An Epidemiologic Perspective


Ethnicity

Country

Project

Age range (years)

Participation rate (%)

No. samples

Myopia (<−0.5 diopters)

Myopia (<−1.0D)

High myopia (<−5 D)

High myopia (<−6 D)

Caucasian

USA

Baltimore Eye Survey [24]

40 ≤

79.2

2,659

24.1

16.8

2.6

1.9

Caucasian

USA

Beaver Dam Eye Study [25]

43–86

83.1

4,926

26.2

26.5

3.8
 
Caucasian

USA

National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey [26]

20 <

84.5

12,010

41.0

33.1

6.0
 
Caucasian

Australia

Blue Mountain Eye Study [27]

49 ≤

82.4

3,654

15.5

12.6

1.8
 
Caucasian

The Netherlands

Rotterdam Study [28]

55–95

79.7

5,673
 
17.6

4.0
 
Caucasian

Australia

Melbourne Visual Impairment Project [29]

40≤

83

3,271

16.9

15.8

2.5
 
Caucasian

Germany

Gutenberg Health Study [30]

35–74

92.9

13,959

35.1

26.2
 
3.5

Mongolian

Mongolia

(Hovsgol) [31]

40 ≤
 
1,617

17.2
  
2.7

Japanese

Japan

Tajimi Study [32]

40 ≤

78.1

3,120

41.8

32.5

8.1

5.5

Chinese

Taiwan

Shihpai Eye Study [33]

65 ≤

66.6

1,361

19.4

15.0

2.4
 
Chinese

China

Beijing Eye Study [34]

40–101

83.4

4,319

21.8

16.9

3.3

2.6

Chinese

China

Handan Eye Study [35]

30 ≤

85.9

6,491

26.7
 
1.8
 
Korean

Korea

Namil Study [36]

40 ≤
 
1,215

20.5
  
1.0

Chinese

Singapore

Tanjong Pagar Study [37]

40–79

71.8

1,232

38.7

28.0
 
6.9

Chinese

China

Liwan Study [19]

50 ≤
 
1,269

32.3
   
Malaysian

Singapore

Singapore Malay Eye Survey [38]

40–80

78.7

3,280

30.5

20.0

3.9
 
Indonesian

Indonesia

Sumatora [39]

41 ≤
 
358

34.1

26.1
 
1.7

Indian

India

Andhra Pradesh Eye Disease Study [40]

40 ≤

85.4

2,522

34.6
 
4.5
 
Indian

Singapore

Singapore Indian Eye study [41]

40

75.6

3,400

28.0

20.4

4.1
 
Indian

India

Central India Eye and Medical Study [42]

30<

83.1

5,885

17.0

13.0

1.8

0.9

Burmese

Myanmar

Meiktila Eye Study [43]

40 ≤

75.1

1,863

50.9

42.7
 
6.5

Indian

India

Chennai Glaucoma Study (rural) [44]

40 ≤

81.8

3,924

36.5
   
Indian

India

Chennai Glaucoma Study (urban) [45]

40 ≤

80.2

3,850

23.2
   
Iranian

Iran

The Yazd Eye Study [46]
 
90.4

2,098

36.5
  
2.3

Bengalese

Bangladesh

Bangladesh National Blindness and Low vision Survey [47]

30 ≤

90.9

1,1624

22.1

12.5

1.8
 
Hispanic

USA

Proyecto VER [48]

40 <

72

4,774
 
18.0

2.5
 
Hispanic

USA

Los Angeles Latino Eye Study [49]

40 ≤

82

6,357
 
16.8

2.4
 
Hispanic

Spain

Segovia Study [50]

40–79

89.6

510

25.4
   
Black

USA

Baltimore Eye Survey [24]

40 ≤

79.2

2,200

20.9
  
0.9

Afro-Caribbean

West Indies

Barbados Eye Study [51]

40–84

84

4,036

21.9
   




1.3 Prevalence of POAG


The prevalence rates of POAG reported in various countries are summarized in Table 1.2. The prevalence rates of POAG, which seem to be much less dependent on environmental factors than myopia, also differ among ethnic groups, i.e., African-American populations have the highest prevalence rates followed by Hispanic and Japanese populations. The prevalence rates of POAG generally are relatively low in Caucasians.


