Oropharynx



Fig. 7.1
MRI (a) axial and coronal images and PET-CT (b) display an oropharyngeal left palatine tonsillar tumor extending superiorly to left anterior tonsillar pillar, anterior inferiorly to base of tongue, and inferiorly to left aryepiglottic plica which is narrowing glossopharyngeal recess and oro/hypopharyngeal airway





2 Evidence-Based Treatment Approaches


Single modality radiotherapy or primary surgery (transoral or open resection) for stage T1-2 N0-1 has been preferred with similar rates of local control and survival, as no prospective randomized comparison is present [13]. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy is mostly the key treatment for locally advanced stages III and IVA/B cancers without distant metastases (Table 7.1) [411], while the resectability and neck nodal disease volume are denominators in decision making to perform initially surgery for primary (T3–T4a) and neck (N0-1) and to consolidate with radiotherapy (close resection margins, lymphovascular and perineural invasion , pT3-T4, N2 or N3, nodal disease levels IV–V) or chemoradiotherapy (positive surgical margins and/or nodal extracapsular invasion) metastases (Table 7.2) [1215]. Induction chemotherapy followed by radio/chemoradiotherapy is yet a category three approach which might be considered in heavy nodal volume with an increased risk of distant metastases [5, 6, 1619]. Cetuximab as a single agent concurrent with radiotherapy for treatment of locoregionally advanced head and neck cancer seemed to improve locoregional control and to reduce mortality, while the addition of cetuximab to the chemoradiotherapy with cisplatin did not improve progression-free or overall survival [20].


Table 7.1
Large, randomized phase III trials of concurrent chemoradiation




































































































Trial

Year

N

RT

Schedule

Concomitant CT

DFS or PFS
 
OS
 
Conclusion
     
Standard

Comparison
 
RT

CRT

RT

CRT
 

French [4] GORTEC 94-01

2004

226

70 Gy; 2 Gy/fraction

70 Gy; 2 Gy/fraction

3 cycles of carboplatin + 5FU

14.6

26.6

15.8

22.4

Chemoradiotherapy improved overall survival and locoregional control

Swiss [8] SAKK

2004

224

74.4 Gy; 1.2 Gy/fraction twice daily

74.4 Gy; 1.2 Gy/fraction twice daily

2 cycles of cisplatin



32

46

Therapeutic index of radiotherapy is enhanced by concurrent cisplatin

German [9] 95-06

2005

384

30 Gy; 2 Gy/fraction + 40.6 Gy; 1.4 Gy/fraction twice daily to a total of 70.6 Gy

14 Gy; 2 Gy/fraction + 63.6 Gy; 1.4 Gy/fraction twice daily to a total of 77.6 Gy

5FU + mitomycin

26.6

29.3

23.7

28.6

C-HART (70.6 Gy) is superior to dose-escalated HART (77.6 Gy)

FNCLCC/GORTEC [10]

2006

163

80.4 Gy; 1.2 Gy/fraction twice daily, 5 days per week

80.4 Gy; 1.2 Gy/fraction twice daily, 5 days per week

3 cycles of Cisplatin + 5FU

25.2 (2 y)

48.2 (2 y)

20.1 (2 y)

37.8 (2 y)

Chemoradiotherapy reveals better outcome than radiotherapy alone, even with an aggressive dose-intense schedule

RTOG 0129 [11]

2010

743

70 Gy; 2 Gy/fraction

72 Gy; 42 fractions over 6 weeks

2–3 cycles of cisplatin



59

56

Standard of care for these patients remains concurrent chemoradiotherapy with standard fractionation.


N number of patients, RT radiotherapy, CT chemotherapy, OS overall survival, DFS disease-free survival, PFS progression-free survival



Table 7.2
Two concurrent postoperative radiation plus chemotherapy trials








































































































Trial
 
RTOG 9501 [14, 15]

EORTC 22931 [12]

# patients
 
416

334

Median follow-up, months
 
45.9 (120)

60

% oropharyngeal cancer
 
43

30

Radiotherapy alone
 
60 Gy in 6 weeks

66 Gy in 6.5 weeks

Chemoradiotherapy
 
60 Gy in 6 weeks plus cisplatin 100 mg/m2 on days 1, 22, and 43

66 Gy in 6.5 weeks plus cisplatin 100 mg/m2 on days 1, 22, and 43

Inclusion criteria

Positive resection margin

+ (6 % of patients)

+ (13 % of patients)
 
Extracapsular extension

+ (49 % of patients)

+ (41 % of patients)
 
≥2 nodes involved

+

 
Perineural involvement


+
 
Vascular tumor embolism


+
 
Oral cavity or oropharyngeal tumor with involvement of level IV or V lymph nodes


+

Overall survival

Radiotherapy alone

47 % (27 %)

40 %
 
Chemoradiotherapy

56 % (29 %)

53 %

Local-regional recurrence

Radiotherapy alone

33 % (28.8 %)

31 %
 
Chemoradiotherapy

22 % (22.3 %)

18 %

Disease free survival

Radiotherapy alone

36 % (19.1 %)

36 %
 
Chemoradiotherapy

47 % (20.1 %)

47 %

Conclusion [13]
 
Subgroup of patients with either microscopically involved resection margins and/or extracapsular spread showed improved local-regional control and disease-free survival by concurrent chemoradiotherapy
 

It has become evident as one of the most significant recent advances that HPV-positive oropharyngeal cancer (HPVOPC) should be considered as a different entity from HPV-negative cancers [21]. HPVOPC is frequently presenting with a smaller primary tumor and more advanced cervical lymph node disease which is having a cystic appearance [2224].

