Treatment
Advantages/disadvantages
Literature support
Systemic risk factor modification
Glycemic control
Decreases morbidity from retinopathy, nephropathy, and neuropathy
Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT)
UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD)
Increased risk of hypoglycemic events
Blood pressure control
Decreased risk of heart attack
Wisconsin Epidemiological Study of Diabetic Retinopathy (WESDR)
Renin-Angiotensin System (RAS)
Decreased risk of retinopathy progression
Diabetic Retinopathy Candesartan Trials (DIRECT) European Controlled Trial of Lisinopril in Insulin-Dependent Diabetes (EUCLID)
Lipid-lowering agents
Decreased risk of retinopathy progression, DME, and cardiovascular disease
Fenofibrate Intervention and Event Lowering in Diabetes (FIELD)
Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD)
Topical Therapy
NSAID and steroid eye drops
Low risk of treatment
Uncontrolled, retrospective studies
Ease of delivery
Intravitreal Injection
Anti-VEGF agents
Greatest improvement in visual-acuity and anatomic outcomes
RESTORE study
BOLT study
VISTA-DME and VIVID-DME trials
Need for frequent visits and repeated treatments, risk of infection, unknown long-term systemic side effects
Steroids
Improvement in visual-acuity and anatomic outcomes
MEAD study
BEVORDEX study
Fluocinolone Acetonide for Diabetic Macular Edema (FAME) A and B studies
May help cases poorly responsive to anti-VEGF
Risk of cataract and glaucoma progression
Systemic Control [10, 11]
The primary goals of systemic intervention are to prevent the development of diabetic retinopathy/DME and to reduce vision loss in patients with existing retinopathy/DME. The mainstays of systemic control are blood sugar and blood pressure control. More recently, therapies targeting the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) and lipid-lowering agents have been investigated. Improvement in systemic risk factors alone can significantly decrease the risk of vision loss from DME.
Glycemic Control
The most effective systemic intervention to prevent the progression of diabetic retinopathy is improved glycemic control seen by a lowering of glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c). This was established by the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT) in type 1 diabetics and the UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) in type 2 diabetics. Both studies showed intensive glycemic control reduced the incidence and progression of diabetic retinopathy.
Not surprisingly, intensive glycemic control is associated with an increased risk of hypoglycemic events. Additionally, the Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD) trial was stopped because an increase in all-cause mortality was identified in patients whose glucose was extremely tightly controlled with insulin and multiple oral agents. The validity of this association has been questioned, but nonetheless it is important to be cognizant of the potential risk.
Optimal metabolic control in both type 1 and type 2 diabetics may be very difficult to achieve. Various interventions to improve patient education such as nurse education and group therapy sessions have been shown to improve HbA1c levels. Since diabetes is a chronic condition, it is imperative that patients have a thorough understanding of their illness which facilitates better compliance with medical therapies.
The American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes provided a consensus statement in 2009 which provided guidance for a treatment algorithm for type 2 diabetes. The guidelines emphasized a goal HbA1c <7.0 %, initial therapy with lifestyle modifications and metformin, rapid addition of additional oral agents if glycemic goals are not achieved or sustained, and early addition of insulin therapy in patients who do not meet goals with oral medications. Based on these guidelines and results of clinical studies, it is fundamental for ophthalmologists to review their patients’ HbA1c and emphasize the importance of metabolic control at each visit.
Blood Pressure Control
Hypertension has been shown to be a major risk factor for DME in studies such as the Wisconsin Epidemiological Study of Diabetic Retinopathy (WESDR). The WESDR found that higher diastolic blood pressure increased the risk of progression of diabetic retinopathy over a 4-year period. Furthermore, the UKPDS demonstrated that improved control of systolic blood pressure reduced the need for laser treatment of diabetic retinopathy in patients with type 2 diabetes. Based on these and other studies, the American Diabetes Association recommends a target blood pressure of less than 130/80 mmHg for patients with diabetes.
Renin-Angiotensin System Inhibition
The renin-angiotensin system (RAS) in the eye is activated by chronic hyperglycemia which leads to overexpression of AII. As mentioned previously, AII induces the release of VEGF as well as increases vascular permeability and promotes vasoconstriction. Clinical trials such as the Renin-Angiotensin System Study (RASS) have evaluated medications that target this system and their effects on diabetic retinopathy. The RASS compared the effect of the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor enalapril, the angiotensin receptor blocker losartan, and placebo on diabetic retinopathy progression over a 5-year period in normotensive patients. Both drugs significantly reduced the progression of diabetic retinopathy independently of glycemic levels and changes in blood pressure. Similar studies such as the Diabetic Retinopathy Candesartan Trials (DIRECT) and the European Controlled Trial of Lisinopril in Insulin-Dependent Diabetes (EUCLID) study have shown favorable effects on diabetic retinopathy progression.
