Sam E. Kinney


Malignancy of the temporal bone is a rare condition in otolaryngology–head and neck surgery. Conley1 estimates that 1 in 3000 to 5000 patients with otologic disease will have a malignancy of the temporal bone. Manolidis et al.2 reported from a referal otologic practice that 1 in 1167 new cases was an epithelial malignancy of the temporal bone.


The tumors can be divided into primary malignancies of the middle ear and mastoid and those with their origin from squamous epithelium or glandular tissue of the external auditory canal. The primary malignancies will be mentioned, with most of the discussion limited to malignancies with their origin in the external auditory canal.


The need to recognize and diagnose a malignancy early is not a controversial issue, but it must be included in this discussion. One of our obligations as otolaryngology–head and neck surgeons is to inform our colleagues in the primary care specialties to be suspicious of a possible malignancy. Infections of the external auditory canal are frequently treated in outpatient centers and primary care offices.


The usual course of treatment of external canal infections with either drops or wicks, or both, will result in resolution of pain and swelling within 5 to 7 days of treatment. Chronic infections may persist with some edema and discharge, but there is usually no pain.


In the elderly population, any external canal infection with persistent pain must be considered a possible malignancy. Any external canal infections with persistent bleeding, formation of granulation tissue, or lack of improvement with medical treatment, must be considered a possible malignancy. The lesion must be biopsied for histologic evaluation or referred to the otolaryngology–head and neck surgeon for biopsy.


Contemporary issues relative to temporal bone malignancy center on pretreatment evaluation, appropriate TNM staging, and designing appropriate treatment modalities. Recognizing that temporal bone malignancies are relatively rare, there are no large single-institution series.


Evaluation


The quality of high-resolution computed tomography (CT) scans has improved, resulting in a resolution that gives fine bone detail. Bone erosion by the tumor can readily be seen. However, when the CT scan shows abnormal soft tissue, the question of inflammation versus malignancy is not as certain. Arriaga et al.3 presented a retrospective review of CT scans of patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the external auditory canal and temporal bone. T1 lesions have tumor limited to the external auditory meatus without bony erosion or soft tissue extension. T2 lesions would be limited to bone erosion of the external bony canal and <0.5-cm soft tissue extension. This category would include lesions extending through preformed pathways such as cartilaginous fissures of the bony cartilaginous junction of the external auditory meatus. T3 lesions would demonstrate full thickness erosion of the osseus external auditory meatus with <0.5 cm soft tissue involvement, tumor involving the middle ear mastoid, or facial nerve paralysis. T4 would be lesions eroding the cochlea, petrous apex, medial wall of the middle ear carotid canal, jugular foramen, or dura with >0.5 cm of soft tissue extension.


A careful clinical examination follows the histologic diagnosis of squamous cell carcinoma. The canal is evaluated for the location of the ulceration or granulation tissue. Evaluation of the tympanic membrane is important; however, it will not be possible to see the tympanic membrane in 50% of cases. Depth of disease in the canal can be helpful. Anterior lateral disease may extend into the glenoid fossa or the superficial lobe of the parotid gland. Anterior medial disease may extend into the deep lobe of the parotid gland. Posterior disease may spread to the postauricular lymph nodes.


A complete head and neck examination is accomplished, including cranial nerves, and the parotid, neck, and postauricular area. Imaging studies are performed. The thin-cut high-resolution CT scan is most important. The magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan may be helpful; however, false-positive soft tissue involvement such as brain extension may be seen. The CT scan is evaluated with the assistance of a temporal bone neuroradiolo-gist. Careful attention is directed to the bone of the external auditory canal, the tympanic membrane, and the ossicles. Disease limited to these areas would be staged as T1 or T2, as noted by Arriaga et al.3 There is no reliable sign to differentiate extension of disease through the tympanic membrane, and lateral ossicles as inflammatory granulation tissue or squamous cell carcinoma.


The structures of the medial wall of the middle ear, mastoid, dural plates, and otic capsule are evaluated. Disease in this area would be staged T3. The carotid canal, jugular bulb, foramen, and skull base are evaluated. Involvement of these structures would be staged T4.


The area of the glenoid fossa, the mandibular condyle, and the parotid gland is evaluated by CT scan and MRI scan. Consultations with colleagues in head and neck, neurotology, and neurosurgery are obtained as required. A treatment plan is outlined by the entire team.


Treatment


Treatment modalities presented in the literature have included radiotherapy alone, surgical resection, preoperative irradiation and surgery, surgery followed by radiotherapy, and occasional supplemental chemotherapy.


The ideal surgical approach to squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck includes the external auditory canal and temporal bone in en bloc resection with the immediate adjacent tissues having the highest probability of lymphatic spread. The goal of surgical resection is to remove all tumor, as noted in the standard approach to squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck, and to create the least amount of surgical morbidity and mortality with the best reasonable chance of 5-year or better survival. In some cases there may be a justification for a less than ideal surgical resection in order to provide relief of pain and a reasonable quality of life in the patient’s last months to 1 year.


The literature during the past 40 years gives some insight into the ability to achieve the goals presented above. Boland4 in 1963 presented the results of megavolt irradiation and felt that better than 50% of patients could be cured. This included T1 lesions as defined by Arriaga et al.3

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Jun 5, 2016 | Posted by in OTOLARYNGOLOGY | Comments Off on Sam E. Kinney

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access