Post-Vitrectomy Endophthalmitis


Authors

Year

Case occurrence

Incidence

Ho and Tolentino [2]

1984

4/2817

0.14%

Cohen et al. [4]

1995

18/12,216

0.15%

Aaberg et al. [3]

1998

3/6557

0.04%

Zhang et al. [5]

2003

3/7000

0.04%

Eifrig et al. [6]

2004

6/15,326

0.03%

Sakamoto et al. [7]

2004

1/1886

0.05%

Joondeph et al. [8]

2005

5/10,397

0.04%

Mollan et al. [9]

2009

2/5278

0.03%

Chen et al. [10]

2009

1/3046

0.03%

Scott et al. [11]

2011

1/4403

0.02%




Table 15.2
Incidence of endophthalmitis in transconjunctival sutureless vitrectomies [10, 11, 1318]






















































Authors

Year

Case occurrence

Incidence

Shaikh et al. [14]

2007

2/129

1.55%

Kunimoto and Kaiser [13]

2007

1/443

0.22%

Scott et al. [15]

2008

1/119

0.84%

Shimada et al. [16]

2008

1/3343

0.03%

Chen et al. [10]

2009

1/431

0.23%

Hu et al. [17]

2009

1/1424

0.07%

Scott et al. [11]

2011

2/4151

0.04%

Mutoh et al. [18]

2012

4/502

0.79%



Predisposing Factors


Inadequate wound closure and subsequent hypotony were proposed as a possible risk factor in the first study reporting endophthalmitis following sutureless vitrectomy [12]. The sclerotomy leakage and hypotony would allow ingress of microorganisms from the ocular surface into the eye. Studies conducted on port site dynamics have shown that there is a definite risk of ingress of material from the ocular surface into the eye in sutureless ports as compared to those that have been sutured [1922].

Endoscopic evaluation of autopsied vitrectomized eyes has shown that vitreous is often incarcerated at the port sites [23, 24]. This incarcerated vitreous can prolapse out of the wound and rest in the sub-conjunctival space especially following sutureless PPV. The microorganisms can potentially migrate along the vitreous blob into the intraocular space predisposing the eye to endophthalmitis.

The type of intraocular tamponade can also have a bearing on the risk of endophthalmitis. This is because of differential surface tension properties. As silicone oil or gas has a greater surface tension than water, both oil and gas are better tamponading agents than balanced salt solution (BSS). The risk of wound leakage is thus lesser when the tamponading agent is either gas or oil as against BSS. In a retrospective series, we have shown that the odds of post-vitrectomy endophthalmitis is 8.2 when the final tamponading agent is BSS as opposed to oil or gas [25].

Vitreous contamination by microorganisms has also been proposed as a risk factor for endophthalmitis. It has been shown that the vitreous contamination is significantly higher in sutureless transconjunctival PPV as compared to 20G PPV [26, 27]. The lesser risk of the instrument contamination in 20G surgeries was attributed to a lesser contact of the 20G instruments with the conjunctival surface. Surgeon learning curve can also increase the risk of endophthalmitis, particularly at the transition phase of the surgeon from sutured to sutureless PPV [28].


Clinical Features


The clinical features in post-PPV endophthalmitis are very similar to those seen in post-cataract surgery endophthalmitis. Most presentations are very acute with patients largely presenting within 48 h of the surgery with pain, redness, watering, and decreased vision. In the largest cohort of these cases, we have shown that the median time interval between vitreous surgery and the onset of endophthalmitis is 1.5 days [25]. Most cases do not have a favorable final visual outcome due to the underlying primary retinal disease.


Microbiology


The overall culture positivity in post-PPV endophthalmitis has been quite varied over the years. Nearly 50% of cultures across studies are culture positive. The commonest organism is coagulase-negative Staphylococci [2933] (Table 15.3).


Table 15.3
Culture positivity rates in endophthalmitis after pars plana vitrectomy [46, 811, 15, 16, 18, 25, 29]














































































Author

Year

Culture positivity rate

Number of culture positive cases

Predominant organism

Cohen et al. [4]

1995

89%

16/18

CNS

Aaberg et al. [5]

1998

100%

3/3

CNS

Eifrig et al. [6]

2004

83%

5/6

Staphylococcus aureus

Joondeph et al. [8]

2005

100%

5/5

CNS

Abi-Ayad et al. [29]

2007

29%

4/14

CNS

Scott et al. [15]

2008

100%

1/1

CNS

Shimada et al. [16]

2008

100%

2/2

MRSA, E. faecalis

Chen et al. [10]

2009

50%

1/2

Staphylococcus aureus

Mollan et al. [9]

2009

0%


None

Scott et al. [11]

2011

50%

2/3

Coagulase-negative Staphylococci

Mutoh et al. [18]

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Mar 1, 2018 | Posted by in OPHTHALMOLOGY | Comments Off on Post-Vitrectomy Endophthalmitis

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access