Hereditary Vitreoretinal Degenerations

Chapter 41 Hereditary Vitreoretinal Degenerations

Hereditary vitreoretinal degeneration, also known as hereditary vitreoretinopathy, is classically characterized by early-onset cataracts, vitreous anomalies, coarse fibrils and membranes, and retinal detachment. Genetic and clinical advances in the last two decades have enabled a reassessment of the essential criteria that define this group of conditions. More recently, these conditions have been defined as the presence of congenital abnormalities of the vitreous, including severe degeneration or maldevelopment, early-onset progressive cataracts, and an increased predisposition to rhegmatogenous retinal detachment.1 Additional ocular and systemic features may be present, depending on the underlying cause.

Since many vitreoretinal degenerations are autosomal dominant, high variability in severity and expression is common both within and between families, so examination of more than one family member is often necessary to reach the correct diagnosis. Molecular genetic studies have demonstrated a correlation between the clinical features of the disease and the underlying gene mutation. Thus, the clinician is able to predict which gene is involved within a family and provide appropriate counseling and management. Failure to recognize a syndromic cause of a childhood retinal detachment can lead to vision loss not only in the patient, but also in other siblings, that could have been avoided.

In this chapter, we discuss five main types of vitreoretinopathies: (1) snowflake vitreoretinal degeneration; (2) X-linked juvenile retinoschisis; (3) the chromosome 5q vitreoretinopathies (e.g., Wagner syndrome); (4) chondrodysplasias with vitreoretinal degeneration (e.g., Stickler syndrome); and (5) enhanced S-cone syndrome (ESCS)/Goldmann–Favre vitreotapetoretinal degeneration. Several additional vitreoretinal degenerations are also summarized, including autosomal dominant neovascular inflammatory vitreoretinopathy (ADNIV) and autosomal dominant vitreoretinochoroidopathy (ADVIRC). We review the common features of vitreoretinal degenerations and highlight those features that can be used to distinguish them from each other clinically. Lattice degeneration and familial exudative vitreoretinopathy are not discussed in this chapter. Table 41.1 summarizes the main features of these disorders. Note that a given patient need not have all of the listed features. The pattern of clinical findings, rather than a specific feature, is the best strategy to make the diagnosis.

Snowflake vitreoretinal degeneration

General features

The term “snowflake vitreoretinal degeneration” (SVD) was originally coined by Hirose et al.2 in 1974, who described an American family of European extraction with early-onset cataracts, fibrillar vitreous degeneration, vascular sheathing, peripheral minute crystalline-like deposits, and retinal detachment. The condition received its name from the minute crystalline-like deposits that can be seen by contact lens biomicroscopy in some patients.2 The vitreous degeneration is fibrillar to a variable extent; the bands of condensed vitreous fibrils may obscure fundus details and peripheral condensations of vitreous on the retinal surface can be observed. Radial or circumferential lattice degeneration is not observed. The average spherical equivalent is –2.90 D, indicating moderate myopia. Other distinguishing features include a dysmorphic optic nerve head that appears flat and often without a cup. Peripapillary vascular sheathing and atrophy, as well as waxy pallor, may be present.

Clinical findings

Ocular features

There were 31 individuals in the Hirose family enrolled in the original study in 1974 (13 affected individuals, 14 unaffected individuals, and 4 unaffected spouses). The 13 subjects diagnosed with SVD ranged from 12 to 85 years of age, with clinical features such as early-onset cataract, fibrillar vitreous degeneration, vascular sheathing, and retinal detachment.2 The inheritance pattern was autosomal dominant, and no obligatory carriers of the snowflake trait were found to be normal. After about 20 years, Lee et al.3 restudied 6 of these 13 patients and identified additional clinical features, including corneal guttata (4 out of 5 patients) and optic nerve head dysplasia (the exact number of affected individuals was not recorded). Early-onset cataracts (5 out of 6), fibrillar vitreous degeneration (6 out of 6), and peripheral retinal abnormalities (5 out of 6), including minute crystalline-like deposits called snowflakes (4 out of 6), were common. Compared to other hereditary vitreoretinal degenerations, there was a relatively low rate of retinal detachment, occurring in 1 of the 6 examined family members.3 Orofacial features, early-onset hearing loss, and arthritis that are typical of Stickler syndrome were absent. Thus, the clinical findings were not typical of Stickler syndrome or chromosome 5q retinopathies, suggesting SVD may be a distinct form of vitreoretinal degeneration.

