risk of additional iatrogenic injury and the potential for introducing infection or air into the inner ear outweighs the potential diagnostic benefits. If the patient continues to experience vertigo for 1 week after injury or is experiencing fluctuating or progressive hearing loss, a perilymph fistula is suspected, and a fistula test is performed. Nystagmus and vertigo suggest the presence of a perilymph fistula. The fistula test is not performed if there is evidence of a CSF fistula or of infection in the middle ear.


Hearing is assessed clinically at the bedside with a progressively louder whispered voice and with the use of tuning forks, but audiograms are not typically obtained until the patient’s condition is stabilized. However, in the presence of the complications of facial paralysis or a CSF fistula, an audiogram is required before the surgical intervention, because the outcome of the audiogram significantly influences the treatment algorithm, as discussed later.


Patients with severe head trauma of the magnitude required for a temporal bone fracture generally already have had a computed tomography (CT) scan of the head to assess for intracranial hemorrhage. Additional imaging of the temporal bone with axial and coronal high-resolution CT scanning (HRCT) is indicated in the presence of facial paralysis, CSF fistula, disruption of the superior wall of the external auditory canal or scutum with potential trapping of epithelium (Fig. 145-9), or suspected vascular injury. HRCT of the temporal bone is also indicated if surgical intervention is required for the management of an otologic complication. Hearing loss (conductive or sensorineural) in the absence of other complications does not warrant additional temporal bone imaging. Demonstrating a transverse fracture through the otic capsule in a profound sensorineural hearing loss does not alter the treatment plan. Preoperative assessment with CT scanning in patients with a conductive hearing loss of sufficient magnitude to warrant exploration and ossicular reconstruction may provide useful information that may influence the surgical approach.



The role of HRCT in the evaluation of potential carotid artery injuries is unclear. Resnick and colleagues23 reported a 5% incidence of carotid injury in basilar skull fractures if the fracture spares the carotid canal and an 18% incidence of carotid injury in patients with fractures through the carotid canal seen on HRCT. However, Kahn and colleagues24 argues that, in an asymptomatic patient, HRCT demonstration of a fracture through the carotid canal yields no valuable additional information. Subsequent angiography performed in cases of asymptomatic carotid canal fractures yielded no evidence of carotid artery injury and provided no clinical utility.24 Consequently, in completely asymptomatic patients who have sustained temporal bone fractures and who are neurologically intact, HRCT and angiography are not required. On the other hand, if there are any transient or persistent neurologic deficits in patients with basilar skull fractures, HRCT of the temporal bone and CT angiography are indicated (Fig. 145-10).



Conventional radiographs including Schüller, Towne, Chamberlain, Stenvers, and basal views as well as tomograms have been supplanted by HRCT scanning and no longer play a role in the evaluation of patients who are suspected of having a temporal bone fracture.



Management of Complications


The morbidity and mortality associated with temporal bone fractures result from injuries to the structures that pass through the temporal bone or that abut the temporal bone as described previously. The common complications include the facial nerve paralysis, sensorineural hearing loss, conductive hearing loss, CSF fistula, stenosis of the ear canal, cholesteatoma formation, and vascular injuries. The evaluation and management of these complications are discussed.



Facial Nerve Injury


Facial paralysis is a severely disfiguring complication of temporal bone fractures. Seven percent of temporal bone fractures result in facial paralysis; 25% of such cases involve complete paralysis.3 The reported incidence in the literature of up to 30% is exaggerated by sampling error due to omitting simple uncomplicated temporal bone fractures that are not referred for otolaryngologic consult. The incidence of facial paralysis is also overestimated by including patients in retrospective reviews who have been referred to the tertiary care center for the management of complications of temporal bone fractures (e.g., facial paresis). Because the entire pool of temporal bone fracture patients is not included in the statistics, the incidence of complications becomes quite biased.


