13 Clear Lens Replacement Refractive Surgery

CHAPTER 13


Clear Lens Replacement Refractive Surgery



John F. Doane, Scot Morris, Andrea D. Border, and James A. Denning


CHAPTER CONTENTS


Preoperative Considerations


Surgical Considerations


Postoperative Considerations


Suggested Readings


We evaluate refractive surgical procedures with five basic criteria.



  • predictability [the percentage of eyes within a certain dioptic range from the target refraction (e.g., ±0.5 D)]
  • accuracy [the percentage of eyes achieving a certain level of uncorrected visual acuity (e.g., 20/25 or better uncorrected)]
  • stability of refraction over time
  • safety [the percentage of eyes losing lines of best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) after a refractive procedure]
  • quality of vision postoperatively

The clinician may find that this procedure is the best option; however, the clinician must evaluate the facts of each case and each patient’s medical history to determine the most appropriate technique to use. The easiest and least invasive procedure may not necessarily be the best in terms of visual outcome.


Advantages



  • high predictability and accuracy of refractive surgical result
  • high level of safety
  • very low incidence of lost lines of BCVA
  • stability of postoperative refraction
  • high quality of vision (does not alter the physiologic prolate corneal shape, thus avoiding potential iatrogenically induced aberrations)
  • over 20 years of experience with technology (cataract surgery)
  • a high level of experience and comfort with the technical aspects of the procedure for most surgeons
  • greater predictability and postoperative visual quality for extreme refractive errors
  • potential for treatment of eyes with low to moderate astigmatism (LASIK possible for any residual refractive errors)

Disadvantages



PREOPERATIVE CONSIDERATIONS


Indications



  • early or frank crystalline lens cataract formation that may require cataract extraction in the near future
  • certain presbyopic or prepresbyopic patients
  • high hyperopia
  • myopia
  • thin cornea
  • extremely flat myopic cornea (<40 D corneal power)
  • extremely steep hyperopic cornea (>49 D corneal power)
  • reasonable patient expectations

Patient Evaluation



Lens Selection


SINGLE-PIECE POLYMETHYLMETHACRYLATE LENS The polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) lens is the gold standard of IOL technology and has been used successfully for more than 20 years.


Advantages



  • available in virtually all needed powers
  • proven and dependable optics
  • monovision a practical option
  • excellent centration and stability within the capsular bag
  • very inexpensive

Disadvantages



  • need for limbal relaxing incisions for astigmatic treatment
  • need for scleral tunnel approach
  • high incidence of posterior capsular opacification (20-30%) requiring yttrium-aluminum-garnet (YAG) capsulotomy

FOLDABLE LENS Silicone, acrylic, and hydrogel lenses are currently available. Cataract surgeons prefer this lens because it allows small self-sealing (sutureless) incisions.


Advantages



  • small size (≤ 3 mm) of corneal entry incision that is astigmatically neutral
  • quickness of procedure
  • ease of postoperative stabilization
  • ability to reduce corneal or globe astigmatism by implanting a TORIC IOL (model no. AA4203-TL and AA4203-TF; Staar Surgical Company, Monrovia, CA)
  • plate haptic design with cylindrical correction incorporated in its design
  • currently available in 3.5 and 2.0 D powers that correct 2.4 and 1.4 D of corneal astigmatism (other powers under investigation)
  • spherical powers available from 9.5 to 30 D
  • lower incidence of posterior capsular opacification (2-3%; particularly for acrylic IOLs)

Disadvantages



  • most experience with this lens gained over the last 5 years
  • difficult management (if silicone oil required for complicated retinal detachment procedures) of movement with silicone lenses (after YAG laser capsulotomy)
  • instability compared with the one-piece PMMA lens
  • need for corneal refractive surgery to eliminate myopia (if patient unable to tolerate monovision)
  • smaller range of IOL powers available for extreme high myopia and hyperopia compared with range for PMMA IOLs
  • more expensive

MULTIFOCAL LENS The Medical Ophthalmics SIN40 lens (AMO ARRAY IOL; Allergan, Irvine, CA) is available in +10 to +30 D in increments of 0.5 D.


Advantages



  • ability of both eyes to function at all distances (near, intermediate, and far)
  • focused binocular visual function at each focal length
  • less or no dependence on prescription spectacles postoperatively
  • has all the advantages of other foldable IOLs

Disadvantages



ACCOMMODATING INTRAOCULAR LENS C&C Vision (Aliso Viejo, CA) developed this lens, which is currently under investigation. This IOL focuses for distance when the patient fixates on distant objects and for near when the patient attempts to read by anterior displacement of the vitreous, which forces the lens optic more anterior thus creating a myopic refractive status for the eye and improving near visual function. The lens optic can move with vitreous pressure because of the optic’s flexible arms.


LENS CALCULATION FORMULAS The length of the eye as measured by A-scan determines which formula you should use to calculate the parameters of the lens.



