Avoidance and Management of Complications of Otosclerosis Surgery

Chapter 26 Avoidance and Management of Complications of Otosclerosis Surgery



image Videos corresponding to this chapter are available online at www.expertconsult.com.


Otosclerosis surgery is one of the most exciting and rewarding procedures an otologic surgeon performs. The physical demands of the operation are among the most refined of the surgical disciplines, and includes an extremely small tolerance for error even when the case goes along well with perfect equipment and perfect performance of support personnel. Small deviations from the surgical techniques illustrated in the remainder of this text regularly prove necessary to avoid complication. The knowledge base and technical skills needed to handle these deviations add difficulty to an already challenging undertaking seen with routine cases. With this difficulty comes a large reward, however, as patients experience improvement of their hearing with a successful outcome—frequently to the normal range.


As with other difficult procedures, the learning curve for otosclerosis surgery is not steep. Complete preparedness for each potential surgical obstacle or complication is necessary to achieve results approaching those of experienced surgeons in centers of excellence located throughout the world. The atmosphere in the operating room is usually one of excitement and potentially slight tension with this procedure, especially for surgeons just beginning their careers. Thorough knowledge of and ability to deal with potential complications and surgical deviations help reduce anxiety and allow the operating surgeon to focus on and complete the job at hand.


Reliable correction of otosclerotic conductive hearing impairment requires discipline, precision, knowledge, preparation of the operating facility, and judgment. Cognitive preparation should be complete before undertaking stapes surgery as the primary surgeon. Expert training and steady experience provide mastery of technical skill and development of operative judgment. Only then can the fullest potential as a stapes surgeon be reached. This chapter provides knowledge based on my own experience and that of other contributors to the field who have courteously shared their experience as colleagues, professors, mentors, and authors. The focus is on the preoperative, operative, postoperative, and reoperative situations a surgeon faces when he or she seeks to prevent or rectify complications.



PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION



Medical Conditions


A written or mental checklist is useful to avoid overlooking an important medical feature during preoperative evaluation. It is helpful (and recommended) to have any and all family members in the office present in the examination room during the interview. A useful practice is to write the names of the individuals present on the chart during the interview. In addition to a complete history and physical examination with attention to medical conditions germane to any surgical procedure, the prudent surgeon attempts to identify the following conditions.


Fluctuating hearing loss, episodic vertigo, and low-frequency sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) may indicate endolymphatic hydrops. Care must be taken to avoid confusing the early conductive hearing loss of prior audiograms (which may falsely appear as SNHL) with endolymphatic hydrops. Patients with endolymphatic hydrops who undergo stapes surgery have a higher rate of SNHL (presumably from dilation of the saccule that contacts the stapes footplate where it is at risk during stapedectomy or stapedotomy) and chronic dizziness. This condition may be a contraindication to surgery.1


Surgeons should insist that acoustic reflex testing be performed and reviewed before entering the operating room because superior semicircular canal dehiscence manifests with conductive hearing impairment, which may be confused with impairment caused by otosclerosis on pure tone audiometry. This practice helps avoid the situation where a mobile and normal stapes is found intraoperatively after entering the middle ear. Clinical history also is very helpful if the patient has symptoms of vertigo with loud sounds. Diagnosis is established or refuted with a computed tomography (CT) scan in the plane of the superior semicircular canal. Patient symptoms such as vertigo with impulse noise may also alert the operating surgeon to the presence of this otosclerosis look-alike.


