Focal and Grid Macular Laser



Focal and Grid Macular Laser


James R. Singer



Focal and grid macular laser have been a cornerstone treatment of various retinal diseases for decades. The most common applications over the years have been diabetic macular edema (DME), macular edema due to branch retinal vein occlusions (BRVO), and central serous retinopathy (CSR). The first solar photocoagulator was developed by Meyer-Schwickerath in the 1940s. He and Littman later developed the xenon arc photocoagulator, which was used for both anterior and posterior segment applications.1

Since being described for the treatment of clinically significant DME (CSDME) in the Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) in 1985,2 focal laser had been the first-line treatment modality for this condition until it was supplanted by intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy in the mid-2000s. That notwithstanding, focal laser still has a role as it remains the preferred treatment for non-center-involved DME (NCI-DME) and is sometimes used to augment anti-VEGF treatment in cases of center-involved DME (CI-DME). Recent clinical trials suggest that while anti-VEGF monotherapy for macular edema from diabetic retinopathy is effective for a large portion of patients, combination therapy with laser treatment is required to achieve the best possible outcome for many patients (approximately 50% of patients in the Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network [DRCR.net] protocol T study)3 and may potentially reduce the frequency of anti-VEGF injections.

Macular laser treatment for BRVO was found to be effective for macular edema in the landmark Branch Vein Occlusion Study (BVOS) trial in 1984.4 Treatment of this condition has also transitioned from macular grid laser to intravitreal anti-VEGF therapy much like DME, but laser still plays a useful role in some clinical scenarios (i.e., focal leakage from capillary breakdown, persistent and/or diffuse leakage despite anti-VEGF therapy, and treatment in patients who wish to forego or minimize injection therapy).

Macular focal laser also has a pertinent role in the treatment of CSR.5 Additionally, focal laser has demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of several other retinal conditions such as retinal arterial macroaneurysms (RAM),6 Coats’ disease,7 retinal capillary hemangiomas,8 and optic disc pit maculopathy.9


The mechanism of action of laser photocoagulation involves light energy being absorbed and converted into a thermal burn at the level of the pigmented tissues of the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) and choroid, triggering local protein denaturation. The mechanism by which this process leads to beneficial physiologic and anatomical effects in the macula is speculative, but there are numerous theories. The direct effect from destruction of the RPE and photoreceptors leading to reduced oxygen consumption and increased oxygenation of the inner retina is one proposed mechanism.10 Another is the direct effect on retinal blood vessels, inducing closure and a corresponding reduction in leakage.10 A third theory asserts that photocoagulation induces the release of transforming growth factor-beta 2 and other cytokines from RPE cells, which in turn suppresses the proliferation of vascular endothelial cells contributing to macular edema.11 Other speculated mechanisms are that focal laser increases the RPE pump action12 and/or induces recruitment of healthy RPE cells as a healing response.13

This chapter focuses on guidelines and treatment parameters for conventional macular lasers (532-nm argon green and 577-nm yellow), which are widely available and have been the standard for decades. It does bear mentioning that there are numerous other laser types (various multicolor lasers, subthreshold) and delivery systems (pattern scanning laser, camera-navigated contactless lasers with retinal landmark tracking), each of which has its own specific unique applications, benefits, and shortcomings. It is beyond the purview of this chapter to explore each of these laser technologies individually, but further discussion on the basic science of lasers can be found in Chapter 3. The treating clinician should have a comprehensive understanding of the laser unit itself (laser parameters, computerized algorithms if available), how the laser functions with the associated delivery device (slit lamp), and the properties of the selected laser wavelength prior to embarking on treatment.





CONTRAINDICATIONS



PREOPERATIVE PREPARATION



  • Obtain written informed consent.


  • Ensure adequate pupillary dilation.


  • Apply topical anesthetic drops to the ocular surface (proparacaine, tetracaine, etc.).


  • Identify and prepare the macular lens to be used, including application of methylcellulose gel if necessary.


  • Review multimodal imaging studies (e.g., fundus photographs, fluorescein angiography, optical coherence tomography [OCT]) to formulate treatment plan and guide treatment.


