Globe perforation
Retrobulbar hemorrhage
Chemosis and subconjunctival hemorrhage
Injury to the optic nerve
Injury to extraocular muscles
Drug allergy
Globe perforation – Globe perforation is a dreaded complication of peri-/retrobulbar anesthesia. This complication can occur in any eye, but the risk is high in patients of high myopia associated with an increased axial length, post scleral buckle surgery, uncooperative patients, and improper technique in the hands on an inexperienced anesthetist [16]. The risk of globe perforation is variable and has been reported to be from 1 in 1000 to 1 in 10,000, with the risk of perforation increasing from 10 to 25 times in eyes with axial lengths of >26.00 mm [17]. This complication manifests with sudden severe pain accompanied either by a very high or low intraocular pressure, poor red reflex, subretinal hemorrhage, vitreous hemorrhage, or rhegmatogenous retinal detachment [18].
Retrobulbar hemorrhage – The reported incidence varies from 0.4 to 1.7 %. It necessitates rescheduling of the surgery. The eventual visual outcomes are, however, comparable to an uncomplicated case [19–21].
Chemosis and subconjunctival hemorrhage – These are rather common complications after periocular anesthesia. They are more frequently encountered after peribulbar anesthesia due to anterior spread of anesthetic agent and bleeding from episcleral or conjunctival vessels secondary to needle injury [21, 22]. These complications do not need any treatment except patient reassurance.
Injury to the optic nerve – Injury to optic nerve is a rare but possible complication of peri- and retrobulbar anesthesia. It occurs due to direct needle injury, secondary to hemorrhage or pressure necrosis from accumulation of local anesthetic agent within and around the nerve [22]. Some anatomic studies have found that the risk of optic nerve injury is highest with orbits smaller than 45 mm [23]. In such situations, it is recommend to use shorter needles of lesser than 31 mm. In addition, the anesthesia must be administered while patient looks in the primary gaze. These suggestions were also validated in CT and MRI studies [24, 25]. In a recent audit of regional ocular anesthesia, needle-related injuries were not found to be linked to axial length and needle length [26].
Injury to extraocular muscles – Injury to the extraocular muscles during periocular anesthesia may occur due to direct needle injury, ischemic necrosis from the volume of anesthetic agent, or its toxicity [27]. The extraocular muscle injury primarily manifests as strabismus or ptosis. One must keep in mind that the injury to extraocular muscles can also occur during the actual surgical procedure. In addition, cataract surgery can unmask a prior latent strabismus. Ptosis may occur due to mechanical damage to levator muscle secondary to insertion of tight speculum or to the placement of the bridle suture [28].
Drug allergy – Allergic responses to local anesthetics are rare but can occur. If a history of allergy to lidocaine or any anesthetic drug is reported, a prior patch testing is recommended [29]. Postanesthetic allergic reaction – The enzyme hyaluronidase has also been attributed to allergic reactions [30]. Further, allergy-like response can also occur due to anxiety or vasovagal response during the procedure [31].
Anterior Segment Complications
We will be discussing intraoperative anterior segment complications (Table 12.2) of this surgery under the following broad categories:
Table 12.2
Anterior segment complications
Wound-related complications | Irregular ragged incision Premature entry Button holing Detachment of scleral spur and tunnel bleed |
Intraoperative bleeding | |
Corneal complications | Descemet’s membrane (DM) detachment |
Corneal edema or striate keratopathy | |
Capsulorhexis-related complications | Rhexis run out, capsular tear Zonulodialysis |
Complications during nucleus delivery through scleral tunnel incision | Iris prolapse Iridodialysis Nucleus drop |
Complications during cortical aspiration | Posterior capsular tear Zonulodialysis |
IOL-related complications | Decentration Dislocation UGH syndrome |
1.
Complications related to construction of scleral tunnel incision
2.
Complications during prolapse of nucleus through capsulorhexis
3.
Complications during extraction of nucleus out of anterior chamber
4.
