Aerodigestive Programs: Role of the Core Team Members, Speech Language Pathology, Pulmonology, Gastroenterology, Otolaryngology, and Parent/Caregiver


Airway


Choanal atresia


Laryngomalacia


Glossoptosis


Vocal fold paralysis


Laryngotracheoesophageal cleft


Stenosis: glottic, subglottic, tracheal, transglottis


Tracheobronchomalacia


Tracheoesophageal fistula


Tracheostomy dependence


Pulmonary


Chronic lung disease of prematurity


Diffuse lung disease


Asthma


Bronchiectasis: aspiration, ciliary dyskinesia, immunodeficiency, post-obstructive


Chronic respiratory failure


Gastroenterology


Gastroesophageal reflux


Eosinophilic esophagitis


Esophageal structure


Failure to thrive


Feeding and swallowing


Swallow incoordination


Oral aversion


Behavioral feeding problems


Sleep


Obstructive sleep apnea


Central sleep apnea


Hypoventilation


Genetic


Trisomy 21


CHARGE association


Pierre Robin sequence


22q11 deletion


VATER/VACTERL


Craniofacial syndromes


Opitz syndrome


Cri du chat


Neurologic


Static encephalopathy


Chiari malformation


Hypotonia



Adapted from Piccione and Boesch [8], with permission




There are a significant number of specialists that would be required to cover all of the possible conditions in children with aerodigestive disorders. Through consensus development by Boesch et al. [7], however, the list of essential core members whose input is required for all patients attending an aerodigestive program can be distilled to the following: care coordinator, nursing, speech language pathologist, pulmonologist, gastroenterologist, and otolaryngologist. An aerodigestive program should include these key players at a minimum.


Consensus was also achieved regarding the essential and defining functions and features of an aerodigestive team evaluation [7]. For maximal efficiency and efficacy, the care cycle for an aerodigestive patient would involve the following work flow: consultation request and care coordination, pre-visit intake, team meeting, prescheduling appointments and procedures, shared clinic visit, combined endoscopy with a single anesthetic encounter, wrap-up visit with the family, summary document, and provision of follow-up care if needed.


The typical aerodigestive program will see patients with a mix of medical and surgical needs. The interdisciplinary approach is important to effectively manage and plan the order of events leading to maximization of medical and surgical interventions and outcomes. Piccione et al. [8] also emphasized that there are several consistent structural elements of an aerodigestive program, namely, a (1) interdisciplinary medical and surgical team, (2) care coordination, (3) team meeting, and (4) combined endoscopy.


The team meeting is essential. This allows for distillation and review of historical events and prior tests. This information may be obtained through a telephone-based intake with caregivers and acquisition of previous medical records. This review will help to formulate a patient visit itinerary based on the team review and available best practice guidelines. It will help to ensure that a complete evaluation will be afforded in a short and convenient time without needlessly repeating tests with the associated cost and risk. The telephone contact is also a great opportunity to council the family about expectations. The multidisciplinary visit can be overwhelming with the total number of interactions and the length of the overall day. Families are often thankful despite the long day once they realize the extent and expedience of the evaluation they will receive. The itinerary will include essential laboratory tests, radiographs, and swallow studies leading up to the clinic visit with the core provider team. The team visit confirms historical and physical findings and affirms the need and plan for the endoscopies and adjuvant tests requiring anesthesia. Piccione et al. [8] compiled the common aerodigestive diagnostic tests which are adapted in Table 1.2.


