Anteroposterior Versus Posteroanterior Approach

3


Anteroposterior Versus Posteroanterior Approach


Roy R. Casiano


Today, there are essentially two endoscopic approaches available to address inflammatory or neo-plastic disease of the ethmoid, maxillary, and sphenoid sinuses: the anteroposterior (AP) approach and the posteroanterior (PA) approach.14


image The Anteroposterior (AP) Approach


Anteroposterior exenteration of the ethmoid sinuses is the technique most widely used in the United States.1,2 In this approach, the surgeon begins with an anterior ethmoidectomy by removing the unci-nate process, bullar cells, agger nasi cells, and occasionally entering the frontal recess. The surgeon then proceeds as far posteriorly as needed to remove the diseased ethmoid cells and polyps and to establish drainage to the dependent sinuses that are blocked. A limited maxillary antrostomy is typically not performed until after most ethmoid cells have been addressed. If a sphenoidotomy is indicated, a transethmoidal operation through the common wall of the sphenoid and posterior ethmoid sinus is performed.


Proponents of the AP approach argue that this technique enables the surgeon to address anterior ethmoidal disease without the need for extensive surgery.1,2,5 Not all surgeons share this view, however, arguing that patients frequently have pansinus disease affecting not only the anterior ethmoid’s dependent sinuses (maxillary and frontal) but also the sphenoethmoidal recess and surrounding ostia draining the posterior ethmoids and sphenoid sinuses.6

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Aug 10, 2016 | Posted by in OTOLARYNGOLOGY | Comments Off on Anteroposterior Versus Posteroanterior Approach

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access