A history of multiple fractures or blue sclera may allow the diagnosis of osteogenesis imperfecta to be made preoperatively.2


Lifelong hearing loss in one ear should alert the surgeon to the possibility of congenital footplate fixation. Congenital footplate fixation carries a higher than usual risk of gusher and SNHL.3 A CT scan should be performed preoperatively in patients with suspected congenital footplate fixation to look for abnormal cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)–perilymph connections that predispose to gusher. If a high risk of a gusher is found, amplification is recommended. A genetic pedigree focused on hearing loss is helpful in identifying patients with X-linked progressive mixed deafness. Patients with this disorder are rare and unique in that a conductive hearing loss is seen on the audiogram with intact stapedial reflexes.4,5 During surgery, a stapes gusher is encountered with the attendant risk of SNHL. Although males are typically affected, heterozygous females may exhibit milder audiologic abnormalities.6


Imbalance may occur after otosclerosis surgery despite a well-done surgical procedure and an excellent hearing result. Professional athletes, high-rise steelworkers, and painters might be best advised to avoid surgery until the completion of their careers. In similar fashion, patients who depend on their sense of taste for employment (e.g., workers in the wine industry, coffee tasters, and professional chefs) may choose to avoid surgery. Changes in chorda tympani function considered minor to most patients may be a source of disability in such professions. Commercial airline pilots usually are allowed to have stapes surgery without affecting their employability, but the operating surgeon or patient should secure written documentation of the patient’s employer’s policy before undertaking surgery. Military personnel who fly aircraft should consult with a flight surgeon.


A history of or exhibited characteristics of severe anxiety, neuropsychiatric disease, claustrophobia, restless legs syndrome, and other conditions that would make the procedure difficult under sedation with an awake patient should be sought. When such patients have surgery, it should be performed under general anesthesia.



Physical Examination


Various findings have an impact on upcoming surgery, including the following:















OPERATING ROOM



Surgical Technique Prerequisites for Residents


When surgeons are in training, much effort is put toward using proper methodology in the operating room. The technical difficulty associated with stapes surgery requires the surgeon to be facile with several key techniques. Residents and fellows should enter the operating room with previously demonstrated abilities in several areas. Preparation becomes more of an issue as the number of cases of surgically correctable otosclerosis decreases in most training programs.11 Limitation of hospital privileges may become more of an issue in the future if case availability precludes ascent to an acceptable level on an individual’s own learning curve. The following list is put forth for surgeons in training to use as preparation for successful performance of stapes surgery, while minimizing the risk of complications for the patient.








Canal injection for hemostasis: Local anesthetic provides anesthesia for the patient under sedation and is crucial to procedure success. The mucosa of the middle ear receives innervation from deeper nerves and is not affected by the canal injection. A drop or two of local anesthesia instilled into the middle ear provides nearly instant relief. Anesthetic should be promptly removed from the middle ear to prevent absorption into the inner ear, avoiding the coincident severe vertigo, nausea, and vomiting. A high percentage of epinephrine in the canal injection (e.g., 1:20,000) provides a maximal amount of vasoconstriction with a minimum of volume of injection. Turning the needle such that the bevel is against the bone allows delicate instillation of solution under thin skin. Most innervation proceeds down the canal, but small nerves traverse the fissures of Santorini in the anteroinferior canal adjacent to the annulus. These nerves are more of an issue when dissection is carried out in this area, but they may also need to be surrounded with local anesthetic to provide a comfortable patient under sedation. Use of identical syringes for each procedure allows the surgeon to develop the feel necessary to perform excellent injections (we suggest a glass dental-type syringe holding 3 mL of solution). A perfect injection is an art that comes only with practice. Surgeons in training should perform and demonstrate proficiency with injections in cases where it is not as critical to the outcome of the procedure (e.g., tympanoplasty) before being allowed to inject for stapedotomy. Creation of large blebs cannot be rectified easily, and markedly increases case difficulty.

Tympanomeatal flap design and elevation: A recurring mistake of inexperienced surgeons occurs when the tympanomeatal flap is too short to reach anatomic position after curetting to expose the oval window niche (Fig. 26-2). One should avoid suctioning the elevated skin to prevent flap tears. Positioning the suction behind the round knife during flap elevation keeps the field dry and prevents inadvertent suctioning of the elevated skin. The vertical incisions of the flap should be kept 1 to 2 mm lateral to the annulus to reduce the likelihood of tearing the tympanic membrane.