Table 1.2

Common aerodigestive diagnostic tests






















































































































Diagnostic modality


Strengths


Weaknesses


Chest radiograph


Identification of lower respiratory tract disease


Low sensitivity for bronchiectasis


Low radiation


Limited ability to differentiate causes of lung disease


Chest CT


Distribution and severity of lung findings of various types


Increased radiation


Differentiation between airway and parenchymal disease


May require sedation for good imaging


Upper GI series


Evaluation of anatomy: peristalsis, stricture, hernia, gastric outlet obstruction, malrotation


Does not evaluate reflux


Radionucleotide reflux scan


Physiologic conditions


Limited sensitivity


May document aspiration from reflux


Radionuclide salivagram


Assess for aspiration of saliva


Poor sensitivity


Radionuclide parotid scan


Assess function of major salivary glands


FEES (fiber-optic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing)


Evaluate functional anatomy of swallowing


Blind to moment of pharyngeal swallowing and esophageal phase


Evaluate airway protective reflexes


Not widely available


Portable


No radiation


VFSS (videofluoroscopic swallowing study)


Evaluates all phases of swallowing


Radiation exposure


Evaluates for aspiration


Limited anatomic evaluation


Microlaryngoscopy and rigid bronchoscopy


Superior optical resolution


Difficult access to peripheral airways


Evaluation of the posterior larynx


Limited assessment of airway dynamics


Access for instrumentation


Requires anesthesia


DISE (drug-induced sleep endoscopy)


Assessment of anatomic site of obstruction during sleep


Only an approximation of sleep state


May miss REM specific obstruction


Flexible bronchoscopy with lavage


Evaluation of static and dynamic airway lesions, nasal-bronchial


Limited evaluation of posterior larynx


Access to difficult and peripheral airways


Limited optical resolution


Evaluation of airway inflammation and infections


Access for instrumentation


Requires anesthesia


Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD)


Evaluation of esophageal mucosal disease: acid and eosinophilic


Requires anesthesia


Evaluation of esophageal, gastric, and duodenal anatomy


Obtain intestinal secretions


Evaluation of celiac disease


Esophageal impedance


Identification and characterization of acid and nonacid reflux


Lack of normative data


May identify dysmotility


Unclear relationship between impedance indices and extra-esophageal disease


Motility studies


Gold standard for dysmotility


Not widely available


Polysomnography (PSG)


Characterization of sleep disordered breathing and sleep architecture


Expensive and cumbersome


Titration of respiratory support


Availability issues



Adapted from Piccione and Boesch [8], with permission


Each of the core specialists will bring their perspective and process for evaluating the chief complaints and symptoms presented by the patient [8]. Although the group encounter, with all present for the clinic interview and the operative endoscopies, has been found to be the most efficient and efficacious, each provider brings unique and individual expertise. Each of the four core disciplines has overlap but also bring a unique role in the evaluation of these complex patients. The role of each core discipline will be outlined in this chapter.


Role of the Speech Language Pathologist


The multidisciplinary voice, swallow, and aerodigestive team can provide comprehensive, patient-centered and evidence-based care for children and adolescents with a variety of disorders impacting voice, swallow, and upper airway. Multidisciplinary team management of aerodigestive disorders in children has been found to be more cost-effective and has better outcomes than stand-alone care [6]. In voice disorders, the model of speech language pathologist and otolaryngologist working together in evaluation and treatment has been well established since the 1980s and became more common in pediatric voice around a decade later. The strength of these teams lies in both the diverse knowledge and skills of the team members and their ability to work collaboratively to evaluate and treat the patient. The speech language pathologist specializing in these areas provides a focused set of knowledge and skills for these patients. We can provide evaluation of structure, function, and behavior of upper airway as they relate to voice, swallow, and breathing. In many cases we can also provide behavioral therapy to change voice, breathing, and swallow function, provide education, and provide compensatory strategies when needed. We have specialized knowledge of laryngeal structure and function; the mechanics of voice, breathing, and swallowing; and neurologic controls of voice, swallow, and breathing. We provide valuable contributions with our in-depth understanding of behavior change. On any medical team, but especially with complex children, we do not operate in a vacuum and collaborate with surgical and medical personnel in both evaluation and treatment. According to the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association’s scope of practice statement, “SLPs share responsibility with other professionals for creating a collaborative culture. Collaboration requires joint communication and shared decision making among all members of the team, including the individual and family, to accomplish improved service delivery and functional outcomes for the individuals served” [9].


