Clinical/Topographic Correlations
J. Bradley Randleman, MD; Marcony R. Santhiago, MD, PhD; and William J. Dupps, MD, PhD
Beyond corneal ectatic disorders and findings before and after corneal refractive surgery, there are clinical entities that present with unique, clinically relevant findings where advanced corneal imaging may be of benefit in their evaluation, diagnosis, and management. The following represents a non-exhaustive collection of these conditions: dry eye, corneal scarring following infectious keratitis, epithelial basement membrane dystrophy (EBMD), Salzmann’s nodular degeneration, pterygium, Fuchs’ corneal dystrophy, corneal stromal dystrophies, limbal stem cell deficiency (LSCD), and floppy eyelid syndrome.
Mild dry eye typically causes symptoms without clinical findings, but more severe forms of dry eye manifest as surface irregularity that can be seen with clinical imaging. In some instances, dry eye can masquerade as other conditions on isolated clinical imaging devices, and multiple imaging modalities may be beneficial in making the appropriate diagnosis. Placido imaging is more sensitive to tear film alterations and typically provides a more useful analysis of dry eye–related findings than Scheimpflug imaging.
Figure 9-1-1. Placido composite image of a patient with dry eye before (left) and after (right) application of artificial tears. The left image pattern is irregularly irregular, with multiple steep and flat areas in no obvious pattern. The right image after application of a tear smooths the pattern and now a mild inferior steepening pattern is visible. This pattern may also be artifact and would take a longer period of time after initiation of a dry eye treatment regimen to assess fully.
Figure 9-1-2. Placido image of the right and left eyes from a patient with symptomatic dry eye. An irregularly irregular pattern is notable in axial curvature (upper), left more than right. This irregularly irregular pattern is significantly more discernible in tangential imaging (lower).
Figure 9-1-3. (A) Scheimpflug imaging of the right eye from a patient who complained of blurred vision in both eyes and had a history of myopic LASIK treatment 15 years prior. Anterior curvature (upper left) exhibits some central irregularity, with irregular flattening and mild focal steepening centrally, but is less obvious than previous Placido images. There are no demonstrable findings in other maps. (B) Spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) imaging of the same right eye. Total thickness mapping shows a pattern analogous to Scheimpflug imaging, but SD-OCT measures significantly thinner in this eye (thinnest point 435 μm vs 470 μm with Scheimpflug). Epithelial pattern is mildly irregular in a manner consistent with dry eye. Case note: Because Scheimpflug imaging interpolates curvature data always, there is never any obvious data drop out centrally in curvature maps. This processing can partially mask significant dry eye or other surface alteration because the irregularly irregular pattern that is readily apparent with Placido imaging is difficult to discern in Scheimpflug imaging. Figure 9-1-4. (A) Placido imaging from a patient with cataract taken at the time of intraocular lens (IOL) measurements. Axial (upper left) and tangential (upper right) curvature maps show central steepening in an irregularly irregular pattern, while Placido ring image (lower right) highlights the surface irregularity. (B) Placido difference map showing the right eye at the initial visit time point (upper left) and follow-up visit 1 month later (lower left). At follow-up, anterior curvature is much more normalized. There is a difference of more than 4 D centrally between images. Case note: Surface irregularity will impact keratometry values at the time of surgery. In this case, the surface irregularity was unfortunately not recognized, resulting in inaccurate IOL calculations. After a treatment regimen to regularize the ocular surface, the curvature pattern appeared significantly more normal. The patient proceeded to IOL exchange. A 37-year-old patient with high myopic astigmatism complained of progressively worsening acuity in both eyes over the past year. The patient had Placido imaging, was diagnosed with keratoconus, and was referred for evaluation. Figure 9-1-5. (A) Placido composite display of the right and left eyes from the patient. There is significant central steepening in both eyes as shown in axial curvature (upper), with a partial truncated bowtie pattern in both eyes. In tangential imaging (lower), the steepening pattern is more irregularly irregular rather than focally steep. (B) Scheimpflug comparative image showing axial curvature (upper) and tangential curvature (lower). The patterns are similar to those seen in Placido imaging but there is less focal irregularity due to the smoothing that occurs during Scheimpflug processing.
SECTION 2: CORNEAL SCARRING RESULTING FROM INFECTIOUS KERATITIS
Infectious keratitis leads to corneal scarring, the severity of which depends on the extent and location of the infectious process. Many of these cases result from contact lens wear; thus, most patients who suffer from infectious keratitis require some form of refractive correction for best acuity.
Figure 9-2-1. (A) Scheimpflug refractive display of the right eye from a patient who developed a contact lens–related ulcer. Anterior curvature exhibits focal steepening in the 10 o’clock meridian in the region where the ulceration occurred. Pachymetry map shows a thin cornea with no obvious alteration from the ulcer or resulting scar. There are focal elevations in both anterior (upper right) and posterior (lower right) elevation maps that do not appear to be affected by the ulceration. (B) Scheimpflug ectasia screening display of the same eye. There are multiple suspicious parameters, including anterior elevation and various D scores.
