CHAPTER 33 Intracorneal rings
Epidemiologic consideration and terminology
Keratoconus is a progressive disorder and usually its progression rate is higher before the fourth decade. The treatment of keratoconus, up to date, was mostly focused on visual rehabilitation. In the future, controlling the progression of the disease will be another important goal for treatment modalities to achieve. This would allow more patients to be in the older ages when the progression of the keratoconus slows down, without significant complication and visual deprivation. Although long-term results with controlled studies are not known, depending on early results, ICRS not only provide better visual quality but also may help in controlling the progression of keratoconus1,2. With the advent of cross-linking, and perhaps with the combination of both modalities, the need for keratoplasty for keratoconus, which has an approximately 20% rejection rate, will decrease. Moreover, it will be possible to help patients with advanced disease with stronger ICRS treatments and state of the art corneal lamellar surgery3.
Fundamental principles
According to the postulates of Barraquer and Blavatskaya, intracorneal ring acts as tissue addition leading to a flattening in the cornea periphery. The diameter of the ring is proportionally inverse to the flattening intensity thus, the smaller the diameter, the more tissue added (ring thickness) with the higher myopic correction4.