  • Position patient at laser slit lamp, make sure laser foot pedal and laser adjustment controls are within reach, and place laser lens against the patient’s cornea.


  • Have patient fixate forward with the fellow eye and focus the slit lamp into the treatment eye, taking note of ocular landmarks. (Moving the slit beam ˜15° off-center will help to minimize glare.)


SETTINGS AND PROCEDURE

The following recommendations are for conventional green 532-nm or yellow 577-nm lasers:


Laser Parameter/Settings Ranges



  • Power, duration, interval, and spot size are the standard adjustable laser parameters. Power, duration, and spot size (in conjunction with the type of lens being used) determine burn intensity, whereas the interval determines the time between laser applications when the laser foot pedal remains engaged. In general, the clinician should use the lowest settings possible initially and then titrate the laser settings to achieve the desired treatment effect. It is important to be mindful that various factors such as the ocular media (i.e., corneal haze, cataract, vitreous
    hemorrhage, etc.) and even the integrity of the fiber-optic laser cable can affect the laser intensity. Consequently, laser settings can vary significantly depending upon these factors in addition to the pathology being treated. As a general starting point for macular disease, the clinician could begin with the following laser parameters and adjust accordingly:



    • Power: 50 to 80 mW


    • Duration: 50 to 100 ms (much longer for intraretinal vascular lesions such as macroaneurysms)


    • Spot size: 50 to 100 microns


    • Interval: None (under this setting, laser will default to one laser application per foot pedal trigger)


Lenses



  • Goldmann 3-mirror (0.93x image magnification, 1.08x laser spot magnification, mirrored lens can allow treatment of more peripheral lesions)


  • Ocular NMR (no methylcellulose required) Fundus Laser (0.97x image magnification, 1.04x laser spot magnification, methylcellulose not required)


  • Ocular Mainster Standard Focal/Grid (0.96x image magnification, 1.05x laser spot magnification, NMR version does not require methylcellulose)


  • Ocular Mainster High Magnification (1.25x image magnification, 0.80x laser spot magnification, NMR version does not require methylcellulose)


  • Ocular Reichel-Mainster 1x Retina (0.95x image magnification, 1.05x laser spot magnification)


  • Ocular Yannuzzi Fundus Ocular (0.93x image magnification, 1.08x laser spot magnification, large scleral flange enhances manipulation of globe/eyelids)


  • Volk Area centralis (1.06x image magnification, 0.94x laser spot magnification)


  • Volk H-R Centralis (1.08x image magnification, 0.93x laser spot magnification)


  • Volk Super Macula 2.2 (1.49x image magnification, 0.67x laser spot magnification)


  • Volk Fundus Laser (1.25x image magnification, 0.80x laser spot magnification)


General Considerations



  • For a given power and duration setting, decreasing the spot size will result in correspondingly higher relative energy delivery over a smaller area. Reducing the spot size without a corresponding adjustment in the power/duration can result in an overly intense burn, with the potential to produce rupture of Bruch’s membrane resulting in hemorrhaging and/or secondary choroidal neovascularization.


  • Laser applications should be placed more than 500 microns away from the foveal center and not within the foveal avascular zone with rare exceptions.


  • Caution should be utilized during treatment in the papillomacular bundle to avoid inducing a cecocentral scotoma.



  • Consider using small spot size (50 microns) and short-duration burns (50 ms) when treating close to the fovea or within the papillomacular bundle.


  • Direct laser treatment of shunt vessels/collaterals should be avoided as well as areas of dense intraretinal hemorrhage (which can damage the inner-retinal layers leading to a scotoma).


  • Several treatment sessions spaced several months apart may be required to achieve maximal resolution of edema from diabetic retinopathy and BRVO. CSR often responds well to a single laser treatment of focal hotspots but recurrences are not uncommon.


For Diabetic Macular Edema

Jun 23, 2022 | Posted by in OPHTHALMOLOGY | Comments Off on Focal and Grid Macular Laser

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access