Small-Incision Lenticule Extraction



Small-Incision Lenticule Extraction


D. Rex Hamilton



Cornea refractive surgery began in the late 1970s and early 1980s with radial keratotomy (RK) and moved into the laser arena with the introduction of excimer laser (193 nm) ablation in the 1990s. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) in 1995 represented the first excimer laser technique for vision correction. The PRK procedure afforded many advantages over the incisional RK procedure: higher predictability, improved safety, and better longterm stability. While the technique is still used today, recovery time is quite long with PRK as the technique requires removal of the corneal epithelium, which must subsequently heal and stabilize. Patients can expect about a month before their vision stabilizes. Laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) was developed in the early 1990s with the FDA approval occurring in 1999. The stromal flap created as the first step of this procedure affords overnight recovery with outstanding vision on postoperative day 1. The second step of the procedure is the same as the PRK excimer ablation. The fast recovery, coupled with predictability, safety, and long-term stability equivalent to PRK, led to the ascension of LASIK as the procedure of choice for laser vision correction. To date, more than 40 million LASIK procedures have been performed worldwide.

Nevertheless, the penetration of laser vision correction amongst myopic patients throughout the world remains very low. In the United States, for example, in 2012, approximately 700,000 eyes were treated, representing only 1.2% of the population pool.1 Despite the outstanding safety record of LASIK, fear remains the major barrier to entry for the majority of potential vision correction candidates. These fears revolve around the existence of the flap, concerns over complications, and simply the concept of having laser surgery on one’s eyes.

The Small-Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE) procedure was developed in the late 2000s and utilizes a single femtosecond laser to create a lenticule-shaped piece of corneal stromal tissue, customized to a patient’s refractive correction. The laser also creates a small surface incision through which the lenticule is extracted without the creation of a flap. The SMILE procedure was FDA approved for spherical myopic treatments in October 2016. In March 2018, the procedure was approved for myopic astigmatic treatments. At the time of publication, SMILE is gaining popularity throughout the world with more than 4 million procedures
performed. SMILE may be an attractive alternative to LASIK for those patients fearful of laser surgery: no flap, no sound (excimer laser makes sound), no smell (odor of vaporized corneal tissue from excimer ablation), no pressure (negligible pressure associated with the VisuMax femtosecond laser), and shorter procedure time relative to LASIK. In addition, because there is no flap and the incision is so small, there are virtually no postoperative restrictions on lifestyle. There is also strong evidence that the severity and duration of dry eye symptoms is less with SMILE than LASIK.2,3




CONTRAINDICATIONS






INFORMED CONSENT CONSIDERATIONS


Informed consent should include a description of the procedure in plain language. For example, “A laser will be used to create a lens-shaped piece of tissue (lenticule) within the cornea (front window of the eye). This lenticule, customized to your prescription, will then be removed by your surgeon through a small surface incision, also created by the laser. By removing this lenticule, your cornea will be flatter and rounder, thus improving your vision without glasses or contact lenses.”

Potential alternative treatments, such as LASIK, PRK, phakic intraocular lens implantation, glasses, and contact lenses, should be listed.

A note from the counseling physician should be included and phrased similar to, “I have counseled this patient as to the nature of the proposed procedure, the attendant risks involved, and the expected results.” The patient’s and doctor’s name should be printed and signed with the date as well as with a witness (typically a staff member).


PREOPERATIVE CARE




As with all refractive surgical techniques, the manifest refraction is the cornerstone to a successful SMILE outcome. Consistency in refraction is critical and, therefore, it is desirable to have the same refractionist performing the measurements on all patients. Variations in refraction technique can account for differences in endpoints, which can lead to variability in outcomes. Binocular balance is important to reduce the possibility of postoperative anisometropia. Patients with spectacle- or contact lens-corrected vision rarely need to deal with anisometropia: the power of the spectacle lens or contact lens can be easily adjusted to bring both eyes to a plano endpoint. Since spectacle-/contact lens-corrected patients are not used to it, anisometropia following refractive surgery can be quite noticeable, particularly in the immediate postoperative period. Cycloplegic refraction is particularly important in younger patients who are susceptible to over-minusing. Care should be taken to identify amblyopia in patients with significant anisometropia, asymmetric astigmatism, and a history of strabismus. It is important to counsel amblyopic patients so that they understand the laser procedure cannot fix the “wiring of the eye to the brain”, which limits the ultimate visual acuity.