According to the dominant features present on fundoscopic examination, SVD has been classified into four stages: (1) extensive white with pressure; (2) snowflake degeneration; (3) sheathing of retinal vessels and fundus pigmentation; and (4) further pigmentation and disappearance of the peripheral retinal vessels. Hejtmancik et al. classified the clinical features of SVD into subgroups of congenital and progressive abnormalities.4 The congenital abnormalities include optic nerve head dysmorphism with fibrillar degeneration of the vitreous. Progressive ocular features include corneal guttae and peripheral retinal degeneration within which minute crystalline deposits, referred to as snowflakes, might be seen. These characteristics distinguish SVD from other vitreoretinal degenerations.

Using Hejtmancik’s genetic studies, it is evident that although the term “snowflake” has been used in reports of other families, they do not appear to be the same condition according to the clinical criteria and/or genetic evaluation. Moreover, the proportion of patients diagnosed with non-syndromic Stickler syndrome that ultimately share a common genetic basis with SVD patients is currently unknown, thus the real prevalence of SVD to date is difficult to estimate. So far, there is only one family reported in the literature with a case history similar to the classic description of SVD. This family was reported by Pollack and colleagues5,6 and showed an autosomal dominant vitreoretinal degeneration with minute crystalline-like dots, probably similar to the Hirose family. A distinguishing feature of this family, however was the appearance of neovascular tufts in the temporal periphery in 4 of the 9 affected members of the middle generation.6 Two other reports have described subjects with SVD. Robertson et al.7 reported familial clustering of granular deposits 100–200 µm in diameter in 10 patients from four families, which was described as snowflake degeneration of the retina in 1982. The deposits were evenly distributed about the circumference of the eye near the equatorial fundus. Smaller crystalline deposits were observed between the granular deposits. However, findings of vitreoretinal degeneration, such as early-onset cataract, severe vitreous degeneration, and retinal detachment, were not observed. The granular deposits are also not similar to those in patients with COL2A1 mutations causing Stickler syndrome.2,3 Chen and colleagues8 reported a family with vitreoretinal degeneration in 1986, but they were distinguished from the Hirose family by nyctalopia, poor visual acuity, annular scotomas, and attenuated retinal vessels. They may also have shown different-appearing deposits compared to the classical SVD description.2 Unfortunately, these two families have not been subject to genetic analysis.

Molecular genetics of SVD

Jiao et al.9 re-examined the family and localized the mutation to chromosome 2q36. Molecular genetic investigation excluded the known locations of genes causing vitreoretinal degeneration,3 and a novel gene location was subsequently identified. One of the authors (XD) studied the location of Kir7.1 (the protein product of KCNJ13) in the retina, and found that it is bound to the inner limiting membrane and the retinal pigment epithelium, which suggests that the mutation could affect development of the vitreous through alteration of Müller cell function.4 The mutation in KCNJ13 demonstrates that classic vitreoretinal degeneration can arise from gene mutations that are not structural components of the vitreous. Alteration in potassium transport provides a mechanism for the electrophysiological abnormalities seen in these patients, but further study is required for a precise explanation. The condition arises due to a mutation in KCNJ13 disrupting the selective transport of potassium through the channel.4 Thus, SVD can be clinically and genetically confirmed as a unique form of vitreoretinal degeneration.

Visual psychophysics

Kinetic perimetry shows peripheral defects, which are more pronounced in the superior field.10 Flicker perimetry reveals abnormalities undetected by kinetic perimetry and dark adaptation tests show elevated rod thresholds, except during the early stage of the disease.