Oropharyngeal cancer has been recommended to be classified as having a low (HPV+, ≤10 pack-year smoking or >10 pack-year and N0–N2a), intermediate (HPV+, >10 pack-year smoking and N2b–N3 or HPV-, ≤10 pack-year smoking, T2–3), or high risk (HPV-, ≤10 pack-year smoking, T4 or HPV-, >10 pack-year smoking) of death on the basis of four factors [25, 26]. However, as the results of ongoing trials for metastases (Table 7.3) are incomplete, current recommendation should be treatment regardless of the HPV status according to the stage of disease at presentation.


Table 7.3
Ongoing phase 3 randomized trials in HPV-positive or HPV-negative oropharyngeal cancer patients




























































Trial

HPV status

Inclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria

Treatment

EORTC-1219

(−)

Oropharynx/larynx/hypopharynx primary tumor, stage III or IV (M0)


Accelerated 70 Gy in 6 weeks RT plus cisplatin vs accelerated

RT plus cisplatin plus nimorazole

RTOG-1016

(+)

T1–2,N2a–N3 or T3–4,any N


Accelerated 70 Gy IMRT plus high-dose cisplatin vs accelerated IMRT plus cetuximab

TROG 12.01

(+)

Stage III (excluding T1–2 N1) or IV if ≤10 pack-year smoking history

T4, N3, or M1

RT plus weekly cetuximab vs RT plus weekly cisplatin

If >10 pack-year smoking history, only N0–N2a

The Quarterback Trial

(+)

Oropharynx/unknown primary/nasopharynx, stage III or IV disease (M0),

Active smokers or smoking >20 pack-year

Responders of 3 cycles of induction TPF randomized to 70 Gy RT plus weekly carbo-platin vs RT (56 Gy) plus weekly carboplatin plus cetuximab

De-ESCALaTE

(+)

Stage III–Iva (T3N0–T4N0, and T1N1–T4N3)

>10 pack-year excluded

RT plus high-dose cisplatin vs RT plus cetuximab

≥N2b disease and smoking history

ADEPT

(+)

Transoral resection (R0 margin)


60 Gy IMRT in 6 weeks vs IMRT plus cisplatin

T1–4a, pN-positive with extracapsular spread


3 Target Volume Determination and Delineation Guidelines


Oropharynx is shaped with following structures: palatoglossal arch, pharyngeal tonsil, tonsillar fossa, tonsillar pillar, palatopharyngeal arch, base of the tongue, epiglottic vallecula , posterior wall of the oropharynx, and oral surface of the soft palate, uvula. The most common locations for a primary tumor of the oropharynx are anterior tonsillar pillar and tonsil. Primary lymphatic drainage is the retropharyngeal, level II and III nodes.


Gross Tumor Volume (GTV)


GTV should include the gross disease at the primary disease site or any grossly involved lymph nodes (>1 cm or nodes with a necrotic center or PET positive) which are determined from CT, MRI, PET-CT, clinical information, and endoscopic findings [27]. The GTV can be subdivided as the primary site (GTVp) and involved gross lymph nodes (GTVn). A thorough contouring is required for GTVp based on the exact spreading pattern which can be questioned as follows given two major sites, base of tongue and tonsil:



  • Anteriorly:



    • Is lingual surface of epiglottis involved (T3 for tonsil primary, T does not change for base of tongue or vallecula primary)?


    • Is retromolar trigone involved?


    • Is buccal mucosa involved (drainage to buccal nodes)?


    • Is anterior tonsillar pillar involved?


    • Is tonsillar fossa involved (lymphatic drainage is primarily to level V nodes)?


    • Is oral tongue involved (IA drainage, T stage does not change; intrinsic muscles – no bony attachment)?


    • Is the mandible involved (T4a)?


  • Laterally:



    • Is the medial (T4a) or lateral pterygoid (T4b) muscles infiltrated (trismus clinically)?


    • Is the retrostyloid compartment intact (the carotid space to cranial nerves IX, X, XI, and XII)?


    • Is the jugular foramen intact (gateway to posterior cranial fossa and IX, X, and XI cranial nerves at risk)?


  • Posteriorly:



    • Is posterior tonsillar pillar involved (possible inferior extension to the pharyngoepiglottic fold and posterior aspect of the thyroid cartilage; more frequent involvement for level V nodes)?


    • Is the prevertebral fascia infiltrated?


  • Inferiorly:



    • Is the floor of the mouth involved (T4a; extrinsic muscles – with bony attachment as hyo/genio/palato/styloglossus; mylohyoid muscle which separates sublingual and submandibular space)?


    • Is the larynx involved?


    • Is the pyriform sinus involved?


    • Is the hypopharyngeal wall involved?


  • Superiorly:



    • Is the soft palate involved?


    • Is hard palate involved (T4a)?


Clinical Target Volume (CTV)


There needs to be three CTV volumes based on risk definitions while respecting anatomical barriers (air, muscle, skin, bone, etc.) to microscopic spread.



  • CTV 1, covering GTVp and GTVn with a margin of ≥ 5 mm (as low as 1 mm in close proximity to critical structures: chiasm, brain stem, etc.) given circumferentially around the GTV.
    < div class='tao-gold-member'>

    Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Jul 7, 2016 | Posted by in HEAD AND NECK SURGERY | Comments Off on Oropharynx

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access