8 Incisional Refractive Techniques: Radial Keratotomy, Astigmatic Keratotomy, and Limbal Relaxing Incisions

CHAPTER 8


Incisional Refractive Techniques: Radial Keratotomy, Astigmatic Keratotomy, and Limbal Relaxing Incisions



Kerry K. Assill, Andrea D. Border, John F. Doane, Scot Morris, and James A. Denning


CHAPTER CONTENTS


General Preoperative Considerations


General Surgical Considerations


General Postoperative Considerations


Radial Keratotomy


Astigmatic Keratotomy


Limbal Relaxing Incisions


Suggested Readings


Radial keratotomy (RK) and astigmatic keratotomy (AK) were the first refractive procedures to be practiced on a wide scale in North America. Although photorefractive RK and laser in situ keratomileusis have largely replaced these two procedures, they are still effective for low myopia and astigmatism and are occasionally used by refractive surgeons. Most of the concepts now used for refractive surgery were developed originally for RK and AK.


GENERAL PREOPERATIVE CONSIDERATIONS


Indications



  • low to moderate myopia and/or astigmatism
  • realistic patient expectations of surgical effect
  • patient age greater than 21 years

Patient Evaluation



image


Figure 8–1   The eight paracentral meridia viewed serially by pachymetry from superotemporal to superior.


Patient Preparation



  • Administer broad-spectrum antibiotics for prophylaxis approximately 25 minutes before surgery.
  • Instill 1% pilocarpine.

    • ensures maximum patient focus intraoperatively with high illumination
    • better defines patient’s visual axis

  • Apply topical anesthetic but not directly to the corneal epithelium [recommended regime: 1 gtt of 4% lidocaine (Xylocaine; Abbott) every 10 minutes (×2), followed by 1 gtt of 0.5% tetracaine every 10 minutes (X2)].
  • Administer up to 20 mg of diazepam 20 minutes before surgery (acts as an anxiolytic and relaxes the muscles of the eye to make the lid speculum more comfortable).

GENERAL SURGICAL CONSIDERATIONS


Relative Contraindications



Absolute Contraindications



  • unrealistic patient expectations of perfect vision or improved best corrected visual acuity (BCVA)
  • patient age less than 21 years
  • systemic disease (e.g., diabetes mellitus because of possible poor healing of corneal incisions)
  • recent unstable refraction greater than 0.5 D sphere or cylinder (within the previous 24 months)
  • keratoconus because of progressive ectasia
  • corneal warpage from contact lens wear or large, chronic eyelid masses like chalazia (discontinue lens wear and topographically document stable curvature before surgery)
  • pre-existing irregular astigmatism
  • severe retinopathy

    • increased risk for severely compromised acuity in the future
    • possible adverse effects on low contrast acuity from increased depth of focus

  • severe dry eye (keratoconjunctivitis sicca)

    • increased risk for keratolysis
    • greatly prolonged visual recovery

  • history of chronic herpes simplex or zoster keratitis because of the. increased risk for keratolysis (ideally should not be considered for surgery)

Equipment



image


Figure 8–2   Diagram of a combined-style diamond knife.


Methods



image


Figure 8-3   When looking through the left ocular, the surgeon marks the visual axis along the opposite inferior border of the filament reflex on the cornea.


GENERAL POSTOPERATIVE CONSIDERATIONS


Medications



Patient Instructions



  • Provide written instructions to the patient.
  • Instruct patient to go home and sleep for several hours and to take the drops as directed (see above).
  • Instruct patient not to rub his or her eyes.
  • Instruct patient not to use eye make-up for 2 weeks.
  • Instruct patient to avoid contaminated water (e.g., pools, hot tubs, showers) for 2 weeks.
  • Instruct patient to refrain from reading for the first day after surgery.
  • Instruct patient to call emergency telephone numbers if experiencing severe pain, discharge, increased redness, or swelling.
  • Inform patient about first follow-up visit.

Follow-Up



  • first postoperative visit (day 2)

    • Measure uncorrected acuity.
    • Perform a slit-lamp examination.

  • subsequent postoperative visits (weeks 1, 3, and 6 and months 3, 6, and 12)

    • Schedule for late afternoon for corneal stability.
    • Measure uncorrected visual acuity.
    • Measure manifest refraction.
    • Measure BCVA.
    • Perform slit-lamp examination.
    • Review patient progress and symptoms.