Differential diagnosis

Gene identification in SVD-like families is the gold standard in the diagnosis of SVD. Clinical diagnosis of SVD is difficult, as the clinical manifestation overlaps with other types of vitreoretinal degeneration. The key distinguishing features are fibrillar degeneration of the vitreous, optic nerve dysmorphism, peripheral areas of retinal pigment epithelial degeneration, corneal guttae, and retinal crystalline-like spots. It is unknown if the discrete crystalline-like spots characteristic of the Hirose family are specific indicators of the underlying gene, or a rare manifestation of vitreoretinal degeneration unique to a few families. Severe fibrillar degeneration of the vitreous also can be seen in type II Stickler syndrome (COL11A1). Corneal guttae may also be a diagnostic feature of SVD in some pedigrees. Abnormal optic nerve heads and posterior sheathing of the retinal vessels are also suggestive. The optic disc is always flat and without a cup, and nasal deviation of the vessels, waxy pallor, and peripapillary atrophy may also be present.

Wagner syndrome

Wagner syndrome (MIM 143200) is caused by noncoding mutations that are thought to affect the splicing of chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan-2 (CSPG2), the gene encoding versican.18,19 These mutations may lead to disease through abnormal ratios of versican isoforms. The distinguishing features of Wagner syndrome are pseudostrabismus, thickened and partially detached posterior hyaloids with an empty vitreous cavity, variable degeneration of the retina and choroid, and the absence of systemic manifestations.20 The absence of nyctalopia, posterior chorioretinal atrophy, and tractional retinal detachment distinguishes Wagner syndrome from other chromosome 5q vitreoretinopathies such as Jansen syndrome and erosive vitreoretinopathy (ERVR).


At this time, no specific management is available, and there are no established guidelines for prophylactic therapy. As the risk of retinal detachment is 20% and cataract surgery of early-onset lens opacification can be difficult due to vitreous liquefaction, family members should be examined to determine if they carry the condition. Affected patients should be educated about cataract and retinal detachments and examined regularly. Children should be given special attention because of cataract-induced refractive problems and their frequent failure to recognize and/or report retinal detachment symptoms.

Common issues in the management of hereditary vitreoretinal degenerations are described below:

The chromosome 5Q retinopathies: wagner syndrome, jansen syndrome, erosive vitreoretinopathy, and related conditions

General features

The chromosome 5q retinopathies include Wagner syndrome, ERVR, and Jansen syndrome. Jansen syndrome and ERVR share clinical and allelic features with Wagner syndrome. Knowledge of the chromosome 5q retinopathies has expanded greatly over the past few years, along with the identification of the responsible genes for the allelic syndromes. It is not possible to easily identify a pathological mutation for the above syndromes due to the difficulties in determining splicing defects in large complex genes. Even so, recent genetic and clinical advances enable a reassessment of the essential criteria which define this group of diseases.

Wagner syndrome is characterized by an optically empty vitreous with avascular vitreous strands and veils, moderate myopia, presenile cataracts, and retinal degeneration with atrophy.23 Stickler syndrome is also associated with craniofacial abnormalities and a progressive arthropathy.24 Wagner syndrome and Stickler syndrome were once incorrectly considered as one entity: the Wagner–Stickler syndrome.

Wagner syndrome is an autosomal dominant genetic disorder first mapped to chromosome 5q13–14 in 1995. A mutation in the chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan 2 gene (CSPG2), now named VCAN, encoding for the versican protein, was found in 2005.20,25,26 VCAN is the only gene currently associated with Wagner syndrome and ERVR.19,27 Autosomal dominant Stickler syndrome is an inherited progressive disorder of the collagen connective tissues and is associated with the mutation of extracellular matrix collagen genes, such as COL2A1, COL11A, COL11A2, and COL9A1.24,2830

Jansen syndrome was described as vitreoretinal and lenticular degeneration associated with retinal detachments in the absence of nonocular findings. However, the disease gene for the original Jansen family was demonstrated to be linked to the same region of chromosome 5q1431 where genes for Wagner syndrome and ERVR were located.25