PROCEDURE AND SETTINGS

image Video 8.1 shows the key steps of the SMILE procedure. There are two components:



  • 1. Laser treatment


  • 2. Lenticule dissection and removal

The VisuMax laser has two microscopes (laser and operating) one for each of these steps (Figure 8.1).








Laser Treatment


Preparation of the Eye

Surgeon’s may choose to premedicate the patient with an oral anxiolytic agent such as alprazolam 0.5 mg. One drop of proparacaine is placed in each eye of the patient in the preoperative area. Once the patient is positioned on the laser bed, a second drop of proparacaine is placed and the patient is asked if there was any stinging. While it is obviously important to anesthetize the eye, it is also important not to use too much proparacaine as this loosens the corneal epithelium. Because there is some pressure placed on the posterior edge of the surface incision during lenticule dissection, epithelial sloughing can occur. If this occurs, there is some risk of introducing epithelium into the interface, which can lead to epithelial proliferation (much like epithelial ingrowth with LASIK).

The skin surrounding the eye is prepped with betadine swabs. A drop of antibiotic is placed in the eye. The lashes are draped and a lid speculum is placed.

The corneal surface is wiped clean using a Weck-Cel sponge soaked in sterile balanced salt solution (BSS). It is very important to confirm there is no material (e.g., mucous) on the cornea or the patient interface prior to docking. Any material trapped between the interface and the cornea can block the laser shots, resulting in “black spots,” which represent tissue that has not been cut by the laser, leading to inability to dissect the lenticule in that area.


Centration

In LASIK flap creation, the femtosecond laser is not performing the refractive correction. Thus, centration of the flap is important but not as critical as with SMILE where the laser
is performing the refractive correction. Consequently, care must be taken to properly center the suction ring on the visual axis. Certain diagnostic systems (e.g., Galilei G4 Tomography system, Ziemer USA) take pictures of the iris and pupil with the position of the visual axis within the pupil identified with crosshairs (Figure 8.2). This picture can be printed and taken to the laser suite and used as a reference during docking. By noting the position of the visual axis relative to the pupil through the laser microscope, the surgeon can ensure the eye is appropriately centered during the docking procedure.







Docking

The VisuMax patient interface features a curved applanation glass that only touches the cornea (Figure 8.3). The pressure associated with docking is minimal. It feels like putting a contact lens in the eye of the patient. With no conjunctival touch, there is no subconjunctival hemorrhage with the VisuMax that is commonly seen with other femtosecond lasers that grab onto the conjunctiva.


Laser Treatment

Figure 8.4 shows the tissue planes that define the SMILE lenticule and the opening incision. The posterior aspect of the lenticule is cut first with the laser spiraling in from the periphery. The optical zone is 6.5 mm in the United States. This zone can be decreased to 6.0 mm in sphere-only treatments to remove less tissue. The depth of the posterior aspect of the lenticule is defined by the amount of refractive correction. Next, the lenticule side cut is created, followed by the cap cut (anterior

aspect of lenticule and cap zone). The cap cut proceeds from the center and spirals outward. The diameter of the cap is 7.5 mm in the United States or 7.0 mm if the optical zone is decreased to 6.0 mm in a sphere-only treatment. The depth of the cap is set at 120 microns in the United States. Finally, the opening incision is made superiorly, centered on the 12 o’clock meridian, at the peripheral aspect of the cap cut. This cut up to the corneal surface is typically 60° wide in the United States but can be increased to 90°.