19 Surgical Reversal of Presbyopia

CHAPTER 19


Surgical Reversal of Presbyopia



John F. Doane


CHAPTER CONTENTS


Monovision


Multifocal Approaches


Accommodating Techniques


Surgical Reversal of Presbyopia


Suggested Readings


Ideally, visual function after age 40 would allow individuals to have excellent unaided distance and near vision with identical distance and near focal points in each eye. This level of visual function is what non-presbyopic emmetropic patients enjoyunifocal vision (symmetrical focal points for each eye) with variable focality (the ability to focus distant, intermediate, and near targets). Presbyopic individuals do not have this level of visual function.


If any refractive error has defied surgical correction to date, it is presbyopia. Options for management include



  • spectacles (bifocal, trifocal, progressive, and reader)
  • contact lenses (monovision, bifocal, and multifocal)
  • intraocular lenses (IOLs) (monovision, multifocal, and accommodating)
  • corneal refractive surgery (monovision or multifocal ablations)

In general, none of these options are universally accepted by all patients. A majority of the population may tolerate each technique, but significant proportions of the population do not fully accept them.


MONOVISION


The most commonly performed technique for managing presbyopia has been the induction of monovision (the intentional targeting of a small amount of myopia in one eye to facilitate near and intermediate visual tasks).


Advantages



  • patient satisfaction of about 50% (tolerance by 25-30% and the remainder abhorrence)

Disadvantages



MULTIFOCAL APPROACHES



  • multifocal contact lenses
  • bifocal contact lenses
  • multifocal ablations

Advantages



  • greater range of useable visual acuity over far, intermediate, and near distances than monofocal corrections

Disadvantages



  • ghost images
  • glare
  • haloing
  • worsening of visual disturbances in low-light situations
  • an unacceptable trade-off between greater range of focus and slightly reduced best acuity at a distance and near compared with monofocal options (for some patients)

ACCOMMODATING TECHNIQUES


Accommodating techniques such as pseudophakic accommodating IOLs are currendy being investigated. The work is in the very early stages, but this type of correction would allow for a unifocal lens with variable focality.


SURGICAL REVERSAL OF PRESBYOPIA


Ronald Schachar, M.D., developed a technique for the surgical reversal of presbyopia (SRP) using scleral expansion band segments.


In theory, this method facilitates accommodation without compromising distance uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA). Schachar’s surgical procedure is designed to expand the diameter of the eye overlying the ciliary muscle.


Theories of Accommodation with Presbyopia


Schachar’s model for the loss of accommodation with age diametrically opposes Helmholz’s theory. However, recent experimental evidence that supports Helmholtz’s original theory challenges Schachar’s theory.


Helmholz’s Theory



  • The crystalline lens loses its flexibility.
  • The lens does not increase its converging power with relaxation of the ciliary muscle to facilitate near-vision tasks as it did before age 40.

Schachar’s Theory



image


Figure 19-1   Animated view of Schachar’s accommodative theory. With increasing radial tension on the zonules, the anterior and posterior crystalline lens radii of curvatures are decreased, which effectively increases the converging power of the crystalline lens. Thus, the lens accommodates for near-vision tasks.


Preoperative Considerations


Indications and Inclusion Criteria



  • presbyopia
  • healthy conjunctiva and sclera
  • near emmetropic refractive error

Exclusion Criteria



  • thin sclera
  • cataract (cataract surgery should be performed when appropriate instead of scleral segment implants)
  • a glaucoma-filtering bleb

Patient Evaluation



Surgical Considerations


Methods



image


Figure 19-2   Insertion of band segment into “belt loop.”


image


Figure 19-3   Four band segments are placed in each oblique quadrant and the overlying conjunctiva has been repositioned.


Postoperative Considerations


Complications



  • infection
  • implant extrusion
  • persistent conjunctival defect over implant
  • scleral erosion
  • anterior segment ischemia

Patient Care and Follow-Up



  • Instruct the patient to use a topical antibiotic-steroid for 7 days and artificial tears and a lubricating ointment before sleep for at least 3 weeks.
  • Remove nonabsorbable sutures that were used to close the conjunctiva 7 days postoperatively.
  • Advise the patient to avoid eye rubbing.
  • Instruct the patient to do pencil pushup and accommodative exercises daily.

Suggested Readings


Glasser A. Can accommodation be surgically restored in human presbyopia? Optom Vis Sci. 1999;76:607-608.


Glasser A, Kaufman PL. The mechanism of accommodation in primates. Ophthalmology. 1999;106:863-872.


Schachar RA, Cudmore DP, Black TD. Experimental support for Schachar’s hypothesis of accommodation. Ann Ophthalmol. 1993;25: 404-409.


Schachar RA, Tello C, Cudmore DP, Liebmann JM, Black TD, Ritch R. In vivo increase of the human lens equatorial diameter during accommodation. Am J Physiol. 1996; 271:R670-R676.


< div class='tao-gold-member'>

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Jul 24, 2016 | Posted by in OPHTHALMOLOGY | Comments Off on 19 Surgical Reversal of Presbyopia

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access