Corneal Cross-Linking
Y. Ralph Chu
Jessica Heckman
Corneal ectasia is the progressive steepening and thinning of the cornea that can occur naturally or be induced surgically. A patient with corneal ectasia will often experience an increase in ocular aberrations and decreased best corrected visual acuity (BCVA). Due to these aberrations and loss of BCVA, these patients report varying degrees of visual symptoms including glare, halo, multiple images, and ghosting. A patient with corneal ectasia may need to wear gas permeable or other specialty contact lenses to obtain their best visual acuity due to the corneal irregularity. Often glasses are not able to fully correct a patient with corneal ectasia.
Various forms of ectasia exist including keratoconus, pellucid marginal degeneration, wound ectasia after penetrating keratoplasty (PK), and keratoglobus. The reported incidence and prevalence rates reported for keratoconus tend to vary widely from an incidence as high as 1 in 400, to a long-term study in the United States reporting 54.5 per 100,000.1,2 It has been generally considered to occur equally in men and women; however, more recent studies have shown an increased risk of development of keratoconus in men, African-Americans, and Latinos and lower risk in women, Asian-Americans, and people with diabetes.1 Keratoconus can begin before puberty and may continue to progress even after the age of 40. The weakening and degradation of the corneal collagen results in the progressive thinning and steepening observed in eyes with keratoconus.3
Corneal ectasia can also occur after laser-assisted keratomileusis (LASIK), small incision lenticule extraction, and photorefractive keratectomy. Risk factors for corneal ectasia include high preoperative myopia, thin residual stromal bed, high total percentage of tissue altered, and forme fruste keratoconus on preoperative topography.4 Corneal ectasia can develop in a normal appearing cornea preoperatively.5 Similar to keratoconus, in corneal ectasia following corneal refractive surgery, there is a suspected weakening and degradation of the corneal collagen resulting in biomechanical instability of the cornea in the residual stromal bed.6,7
In April 2016, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved corneal crosslinking for progressive keratoconus and corneal ectasia following refractive surgery. Corneal cross-linking is performed to slow or halt the progression of keratoconus and corneal ectasia by increasing the biomechanical rigidity of the cornea. It is thought to achieve this by replicating the age-related cross-linking that occurs in the cornea naturally with time.8 The procedure is performed using ultraviolet-A (UV-A) light
and topical riboflavin as a photosensitizing agent to result in local photopolymerization.9 Different from other corneal ectasia surgical treatments (intrastromal corneal ring segments and PK), this procedure can be performed in earlier stages of disease progression to prevent further vision loss from progressive corneal ectasia.
and topical riboflavin as a photosensitizing agent to result in local photopolymerization.9 Different from other corneal ectasia surgical treatments (intrastromal corneal ring segments and PK), this procedure can be performed in earlier stages of disease progression to prevent further vision loss from progressive corneal ectasia.
INDICATIONS
Key Indications
Progressive keratoconus
Corneal ectasia following refractive surgery
Corneal cross-linking is indicated for progressive keratoconus and corneal ectasia following refractive surgery. The definition of progression is at the discretion of the physician. There are many factors that have been evaluated as progressive determinants for keratoconus and ectasia following refractive surgery including topometric, pachymetry, and refractive changes.10 Topometric changes indicative for progression include an increasing maximum keratometry and/or steepening of the anterior or posterior corneal surface.11,12 Thinning pachymetry, as well as an increase in the rate of corneal thickness change from the periphery to the thinnest point of the cornea are also considerations for progression.11,12 Insurance carriers often require documentation of specific criteria.13,14
These criteria may include the following:
An increase of greater than or equal to 1 diopter of steepest keratometry value within 24 months
An increase of greater than or equal to 1 diopter of cylinder in subjective refraction within 24 months
A decrease of greater than or equal to 0.1 mm in back optical zone radius (base curve) in rigid gas permeable contact lens wearer within 24 months
Progressive deterioration of best spectacle corrected visual acuity.
CONTRAINDICATIONS
Key Contraindications
Pregnant and nursing mothers
Age consideration
History of herpes simplex keratitis
Thin cornea
The safety and efficacy of corneal cross-linking has not been evaluated during pregnancy or in nursing mothers. There is no contraindication to operation of the device by pregnant operators.
While there is no specific age range in the indication statement for corneal crosslinking, the United States clinical trials that led to FDA approval included only patients aged 14-65.15,16 If the procedure is being submitted to a patient’s insurance, this may play a role in coverage determination for the patient if outside this age range.
Exposure to UV light may cause reactivation of herpes simplex virus keratitis.17 Due to this, caution should be exercised in patients with history of prior herpes simplex virus keratitis.
To prevent endothelial cell damage, the last contraindication to corneal cross-linking is corneal stromal thickness below 400 microns at the time of UV light exposure. Hypotonic riboflavin may be used to thicken a cornea to or above the 400-micron threshold at the time of the procedure.15,16
The last relative contraindication is a patient’s ability to tolerate the procedure and comply with procedure instructions. The patient does need to maintain fixation underneath the UV light for 30 minutes. A patient who is unable to remain in the proper position for this duration of time, or if there are concerns regarding a patient’s ability to follow and comply with procedure or postoperative instructions, may not be an ideal candidate for this procedure.
INFORMED CONSENT CONSIDERATIONS
Key Informed Consent Adverse Events Listed
Blurred vision
Eye pain
Dry eye
Corneal opacity (haze)
Corneal edema
Slowly healing cornea/persistent epithelial defect
Light sensitivity/photophobia
Corneal infection/infectious keratitis
Ineffectiveness of the procedure
Informed consent should include a description of the procedure in plain language, for example, “The very superficial layer of the cornea will be temporarily removed, and eye drops along with UV light will be used over the course of one hour to strengthen the cornea.”
Potential alternative treatments, such as continuing to wear eyeglasses and/or contact lenses, monitoring, other corneal surgeries including corneal transplant penetrating keratoplasty (PKP), Intacs, among others, should be listed. Risks and complications,
inherent to the procedure, include but are not limited to blurred vision, eye pain, dry eye, corneal haze or edema, a slowly healing cornea following the procedure, light sensitivity, and corneal infection, as well as ineffectiveness of the procedure.
inherent to the procedure, include but are not limited to blurred vision, eye pain, dry eye, corneal haze or edema, a slowly healing cornea following the procedure, light sensitivity, and corneal infection, as well as ineffectiveness of the procedure.
The patient should sign and date the consent to indicate their understanding of the procedure and acceptance of risks.
PREOPERATIVE CARE
Key Preoperative Considerations