Complications during cortical aspiration
5.
Complications during placement of IOL
Complications Related to Construction of Scleral Tunnel Incision
Construction of a self-sealing scleral tunnel incision is the cornerstone of MSICS [32]. A poorly constructed wound not only leads to loss of wound integrity but also provides ingress to microorganisms into the eye. The following complications may occur during construction of scleral tunnel incision:
Irregular or ragged incision – due to poor blade quality, surgeon inexperience, deep-set eyes, or improper dissection of the tenon’s capsule at the site of the incision.
Button holing of the scleral tunnel – Ideally the plane of sclera tunnel dissection should be mid stromal. A superficial dissection can result in scleral buttonhole with the loss of self-sealing character. Thinner flap and button hole of the superficial scleral flap can also occur while making back-cuts. To prevent these complications, it is important to start scleral dissection at a right depth and keep blade in the same plane as well as parallel to sclera. However, in the event of buttonhole, surgeons can either start fresh dissection at a deeper plane or suture the wound at the end of the surgery.
Premature entry – If the plane of dissection is too deep, one can inadvertently enter into anterior chamber prior to the completion of dissection of the tunnel. This in turn results in loss of self-sealing character of the wound and wound leak. All such wounds must be carefully examined at the conclusion of the surgery. If the wound is not watertight, one must not hesitate to apply sutures.
Intraoperative bleeding – The MSICS surgery can get complicated by excessive intraoperative bleeding from the anterior perforating vessels or injury to uveal tissues. If not managed properly, it can also result into postoperative hyphema. It is, therefore, important to identify anterior perforating vessels and cauterize these at point of scleral entry. Similarly, one must ensure to avoid uveal tissue injury during wound construction. Excessive intraoperative bleeding can be managed by air tamponade.
Detachment of scleral spur – Inappropriate dissection of scleral tunnel can lead to a localized detachment of the scleral spur which in turn leads to wound gape, wound leak, and high surgically induced astigmatism.
Complications During Prolapse of Nucleus Through Capsulorhexis
We all are aware of the advantages of continuous curvilinear capsulorhexis [33, 34]. Classical MSICS incorporates capsulorhexis as one of the important steps of the surgery. However, surgeons need to understand a fundamental difference in the influence of capsulorhexis for phacoemulsification and MSICS. In the former, nucleotomy is performed within the capsular bag, while in the latter, the intact lens nucleus is delivered out through the capsulorhexis before being delivered out of the eye.
Although anterior lens capsule has good elasticity and tensile strength [34, 35], delivering a large nucleus through a small capsulorhexis can put a lot of stress on lens zonules or posterior capsule with its attended complications such as:
Failure to deliver nucleus
Zonular dialysis
Tear in capsulorhexis with consequent extension
Posterior capsular dehiscence
Complications During Nucleus Delivery Through Sclera Tunnel Incision
Nucleus delivery in MSICS involves engaging nucleus in the internal wound of the scleral tunnel followed by delivery out of the eye by applying pressure on the posterior lip of the external wound. The delivery is facilitated by raised intraocular pressure facilitated by irrigation fluid from anterior chamber maintainer. The success of the procedure depends on the appropriateness of the scleral tunnel [36].
If the wound is not constructed properly, it can result in:
Iris prolapse
Iridodialysis
Hyphema
Failed delivery
Posterior capsular tear: If the sheet glide or irrigating vectis is used to facilitate nucleus delivery, then sudden shallowing of anterior chamber can result in posterior capsular tear.
Endothelial injury: Difficult nucleus delivery can also result in endothelial injury and even DM detachment.
Injury to iris tissue: Can occur from repeated prolapse and reposition or handling of iris. In cases where the iris is flabby and liable to chaffing with repeated episodes of iris extrusion out of the wound, suturing the wound is a good treatment option.
