Children’s Oncology Group (COG) Trials for Retinoblastoma



Fig. 21.1
Group B retinoblastoma superonasal to the optic nerve at staging examination under anesthesia and prior to treatment (a). After the first cycle of CEV systemic chemotherapy (2 days of drug infusion with 3 weeks of recovery). Note a dramatic reduction in tumor volume (b). This tumor now exhibits regression features of both calcification and “fish-flesh”-like changes labeled type III regression





21.3 Establishment of the Children’s Oncology Group (COG)


The establishment of the Children’s Oncology Group (COG) in 2001 from the four existing pediatric cooperative groups brought together the major institutions treating children with cancer in the United States, Canada, and several other countries. Since the majority of the 350 children with this diagnosis annually in North America were receiving treatment at only 6 or 8 institutions, it was quite feasible to begin discussions with these investigators to develop research protocols.


21.4 Major Biologic Questions About the RB1 Pathway


Since the cloning of RB-1, the first tumor suppressor gene to be cloned, the RB pathway has been shown to be critical in the cell cycle of normal and neoplastic cells, but more questions remain concerning its mechanisms (Chap.​ 6) [5].


21.5 Formation of a COG Committee on Retinoblastoma


A committee consisting of ophthalmic surgeons and pediatric oncologists was formed within the Children’s Oncology Group; they later enlisted radiation oncologists, pathologists, statisticians, epidemiologists, and basic scientists in efforts to pursue questions regarding this tumor that required a critical mass of patients and an infrastructure within which to conduct clinical trials and basic research.

The initial aims of this committee were to: (1) identify all retinoblastoma patients in North American in order to monitor incidence, extent of disease, management, and outcome, (2) test the reliability and validity of the International Classification of Intraocular Retinoblastoma (ICIRB) [6] in this context, (3) centralize tumor samples and conduct more consistent, screening for Rb1 mutations, (4) conduct studies for specific subgroups of retinoblastoma and those with metastatic and intracranial disease, and (5) adjust therapy depending on grouping by the international classification with an aim to increase survival and reduce the need for external beam irradiation and enucleation wherever possible, that is, to preserve vision and reduce long-term sequelae.


21.6 Five COG Retinoblastoma Protocols


The committee met to deliberate the methods by which these questions might be practically addressed. Five distinct protocols have since emerged, each dealing with a subset of retinoblastoma patients with specific aims, methods, statistical analyses, and expectations regarding outcome. The protocols are listed in Table 21.1. Their aims, background, study methods, and statistical considerations are summarized below.


Table 21.1
The Children’s Oncology Group retinoblastoma protocols









































COG protocol# ARET-

Protocol

Investigators

Short name

Full name

0332

Histopathologic Risk Factors

A Study of Unilateral RB With and Without Histopathologic High-Risk Features and the Role of Adjuvant Chemotherapy

Chintagumpala, Chevez-Barrios, Eagle, Albert, O’Brien

0331

Group B

Trial of Systemic Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Group B Intraocular Retinoblastoma

Friedman, Murphree

0231

Group C/D

A Single-Arm Trial of Systemic and Subtenon Chemotherapy for Groups C and D Intraocular Retinoblastoma

Jubran, Villablanca, C. Shields

0321

Extraocular disease

A Trial of Intensive Multimodality Therapy for Extraocular Retinoblastoma

Dunkel, Abramson

12P1

Intra-arterial chemotherapy

A Multi-institutional Feasibility Study of Intra-arterial Chemotherapy Given in the Ophthalmic Artery of Children with Retinoblastoma

Chintagumpala, Gombos


21.6.1 COG ARET 0332 A Study of Unilateral Retinoblastoma With and Without Histopathologic High-Risk Features and the Role of Adjuvant Chemotherapy (The Histopathologic Risk Factors Protocol)



21.6.1.1 Aims


To prospectively determine the prevalence of high-risk histopathologic features such as choroidal involvement, optic nerve invasion, and scleral and anterior segment involvement in patients with unilateral retinoblastomas who had undergone enucleation and to estimate the event-free survival (extraocular or metastatic disease) and survival of patients with unilateral retinoblastoma with and without high-risk features.


21.6.1.2 Background


Patients with metastatic retinoblastoma have a very poor outcome [7]. Several studies have identified risk factors which may be associated with the development of metastatic disease including post-lamina optic nerve involvement, choroidal invasion, and scleral and anterior segment involvement [810]. Tumor cells in the optic nerve posterior to the lamina cribrosa also confer a poorer prognosis.

Although “massive” involvement of the choroid is considered a poor risk factor, recent data suggest that choroidal involvement alone does not have a negative effect on outcome but when associated with optic nerve involvement seems to have an adverse influence on the outcome. There are fewer studies addressing scleral and anterior segment involvement.

The presence of the above risk factors either singly or in various combinations had prompted previous investigators to use chemotherapy as prophylaxis. Studies by Uusitalo et al. and Honavar et al. have shown that chemoprophylaxis is effective in reducing the occurrence of metastases in patients with retrolaminar optic nerve invasion and massive choroid invasion [11, 12]. The data from these studies are confounded by (1) different criteria for initiation of chemoprophylaxis used and (2) different chemotherapy regimens used.

This prospective study defined specific criteria for initiation of post-enucleation chemotherapy with the goal of preventing metastases and improving patient survival [13]. In addition, the chemotherapy regimen was consistent across all participating centers. It was anticipated that such a study would provide a foundation for future research by providing an estimate of the outcome associated with a uniform post-enucleation chemotherapy regimen for patients with uniformly defined histopathologic risk factors and by providing an estimate of the outcome associated with enucleation alone for patients without the defined histopathologic risk factors requiring chemotherapy. More importantly, for the first time information was gathered about the true prevalence of such high-risk histopathologic features present in the majority of the patients with unilateral retinoblastoma diagnosed in North America.


