Technique for Prosthetic Closure of Large Nasal Septal Perforations
John F. Pallanch
INTRODUCTION
Prosthetic closure has been an option for over 60 years for patients with symptomatic nasal septal perforations who are not candidates for closure with native tissue. The latest refinement in sizing and fabrication using 3D imaging tools has further increased the number of individuals who can be helped. Comfortable retention of the prostheses has gone from 75% 30 years ago to over 90% today. This chapter describes the latest technique for prosthetic closure of large and irregular nasal septal perforations.
HISTORY
Patients with large nasal septal perforations complain of symptoms that include crusting, bleeding, whistling, nasal obstruction, pain, nasal discharge, and postnasal drainage. Patients who are candidates for prosthetic closure have the same range of etiologies as those who have closure of nasal septal perforations with native tissue. A history of previous nasal surgery that included the septum will often reveal that the perforation was noted subsequent to the surgery. Some patients may give a history of epistaxis that was treated by cautery prior to the development of the perforation. A common presentation is a patient who has had a history of years of crusting and removal of crusts with eventual development of the perforation. They may not admit to any intranasal self-removal of the crusts. The use of cocaine can lead to significant-sized septal perforations. Patients should be questioned about any systemic symptoms that might implicate vasculitidies such as granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA).
PHYSICAL EXAMINATION
The size and location of the perforation should be documented. A Q-tip handle that is marked with a finepointed pen at 1-mm increments can be used to measure the anterior-to-posterior dimension of the perforation. Any marked irregularities of the perforation should be noted, as well as any adhesions that would need to be opened. Successful prosthetic closure depends on having the potential of margins anteriorly, posteriorly, superiorly, and at least partially inferiorly. Septal deviations should be noted and described in the record.
The amount of crusting and dried blood is noted as is the presence of granulation or other abnormal tissue on the edges of the perforation. The condition of the adjacent turbinates is noted.
INDICATIONS
Closure of nasal septal perforations is only considered for patients whose perforations are causing a significant impact on their quality of life. Furthermore, they should be patients who either are not candidates for or choose to avoid surgical closure with native tissue.
The most common bothersome symptoms are crusting, bleeding, and nasal obstruction. If persistent crusting and crust removal are causing slow but persistent enlargement of the perforation, some patients proceed with placement of a prosthesis with the additional goal of protecting the edges of the perforation.
Patients who are not thought to be candidates for the general anesthetic required for surgical tissue closure can still be candidates for closure with a prosthesis.
CONTRAINDICATIONS
A patient who is too high a risk for general anesthesia or who is too anxious or apprehensive for an office procedure would not be an appropriate candidate for this technique. Patients with active GPA or other vasculitidies may have ongoing changes in the size of their perforation and are best treated when their condition is in remission.
Patients without adequate tissue margins to hold the prosthesis would not be candidates for prosthetic closure. There should be margins of tissue present circumferentially. I have been able to successfully close the perforations in two patients who had almost no margin along the floor of the nose in the midportion of the inferior part of the perforation, with the prosthesis inferior flanges splaying right and left along the floor of the nose.
PREOPERATIVE PLANNING
The perforation is cleaned and a decongestant applied just prior to obtaining the imaging for sizing. After the CT is done, the image data are reviewed by the specialist in biomedical imaging, and the block of data to be printed is demarcated and sent to the 3D printer. After the template of the perforation and adjacent anatomy is printed “life size,” it can be stabilized (or “fixed”) with cyanoacrylate. The template then goes to the Prosthetics Department where a prosthesis is fabricated that will exactly conform to the 3D shape of the perforation and adjacent anatomy. If the tissues had not been decongested prior to the CT, or if there is narrowing of the airway to begin with, the template can be shaved down a bit, just beyond the margin of the perforation so that the resultant prosthesis will have some “toe-in,” particularly anteriorly, and will thus hug the margin of the perforation.
If there are adhesions between the margin of the perforation and the adjacent turbinate, the surgeon “simulates” surgery by drilling away the adhesion on the template, exposing the edge of the perforation. When the CT has shown a bony rind that also needs to be opened in order for the flange of the prosthesis to fit, the template can be printed in two colors (e.g., with white for tissue and blue for bone). This allows the surgeon to identify structures such as the skull base when drilling the template to simulate the opening of the bone that will be done at the time of the actual surgery.
SURGICAL TECHNIQUE
Office versus OR Placement
The decision regarding placement in the office versus in the operating room with a brief general anesthesia is largely determined by the patient. Generally, smaller prostheses are easily placed at the office, but a very anxious and apprehensive patient is allowed the option of a brief procedure in the operating room. I prefer to do procedures in the operating room for patients who have a very large perforation (Fig. 5.1) with prostheses that will entail significant manipulation to pass through a small nostril or if there will be opening of adhesions (Fig. 5.2) or a bony capsule (Fig. 5.3) in order to expose some of the margins of the perforation. A general anesthetic also makes it much easier to remove and replace a large prosthesis for trimming, though 3D sizing has markedly reduced the need for any adjustment in the size of the flanges at the time of placement.
Description of Technique
In the office, anesthesia is provided with 0.5% phenylephrine mixed with 4% lidocaine as a spray and then applied to the mucosa with pledgets. If this does not provide adequate anesthesia, I use pledgets to apply 4% cocaine solution to the margins of the perforation. In the operating room, appropriate briefing, patient identification, patient consent, and protocol are followed for rhinologic procedures under general anesthesia. Oxymetazoline spray is used for decongestion of the tissues. Injection of the margins of the perforation that could cause bleeding is not necessary and is avoided. If crusting or dried blood is present on the margins of the perforation, cleaning is done using small pledgets with 1:2,000 epinephrine solution, which also provides further vasoconstriction. Pledgets can also be soaked in gentamicin or other antibiotic solution and used to clean the intranasal surfaces. Nasal irrigation with an antibiotic solution can also be done by the patient prior to an office placement or by the surgeon when the patient is under general anesthesia with a protected airway.
Get Clinical Tree app for offline access |