Phonosurgery: Transoral Endoscopic Techniques



Fig. 10.1
The optimal injection site for Vox Implants is the deep paraglottic space, between the thyroarytenoid muscle and the inner perichondrium of the thyroid cartilage



A322408_1_En_10_Fig2_HTML.jpg


Fig. 10.2
Microlaryngoscopic view of the augmentation process (Vox Implants)


A322408_1_En_10_Fig3_HTML.jpg


Fig. 10.3
Left recurrent nerve palsy with glottic gap, preoperative videostroboscopic view


A322408_1_En_10_Fig4_HTML.jpg


Fig. 10.4
Same patient as in Fig. 10.3, 6 weeks post injection: note complete glottic closure


Animal studies show an excellent biocompatibility of PDMS particles [45]. Hypersensitivity is not an issue for subcutaneously located PDMS elastomers, neither in animals nor in humans [46], so skin testing is not required prior to injection. Particle size prevents the material from being phagocytosed. Hence, it does not serve as an antigen.

Several studies show favourable results in terms of voice restoration (Videos 10.4, 10.5, 10.6, and 10.7) similar to thyroplasty [1, 4750]. PDMS particles provide a long-term augmentation with documented follow-up of 6 years in average [51]. Substance-associated complications seem to be a rare exception and can be difficult to separate from adverse findings as a consequence of malpositioning, i.e. by injecting to superficial, which may happen more frequently. As a last resort, surgical removal of displaced PDMS particles is technically feasible to a certain degree, though a marked stiffness of the erroneously injected subepithelial space cannot be restored completely [52, 53].

In the group of permanent, non-resorbable substances, longevity, safety and efficacy in terms of voice improvement are best documented for PDMS particles. Therefore, Vox Implants™ are most suitable for deep injection laryngoplasty addressing mild to moderate glottic insufficiency in unilateral vocal fold paralysis. Thus, PDMS particles are offering a true alternative to open thyroplasty for patients preferring an endoscopic approach.

Calcium hydroxylapatite (CaHA) is a calcium phosphorus compound found as basic component in the bone and teeth. There is a commercially available material consisting of CaHA microspheres and a carrier gel marketed under the brand name Radiesse that can be injected through a fine needle (25–27 gauge). Once injected, the carrier gel is replaced by fibrosis with the CaHA microspheres remaining in place.

The substance has been studied in both animal and human studies. In an in vivo canine vocal fold model, it has been shown that CaHA injection provided adequate medialization of the canine vocal fold up to 12 months follow-up without migration or resorption and a giant cell reaction without appreciable chronic inflammation [54]. A recent multi-institutional clinical trial revealed excellent results of 80% improvement at 12-month follow-up Rosen 2009 [55]. It is intended as a permanent implant, but resorption occurs to some degree. There are data [56] on longevity showing a loss of benefit in 64% of patients, with an average length of benefit of 18, 6 months (ranging from 8 to 36 months). Therefore, Radiesse is more appropriately labelled as slowly resorbable than non-resorbable. In many aspects similar to collagen, CaHA can be used for the same indications; also the technical process of injection is basically identical. Versatility and ease of use have made it a very popular substance for injection laryngoplasty in the office as well as in the operating room.

There is FDA approval for potentially long-term vocal fold injection. Nevertheless, some substance-associated complications have been described [57, 58]. Voice results seem to be well comparable to those accomplished using thyroplasty type I [59].



References



1.

Koelmel JC, Sittel C. Stimm- und Lebensqualitat nach Injektionslaryngoplastik mit VOX-Implants(R) (Polydimethylsiloxan). Laryngorhinootologie. 2014;93(5):316–20.CrossrefPubMed


2.

Brünings W. Über eine neue Behandlungsmethode der Rekurrenslähmung. Ver Deutsch Laryng. 1911;18:58.


3.

Rubin HJ. Misadventures with injectable polytef (Teflon). Arch Otolaryngol. 1975;101(2):114–6.CrossrefPubMed


4.

Varvares MA, Montgomery WW, Hillman RE. Teflon granuloma of the larynx: etiology, pathophysiology, and management. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1995;104(7):511–5.CrossrefPubMed


5.

O’Leary MA, Grillone GA. Injection laryngoplasty. Otolaryngol Clin N Am. 2006;39(1):43–54.Crossref


6.

Hillel AT, Ochsner MC, Johns MM III, Klein AM. A cost and time analysis of laryngology procedures in the endoscopy suite versus the operating room. Laryngoscope. 2016;126(6):1385–9.CrossrefPubMed


7.

Ford CN, Roy N, Sandage M, Bless DM. Rigid endoscopy for monitoring indirect vocal fold injection. Laryngoscope. 1998;108(10):1584–6.CrossrefPubMed


8.

Bove MJ, Jabbour N, Krishna P, Flaherty K, Saul M, Wunar R, et al. Operating room versus office-based injection laryngoplasty: a comparative analysis of reimbursement. Laryngoscope. 2007;117(2):226–30.CrossrefPubMed


9.

Mathison CC, Villari CR, Klein AM, Johns MM III. Comparison of outcomes and complications between awake and asleep injection laryngoplasty: a case-control study. Laryngoscope. 2009;119(7):1417–23.CrossrefPubMed


10.

Clary MS, Milam BM, Courey MS. Office-based vocal fold injection with the laryngeal introducer technique. Laryngoscope. 2014;124(9):2114–7.CrossrefPubMed


11.

Mayerhoff RM, Kuo C, Meyer T. A novel approach to the challenging injection laryngoplasty. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2016;125(5):415–20.CrossrefPubMed


12.

Sardesai MG, Merati AL, Hu A, Birkent H. Impact of patient-related factors on the outcomes of office-based injection laryngoplasty. Laryngoscope. 2016;126(8):1806–9.CrossrefPubMed


13.

Hoffman H, McCabe D, McCulloch T, Jin SM, Karnell M. Laryngeal collagen injection as an adjunct to medialization laryngoplasty. Laryngoscope. 2002;112(8 Pt 1):1407–13.CrossrefPubMed


14.

Verma SP, Dailey SH. Office-based injection laryngoplasty for the management of unilateral vocal fold paralysis. J Voice. 2014;28(3):382–6.CrossrefPubMed

Jan 1, 2018 | Posted by in OTOLARYNGOLOGY | Comments Off on Phonosurgery: Transoral Endoscopic Techniques

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access