Cancer Stem Cells in Uveal Melanoma



Fig. 9.1
(a) Melanomasphere forming efficiency (MSFE) in non-adherent culture. Melanoma cells isolated from 16 primary tumours were grown in non-adherent culture in a complex medium at a density of 2,000 cells/mL. The number of colonies >100 μm was determined after 21 days in culture. The MSFE was determined as: (no. of colonies counted/no. of cells plated) × 100. Cells isolated from monosomy 3 uveal melanomas formed floating spheres in a larger number of cases and at higher efficiency (dark grey bars) than cells isolated from disomy 3 uveal melanomas (light grey bars). (b) Immunofluorescence staining of isolated primary uveal melanoma cells grown in adherent culture. Primary uveal melanoma cells were isolated from tumour tissue and grown in adherent culture using eight well chamber slides for up to 14 days. Cells were fixed with 4% formalin in PBS and indirect immunofluorescence performed with antibodies against c-kit, ki67, HMB45, Mitf, α smooth muscle actin (SMA), MelanA, neural filament protein (NFP) and vimentin (Vim). Some cells were also stained with Oil Red O and haematoxylin. The panels show representative immunofluorescence staining of cells from a poor prognosis monosomy 3 tumour and demonstrate expression of markers of several neural crest cell types including myofibroblasts (αSMA), neural cells (NFP) and adipocytes (Oil Red O)



In a review by Harbour et al., reference is made to work showing that class 2 tumours are multi-potent for lineage differentiation but the authors do not provide details of the cell lineages observed [56].

In cutaneous melanoma, Fang and co-workers [16] investigated whether melanoma cells grown in spheroid culture could undergo neural and mesenchymal differentiation. They demonstrated that whilst the cells failed to differentiate into neural lineages, they displayed characteristics associated with cells of mesenchymal lineages (adipogenic, chondrogenic, osteogenic) with varying efficiency. The observation that cells isolated from an advanced primary cutaneous melanoma and a metastatic lymph node underwent mesenchymal lineage differentiation lends further support to the concept of cellular plasticity in aggressive melanomas [18] requiring further investigation in uveal melanoma.

“Vasculogenic mimicry” is another example of tumour cell plasticity and describes the formation of perfusion pathways in tumours by highly invasive and genetically deregulated tumour cells (reviewed in [57]). The formation of loop-like patterns by these vasculogenic structures, which are rich in extracellular matrix, has been associated with poor prognosis in uveal melanoma [58, 59].



Putative Cancer Stem Cell Markers in Uveal Melanoma


Thill et al. demonstrated a variety of putative stem cell markers in uveal melanoma and these included CD133, Pax6, Musashi, nestin, Sox2 and ABCB5; this was done by examining eight uveal melanoma cell lines and eight paraffin embedded primary uveal melanomas, using fluorescence activated cell sorting, immunohistochemistry and reverse transcriptase PCR [42]. A limitation of this study, however, as recognised by the authors themselves, was the inability of these markers to unequivocally identify the cancer stem cell population. Indeed, the expression levels of cancer stem cell markers, such as CD133, CD44 and ABCB transporters, has been highly variable between studies for a particular tumour type and often differs depending on the experimental techniques employed for identification [60, 61].

To overcome these limitations and to characterise downstream molecules, it is necessary to develop standardised functional assays that identify tumour cells with stem cell like properties.


Functional Characterisation of Cancer Stem Cells in Uveal Melanoma


Few investigators have searched for cancer stem cells in uveal melanoma despite the availability of cell lines derived from both primary and metastatic tumours.

Using in vitro clonal analyses, serial passaging, re-plating assays, immunophenotyping and reverse transcriptase-PCR, we recently provided functional evidence that uveal melanoma cell lines contain a subpopulation of self-renewing cancer cells as well as cells that can proliferate and differentiate [41]. In this study, uveal melanoma cell lines showed distinct clonal morphologies in adherent culture akin to holoclones, meroclones and paraclones. These cells formed melanomaspheres (MS) when grown at clonal density in non-adherent culture, which could be serially propagated for several generations. MS demonstrated antigenic heterogeneity expressing markers associated with both a primitive migratory neural crest phenotype (Sox10, Pax3, Notch1 and slug) and a more differentiated phenotype (MelanA and HMB45). Moreover, the uveal melanoma cells surviving cisplatin treatment produced significantly more holoclones than untreated cells, suggesting enrichment for this cancer stem cell-like subpopulation. These data are consistent with studies using cancer cell lines from a range of tumour types, including prostate, breast and head and neck, which have all demonstrated retention of a subpopulation with stem cell-like characteristics [6265]. Such studies have shown that in vitro clonogenicity correlates well with in vivo tumour initiating abilities [6264].