Complications During Cortical Aspiration
Cortical aspiration is carried out by a single-port aspiration cannula and is facilitated by anterior chamber maintainer. In contrast to phacoemulsification where aspiration pressure is generated by machine, in MSICS cortical aspiration is facilitated by suction of syringe attached to single-port cannula and therefore suffers from disadvantages of being less efficient and less regulated. The following complications can occur during this surgical step:
Posterior capsular tear or zonular dialysis: This can occur from inadvertently capturing posterior capsule. Management strategies for posterior capsular tear are similar to any other form of extracapsular cataract extraction. It is important to avoid repeated collapse of anterior chamber to avoid extension of the rent and minimize vitreous loss. A good vitrectomy with automated vitrector is necessary. Intraocular lens management is also same as with any other cataract surgery including the selection of intraocular lens, site of placement, and type of fixation. One must ensure that the lens is stable at the end of surgery and the anterior chamber is free of any vitreous strands.
Incomplete cortical clean-up: Especially the cortical matter present near equator of the capsular bag. Less efficient aspiration system combined with fluid pressure of anterior chamber maintainer is responsible for this complication.
Complications During Placement of IOL
Intraocular lens-related complications are same as with any extracapsular cataract surgery procedure. These are primarily related to asymmetric placement of IOL or wrong choice or selection of IOL and includes:
(a)
Decentration
(b)
Dislocation
(c)
Uveitis glaucoma hyphema syndrome
In addition to the above complications, MSICS can be complicated by the following corneal complications:
Descemet’s membrane (DM) detachment – Compared to phacoemulsification, DM detachment is a relatively more common complication of MSICS. This higher predisposition is due to a larger area of dissection at the main wound and multiple side ports. The detachment can occur at the site of the main wound or side ports including the one used for inserting anterior chamber maintainer. The use of blunt instruments is a potential risk factor for DM detachment. Inserting anterior chamber maintainer while keeping irrigation fluid on can also result in DM detachment. The size of DM detachment varies depending upon the surgical step, time of its identification, and subsequent interventions. If goes unrecognized, it will result in severe postoperative edema depending on the size and location of the detachment. If recognized early, avoiding anterior chamber entry from the affected site will help limit the detachment. To facilitate reattachment, one can fill anterior chamber with air or perfluoropropane gas(C3F8) [37, 38]. Our experience suggests that air descemetopexy is safer and as effective as using C3F8 gas [37, 38].
Corneal edema or striate keratopathy – The rates of endothelial cell loss between various techniques of extracapsular cataract extraction has been comparable [39, 40]. The incidence of postoperative corneal edema following MSICS surgery is no different than in phacoemulsification. However, one can encounter this complication in the following clinical scenarios: (a) preoperative compromised corneal endothelium (b) Excessive endothelial cell loss from poor wound, repeated iris prolapse or difficult nucleus delivery. Corneal edema characteristically is most severe in the immediate postoperative period and clears gradually over a period of time without any special interventions. However, if the degree of endothelial injury is severe, the edema might not clear completely requiring endothelial replacement for the restoration of vision [41].
Posterior Segment Complications
Important posterior segment complications (Table 12.3) associated with MSICS are:
Table 12.3
Posterior segment complications
Endophthalmitis |
Expulsive hemorrhage |
Vitreous hemorrhage |
Choroidal detachment |
Retinal detachment |
Cystoid macular edema |
Endophthalmitis – Like any other cataract surgery, MSICS is also associated with the risk of endophthalmitis. The rate of endophthalmitis is variable and depends on the aseptic protocols, intraoperative complications, and surgeons’ experience with the procedure [42]. A recent paper reported the incidence of endophthalmitis following MSICS (0.04 %) from a large sample size and with diverse groups of surgeons and found rates to be comparable to phacoemulsification surgery [43]. A variety of microorganisms are reported to cause endophthalmitis, but like phacoemulsification, Gram-positive microorganisms are the most common etiological agents of endophthalmitis following MSICS [44]. A good preoperative evaluation, proper wound construction and closure, and strict asepsis will go a long way in preventing this complication.Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel
Full access? Get Clinical Tree