Prosthesis sizing: Understanding of the measurements used (Fig. 26-3) improves results. Measurement from the lateral surface of the footplate to the medial side of the incus is taken. To this figure is added 0.5 mm and an amount equal to the thickness of the stapes footplate. Footplate thickness may vary from 0.2 mm to several millimeters. The prosthesis should extend 0.5 mm beyond the medial surface of the footplate into the vestibule (Figs. 26-4 and 26-5).









Surgeons who have performed stapes surgery frequently understand that each individual step of the procedure itself must be performed to perfection, or the ill effects become additive. (For example, an imperfect injection makes every remaining portion of the procedure more difficult if blood continues to enter the operative field. Likewise, inadequate curetting limits exposure of the footplate.) A small amount of compromise in each step of the procedure quickly adds up to overall failure. This “law of additive inadequacy” has proven useful as a teaching concept. Viewing the procedure in this way emphasizes the need for perfection in each step before moving forward in the operation.


Similar to a preflight checklist, every skill must be checked off before allowing performance of a stapedotomy. Surgeons who never master the listed techniques probably should not perform stapes surgery as part of their surgical practice—just as not every otolaryngologist is able to perform procedures such as blepharoplasty, partial laryngectomy, and laryngotracheal reconstruction.


Attending physicians are reticent to allow significant participation of residents and fellows if this means that several inadequacies have already summed to put the senior surgeon in a tough spot while completing the procedure. Residents and fellows gain the confidence of their attending surgeons as these skills are mastered allowing greater and greater participation. It is the duty of those of us who teach surgical technique to deliver to the next generation a cadre of well-trained individuals suited to stapes surgery without sacrificing success and safety for our current patients.



Surgical Equipment, Decisions, and Techniques



Prosthesis Type, Size, and Availability


Three general prosthesis types exist: piston/wire, bucket handle, and polytef (Teflon) varieties. Few comparative data exist to compare the different types, but bucket handle prostheses may have a smaller incidence of incus necrosis in long-term follow-up. Piston/wire and Teflon varieties are probably easier to place. Self-crimping prostheses offer a new option in design, which may reduce the need for manual crimping.13 Long-term results with attention to incus necrosis would be of interest because the metal nitinol used in these prostheses contains a small percentage of nickel—a known cause of hypersensitivity reactions in other uses in humans such as jewelry.


Prostheses come in several different diameters, ranging from 0.3 to 0.8 mm most commonly. Experienced surgeons have indicated that 0.6 mm gives optimal results.14 Several studies have looked at alternative sizes, and there seems to be no degradation of results in the speech range down to 0.4 mm piston diameter.15 Prostheses measuring 0.3 mm show worse hearing results compared with prostheses measuring 0.4 mm.16 Lighter prostheses perform better in higher frequencies in situ in temporal bone studies.


Prosthesis length varies from patient to patient. Availability of the correct prosthesis is crucial to successful outcome. We prefer to use nonferromagnetic materials, in particular titanium bucket handle prostheses. Table 26-1 outlines the prostheses stocked in our operating suite. Note the inclusion of the incus replacement prosthesis (see the later discussion on incus necrosis).




Laser Stapedotomy versus Drill Stapedotomy


It is generally agreed among most surgeons that use of the laser reduces the risk of mechanical transmission of vibratory energy to the inner ear, making it a safer technique. Comparative data from primary stapedotomy question this tenet, viewing both techniques as effective and safe.17 Use of a laser does improve results in revision cases.18 In all cases, proper use of the laser reduces bleeding associated with tissue ablation, which is an advantage. Both techniques are accepted within the standard of care.



Stapedectomy versus Stapedotomy


For most otologists, the procedure of choice for otosclerosis has become stapedotomy. Compared with stapedectomy, the limited fenestra improves results in the high frequencies, and most authors report a reduction in SNHL as a result of the procedure.1921 Stapedotomy carries a smaller rate of postoperative vestibular complaints. Stapedectomy remains a valuable alternative in the experience of some surgeons. Occasionally, a stapedotomy needs to be converted to a complete stapedectomy.


Jun 14, 2016 | Posted by in OTOLARYNGOLOGY | Comments Off on Avoidance and Management of Complications of Otosclerosis Surgery

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access