  • short eyes

    • Holladay II formula
    • Hoffer-Q formula

  • average eyes

    • Holladay I formula

  • long eyes

    • SRK/T formula

SURGICAL CONSIDERATIONS


Contraindications



  • all amblyopia or monocularities
  • untreated peripheral retinal lattice degeneration or holes and tears or other inner retinal pathology (increases risk for retinal detachment)
  • unreasonable patient expectations

    • unwillingness to lose residual crystalline lens accommodation
    • expectations of perfect near and distance vision

Patient Preparation



  • Dilate pupil with 1% cyclopentalate and 2.5% phenylephrine 30 min before the procedure.
  • Administer peribulbar block or topical anesthesia.
  • Prepare skin and lid and draping in sterile fashion.

Standard Equipment



  • keratome
  • 0.12 forceps
  • capsulorrhexis needle
  • hydrodissection cannula
  • viscoelastic substance
  • lens manipulator or chopper
  • phacoemulsification machine

Methods



Alternative Treatments



POSTOPERATIVE CONSIDERATIONS


Results



  • Expect at least 95% of eyes to be within ±0.5 D of targeted refraction.
  • There is usually virtually no induced surgical astigmatism.
  • Two to 4% of patient may want to have additional enhancement surgery for residual refractive error.

Postoperative Care



  • topical antibiotic (4 times a day for 1 week)
  • topical corticosteroid (tapered over 4 weeks)
  • ocular shield for 1 week while sleeping
  • follow-up visits (at 1 day, 1 week, 1 month, 4 months, and 1 year after surgery)

    • Check uncorrected distance vision.
    • Check near BCVA distance and near vision with manifest refraction.
    • Check IOP.
    • Check lens position.
    • Assess anterior segment cell and flare.
    • Assess vitreous humor and posterior pole.

Complications and Management



Enhancements and Secondary Procedures



  • corneal refractive surgery (for residual refractive error)
  • incisional keratotomy
  • radial keratotomy
  • astigmatic keratotomy
  • limbal relaxing incisions [often in conjunction with clear lens replacement (CLR) or cataract surgery]
  • laser refractive procedures
  • PRK
  • LASIK [preferred method after refractive lensectomy (RL) or phakic IOL insertion]
  • laser thermokeratoplasty
  • an intracorneal ring (Intacs; KeraVision, Fremont, CA)

Clear Lens Extraction Plus Laser In Situ Keratomilieusis


This combined technique, also known as bioptics, was introduced by Dr. Roberto Zaldivar of Argentina for use with phakic IOLs (Figs. 13-1 and Figs. 13-2).


Advantages



  • fully corrects spherical error with CLR
  • fully corrects any residual spherical error or astigmatism with LASIK
  • preserves high visual quality
  • keeps risk for loss of BCVA minimal for even extreme corrections

Disadvantages



  • need for two procedures at least 1 month apart
  • risk for complications with both procedures
  • potential IOL movement when suction applied during LASIK keratectomy
  • expensive technology required

image


Figure 13-1   The bioptic concept as applied to CLR with LASIK. The benefits of both procedures can be combined to correct virtually any refractive error.


image


Figure 13-2   The two incisions are visible in the right eye. The more linear, vertical 3.2-mm incision on the left is from the refractive lensectomy (RL). The more central, round incision on the right is from the LASIK keratectomy edge.


Suggested Readings


Allen HF, Bangiaracine AB. Bacterial endophthalmitis after cataract extraction. Arch Ophthalmol. 1974;91:3-7.


Christy NE, Lall P. A randomized controlled comparison of anterior and posterior periocular injection of antibiotic in the prevention of postoperative endophthalmitis. Ophthalmic Surg. 1986;17:715-718.


Doane JF, Nordan LT, Baker RN, Slade SG. Basic tenets of lamellar refractive surgery. Ocul Surg News. 1996;Jul 1:31.


Goldberg MF. Clear lens extraction for axial myopia: an appraisal. Ophthalmology. 1987;94: 571-582.


Lindstrom RL. Retinal detachment in axial myopia. Dev Ophthalmol. 1987;14:37-41.


Miller KM, Glasgow BJ. Bacterial endophthalmitis after sutureless cataract extraction. Arch Ophthalmol. 1993;111:377-379.


Praeger DL. Five years’ follow-up in the surgical management of cataracts in high myopia treated with the Kelman phacoemulsification technique. Ophthalmology. 1979;86: 2024-2033.


Werblin TP. Clear lens/cataract extraction for refractive purposes. In: Elander R, Rich LF, Robin JB, eds. Principles and Practice of Refractive Surgery. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1997: 449-458.


< div class='tao-gold-member'>

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Jul 24, 2016 | Posted by in OPHTHALMOLOGY | Comments Off on 13 Clear Lens Replacement Refractive Surgery

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access