Intraoperative Nerve Monitoring for Parathyroid Surgery

Fig. 36.1
Left inferior gland parathyroid carcinoma

Temporary hoarseness can occur after any surgery that involves general anesthesia, but the potential for RLN injury in parathyroid surgery mandates greater concern when hoarseness occurs after this type of procedure [5]. The other nerves of major interest, which are frequently less directly addressed during parathyroid surgery, are the bilateral superior laryngeal nerves (SLN) , injury to which can impair the ability to change pitch and reduce voice projection [6]. The obvious result of vocal fold paralysis (VFP) is loss of voice. In addition, debilitation can result from dysphagia and aspiration; an important role of the larynx is to achieve tight vocal fold closure necessary for normal swallowing. Shortness of breath and exercise intolerance can also result from this lack of closure necessary to Valsava [7]. Finally, the most dreaded of concerns is the life-threatening loss of airway patency and respiratory distress if a bilateral injury were to occur that would potentially necessitate a tracheostomy.

There has been a recent report looking at the impact of unilateral or bilateral (VCF) following thyroid surgery. The cost analysis could be similarly applicable to patients sustaining injury after parathyroid surgery. Seventy six patients who sustained either unilateral or bilateral (VCF) were compared to 238 patients who did not have injury during thyroid surgery. The two groups are matched to age, sex, race, and type of procedure. The authors found that, “patients who suffer a unilateral or bilateral VFP after undergoing thyroidectomy experience significantly more morbidity than similar patients who do not have VFP after thyroidectomy. The VFP patients incurred significantly more charges for health care in the first 90 days after surgery ([8]; Benninger et al. 2015).”

The avoidance of nerve injury in parathyroid surgery is centered on injury prevention measures that begin not during surgery but rather at the time of the initial evaluation of the patient. This evaluation is coupled with intraoperative and postoperative management decisions that optimize patient outcome. A detailed history, review of pathology, outside surgical records if applicable, and review of surgical indications with the patient and family are necessary to assess risk for any patient being considered for parathyroid surgery.

Experienced surgeons with low nerve complication rates are guided by principles to which they adhere with great discipline. Meticulous hemostasis throughout the surgical procedure cannot be overemphasized. It affords the surgeon with a clear view, often aided with loupe magnification, of the operative field to identify critical anatomic landmarks that lead to the identification of the RLN [7]. Recurrent laryngeal nerve visualization is currently considered the gold standard for nerve preservation [9]. It is associated with a lower risk of RLN palsy [10, 11].

The precise handling of tissue around the nerve to prevent stretch or traction injury on the nerve is of utmost importance. There is limited data in the literature to suggest that approximately 10 % of nerves that are traumatized are visually identified and appreciated as injured by the surgeon [3]. This places further emphasis on the importance of tissue handling and management of hemostasis. Nerve transection, which would generally be appreciated by surgeons who routinely identify the nerve, the standard for nerve protection, may not be as common of a contemporary reason for nerve injury.

Unique Circumstances in Parathyroid Surgery

Parathyroid surgery, in general, is an elective procedure without the acute threat of morbidity or mortality associated with malignancy. While guidelines exist for surgical candidacy, many patients present in an asymptomatic or low symptom profile state secondary to incidental blood testing that led to the diagnosis of hyperparathyroidism. This often healthier population carries an expectation for a lower treatment complication rate than that associated with other conditions. Although nerve identification is a routine practice for most surgeons during thyroid surgery, the same assumption cannot be extrapolated to parathyroid surgery. Many experienced and high-volume parathyroid surgeons do not routinely find the RLN nor certainly the SLN in each case. A particularly vulnerable and common area for nerve injury during thyroid surgery is at the ligament of Berry, where an extralaryngeal RLN bifurcation is susceptible to nerve injury [12]. This particular area does not have the same significance in parathyroid surgery, where the parathyroid gland does not have to be removed off the trachea at the ligament of Berry and thus does not place the nerve at the same level of risk for heat, traction, or transection risk. Recommendation has been made for surgeons though to have a low threshold for identifying the RLN during parathyroid surgery [13, 14]. There is no substitute for identifying the nerve to reduce inadvertent nerve injury rates [15].

Nevertheless, as discussed elsewhere in this book, changing practice patterns with evidence-based support for directed parathyroid surgery utilizing very small incisions, minimally invasive endoscopic approaches, or even remote access approaches does raise the concern for potential RLN or SLN nerve injury due to limited exposure for dissection. This risk is compounded by the aforementioned minority of nerve injuries that are even appreciated by surgeons intraoperatively. Recurrent laryngeal nerve monitoring may be valuable in identifying and confirming the location of the RLN [16, 17]. Because the frequency of RLN injury is low among experienced surgeons, who are a primary source of evidence-based surgical studies examining IONM, it is difficult to adequately power studies to provide evidence of its value in preventing nerve injuries [10, 18]. Furthermore, many experienced surgeons may commonly perform routine parathyroid procedures under local anesthesia because they believe the risk of nerve injury is quite low and the clinical scenario would not warrant IONM.

An interesting recent publication has examined the anatomic proximity of parathyroid tumors to the RLN in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism undergoing parathyroidectomy [16]. This is unique from much of the literature that primarily combines both thyroid and parathyroid patients. In this prospective study consisting of 136 patients with primary hyperparathyroidism, IONM was used to confirm RLN identification and to record the distance from the anatomically confirmed RLN to the parathyroid tumor. The findings confirmed that the RLN often lies in close proximity to the parathyroid adenoma at an average of just 0.52 cm, with tumors of the right upper position most commonly abutting the nerve compared to other positions. The tumors in the right upper position were on average only 0.25 cm from the nerve with 47 % of the tumors in the right upper position abutting the nerve [16]. This may clearly have implications for a personalized approach with consideration for IONM for tumors in this area if a directed approach is taken.