If head trauma patients are carefully evaluated in the emergency department upon admission (before the administration of muscle relaxants), 27% of the facial nerve injuries will present with immediate-onset facial paralysis. Seventy-three percent will have facial motion in the initial examination and subsequently deteriorate.3 The latency of delay in onset of facial palsy ranges from 1 to 16 days. It is crucial to differentiate “delayed onset” from “delayed diagnosis.” Delayed onset of facial paralysis is defined as documented facial function in the emergency department that subsequently deteriorates; delayed diagnosis of facial paralysis occurs when the patient is given a paralytic agent and is intubated before the examination of facial function. In this situation, an assessment of facial function is delayed until extubation. These patients should be categorized as unestablished onset and treated in a manner that is similar to the immediate onset patients. In one large series, 10% of patients fell into this unestablished onset category.25


Many aspects of the management of facial nerve injuries remain controversial. One of the main issues to be resolved is that of which patients should undergo surgical exploration. Because the vast majority of traumatic facial palsies resolve spontaneously, the choice of which patients should undergo exploration is based on prognostic factors for poor outcome. The factors that are assessed to predict the recovery of facial function include the timing of onset (delayed vs. immediate onset), the severity of the injury (penetrating vs. nonpenetrating), and the presence of associated infection.


The delay of onset of paralysis after temporal bone fracture is the most important of the predictive factors. In one series of 37 delayed-onset facial palsies, five were lost to follow-up, and the remainder recovered to a House-Brackmann grade I or II.3 McKennan and Chole26 described their experience with 17 patients with immediate-onset facial paralysis and 19 patients with delayed-onset paralysis. Complete spontaneous recovery of facial function occurred in 94% of the patients with delayed-onset paralysis; the one remaining patient had a House-Brackmann grade II recovery. By contrast, 8 of the 17 immediate-onset paralysis patients had facial nerve transsections.


Turner7 reviewed a large series of traumatic facial paralysis patients who were treated conservatively. His paper included 36 immediate-onset and 34 delayed-onset facial palsies. Complete recovery occurred in 94% of the delayed-onset cases and 75% of immediate-onset cases. The one patient with delayed-onset paralysis who had no recovery of function developed the facial palsy coincident with acute otitis media. By contrast, Maiman and colleagues27 found no correlation between immediate- or delayed-onset facial paralysis (treated nonsurgically) and outcome. However, 44 of 45 of their patients (including both immediate- and delayed-onset patients) had satisfactory recovery. Review of the literature argues strongly against surgical exploration and decompression of delayed post-traumatic and facial paralysis. The natural course of delayed facial paralysis is almost always the recovery of facial function to a House-Brackmann grade I or II. There are no convincing data in the literature that demonstrate that surgical intervention in delayed-onset paralysis will increase the probability of complete recovery of function.


May28 describes the difficulty in differentiating immediate-onset from delayed-onset facial paralysis. He explored reported delayed-onset palsies and found, on occasion, a severed nerve; this observation highlights the necessity of careful examination in the emergency department. Even in comatose patients, painful stimuli generally induce a grimace. Admittedly information about the immediate facial nerve function is not always available. Sometimes the examination is omitted because attention is given to other life-threatening complications or because the patient has already received muscle relaxants with intubation. Some patients are not responsive to pain, and a grimace cannot be induced; the critical issue is whether or not any facial function has been identified. If facial function is present in the emergency department and subsequently deteriorates, our experience is that the patient will recover without surgical treatment. When reliable information from the emergency department is unavailable, the patient is never documented to have facial function, and the diagnosis of facial palsy is delayed by a few days, these cases must be categorized as “unknown onset” and considered as part of the immediate-onset group.


The degree of facial nerve injury is also a critical factor for guiding the management algorithm. Incomplete paresis rarely fails to resolve spontaneously unless an additional insult to the nerve, such as infection, occurs.3 Consequently, only patients with complete paralysis of immediate or unknown onset are considered for surgical exploration.


The degree of the injury can be assessed not only clinically with facial motion but also with electrodiagnostic testing using the Hilger facial nerve stimulator, evoked electromyography (EEMG), and standard electromyography (EMG). The role of electrodiagnostic testing is to assist the clinician in differentiating a neuropraxic injury from a neural degenerative injury and to assess the proportion of degenerated axons. Nerves that have sustained a neuropraxic injury proximal to the stimulated portion of the nerve maintain electrical stimulability. Partial or complete disruption of the nerve results in wallerian degeneration and consequent decrease or loss of stimulability. However, the distal segment of the nerves maintains electrical stimulability for 3 to 5 days29; consequently, electrodiagnostic testing cannot reliably differentiate a neuropraxic injury from a laceration of the nerve for up to 3 to 5 days.