Evaluation of Swallow


Dysphagia is relatively common in children. A rate of 0.9% was found in children aged 3–17 [10], and incidence is higher in certain medically complex populations including those with cerebral palsy and craniofacial syndromes [1113]. There has been a marked increase in diagnoses of dysphagia in the pediatric hospitalized population, from 0.08% in 1997 to 0.41% in 2012 [14]. While exact reasons for this are not clear, it is often attributed both to increased survival rates of extremely preterm infants and improved diagnosis of swallowing disorders. Often the SLP is the first contact a child with dysphagia has with the multidisciplinary team. Children may be referred directly to us for a swallow evaluation or for treatment of feeding or swallowing disorders, or we may care for the child in the NICU from birth. We have the benefit of being able to spend the time to get a comprehensive history and provide ongoing assessment in therapy sessions. The SLP has several methods of evaluating swallowing, including the clinical swallowing evaluation, flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing, and video fluoroscopic swallowing study, as well as less frequently used measures including manometry. These may be used in combination depending on the needs of the patient. According to ASHA, the role of the SLP in evaluation includes participating in determining the appropriateness of instrumental evaluation and follow-up, diagnosing pediatric oral and pharyngeal swallowing disorders, making appropriate referrals to other disciplines, and recommending a safe swallowing and feeding plan [9].


We require the expertise of others when evaluating and planning treatment beyond swallow recommendations for structural and functional deficits impacting swallowing, including (but not limited to) neurologic impairments, cerebral palsy (CP), sensory deficits, tracheoesophageal fistula, laryngeal cleft, acid reflux, esophageal dysmotility, laryngeal mobility impairment, and neurologic disorders.


Treatment of Dysphagia


SLPs on the multidisciplinary team as well as our colleagues working in more general outpatient settings, birth to three, and schools provide feeding and swallowing therapy to habilitate or rehabilitate swallowing and progress feeding skills. Feeding is defined as any aspect of eating or drinking and includes preparing food or liquid for intake, sucking or chewing, and swallowing [15]. Swallowing specifically refers to the complex processes involved in transporting solids, liquids, or saliva from the mouth to the digestive tract while maintaining airway protection [15]. Speech language pathologists are involved in evaluation and treatment of both.


A detailed description of all forms of feeding and swallowing therapy is beyond the scope of this chapter. Approaches to swallowing treatment may include positioning changes, changes in viscosity of bolus, changes in flow rate of bolus, maneuvers, sensory stimulation techniques, oral motor treatments, pacing, and cue-based feeding [15].


Evaluation of Voice


Incidence estimates of pediatric dysphonia are varied, ranging from 1.4% [10] to 26% [16]. Dysphonia rates in children are likely increasing for some of the same reasons dysphagia rates are increasing, and children are presenting with more complex etiologies of voice disorders, beyond benign lesions. As survival rates of children born extremely preterm, or with complex tracheal or laryngeal anomalies, increase, rates of hoarseness and the complexity of children seen in the voice clinic will increase. For example, 38% of a sample of children born extremely preterm were found to have moderate-severe dysphonia at school age, with only 6% having normal voice [17]. Speech language pathologists often work in collaboration with an ENT in diagnosis and evaluation of voice disorders. According to the ASHA scope of practice, SLPs can perform a comprehensive voice evaluation which includes clinical and instrumental evaluation, assess normal or abnormal vocal function, describe voice quality and function, diagnose a voice disorder, refer to appropriate professionals to provide diagnosis of the underlying cause of the voice disorder (e.g., nodules as a cause of dysphonia), and make referrals to other professionals for other medical, surgical, or behavioral evaluation [9]. We can perform perceptual, acoustic, and aerodynamic evaluation of vocal function. We can also visualize the larynx using rigid or flexible endoscopy with stroboscopy, as well as high-speed digital video imaging of the larynx, and provide skilled interpretation of structure and function based on this. We do not diagnose lesions but can identify and describe the parameters of laryngeal function based on these evaluations and contribute to planning treatment, whether it be behavioral, surgical, or a combination of the two. The voice evaluation is also an important time to assess for stimulability for change based on therapeutic probes.