Lipid-Lowering Agents
Lipid-lowering therapy is vitally important to decrease the risk of cardiovascular disease in patients with diabetes. Statins and fibrates have been shown to reduce hard exudates, microaneurysms, and the risk of vision loss in diabetic retinopathy. The Fenofibrate Intervention and Event Lowering in Diabetes (FIELD) study showed a decrease in the rate of DME development and need for laser photocoagulation in type 2 diabetic patients. The protective effects of fenofibrate were independent of blood glucose, blood pressure, and baseline lipid levels. Furthermore, the ACCORD study showed that the addition of fenofibrate to statin therapy resulted in a reduction in diabetic retinopathy progression compared to taking a statin alone. These effects of fibrate medications appear to be independent of lipid concentration and have raised questions as to their mechanism of action.
Topical Therapy
Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDS)
The benefits of topical NSAIDs for treatment of DME are mainly reported anecdotally or in uncontrolled retrospective studies. For example, one case series of 6 eyes with DME treated with nepafenac 0.1 % for 6 months showed improvement in the average foveal thickness from 417 to 267 μm. Authors also reported that four eyes gained vision with a modest improvement in mean visual acuity from 0.78 to 0.67 logMAR [12]. Such results have prompted larger, controlled studies by the Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network (DRCRN) and National Eye Institute (NEI) which have not yet been published. Overall, most clinicians use topical NSAIDs with or without topical steroids to treat macular edema in diabetic patients associated with cataract surgery. If a response is not achieved after 1–3 months or side effects are experienced, intravitreal or surgical intervention is typically pursued [13].
Steroids
Topical steroids have been shown in small, uncontrolled studies to improve retinal thickening and visual acuity in patients with DME after surgical procedures and are typically given in combination with topical NSAIDs [14]. The treatment effect of topical steroids as monotherapy for DME has not been studied extensively and is not recommended.
Other Topical Agents
A growing interest in topical therapy for the treatment of DME and other retinal diseases has emerged. Topical therapy would be greatly advantageous compared to intravitreal injection or surgical intervention. In animal models, ranibizumab (Lucentis, Genentech, Inc., San Francisco, CA) has been shown to reach the vitreous cavity and retina with topical application [15]. Other studies have evaluated coupling anti-VEGF drugs with various agents to improve intraocular penetration with topical administration. Even more exciting perhaps is the development of new drugs which target different pathological factors involved with DME. For example, the drug FOV-2304 (Fovea Pharmaceuticals SA) is delivered as a topical drop and targets the kallikrein-kinin system (KKS), which has been shown to induce vascular permeability in diabetic rats [16]. A phase II randomized, placebo-controlled trial evaluating the safety and efficacy of FOV-2304 was begun in 2011 with final results pending.
Intraocular Therapy
The treatment of DME drastically changed with the advent of intravitreal injections. Intravitreal steroids and anti-VEGF agents are superior to laser photocoagulation with regard to improving visual acuity. This has led to a paradigm shift in the treatment of DME.
Steroids
Several studies have shown the effectiveness of intravitreal injection of steroid with or without focal/grid laser. Cataract formation and intraocular pressure (IOP) rise are important adverse effects of steroid therapy that are frequently encountered with sustained release steroid injections that need to be considered.
The Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network (DRCRnet) has investigated the effects of intravitreal triamcinolone acetate on DME. The DRCRnet has shown that triamcinolone plus focal/grid laser is more effective than laser alone in pseudophakic eyes with DME. However, phakic eyes showed no improvement with the addition of triamcinolone compared to focal/grid laser alone and were much more likely to develop cataracts and an increase in IOP [17, 18].
Despite the lack of significant success with triamcinolone, other intravitreal steroids have shown to be effective in treating DME. The MEAD study was a 3-year, randomized, sham-controlled trial of Ozurdex (dexamethasone intravitreal implant; Allergan, Inc, Irvine, CA) in patients with center-involving DME. Ozurdex is a biodegradable implant delivered via a preloaded, single-use 22-gauge needle. In the study, roughly 20 % of patients experienced ≥15-letter improvement in BCVA from baseline with about 4 Ozurdex injections over the 3-year period, which achieved the predefined primary efficacy endpoint for the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). However, it is important to consider that roughly 65 % of patients who received Ozurdex compared to 20 % of patients in the sham group developed cataracts.
The BEVORDEX study compared Ozurdex 0.7 mg with bevacizumab 1.25 mg (Avastin, Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA) for center-involving DME. Both achieved similar rates of visual improvement with roughly 40 % of patients gaining 10 or more letters of best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA). Ozurdex achieved superior anatomic outcomes compared to bevacizumab with a mean improvement in central macular thickness of 187 μm compared with 122 μm. Also, Ozurdex-treated eyes required fewer injections with a mean of 2.7 injections of the implant compared to a mean of 8.6 injections in the bevacizumab group. Similar to the MEAD study, patients in the Ozurdex group developed cataract at a much higher rate compared with those treated with anti-VEGF agents, and roughly 1 % of patients treated with Ozurdex required glaucoma surgery due to uncontrolled increase in IOP. Combined, the BEVORDEX and MEAD studies helped gain Ozurdex FDA approval for the treatment of DME [19, 20].