ERVR also displays an autosomal dominant inheritance pattern and shares some clinical features with Wagner syndrome. The critical region of the genetic defect underlying ERVR was found to overlap with the critical region for Wagner syndrome, 5q13-q14.19

Clinical findings

Ocular features

Wagner syndrome is characterized by an optically empty vitreous with equatorial avascular vitreous veils. Additional features include its early-onset, moderate myopia, and typical dot-like cortical cataracts, foveal ectopia, abnormal retinal vessels (inverted papilla), perivascular pigmentation and sheathing, retinal thinning, as well as slowly progressive chorioretinal atrophy. Patients with Wagner syndrome have pseudostrabismus from congenital temporal displacement of the fovea. They also have nyctalopia early in life and final dark adaptation thresholds are elevated in some patients.32 Most patients under the age of 20 have normal vision; however, cataract, retinal detachment, optic atrophy, and chorioretinal atrophy may be progressive and cause visual loss with advancing age20,23,2527 (Fig. 41.1). In addition to the clinical features of Wagner syndrome, ERVR reveals progressive nyctalopia and visual field constriction. A conspicuous loss of retinal pigment epithelium and choriocapillaries is observed by fluorescein angiography.19 The vitreous findings are marked syneresis with prominent membranes. Rhegmatogenous retinal detachment is usually described as a feature of ERVR, and is less frequent in the original description of Wagner syndrome.33

Differential diagnosis

Ophthalmologic examination, an autosomal dominant inheritance pattern of family history, visual field examination, ERG, and orthoptic assessment are critical for definitive diagnosis and timely management. The differential diagnosis includes both autosomal dominant and recessive vitreoretinopathies.

Autosomal dominant vitreoretinopathies

Snowflake vitreoretinal degeneration

SVD is a progressive hereditary eye disorder caused by mutations in KCNJ13. Diagnostic features of SVD consist of fibrillar vitreous degeneration, early-onset cataract, minute crystalline deposits in the neurosensory retina, and retinal detachment.4 However, membranous degeneration of the vitreous with avascular strands and veils is not observed in SVD. Retinal defects typically start in the superficial retinal layers and retinal detachment is uncommon.4,27

Autosomal recessive vitreoretinopathies

Goldmann–Favre syndrome (GFS) and enhanced S-cone syndrome

GFS and ESCS share common mutations in the NR2E3 gene and are usually associated with night blindness and visual field abnormalities. ERG typically reveals a severe reduction in rod function and a relatively enhanced function of the short-wavelength-sensitive cones.27,37 GFS manifests with progressive vitreous changes, hemeralopia, chorioretinal atrophy, and pigmentary retinal degeneration, later resulting in marked visual field loss, retinoschisis in the periphery and/or macula, presenile cataract, and hyperopia rather than myopia.27,38,39 ESCS lacks the typical marked vitreous changes of GFS.

Knobloch syndrome

Knobloch syndrome is an autosomal recessive disorder characterized by pathogenic mutations in the COL18A1 gene.40 Characteristic features of Knobloch syndrome are high myopia, vitreoretinal degeneration with retinal detachment, and congenital encephalocele.

Chondrodysplasias associated with vitreoretinal degeneration: the stickler syndromes, marshall syndrome, kniest dysplasia, knobloch syndrome, and weissenbacher–zweymuller syndrome

General features

Chondrodysplasias refer to a group of hereditary and systematic disorders that affect skeletal development and growth. These conditions may also feature ocular, central nervous system, or renal abnormalities. The genes involved in these syndromes affect types II, III, V, X, or XI, collagen molecules that are found mainly in cartilage and vitreous and are essential for the normal development of bones and other connective tissue, thus accounting for the symptoms observed clinically. Antenatal diagnosis, including fetal magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, ultrasonography, and genetic testing of fetal DNA obtained from aminocentesis or chorionic villus sampling, is important for the proper management of children and counseling of parents.4143

According to the various “chondrodysplasia genes” and clinical presentations, five syndromes with distinct ocular dysfunctions – Stickler syndrome, Marshall syndrome, Kniest dysplasia, Knobloch syndrome, and Weissenbacher–Zweymuller syndrome – belong to the family of chondrodysplasias associated with vitreoretinal degeneration.