Table 1.2
Prevalence of OAG and NTG: summary data from previous population-based studies




































































































































































































































































































































Ethnicity

Country

Project

Age range (years)

Prevalence of OAG (crude)

NTG/OAG (%)

Prevalence of NTG (%) (crude)

Caucasian

UK

(Hollows and Graham) [52]

40–74

0.4

35.0

0.2

Caucasian

Ireland

Roscommon Glaucoma Survey [53]

50 ≤

1.9

36.6

0.7

Caucasian

USA

Baltimore Eye Survey [54]

40 ≤

1.4
   

Caucasian

USA

Beaver Dam Eye Study [55]

43–86

2.1

32.0
 

Caucasian

Australia

Blue Mountain Eye Study [56]

59 ≤

3.0
   

Caucasian

The Netherlands

Rotterdam Study [57]

55–95

1.1

39.0

0.4

Caucasian

Italy

Casteldaccia Eye Study [58]

40 ≤

1.2

38.5
 

Caucasian

Italy

Egna-Neumarkt Study [59]

40 ≤

2.0

28.6

0.6

Caucasian

Australia

Melbourne Visual Impairment Project [60]

40 ≤

1.8
 
1.4

Mongolian

Mongolia

(Hovsgol) [61]

40 ≤

0.4
   

Mongolian

Mongolia

Kailu [62]

40 <

1.4

64.0

0.9

Japanese

Japan

Japan nationwide [12]

40 <

2.5

79.0

2.0

Japanese

Japan

Tajimi Study [63]

40 ≤

3.9

92.3

3.6

Japanese

Japan

Kumejima Study [64]

40 ≤

4.0

82.1

3.3

Korean

Korea

Namil Study [65]

50 ≤

3.6

77.8

2.8

Chinese

China

Beijing Eye Study [66]

40–101

2.5
   

Chinese

China

Handan Eye Study [67]

30 <

1.2

90.0

1.0

Chinese

China

Liwan Study [68]

50–102

2.1

85.0

1.8

Chinese

Singapore

Tanjong Pagar Study [69]

40–79

1.2
   

Malay

Singapore

Singapore Malay Eye Survey [70]

40–80

2.5

84.6

2.7

Bengalese

Bangladesh

Bangladesh Study [71]

35 ≤

1.2
   

Thai

Thailand

(Rom Klao) [72]

50 ≤

2.3
   

Indian

India

Aravind Comprehensive Eye Survey [73]

40 ≤

1.2

75.0

0.9

Indian

India

Andhra Pradesh Eye Disease Study (rural) [14]

40 ≤

1.6

63.0

1.0

Indian

India

West Bengal Glaucoma Study [74]

50 ≤

3.4
   

Indian

India

Chennai Glaucoma Study (rural) [75]

40 <

1.6

67.2

1.1

Indian

India

Chennai Glaucoma Study (urban) [75]

40 ≤

3.5

82.0

2.9

Indian

Singapore

Singapore Indian Eye Study [76]

40

1.3

82.6

1.1

Burmese

Myanmar

Meiktila Eye Study [77]

50 ≤

2.0
   

Hispanic

USA

Proyecto VER [78]

40 <

2.0

80.0

1.6

Hispanic

USA

Los Angeles Latino Eye Study [79]

40 ≤

4.7

82.0

3.9

Hispanic

Spain

Segovia Study [80]

40–79

2.0
   

Multiethnic

South Africa

(Western Cape) [81]

40 ≤

1.5
   

Multiethnic

West Indies

Barbados Eye Study [82]

40–84

7.1
   

Black

West Indies

(St Lucia) [83]

30 ≤

8.8

36.0
 

Black

USA

Baltimore Eye Survey [54]

40 ≤

4.2
   

Black

Tanzania

(Kongwa District) [84]

40 ≤

3.1

75.0
 

Black

South Africa

(KwaZulu-Natal) [85]

40 ≤

2.8

57.1

1.6


1.4 Relationship Between Intraocular Pressure and Refraction


Needless to say, high intraocular pressure (IOP) is a definitive risk factor for POAG. As summarized in Table 1.3, the distribution of IOP values also differs among ethnic groups with African-American and Caucasian populations having relatively higher mean values. Unexpectedly, there is a paucity of information on the relationship between refraction and IOP. In two population-based studies performed by the Japan Glaucoma Society (Tajimi Study and Kumejima Study), higher myopia was associated significantly with higher IOP [10, 11], which also agreed with the results reported in a large Japanese study [12] and a population-based study performed in Northern China (Beijing Eye Study) [13].


Table 1.3
IOP: summary of previous population-based studies




































Ethnicity

Country

Study

Age range (years)

IOP

Caucasian

United Kingdom

(Hollows and Graham) [52]

40–74

15.9

Caucasian

Ireland

Roscommon Glaucoma Survey [53]

50 ≤

14.6

Caucasian

USA

Baltimore Eye Survey [86]

40 ≤

17.2

Caucasian

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Oct 28, 2016 | Posted by in OPHTHALMOLOGY | Comments Off on An Epidemiologic Perspective

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access