Middle Ear Surgery

5 Middle Ear Surgery


5.1 General Considerations for Ear Surgery


• Consider the hearing in the other ear, comorbidity, and patient’s wishes; great caution in operating on the better-hearing ear


• When considering the risks of ear surgery, weigh up against the risks of leaving the condition untreated; e.g., lifetime risk of developing an otogenic intracranial abscess ~1:200 but poor evidence that surgery lessens this risk


5.2 Cholesteatoma Surgery


• Modified radical mastoidectomy (MRM) or canal wall down mastoidectomy:


figure Preserves remnants of tympanic membrane (TM) and ossicular chain, keeping eustachian tube orifice covered (as distinct from radical procedure)


figure Leaves open mastoid cavity


figure Cavity problems minimized by creating well-saucerized small cavity, covering middle ear (ME) mucosa with TM remnant, keeping facial ridge low, and creating adequate meatoplasty for ventilation and access


figure Often necessitates long-term aural toilet and water exclusion; may be more difficult to create well-fitting hearing aid (HA) mold or reconstruct hearing by ossiculoplasty


• Combined approach tympanoplasty or canal wall up mastoidectomy:


figure Preservation of ear canal wall with posterior tympanotomy to allow for access to facial recess


figure Requires second-look surgery to exclude residual disease (found in up to 20% of cases), so need to be medically fit for at least two general anaesthetics and have reliable follow-up


figure Use of potassium titanyl phosphate laser can help reduce residual disease rate and allow for ossicular chain preservation to preserve hearing


figure Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging techniques may allow for detection of residual disease and so prevent unnecessary second-look procedures


figure In the long term, no need for continued aural toilet or water exclusion; may allow for better ossiculoplasty results and easier HA fitting


• Atticoantrostomy or front-to-back surgery:


figure For more limited attic disease can allow for disease removal with a small cavity


figure Can be extended to an MRM


• Revision mastoidectomy:


figure A problem cavity may be improved by lowering facial ridge, obliterating cavity, closing TM perforation, or creating larger meatus


figure If no hearing, consider subtotal petrosectomy and blind sac closure


• Complications:


figure Much the same as for untreated disease: deafness, dizziness, facial palsy


figure Taste disturbance, sigmoid sinus bleed, semicircular canal fistula


5.3 Tympanoplasty


• Operation to eradicate disease in the ME with or without TM reconstruction


• Myringoplasty: operation to repair TM without removal of disease from the ME


figure In children, generally consider after ~8 years of age, once grown out of childhood ear conditions


• Modified Wullstein classification (Fig. 5.1):


figure Type 1: reconstruction TM with intact and mobile ossicular chain (myringoplasty)


figure Type 2: absent malleus handle; TM reconstructed over malleus remnant and long process incus


figure Type 3: no incus/malleus; TM reconstructed to lie on stapes head (myringostapediopexy)


figure Type 4: stapes footplate present; exteriorized, exposed in mastoid cavity; TM reconstructed over round window to create baffle


figure Type 5: fixed footplate; fenestrate lateral Scc


figure Type 6: sono-inversion; TM reconstructed over oval window (baffle) with round window uncovered


Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Jul 4, 2016 | Posted by in OTOLARYNGOLOGY | Comments Off on Middle Ear Surgery

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access