Stickler syndrome, also known as hereditary progressive arthro-ophthalmopathy, is considered to be the most common chondrodysplasia associated with vitreoretinal degeneration. Types I, II, and III are the three subgroups of Stickler syndrome classified by genetic heterogeneity. Types I and II Stickler syndrome, respectively caused by mutations in the COL2A1 gene encoding type II collagen44 and in the COL11A1 gene encoding type XI collagen,45 can be differentiated successfully by vitreous phenotypes. Mutations in COL2A1 usually result in a congenital membranous vitreous anomaly, while mutations in COL11A1 result in an irregular and beaded vitreous.46,47 Recently, a new subgroup of COL2A1 mutations was found that lead to a hypoplastic vitreous which is either optically empty or contains sparse irregular lamellae.13 Due to the differential splicing, COL2A1 gene transcription products can be divided into two types: collagen IIA with an exon2-encoded length of 69 (rich in amino acid homocysteine) and collagen IIB without the exon2-encoded peptide. Whereas both collagen IIA and IIB loss results in systemic connective tissues disease, collagen IIA loss also leads to ocular abnormalities. It is because collagen IIA primarily exists in the vitreous.48,49 Recent studies have indicated that mutations in any collagen IX genes, like COL9A1, COL9A2, or COL9A3, can cause autosomal recessive Stickler syndrome.5052 Thus far, the diagnosis of Stickler syndrome has been based on clinical manifestations without consensus on the minimal clinical diagnostic criteria. The anomalous formation of the vitreous gel structure and its corresponding characteristic abnormalities are essential for the diagnosis of types I and II Stickler syndrome. In additional to these clinical manifestations, a detailed family history should be obtained and the diagnosis can be confirmed by genetic analysis. Recently, the COL2A1 mutation in peripheral white blood cells has been used to identify patients with type I Stickler syndrome.51

Marshall syndrome, an autosomal dominant chondrodysplasia, is caused by a splicing mutation of 54-bp exons in the c-terminal region of the COL11A1 gene which is located on the short arm of chromosome 1. Although Marshall syndrome and Stickler syndrome are now considered two distinct diseases, a case of a patient with overlapping phenotypes has been described.53

Kniest dysplasia, inherited in an autosomal dominant pattern, is a moderately severe collagenopathy. Like type I Stickler syndrome, Kniest dysplasia is caused by mutations in COL2A1 gene which encodes type II collagen, so cartilage and vitreous are mainly involved. It is reported that small deletions or splice site alterations between COL2A1 gene exons 12 and 24 may cause the inframe deletions of type II collagen.

Knobloch syndrome is a rare and clinically heterogeneous autosomal recessive disorder. Collagen XVIII, which is a basement membrane proteoglycan, distributes in multiple organs of the body and plays an important role in the function and development of the eye, kidney, and nervous system. In most patients with this symptom, null mutations in the COL18A1 gene mapped to the long arm of chromosome 21 are supposed to induce the changes in collagen XVIII.54 There are also case reports of Knobloch syndrome without COL18A1 gene mutations, and thus immunofluorescent histochemistry of skin biopsy samples has proved to be a useful preliminary and complementary test for the diagnosis of Knobloch syndrome.55

Weissenbacher–Zweymuller syndrome, also called Pierre Robin syndrome with fetal chondrodysplasia, is an autosomal recessive disorder characterized by a single-base mutation in the COL11A2 gene, which substitutes glutamate for glycine.56 In the past, it was often misdiagnosed as Stickler syndrome. Recently, investigators have differentiated these two syndromes successfully by prenatal ultrasonography.57

Mar 21, 2017 | Posted by in OPHTHALMOLOGY | Comments Off on Hereditary Vitreoretinal Degenerations
Premium Wordpress Themes by UFO Themes