Enhancements



  • nonsurgical

    • Nonsurgical intervention is possible if the degree of myopia is within 0.5 D of target.
    • Begin with pressure patching (preferred) beginning at 1 week and continuing for 6 weeks only at night or continuously both day and night.

  • surgical

    • Surgery is required if residual myopia is greater than 0.5 D.
    • Provide additional incisions (cumulative total, ≤ 8) if the undercorrection is greater than 1.25 D, the OZ is a minimum of 2.75 mm, the limbal zone is a minimum of 0.5 mm, and there are fewer than eight original incisions.
    • Lengthen existing incisions by decreasing the limbal clear zone or by decreasing the optical clear zone (if the undercorrection is 0.50-1.25 D, the OZ is >2.75 mm, the limbal zone is >0.5 mm, and there is significant astigmatism and eight original incisions).
    • Deepen some or all of the existing incisions if they appear to be shallow at the slit lamp, the OZ is at the minimum, and there are at least eight original incisions.

RADIAL KERATOTOMY


Preoperative Considerations


Indications



  • particularly effective for up to –4 D of myopia
  • increasingly effective with increasing age
  • best to aim for slight undercorrection to compensate for the progressive hyperopic shift documented with RK (0.1 D/year)

Surgical Considerations


Methods



image


Figure 8-4   Diagram of the base of a radial incision being squared off.


image


Figure 8-5   Diagram of a centripetal (Russian)


image


Figure 8-6   Diagram of a centrifugal (American) incision.


image


Figure 8-7   A combined (genesis) incision. (A) The centrifugal incision begins at the OZ. (B) Keeping the blade in the groove, the second incision deepens and evens out the groove.(C) The uphill centripetal incision ensures uniform depth and slight undermining of the OZ for maximal effect.


Intraoperative Complications



Postoperative Considerations


Complications



Enhancements



  • Perform no more than two enhancements per eye.
  • Make no more than a total of eight incisions (primary plus enhancements).
  • The limbal zone must be a minimum of 0.5 mm.
  • The OZ must be a minimum 2.75 mm.

ASTIGMATIC KERATOTOMY


Preoperative Considerations


Preoperative care for AK is identical to that for RK patients.


Indications



  • myopic or piano-spherical equivalent refraction
  • astigmatic patients intolerant of contact lenses (high cylinder in the spectacle plane creates peripheral vision problems)

Patient Preparation



Surgical Considerations


Methods



  • Fixate the globe with two-point forceps grasping the conjunctiva near the limbus.
  • Incise over the corneal marks with the diamond blade perpendicular to corneal stroma.

    • Achieve maximal effect with 5- to 7-mm OZs.
    • A 3-mm tangential incision yields the same effect as a 45-degree arcuate incision at a 6-mm optical zone.
    • Longer incisions and arcuate incisions are more efficient.
    • Longer incisions yield greater effect up to a 90-degree arc length.
    • AK incisions peripheral to old scars are ineffective.

Postoperative Considerations


Age and wound healing properties affect outcomes. For example, a 30-year-old patient should theoretically be compensated for effect: EFFECT = 100% + (patient age – 30) x 2%. Because the standard distribution of effect of AK is greater than that of RK, attempt only 60% of the full correction.


Postoperative Care



Enhancements



  • Wait at least 6 weeks before attempting enhancements because AK enhancements require more time to stabilize than do radial incisions.
  • Dilate patients because you will be able to more easily discern the incisions against a red reflex and avoid intersecting previous incisions.
  • If postoperative topography maps show persistent irregular astigmatism in the original hemimeridian, a too-shallow or shelved incision is likely present. Properly place an adjacent incision in the same hemimeridian to correct this (possibly).
  • If postoperative topography maps show a shift in astigmatism axis, irregular astigmatism, or undercorrection, use the topographical map to elongate the original incisions in the direction of the resultant steep zone.
  • If the resultant refractive error is hyperopic astigmatism, cautiously reopen the original incisions , remove the fibrous plug, and reapproximate the wound margins using 10-0 nylon suture.
  • Also, reapproximate wound margins using 10-0 nylon sutures (if the flat axis was incorrectly incised) unless the resultant refractive error is still myopic astigmatism. If so, place conservatively short arcuate incisions at the newly defined steep hemimeridia.