Sunderland30 classified nerve fiber injuries into five categories. The first-degree injury is anatomically intact, with a conduction blockade (neuropraxia); these lesions tend to recover completely. The second-degree injury transects the axons but maintains an intact endoneurium (axonotmesis); these lesions also tend to resolve without subsequent deficits. The third-degree injury transacts the axon and endoneurium but maintains an intact perineurium (neurotmesis); aberrant regeneration can occur with third-degree injuries and leave patients with some weakness and synkinesis. Fourth-degree injuries transect the entire nerve trunk but maintain an intact epineural sheath (neurotmesis). Loss of the conduit of the epineural sheath allows regenerating axons to cross into adjacent fascicles, thereby resulting in a loss of topographic organization. A proportion of the regenerating fibers are also lost as a result of the healing process and scarring. These lesions result in a high incidence of residual weakness, synkinesis, and hyperkinesis. Complete transection of the entire nerve trunk and epineurium is classified as a fifth-degree injury (neurotmesis) and is associated with poor (if any) likelihood of spontaneous recovery, depending on the degree of diastasis of the nerve ends.


The Hilger facial nerve stimulator is used to perform both the minimal nerve excitability test (NET) and the maximal stimulation test (MST). The facial nerve is stimulated percutaneously adjacent to the stylomastoid foramen and the various distal branches. In NET, the current is increased until the threshold is reached, which is manifested with facial twitching. A threshold difference of 3.5 mA or greater between the affected and nonaffected sides of the face suggests significant neural degeneration. The test is most useful between days 3 and 14 after injury in patients with dense facial paralysis to differentiate between neuropraxic and degenerative injuries. The testing is unnecessary in incomplete paralysis, in which there is almost always 100% recovery.


May and colleagues31 argue that the MST provides a more reliable estimation of the degree of degeneration. In the MST, stimulation is performed similar to the way it is for NET, but the intensity of the stimulus is increased until the amount of facial contraction plateaus or is limited by patient intolerance. The degree of contraction is subjectively assessed by the physician and compared with electrical stimulation of the unaffected side of the face. The difference in contraction is expressed as equal, mildly decreased, markedly decreased, or no response; the latter two categories are associated with poorer prognosis. Much like NET, MST is most useful between days 3 and 14 after injury in patients with dense facial paralysis.


EEMG has been popularized by Fisch32 in a version called electroneuronography (ENoG). ENoG differs from EEMG only in the use of bipolar stimulating and recording electrodes. Both techniques measure the evoked compound muscle action potential (CAP) and provide similar information to the MST, but in an objective fashion. The stimulating electrode is placed adjacent to be stylomastoid foramen, and the recording electrode is placed in the nasolabial crease. The diminution in the amplitude of the CAP is indicative of the percentage of degenerated nerve fibers. EEMG has been demonstrated to be the most accurate electrodiagnostic test for prognostic information.33 Fisch34 reported that patients in whom the degeneration on EEMG reaches 90% within 6 days of onset of traumatic facial paralysis have a poorer outcome and consequently should undergo facial nerve decompression. Sillman and colleagues35 demonstrated a significant association between a CAP decline of more than 90% and poor recovery of function for idiopathic paralysis, but they demonstrated no significant association between a CAP decline of more than 90% and clinical outcome in traumatic paralysis.


The value of EMG for the acute management of traumatic facial paralysis remains controversial. Standard monopolar EMG is performed with the insertion of an EMG electrode into the muscle, and the spontaneous electrical activity is then recorded. Two types of information are obtainable: voluntary activity and fibrillation potentials. If voluntary activity is present during the acute postinjury period, the patient has a very high probability of good recovery.35

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Jun 5, 2016 | Posted by in OTOLARYNGOLOGY | Comments Off on Management of Temporal Bone Trauma

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access