Visual conversion disorder: fabricated or exaggerated symptoms in children

Chapter 60 Visual conversion disorder


fabricated or exaggerated symptoms in children





Features and definitions


Many terms have been used (Table 60.1) and many are useful but none perfectly encapsulates what we refer to as visual conversion disorder (VCD).


Table 60.1 – Alternative terminologies used for children with fabricated or exaggerated symptoms









































Terminology Advantages or disadvantages
Conversion disorder (visual conversion disorder, VCD) The preferred term of the American Psychiatric Association but it implies certain knowledge of the underlying mechanism
Hysterical blindness/amblyopia Incorrectly implies instability or “madness” but it is commonly used
Stress-related visual disorder Many cases are not apparently stressed by any definition
Conversion neurosis Implies a certain knowledge of the underlying mechanism and instability
Medically unexplained visual loss Obscures the meaning from parents and patients
Amblyopic schoolgirl syndrome A sexist and pejorative term
Functional visual loss Meaningless term designed to obscure the meaning from parents and patients
Malingering A term correctly used for someone who deliberately feigns a symptom for some form of gain – compensation, avoidance of work, military service, etc.2 This is usually seen in adults
Factitious disorder A term correctly used for a person acting as if they have an illness by deliberately producing, feigning, or exaggerating symptoms to gain attention or sympathy. Was known as Munchausen’s syndrome
Factitious disorder by proxy Used to be known as Munchausen’s syndrome by proxy. Symptoms or signs produced in a child by a carer to elicit sympathy etc. for the carer
Psychogenic blindness Terms that are still used and can be helpful
Non-organic visual loss

Children commonly present to ophthalmologists not only with symptoms that do not fit in with known ophthalmic diseases but that also must be proved to have characteristics that definitely cannot be caused by organic disease. VCD is not a diagnosis of exclusion but one that is made by positive identification of signs that cannot possibly be due to disease processes. It is safer to assign those without positive diagnosis to an “unknown cause – to be reviewed” category than to assign them an incorrect diagnosis for any reason.


Many of the symptoms that children describe to us are not always understandable. That does not necessarily mean that they are fabricated and we need to be careful not to diagnose a child’s description of a normal phenomenon as an abnormal or fabricated one.


The major characteristics of VCD are as follows (modified from The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (now IV-SR) of the American Psychiatric Association1):



The symptom or deficit is not intentionally produced or feigned (as it is in factitious disorder or malingering):




Conversion disorder


Conversion disorder was described3 as a loss or distortion of neurologic function not fully explained by organic disease. The patient has an internal conflict, of which they are unaware, which becomes converted into a symptom as a means of expression after dissociation, a mental mechanism whereby underlying feelings and the symptoms are separated. Conversion disorder can be distinguished from other psychiatric disorders mimicking organic loss by its absence of conscious or intentional desire to trick the doctor (or parent). The child with the ocular manifestations of a visual conversion disorder (VCD) develops visual loss due to unconscious problems or mental disturbances outside their awareness. Often such children have a history of previous conversion reactions, not necessarily involving the visual system (e.g. non-organic loss of motor function).



Clinical presentation and symptoms


The child with VCD is between 6 and 16 years, most frequently 10 years old; girls are more frequently affected than boys.4 There may be a family history of illness or of eye disease, such as retinitis pigmentosa.5 The symptoms come on gradually in most cases, often following a marginal failure at a school eye test. Subsequent examinations reveal varying degrees of acuity and visual field loss, often worsening as time goes on but rarely to the extent that the child becomes bilaterally blind. The remarkable thing is how little most children are inconvenienced by an apparently marked visual loss. Repeated objective examinations and further examinations, including neurophysiology and radiology, are all normal. The condition is usually bilateral,4 with the most common complaints being “just not seeing,” blurred vision, or distorted or small images. Occasionally visual field defects are described, commonly “tunnel vision”; hemianopias are occasionally encountered. Central scotomas are rare and should make one think of associated organic disease. Non-ocular defects occasionally also occur,6 including spasm of the near reflex, headaches, voluntary nystagmus, and eye movement tics, contraversive eye deviation, and accommodation paralysis.


The symptoms of VCD have some of the following characteristics:7,8




Jun 4, 2016 | Posted by in OPHTHALMOLOGY | Comments Off on Visual conversion disorder: fabricated or exaggerated symptoms in children

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access