LIMBAL RELAXING INCISIONS


Preoperative Considerations


Advantages



  • able to be performed with cataract surgery or separately
  • may induce less postoperative healing time, glare, and discomfort than corneal relaxing incisions (CRIs) because the incision is placed at the limbus instead of inside the cornea
  • a practical, relatively simple, and forgiving way to correct astigmatism (axis placement and the length of the incisions not critically precise regarding refractive effect)
  • rare overcorrections

Indications



  • visually significant cataracts and 0.50 to 3.00 D of astigmatism
  • strong patient desire for diminished or eliminated dependency on spectacles or contact lenses following cataract surgery
  • candidates for clear lens extraction who have up to 3.00 D of astigmatism

Surgical Considerations


Equipment



  • corneal topographer and keratometer (determines the amount, axis, and symmetry of corneal cylinder)
  • a marking device (mark the steep axis determined by topography)
  • a surgical keratometer (confirms axis results before placing incisions)
  • an RK/AK surgical diamond knife (e.g., the Lab Instruments L320 micrometer knife)

Methods



  • For phakic patients more than 73 years old

    • Customize LRI placement according to topography. (Do not consider refractive cylinder.)
    • For asymmetric astigmatism, elongate the LRI slightly in the steepest of the two steep axes and shorten it (by the same slight amount) in the flatter of the two steep axes.
    • For nonorthogonal astigmatism, place each of the paired LRIs at the steepest portion of the topography “bow tie” that was indicated by topography (i.e., you do not need to create paired LRIs in the same meridian).
    • Mark the steep meridian of astigmatism with cautery based on the topography results that were confirmed with surgical keratometry.
    • Using the diamond knife (set at 600 μm for most cases), place a 6-mm incision on the steep axis at the limbus barely anterior to the palisades of Vogt (for 1.00 D, use one 6-mm incision; for 1.00-2.00 D, use two 6-mm incisions; for 2.00-3.00 D, use two 8-mm incisions).

  • Make shorter incisions for phakic patients less than 73 years old to achieve the same refractive effect as for older patients.
  • For patients older than 80 years or those who have corneoscleral thinning, use a diamond blade set at 500 μm.
  • For pseudophakic patients

    • Use the same nomogram as for phakic patients.
    • Base axis and amount of astigmatism on refraction only.
    • Base the steep meridian on only the axis of refractive cylinder.
    • Determine the symmetry of astigmatism using topography only.

Postoperative Considerations


Complications



Enhancements



  • If a single 6-mm LRI results in undercorrection, extend the incisions to 8 mm, or make a second 6-mm incision.
  • If you have made two 8-mm incisions but undercorrection still exists, then perform CRIs to treat the residual astigmatism (also for initial astigmatism >3.00 D with LRI).
  • For corneal relaxing incisions (more likely to produce glare and discomfort than are LRIs because they are placed inside the corneal limbus)

    • First, place two 8-mm LRIs on the steep axis at the limbus.
    • Set the diamond blade at 99% of corneal depth (as determined by pachymetry).
    • Create one 2-mm incision for every diopter of astigmatism over 3 D and allow an 8-mm OZ. (Exact axial placement of CRIs along the steep axis is critical because CRIs produce significantly more refractive effect than do LRIs.)

Suggested Readings


Assil KK, Schanzlin DJ. Radial and Astigmatic Keratotomy: A Complete Handbook. St. Louis, MO: Poole Press; 1994.


Gills JP. Nomogram for Limbal Relaxing Incisions with Cataract Surgery. Tarpon Springs, FL: St Luke’s Cataract and Laser Institute; 1999.


Sanders DR, Hofmann RF. Refractive Surgery: A Text of Radial Keratotomy. Thorofare, NJ: Slack Inc.; 1980.


< div class='tao-gold-member'>

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Jul 24, 2016 | Posted by in OPHTHALMOLOGY | Comments Off on 8 Incisional Refractive Techniques: Radial Keratotomy, Astigmatic Keratotomy, and Limbal Relaxing Incisions

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access