21.6.1.3 Study Methods


Patients with the high-risk features listed in Table 21.2 received chemotherapy consisting of 6 cycles of standard-dose carboplatin, vincristine, and etoposide (Chap.​ 11) given once every 4 weeks (Table 21.2). All other patients were treated with enucleation alone.


Table 21.2
High-risk histopathologic features in an enucleated eye that qualified for adjuvant chemotherapy under COG ARET-0332


















Feature

Details

Massive choroidal invasion

Posterior uveal invasion grades IIC and IID (as defined in pathology guidelines of the protocol)

Any posterior uveal invasion with any optic nerve involvement (optic nerve head, pre-lamina and post-lamina cribrosa)

Both posterior uveal invasion and optic nerve involvement are required

Optic nerve involvement posterior to the lamina cribrosa as an independent finding


21.6.1.4 Statistical Considerations


Patients with at least one high-risk feature for which adjuvant therapy was indicated were nonrandomly assigned to receive a single-arm adjuvant therapy regimen. All other patients were treated with enucleation alone. All patients were followed for the development of metastasis, extraocular disease, MDS/secondary leukemia, and death. The event-free survival distribution was compared to historical series according to treatment arm (adjuvant therapy or enucleation alone) [14, 15].


21.6.1.5 Protocol Update


Patients were entered on this study from February of 2005 until May 2010, and the study has since been closed to new patient enrolment. Patients from across the United States and India were entered in this trial. Over 300 eyes were reviewed by central histopathologic review in a standardized fashion. This process was highly successful and led to a significant number of patients having their pathology reclassified. At present, the two cohorts are being monitored for differences in event-free survival and overall survival.


21.6.2 COG ARET 0331: Trial of Systemic Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Group B Intraocular Retinoblastoma (The Group B Protocol)



21.6.2.1 Aims


Using a backbone of neoadjuvant 2-agent (vincristine/carboplatin) systemic chemotherapy (chemoreduction), together with local ophthalmic therapy, the primary aim of this trial was to estimate the event-free survival rate at 2 years. An event was defined as additional chemotherapy, enucleation, external beam radiotherapy (EBRT), or death from any cause. A secondary aim was to estimate the response rate to vincristine and carboplatin after an initial single cycle of chemoreduction prior to implementing standardized local ophthalmic therapy and correlate with event-free survival.


21.6.2.2 Background


The standard therapies to treat retinoblastoma, enucleation, and EBRT are associated with significant morbidity [1618]. The prevalence of second malignancies following the hereditary form of retinoblastoma remains higher than that for any other pediatric malignancy, an effect worsened by the use of external beam radiation therapy [18, 19]. To avoid the associated morbidities of these therapies, and to utilize, now standardized, local ophthalmic therapies in a greater number of patients, research has been directed towards chemoreduction—using chemotherapy to reduce tumor volume in order to increase the efficacy of local therapies. In single-institutional studies, small, Group B tumors have been shown to respond to vincristine, carboplatin, and etoposide, and also to carboplatin and vincristine [20]. It is important to demonstrate that etoposide can be omitted from the treatment of these tumors since it increases the risk of infectious complications, and possibly, secondary leukemia [21].


21.6.2.3 Study Methods


A total of 6 cycles of chemotherapy with standard-dose vincristine and carboplatin (Chap.​ 11) was administered. Response to chemotherapy was determined following the first cycle of vincristine and carboplatin. Local ophthalmic therapy was delivered prior to the 2nd through 6th cycle as clinically indicated. Patients whose disease remained stable were continued on therapy; those who developed progressive disease at any time were treated at investigator discretion. Central review of Retcam images by three ophthalmologists was performed at diagnosis to confirm eye group.


21.6.2.4 Statistical Considerations


This single-arm trial compared the event-free survival following 6 cycles of 2-drug therapy with the event-free survival expected under the standard 3-drug therapy [2]. An event was defined as the need for non-protocol therapy, including (1) any systemic chemotherapy other than or in addition to vincristine and carboplatin as defined in the protocol, (2) enucleation, (3) external beam radiation, (4) or death from any cause. For patients with bilateral disease, the need for non-protocol therapy of either eye was defined as a failure at the patient level.


21.6.2.5 Protocol Update


The study has since been closed to new patient enrolment having met a stopping criterion defined in the protocol. Currently enrolled patients are being monitored for event-free survival as defined above.


21.6.3 COG ARET 0231: A Single-Arm Trial of Systemic and Subtenon Chemotherapy for Groups C and D Intraocular Retinoblastoma (The Group C/D Protocol)



21.6.3.1 Aims


The primary aim was to determine the event-free survival (EFS) at 12 months for eyes with Group D intraocular retinoblastoma treated with systemic high-dose carboplatin/etoposide/vincristine (CEV), subtenon carboplatin, and local ophthalmic therapy. An event was defined for each eye individually as the need for non-protocol chemotherapy, enucleation or external beam radiation, or death. Secondary aims included determination of the event-free survival at 12 months for Group C eyes treated with this regimen and to describe the toxicities, patterns of failure, and predictors of failure from findings at the diagnostic eye exam and the response status at end of therapy.
< div class='tao-gold-member'>

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Jun 30, 2016 | Posted by in OPHTHALMOLOGY | Comments Off on Children’s Oncology Group (COG) Trials for Retinoblastoma

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access