Treatment of Dysphonia


SLPs in a voice clinic and in other settings plan and deliver skilled treatment to optimize vocal function given the current anatomy, provide pre- and postoperative therapy, and provide therapy to change ingrained vocal functional behaviors. A detailed discussion of the types of voice therapy provided is beyond the scope of this chapter but can be found in other sections of this book and in these and other resources [1823].


Evaluation and Treatment of Breathing Disorders


Speech language pathologists are also experts in evaluation and management of laryngeal breathing disorders such as paradoxical vocal fold motion disorder, exercise-induced laryngomalacia, and chronic cough [9]. We can behaviorally and endoscopically evaluate laryngeal, pharyngeal, and respiratory function during breathing and provide interventions related to laryngeal sensitivity and control as well as optimizing respiratory coordination [2428].


Conclusion


The benefits of working as a part of a multidisciplinary team cannot be overstated, for both clinician and patient. We are able to evaluate based on our areas of expertise and then discuss with other team members based on the findings of their specialized evaluations, providing optimal treatment for patients.


Role of the Otolaryngologist


As a specialist of disorders of the upper aerodigestive tract, the otolaryngologist shares the pathway to both the lungs and the gastrointestinal tract. This unique perspective positions them to be able to relate to both the pulmonologist and gastroenterologist. Working in conjunction with the speech language pathologist, the otolaryngologist can help assess the anatomy and physiologic function of the upper aerodigestive tract. Medical treatments of aerodigestive disorders in children are likely made in conjunction with the gastroenterology and pulmonology regarding reflux, inflammation, or infection. Dynamic surgical interventions of the airway may be suggested after functional assessment in collaboration with the speech pathologist. The typical aerodigestive problems evaluated by the otolaryngologist can be seen in Table 1.1. The role of the otolaryngologist centers primarily on evaluation of airway surgical issues and aspiration [8].


The otolaryngologist should elicit history specific to obstructive sleep apnea, voice and swallowing disorders, recurrent infection, previous surgical history, or instrumentation of the airway. An assessment of possible congenital or genetic disorders is also essential. Growth and weight gain curves are helpful to assess potential feeding or breathing problems.


The otolaryngologist can offer expertise in office and operative endoscopy to evaluate function and anatomy. Identifying sites of abnormal anatomy, obstruction, or function of the upper aerodigestive tract is the prime modality offered. Expertise in nasopharyngoscopy in the awake patient facilitates anatomical and functional evaluation for airway obstruction, voice disorders, and swallowing dysfunction. Expertise with flexible endoscopy with the patient in a state mimicking sleep is also essential for identifying sites of obstruction causing obstructive sleep apnea. Drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) protocols continue to be developed to bring the patient as close to a state of true sleep as possible [29]. Typical dense general anesthesia for airway endoscopy changes muscular tone and can change the site of obstruction that occurs during this type of sleep and can misdirect the clinician during the evaluation. Accurately identifying the true site of obstruction during normal sleep is required to allow for successful surgical management of obstructive sleep apnea.


Plain radiographs of the airway are often helpful during the assessment of the airway and may be ordered by the otolaryngologist. PA and lateral plain radiographs of the upper aerodigestive tract and chest are often helpful. This affords an assessment of the upper airway and trachea. Obstruction from adenoidal hypertrophy (Fig. 1.1), subglottic narrowing, vascular compression, or complete tracheal rings may first be identified or suspected in these films which are easy to obtain. This will help prepare the team for operative endoscopy and prevent unsuspecting catastrophe in cases such as complete tracheal rings.

../images/462662_1_En_1_Chapter/462662_1_En_1_Fig1_HTML.png

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Apr 26, 2020 | Posted by in OTOLARYNGOLOGY | Comments Off on Aerodigestive Programs: Role of the Core Team Members, Speech Language Pathology, Pulmonology, Gastroenterology, Otolaryngology, and Parent/Caregiver

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access