Endoscopic Septoplasty
John M. Lee
INTRODUCTION
Nasal septoplasty is one of the operations most frequently performed by otolaryngologists throughout the world. Whether it is done for the correction of septal deviations causing nasal obstruction or for improving access to the paranasal sinuses, this operation is one of the oldest procedures described in the surgical literature. Traditionally, this technique is performed with a headlight and nasal speculum and is considered a fundamental skill for junior trainees. However, with the advent of nasal endoscopy, the technique of endoscopic septoplasty was soon developed and first described in the early 1990s. Over the last 20 years, this modification of the traditional septoplasty has gained significant interest and popularity.
Advantages of endoscopic septoplasty primarily rest on the improved illumination and visualization afforded by the endoscope, enabling the surgeon to more precisely evaluate and surgically correct the deviated nasal septum. This technique also offers a seamless transition when performing concurrent procedures such as endoscopic sinus surgery. Perhaps as importantly, this technique using better visualization has significantly improved the education of the surgical trainee. In the traditional headlight technique, it is very difficult for an observer to see and appreciate what the surgeon is actually doing, a limitation that also hinders appropriate surgical supervision. However, the endoscope provides an unparalleled view of the anatomy of the septum, allowing for a greater appreciation of this technique. In this chapter, specific indications for endoscopic septoplasty are reviewed and the practical steps for performing this procedure are discussed focusing on the key pearls for optimizing successful outcomes.
HISTORY
A thorough rhinologic history is of fundamental importance when evaluating any patient with a suspected sinonasal problem. This is especially important in the context of a septal deviation, as symptoms may not always match the findings on physical examination. In fact, this may be the biggest pitfall in performing septoplasty: The presence of a septal deviation is not an absolute indication for surgical correction. Documenting the history carefully will allow the surgeon to identify the patient who will benefit from septal surgery. To this end, the first determination is whether patients are being evaluated for nasal airway symptoms or are there other concurrent sinonasal problems as well. If nasal obstruction is the primary concern, the side of obstruction, timing, and severity should be clearly elicited. The ideal candidate for septoplasty should have obstructive symptoms that parallel the side of the deviation. Issues of nasal congestion can be tricky, as this can reflect the dynamic and reactive nature of the nasal mucosa, something that is not addressed with surgery. In this regard, many patients will undergo a trial of conservative measures such as nasal steroid sprays prior to the consideration of septoplasty. Similarly, any suspected environmental allergies should be properly evaluated and treated.
Many patients with a septal deviation may not have any significant obstructive symptoms. Instead, they may be under investigation for other rhinologic issues, including epistaxis, chronic rhinosinusitis, or a skull base tumor. While a deviated septum can be a contributing factor in the etiology of epistaxis or obstruction of the osteomeatal complex, this anatomical finding may be incidental on physical examination. Nonetheless, the septum may still need to be treated surgically as it may prevent adequate endonasal access to the paranasal sinuses or the skull base.
Finally, patients should also be asked if they are seeking a consultation for any external/cosmetic changes to the nose. If so, it is preferable to correct a deviated septum during a formal septorhinoplasty approach (not discussed in this chapter). It is also important to ascertain if there is any history of prior nasal surgery, recreational nasal drug use, or a history of autoimmune conditions.
PHYSICAL EXAMINATION
In patients with a suspected septal deviation, a complete examination of the nasal cavity is required, and this begins with inspection of the external nose. While an exhaustive cosmetic analysis is not required, it is important to document the presence of a twisted nasal bridge, external valve stenosis, or collapse of the internal nasal valve (i.e., with a Cottle maneuver). All of these findings may contribute to the symptoms of nasal obstruction, which may not resolve with septoplasty alone.
The examination of the nasal cavity is first performed with a nasal speculum and a headlight. This allows for a good assessment of the caudal septum. As I will discuss later, significant caudal deflections are a relative contraindication for endoscopic septoplasty. The headlight examination also allows for a general overview of the configuration of the nasal septum (e.g., midline, S-shaped, or C-shaped).
A thorough nasal endoscopy should then be performed to carefully document the presence of a broad septal deviation or an isolated septal spur. This should be done after appropriate decongestion has been obtained and a topical anesthetic has been applied. Endoscopy allows for an appreciation of the nasal airway without any external manipulation (i.e., with a speculum). While there have been several classification systems proposed for documenting the type and degree of septal deviation, none are universally used. From a nasal airway perspective, the most important assessment is whether the extent of the septal deviation could account for symptoms of nasal obstruction. As a general rule, this may occur when a deviation or spur severely limits the inspection of the entire nasal anatomy. Anterior deviations may prevent adequate inspection of the middle turbinate and meatus while posterior deviations may prevent visualization of the nasopharynx. For revision cases, palpation of the septum with a cotton tip applicator may help with estimation of how much residual cartilage or bone is present.
Endoscopy also allows for documentation of any concurrent sinonasal findings, including the presence of nasal polyps, hypertrophy of the inferior turbinate, and the presence of adenoid tissue or a neoplasm in the nasopharynx. All of these issues may contribute to problems of nasal obstruction and may need to be addressed. If endoscopic sinus surgery is being considered, the need for concurrent septoplasty should always be entertained if it appears that visualization or access to the middle meatus will be hindered both during surgery and in the postoperative period.
INDICATIONS
Indications for endoscopic septoplasty can largely be classified into obstructive or access-related issues. The following is a list of the most common indications for endoscopic septoplasty:
Broad septal deviation or isolated septal spur causing nasal obstruction (primary or revision)
Septal perforation with concurrent symptomatic septal deviation
Septal deviation/spur limiting endoscopic access for other endonasal procedures (e.g., endoscopic sinus or skull base surgery)
Septal deviation/spur contributing to refractory epistaxis
CONTRAINDICATIONS
Endoscopic septoplasty should not be employed in isolation if there are anatomical abnormalities requiring an open septorhinoplasty approach. This includes a significant caudal septal deviation or a severely twisted nose. The endoscopic approach does not enable adequate manipulation of the caudal septum, and the advantages of visualization and illumination are obviated with external techniques. However, the endoscope can always be brought into the field as an adjunctive technique to evaluate the rest of the nasal airway.
PREOPERATIVE PLANNING
For a symptomatic septal deviation or spur, the only preoperative decision that must be made is whether the anatomical problem can be addressed with an endoscopic approach. As previously mentioned, caudal deflections often require an external technique to adequately reposition or reconstruct this area of the septum. If the decision is made to proceed with endoscopic septoplasty, there is little additional investigation that is required. Of course, this is dependent on the adequacy of the endoscopic examination preoperatively to thoroughly inspect the nasal cavity. If there is any suspicion of concurrent sinonasal conditions, such as chronic rhinosinusitis, a computed tomography scan of the paranasal sinuses is recommended for preoperative planning. This imaging modality can also be helpful in cases of revision septoplasty when it is not obvious how much bone remains in the septum. I strongly recommend that any suspected nasal mucosal inflammation be optimized prior to surgery. Addressing these problems can help with patient expectations and outcomes following surgical intervention.
Adjunctive investigations such as acoustic rhinometry or rhinomanometry may be considered if it is still not entirely clear whether the obstruction is caused by mucosal inflammation or a fixed anatomical problem.
SURGICAL TECHNIQUE
Broad Septal Deviation
Both nasal cavities are decongested with pledgets soaked in either oxymetazoline or topical 1:1,000 epinephrine.Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel
Full access? Get Clinical Tree