Figure 9-2-1. (C) Scheimpflug raw image of the same eye showing a hyperreflective region coinciding with the ulceration and resulting scarring. (D) SD-OCT cross-sectional image of the same eye showing the area of ulceration in the far left side of the image. There is a hyperreflective region coinciding with the healed scar. There is epithelial hypertrophy overlying the ulceration. (E) SD-OCT image of the same eye. Total thickness map is analogous to Scheimpflug imaging. Epithelial mapping shows an area of thinning in the region of the ulcer; this is artifactual, as the cross-sectional image clearly shows epithelial hypertrophy overlying the ulcer. Figure 9-2-2. (A) Slit lamp imaging of a patient with a long history of contact lens wear and recent contact lens–related ulcer. There is a focal central scar in the center of the eye. There is also pannus with corneal neovascularization superiorly. (B) Scheimpflug tangential curvature map of the same eye highlighting the irregularity induced by the ulceration. (C) Scheimpflug refractive display of the same eye. Anterior curvature exhibits similar irregularity, but is less defined due to the axial output setting. Pachymetry and elevation maps are unremarkable. (D) SD-OCT cross-sectional image of the same eye showing the central ulcer with residual corneal scarring and overlying epithelial remodeling. Figure 9-2-2. (E) SD-OCT image of the same eye. Total thickness is analogous to that shown in Scheimpflug imaging. Epithelial mapping shows focal epithelial hypertrophy in the region of the central ulceration. Figure 9-2-3. SD-OCT cross-sectional image of a patient who developed a corneal ulcer from bacterial keratitis. The left image shows the location of the ulceration, while the right image shows the region in cross section. There is significant corneal opacification with an irregular anterior surface. The epithelium appears fully healed, and epithelial remodeling has begun. Figure 9-2-4. (A) Slit lamp imaging of a patient who developed a severe corneal ulcer many months prior to imaging. After resolution of the infection the patient had a significant irregularly shaped corneal scar near the center of the visual axis, with irregular borders and varying densities of residual opacity. (B) Scheimpflug raw image showing the extent of the ulceration as hyperreflective opacity. The cornea appears significantly thin in a multiple-millimeter region. Figure 9-2-4. (C) Scheimpflug refractive display of the same eye. Anterior curvature (upper left) shows significant irregularity, with significant steepening in the region adjacent to the scar. Pachymetry map (lower left) shows focal thinning in the region of the ulcer. Anterior elevation (upper right) shows focal elevation in the area coinciding with steepest curvature, while posterior elevation (lower right) is focally increased in the region corresponding with maximal thinning. Figure 9-2-5. SD-OCT imaging of a patient who developed a Descemetocele after infectious keratitis. The patient was a scleral contact lens wearer, and after resolution of the infection returned to scleral lens wear. The Descemetocele remained stable over many years. Images 1 to 4 (lower left) show the cornea in areas adjacent to the Descemetocele, while images 8 and 10 to 13 (right) show cross-sectional images within the region of the Descemetocele. The thin uniform white line above the cornea in these images is the scleral contact lens.
SECTION 3: EPITHELIAL BASEMENT MEMBRANE DYSTROPHY
Also termed anterior basement membrane dystrophy, map-dot dystrophy, and Cogan’s microcystic dystrophy, EBMD is a disease process impacting the epithelial basement membrane, Bowman’s membrane, and, occasionally, the anterior stroma in severe cases presenting with duplicated, irregular basement membrane material becoming sequestered within normal epithelial layers, causing irregular linear deposits within the epithelial layers. These irregularities can give rise to irregular curvature and anterior opacities that reduce acuity if located within or near the visual axis, and recurrent erosion symptoms.
Figure 9-3-1. (A) Slit lamp imaging of a patient with EBMD. There is patchy opacification with large intervening clear zones and focal “dots” of epithelial cell nests. (B) Placido ring image for the same eye showing the distortion of central rings in the region corresponding to the EBMD.
Figure 9-3-1. (C) Placido image of the same eye showing axial and tangential curvature. The pattern is irregularly irregular centrally, with the irregularity of the pattern highlighted in tangential map. (D) Placido axial curvature image of the same eye after superficial keratectomy. The central irregularity has been reduced but not fully resolved. This eye may benefit from further phototherapeutic keratectomy (PTK) stromal smoothing. Figure 9-3-2. (A) Placido ring images for a patient with bilateral EBMD. The rings are distorted centrally in both eyes. (B) Placido composite map showing axial curvature (upper), tangential curvature (middle), and corneal wavefront data (lower) for both eyes. The patterns are irregularly irregular paracentrally in both eyes, with the patterns highlighted in tangential map. Corneal wavefront demonstrates significant higher-order aberrations in both eyes. Figure 9-3-3. (A) Scheimpflug anterior curvature map in tangential scale of a patient who presented with blurred vision and was diagnosed with EBMD. There is an irregularly irregular curvature pattern, with points of focal steepening and flattening centrally and paracentrally. (B) Scheimpflug refractive display of the same patient. Anterior curvature (upper left) in axial curvature shows the same pattern but less distinctly as compared to the tangential curvature map. Corneal thickness and elevation maps are unremarkable. Figure 9-3-3. (C) Scheimpflug topometric display of the same eye. Despite the irregular surface curvature only one asymmetry index is identified as abnormal. (D) Scheimpflug raw image of the same eye shows multiple areas of hyperreflectivity corresponding to the superficial opacities from EBMD.
Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel
Full access? Get Clinical Tree