Role of Mitomycin-C in Keratorefractive Surgery



Role of Mitomycin-C in Keratorefractive Surgery


Parag A. Majmudar



Mitomycin-C (MMC) is an antibiotic derived from Streptomyces caespitosus, and its crosslinking properties enable it to bind to DNA and prevent replication. For that reason, this alkylating agent was originally used as a systemic chemotherapeutic agent. In a manner similar to the way in which MMC prevents replication of neoplastic cells, it can prevent fibroblastic proliferation as well. This property was recognized to be beneficial in prolonging the success of glaucoma filtration surgery, and its use in this capacity is commonplace. In addition, MMC has also proven to be helpful in the management of corneal intraepithelial neoplasia and pterygium. More recently, MMC has become increasingly accepted for use in refractive corneal surgery as a modulator of wound healing following excimer laser surface ablation.

A well-recognized, but perhaps poorly understood, complication of corneal surface ablation with the excimer laser is the development of corneal haze. Its incidence has fortunately diminished with the advent of more sophisticated excimer laser technology. The improved technology has allowed for a more homogeneous distribution of laser energy, which may result in smoother ablation of the corneal stroma and may prevent activation of stromal keratocytes. These activated keratocytes deposit ground substance and abnormal collagen, which is thought to cause clinically significant haze. Nonetheless, corneal haze is still seen following surface excimer laser procedures. Despite the initial promise of laserassisted subepithelial keratectomy (LASEK), haze can be seen following this procedure as well.

In 1991, Talamo et al.1 described an animal model of photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) haze and analyzed the effects of MMC on haze prevention. Their results showed that eyes treated with MMC developed significantly less corneal haze. Our group described the first human series of eyes to receive treatment with MMC for post-PRK corneal haze. In those
early cases, recurrent corneal haze resulted in severe visual disability and patients were contemplating corneal transplantation. We postulated that the antiproliferative effect of MMC on the activated stromal keratocytes might prevent further haze formation, and developed the protocol for the treatment of corneal haze following surface excimer laser ablation, which is widely accepted today.

Because MMC was successful in preventing recurrence of existing haze, the protocol was expanded for prophylactic use in patients predisposed to the development of corneal haze following primary surface ablation for high myopia, and surface ablation over irregular LASIK flaps, such as buttonholes. Although this application of MMC remains controversial, there is evidence that it can be safe and effective (See Videos 6 & 7).


▪ Treatment of Existing Corneal Haze with Mitomycin-C

The technique of superficial keratectomy with MMC for existing corneal haze is described in this section. It is important to note that MMC in no way eradicates corneal haze; rather, MMC prevents the stromal keratocytes from depositing additional scar. Therefore, it is imperative that the scar be completely removed. Two methods are used to remove scar tissue: mechanical debridement using a 64 Beaver blade or a diamond-dusted burr, like that used for pterygium removal and excimer laser phototherapeutic keratectomy (PTK). Both methods may work equally well. In either case, multiple intraoperative slit-lamp examinations may be required in order to gauge the efficacy and determine the end point of the keratectomy. When using PTK, care must be taken to vary the distribution of pulses throughout the corneal surface in order to reduce the likelihood of unwanted hyperopic shifts.

Once the scar has been removed, it is of the utmost importance to follow the protocol for MMC application meticulously in order to prevent potential complications. This begins with procurement of the medication. Significant deviation from the concentration and duration of exposure can lead to vision-threatening adverse events. Our protocol is to have MMC 0.2 mg/mL (0.02%) prepared by an independent compounding pharmacy in order to minimize errors in dilution. A common area of confusion is the unit of measure for the MMC; 0.02% is equivalent to 0.2 mg/mL, but there have been anecdotal case reports of 0.2% being used. This is 10 times the suggested concentration and results in severe endothelial toxicity.

Once the MMC has been correctly prepared, 1-mL aliquots may be frozen for several weeks until ready for use. The MMC is thawed prior to surgery and placed in an empty disposable contact lens well. Proper application of MMC to the corneal surface is best achieved by using a 6- to 8-mm circular Merocel sponge (Beaver-Visitec International, Inc., Waltham, MA), commonly used in the operating room to shield the retina from microscope-induced phototoxicity. The advantage of the corneal light shield over a spear is that the light shield achieves better contact with the corneal surface and, more importantly, prevents excess MMC from coming into contact with the limbus. Limiting the spread of MMC is critical in reducing potential postoperative complications. The corneal light shield is placed in the MMC solution at the beginning of the case and is left in the solution until needed.

During application of MMC, care should be taken to ensure that the shield is wet but not dripping with MMC. It is placed on the central cornea, and the surgeon must meticulously monitor the surface to prevent MMC from coming into contact with the limbus and conjunctiva. The duration of exposure is exactly 2 minutes. After the allotted exposure time, the MMC-soaked sponge is carefully removed and discarded, a cellulose sponge is used to remove any excess MMC left on the cornea, and the surface of the eye is vigorously irrigated with 30 mL of balanced salt solution. These steps remove excess MMC from the corneal stroma, and will also help to minimize potential complications.

Typical post-keratorefractive surgery medications are administered—topical antibiotics, corticosteroids, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents—and a therapeutic bandage contact lens is placed. The cornea is carefully
monitored for reepithelialization, which typically occurs in 3 to 5 days. The patient should be forewarned that visual recovery may be slow, and that the final refractive error is difficult to predict. The possibility of the future need for refractive treatment should be explained.

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Jun 5, 2016 | Posted by in OPHTHALMOLOGY | Comments Off on Role of Mitomycin-C in Keratorefractive Surgery

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access