Optimization of Toric IOL Calculation


Toric IOL calculators

Web site

Alcon, AcrySof toric


Abbott Medical Optics, Tecnis


Bausch + Lomb, Trulign Toric IOL


HumanOptics, Torica-aA


Barrett Toric Calculator





Table 4.2
Baylor toric IOL nomogram

A325183_1_En_4_Tab2_HTML.gif


WTR with-the-rule astigmatism, ATR against-the-rule astigmatism, D diopter, PCRI peripheral corneal relaxing incision

WTR ↑ 0.7 D. ATR ↓ 0.7 D

Values in the tables are the vector sum of the anterior corneal and surgically induced astigmatism. Examples: (1) If the cornea has 3.70 D WTR and surgically induced astigmatism is 0.20 D WTR, use the value of 3.9 D to select IOL toricity. (2) If the cornea has 1.90 D ATR and surgically induced astigmatism is 0.20 D WTR, use the value of 1.70 D to select IOL toricity

aEspecially if spectacles have more ATR




4.6 Current Toric IOL Models


Currently available are 11 monofocal toric IOL models, five of which are FDA approved (Table 4.3), and four multifocal toric IOL models, one of which is FDA approved (Table 4.4). There are a variety of IOL biomaterials including silicone (Staar toric), hydrophobic acrylic (AcrySof toric), hydrophilic acrylic (Rayner T-flex) and polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) components (Hoya iSert toric). The type of lens material has been shown to influence the postoperative rotational stability of the lens. After implantation of the IOL, it is thought that the anterior and posterior capsules fuse with the IOL, creating adhesions that prevent rotation of the IOL [35, 36]. Additionally, different IOL materials may have differing affinities to proteins in the capsular bag. Fibronectin, in particular, has been reported to play a significant part in the formation of IOL-capsular bag adhesions [37]. Acrylic IOLs explanted from human autopsy eyes have been shown to contain significantly more fibronectin than silicone or PMMA IOLs, suggesting that acrylic lenses may form stronger adhesions with the capsule [37]. Lombardo et al. also found that the highest adhesive properties were demonstrated by hydrophobic acrylic IOLs, followed by hydrophilic acrylic, PMMA, and lastly silicone IOLs [35].


Table 4.3
Currently available monofocal toric IOLs












































































































































































Toric IOL

Material

IOL design

IOL diameter (mm)

Aspheric

Model

Spherical power (D)

Cylinder power (D)

Incision size (mm)

Marks

A-constant

Staar (Staar Surgical, Monrovia, Ca)a

Silicone

Plate haptic

10.8/11.2

+

AA4203-TF

AA4203-TL

21.5–28.5 (0.5 D steps)

9.5–23.5 (0.5 D steps)

2.0 or 3.5

3.0

Two hash optic periphery

118.5b

AcrySof Toric (Alcon Labs, Fort Worth, Tx)a

Hydrophobic acrylic

Loop haptic

13.0

+

SN6AT3 to T9

+6.0–+30.0 (0.5 D steps)

1.50

2.25

3.00

3.75

4.50

5.25

6.00

2.2

Three dots optic periphery

119.0b

AMO Tecnis (Abbott Medical Optics, Santa Ana, CA)a

Hydrophobic acrylic

Loop haptic

13.0

+

ZCT 150

ZCT 225

ZCT 300

ZCT 400

+5.0–+34.0

1.50

2.25

3.00

4.00

2.2

Four dots optic periphery

119.3b

Trulign Toric IOL (Bausch + Lomb, Aliso Viejo, CA)a

Silicone (plate)/polyimide (haptic)

Plate/loop Haptic

11.5

+

BL1UT

10.0–29.0 (0.50 D steps)

1.25

2.00

2.75

2.85


119.1b

iSert Toric (Hoya Surgical Optics)a

Hydrophobic acrylic (optic)/PMMA (haptic)

Loop haptic

12.5

+

351 T3 to T9

+6.0–+30.0 (0.5 D steps)

1.5–6.0 (0.75 D steps)

2.2


118.4b

T-flex (Rayner)

Hydrophilic acrylic

Loop haptic

12.0/12.5

+

573 T

623 T

−10.0–+35.0 (0.5 D steps)

1.0–11.0 (0.50 D steps)

<2.0


118.9b

Lentis Tplus (Oculentis/Topcon)

Hydrophilic acrylic with hydrophobic surface

Plate/loop Haptic

11.0

+

LS-313 T1

LS-313 T2

LS-313 T3

LS-313 T4

LS-313 T5

LS-313 T6

+10.0–+30.0 (0.5 D steps)

1.50

2.25

3.00

3.75

4.50

5.25

2.6


118.0b

Torica-aA (HumanOptics, Germany)

Hydrophilic acrylic

Loop haptic

12.5

+

MC6125 T

−10.0–35.0 (0.5 D steps)

1.0–15.0 (0.5 steps)

3.4

Two lines optic periphery

118.4b

AT Torbi (Carl Zeiss Meditec)

Hydrophilic acrylic/hydrophobic surface

Plate haptic

11.0

+

709MP

709 M

−10.0–+24.0 (0.5 D steps)

−10.0–+32.0 (0.5 D steps)

1.0–4.0 (0.5 D steps)

1.0–12.0 (0.5 D steps)

1.8

1.5


118.3b

Morcher 89A (Morcher GmbH)

Hydrophilic acrylic

Bag-in-the-lens

7.5


89A

+10.0–30.0 (0.5 steps)

0.5–8.0 (0.5 steps)

2.5


118.2b

Light-adjustable lens (Calhoun Vision, Pasadena, CA)

Silicone with PMMA haptics

Loop haptic

13.0

+


+17.0–+24.0

0.75–2.0

3.0



VisTor (Hanita lenses)

Hydrophilic acrylic

Plate haptic

11.0

+


+16.5–30.0 (0.5 D steps)

1.0–6.0 (0.5 D steps)

1.8

Two dots + a line optic periphery



aFDA approved

bEstimates only



Table 4.4
Currently available multifocal toric IOLs










































































Toric IOL

Material

IOL design

IOL diameter (mm)

Aspheric

Multifocal technology

Model

Spherical power (D)

Cylinder power (D)

Near addition (D)

Incision size (mm)

A-constant

AcrySof IQ ReSTOR Toric (Alcon Labs, Fort Worth, TX)a

Hydrophobic acrylic

Loop haptic

13.0

+

Diffractive + refractive

SND1T2-T5

+6.0–+34.0

1.0–3.0

+3.0

2.2

118.9b

M-flex T (Rayner)

Hydrophilic acrylic

Loop haptic

12.0

12.50

+

Refractive

588F

688F

+14.0–+32.0 (0.5 D steps)

1.0–6.0 (0.5 D steps)

+3.0

+4.0

<2.0

118.6b

AT Lisa Toric (Carl Zeiss Meditec)

Hydrophilic acrylic with hydrophobic surface

Plate haptic

11.0

+

Diffractive

939MP

−10.0–+32.0 (0.5 D steps)

1.0–12.0 (0.5 steps)

+3.75

<2.0

118.8b

Lentis Mplus Toric (Oculentis/Topcon)

Hydrophilic acrylic with hydrophobic surface

Plate optics/haptic

11.0

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Feb 4, 2018 | Posted by in OPHTHALMOLOGY | Comments Off on Optimization of Toric IOL Calculation

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access