Another functional property of the normal stem cell population is their ability to efflux cytotoxic chemicals, thereby protecting them from damage and death. To achieve this, they express high levels of the ABC group of drug transporters [66, 67]. These same transporters have also been shown to afford protection to cancer stem cells contributing to multidrug resistance [68]. The multidrug resistance proteins, P-glycoprotein (also known as ABCB1), multidrug resistance-associated protein (MRP1) and lung resistance protein (LRP) have been identified in primary uveal melanoma specimens and cell lines [69, 70]. More recently, ABCB1 was shown to be expressed in primary uveal melanomas, but not in normal uveal melanocytes [71]. In the same study, ABCB1− and ABCB1+ cell populations were isolated from the uveal melanoma cell line OCM1A and examined for their tumourigenic and metastatic propensity. The ABCB1+ cells exhibited enhanced clonogenicity and anchorage-independent growth. Furthermore, although both ABCB1+ and ABCB1− cells formed tumours in mice, the ABCB1+ cells did so more efficiently and produced significantly larger tumours than the ABCB1− cells. Similarly, when injected into the tail vein of NOD SCID gamma mice, ABCB1+ cells formed metastatic growths in the liver that tended to be larger and more frequent in number than when the ABCB1− cells were injected. Based on our current knowledge that efflux pumps afford protection to cancer stem cells, shielding them from the adverse effects of therapeutic insult, there is much scope for investigating these proteins and the mechanisms by which they may contribute to therapeutic resistance in uveal melanoma.



Metastatic Uveal Melanoma


Metastasis is a multi-step process involving tumour–stromal interactions that enable tumour angiogenesis, tumour cell migration and invasion into the secondary site. Each type of cancer tends to have its own target organs for metastases. For example, uveal melanomas metastasise preferentially to the liver [72, 73], suggesting that the microenvironment in the secondary organ must be very important, as originally hypothesised by Paget’s “seed and soil” theory (reviewed in [74]).

It is well known that following ablation or surgical removal of the primary uveal melanoma, some patients develop metastatic disease after many years of clinical remission [75]. One explanation for this phenomenon of “tumour dormancy” is that the dormant metastatic cells are cancer stem cells in a quiescent state.

Hepatic metastases from uveal melanoma are usually very numerous and widely dispersed throughout the liver. It is not known whether such miliary metastases represents an enhanced cancer stem cell pool in the original primary tumour or de-differentiation of uveal melanoma cells by the local liver microenvironment to a cancer stem cell phenotype.


Conclusions


The molecular characterisation of uveal melanoma stem cells is still at a very early stage. The origin of uveal melanoma stem cells has yet to be determined. Whether uveal melanoma stem cells are derived from melanocyte stem cells, melanocyte progenitors, or more mature melanocytes that have de-differentiated remains unknown and requires further investigation.

Many significant experimental challenges remain. There is a need for standardised and sensitive self-renewal assays, as well as models that mimic uveal melanoma cells and their local microenvironment.

If cancer stem cells are indeed the driving force behind uveal melanoma development, progression and metastasis, this would have profound therapeutic implications. We could at last achieve the breakthroughs that have eluded us for so many years.


References



1.

Damato BE, Coupland SE (2012) Differences in uveal melanomas between men and women from the British Isles. Eye (Lond) 26:292–299CrossRef


2.

Damato B, Coupland SE (2008) Managing patients with ocular melanoma: state of the art. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 36:589–590PubMedCrossRef


3.

Kujala E, Makitie T, Kivela T (2003) Very long-term prognosis of patients with malignant uveal melanoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 44:4651–4659PubMedCrossRef


4.

Damato B (2010) Does ocular treatment of uveal melanoma influence survival? Br J Cancer 103:285–290PubMedCrossRef


5.

Singh AD, Turell ME, Topham AK (2011) Uveal melanoma: trends in incidence, treatment, and survival. Ophthalmology 118:1881–1885PubMedCrossRef


6.

Beachy PA, Karhadkar SS, Berman DM (2004) Tissue repair and stem cell renewal in carcinogenesis. Nature 432:324–331PubMedCrossRef


7.

Laird DJ, von Andrian UH, Wagers AJ (2008) Stem cell trafficking in tissue development, growth, and disease. Cell 132:612–630PubMedCrossRef


8.

Sharifi AM, Darabi R, Jadidi K (2010) Isolation, culture, characterization and optimization of human corneal stem cells. Biocell 34:53–55PubMed


9.

Wu X, Wang S, Chen B, An X (2010) Muscle-derived stem cells: isolation, characterization, differentiation, and application in cell and gene therapy. Cell Tissue Res 340:549–567PubMedCrossRef


10.

Visvader JE (2011) Cells of origin in cancer. Nature 469:314–322PubMedCrossRef


11.

Borovski T, De Sousa EMF, Vermeulen L, Medema JP (2011) Cancer stem cell niche: the place to be. Cancer Res 71:634–639PubMedCrossRef


12.

Clevers H (2011) The cancer stem cell: premises, promises and challenges. Nat Med 17:313–319PubMedCrossRef


13.

D’Angelo RC, Wicha MS (2010) Stem cells in normal development and cancer. Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci 95:113–158PubMedCrossRef


14.

Frank NY, Schatton T, Frank MH (2010) The therapeutic promise of the cancer stem cell concept. J Clin Invest 120:41–50PubMedCrossRef


15.

Civenni G, Walter A, Kobert N, Mihic-Probst D, Zipser M, Belloni B, Seifert B, Moch H, Dummer R, van den Broek M, Sommer L (2011) Human cd271-positive melanoma stem cells associated with metastasis establish tumor heterogeneity and long-term growth. Cancer Res 71:3098–3109PubMedCrossRef
< div class='tao-gold-member'>

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Jun 30, 2016 | Posted by in OPHTHALMOLOGY | Comments Off on Cancer Stem Cells in Uveal Melanoma

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access