Other circumstances that may also demand consideration for IONM during parathyroid surgery may include difficult parathyroidectomy procedures such as reoperations. The superior parathyroid gland develops in an embryological position posterior to the RLN when viewed in a sagittal plane (Fig. 36.2). Therefore, large superior parathyroid glands and inferiorly descended, ectopic superior thyroid glands behind the RLN in the retroesophageal region may place the RLN at a greater risk. Further consideration should be given for missing parathyroid glands, nonlocalizing preoperative imaging studies, prior neck surgery for spine surgery, trauma or any other reason, morbid obesity, or other patient anatomic factors creating exposure difficulty. These factors can certainly increase technical difficulty and have been shown to increase the rate of RLN injury [12]. IONM can be complimentary and beneficial to direct anatomic visualization of the RLN and perhaps even the SLN if an ectopic gland exploration would demand dissection that could potentially place it at risk (Fig. 36.3).


Fig. 36.2
Relationship of recurrent laryngeal nerve to parathyroid glands


Fig. 36.3
Ectopic left parathyroid gland

Expected Value of Nerve Monitoring for the Intraoperative Decision Process

The International Neural Monitoring Study Group, a multidisciplinary international group of surgeons and researchers dedicated to thyroid and parathyroid surgery, and neural monitoring, had proposed three modes listed below for IONM application that are relevant for parathyroid surgery [18].

Identification of the RLN

The application of intraoperative neural monitoring can assist in neural mapping using the neural monitor probe to electrically map the course of the nerve in the paratracheal region. Success for nerve identification rates between 98 and 100 % has been reported in multiple studies [19]. The use of the RLN nerve monitor does not prevent nerve injuries but is an excellent adjunct that may be helpful.

Several large studies have compared a monitored group of patients and a nonmonitored group to determine if there was a difference in RLN injuries. These studies contained both thyroid and parathyroid surgeries with the majority of patients undergoing thyroid surgery. The documentation of proof that the use of nerve monitoring prevents nerve injury has been elusive for the previously stated reasons, especially for experienced surgeons with low complication rates. This may not be applicable to surgeons in general who perform these procedures. One of the largest of the series was a multi-institutional prospective nonrandomized study of over 16,000 patients who underwent thyroidectomy. The authors concluded that there was no statistical significant difference between visual identification alone and combined visualization with RLN monitoring [10]. Because of the unique circumstances of parathyroid surgery, it is even more unclear and difficult to power a similar study to examine a difference in nerve injury rates for monitored versus unmonitored patients in just parathyroid surgery. It is clear, however, that nerve monitoring will not turn an unsafe surgeon into a safe surgeon [20] and thus the aforementioned points of meticulous technique must always be respected.

Aid in Dissection

After identifying the nerve, stimulation applied in intermittent fashion could provide feedback to assist the dissection. This could be particularly valuable in a reoperative setting to trace the nerve’s course through scar that obscures the field and allow for its dissection off the parathyroid tumor. In a study examining intraoperative electromyographic monitoring of the RLN in reoperative thyroid and parathyroid surgery, 52 cervical re-exploration procedures were performed with electromyography. Thirty one percent of the procedures were for parathyroid conditions (1 parathyroid carcinoma) and this group was compared to a nonmonitored group with similar characteristics. The monitoring did not decrease RLN complications in the study, but the authors did state that locating the RLN was generally not the source of injury, but rather resection of close disease placed the nerve most at risk [4]. The potential to dissect through these obscured planes with close disease utilizing neural monitoring as an adjunct could be valuable.

Neural Function Prognostication

The functional information provided by IONM could be invaluable to the physician who has seen a visually intact nerve but wants further support of its functional status before proceeding to the contralateral side for a four gland exploration. Dissection on the contralateral side could place the other nerve at risk, potentially resulting in a compromised airway at the end of an elective procedure. In other words, a nerve that is compromised on one side may give the surgeon pause to continue on and lead him or her to stage the procedure once an expected return of function on the compromised side has occurred. It would also allow for investigation of the nerve for potentially treatable injuries that would include a crush injury from a suture tie or clip or lead to a primary repair of a discovered transected nerve that had not been appreciated during the initial dissection.

Prevention of bilateral paralysis is perhaps the most important application of IONM. Prior to neural testing there had been no other mechanism to accurately identify the location of nerve injury. Excellent evidence exists that final evoked potential amplitudes on intraoperative electromyography of the RLN correlates with immediate postoperative vocal fold function after thyroid surgery [21, 22]. In this study, the immediate postoperative vocal cord paralysis experience was reviewed when an EMG amplitude of less than 200 μv was set as a cutoff. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and accuracy at this level for vocal cord paralysis were found to be 95.5 %, 99.2 %, 72.4 %, 99 %, and 99.1 % respectively. This could certainly be applicable in parathyroid surgery. It would be of great value to the surgeon to alert him or her to the complication before it was clinically evident and therefore allow for preparations to be made, especially if it involved securing a compromised airway.

Although the routine use of neural monitoring in parathyroid surgery is controversial, there are clinicians who are proponents of its routine use to benefit patients. Expert opinion has advocated that neural monitoring be performed routinely because difficult cases cannot always be predicted preoperatively. The routine use of monitoring will allow for an advancement in the learning curve for surgeons so that they have greater experience in signal interpretation and troubleshooting [18, 23].

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Aug 28, 2017 | Posted by in OTOLARYNGOLOGY | Comments Off on Intraoperative Nerve Monitoring for Parathyroid Surgery
Premium Wordpress Themes by UFO Themes