Vision Care Disparities by Nativity Among US Adults and Children: An Analysis of the 2023 National Health Interview Survey

Purpose

To evaluate disparities in access to vision care among US-born and foreign-born adults and children in the United States, with particular attention to duration of US residence and language spoken with healthcare providers.

Design

Retrospective cohort study.

Subjects

US-born and foreign-born adults and children participating in the 2023 National Health Interview Survey.

Methods

Data from the 2023 National Health Interview Survey were analyzed using survey-weighted methods. Outcomes included delayed medical care due to cost or transportation, receipt of an eye examination, vision testing history among children, and self- or parent-reported vision difficulty. Multivariable logistic regression models estimated adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), adjusting for sociodemographic characteristics and insurance status. Among foreign-born adults, analyses were further stratified by years lived in the United States and language spoken with healthcare providers.

Main Outcome Measures

Delayed medical care due to cost or transportation, receipt of an eye examination in the past 12 months, lifetime vision testing among children, and vision-related functional outcomes.

Results

Among 27,822 adults, foreign-born individuals had lower adjusted odds of receiving an eye examination in the past 12 months compared with US-born adults (aOR 0.91; 95% CI 0.84-0.98). Among foreign-born adults, use of a non-English language with healthcare providers was associated with lower odds of recent eye examination (aOR 0.66; 95% CI 0.53-0.83). Cost-related delays to care were more common in unadjusted analyses among foreign-born adults but attenuated after adjustment. Among 6615 children, those from foreign-born households had significantly lower odds of ever having undergone vision testing (aOR 0.50; 95% CI 0.36-0.69) and lower odds of receiving an eye examination in the past year (aOR 0.74; 95% CI 0.57-0.96).

Conclusions

The 2023 NHIS data identified possible disparities in access to preventive vision care for both immigrant adults and children. Language barriers and insurance-related factors primarily affected adults, whereas reduced exposure to preventive screening appeared to contribute to disparities among children. Targeted, age-specific strategies could potentially promote equitable access to vision care in immigrant populations.

INTRODUCTION

Visual impairment remains a significant public health concern in the United States, with substantial implications for quality of life, educational attainment, and long-term health outcomes. ,,, Access to timely preventive vision screening and eye care is critical for early detection and intervention, yet disparities in utilization persist across sociodemographic groups. These inequities disproportionately affect individuals from lower socioeconomic backgrounds, racial and ethnic minority populations, and immigrant communities, where structural barriers may limit engagement with routine eye care.

Among adults, gaps in vision care utilization have been consistently documented, particularly among those at elevated risk for vision loss. Despite clinical guidelines recommending periodic eye examinations, many adults do not receive preventive care, often due to lack of insurance, interruptions in coverage, or financial constraints. Variation in state-level Medicaid coverage for routine vision services further contributes to unequal access across regions. Language barriers represent an additional and independent obstacle: adults with limited English proficiency (LEP) experience greater difficulty navigating the health system and lower utilization of preventive services, including eye care. ,

For children, early identification of visual disorders is especially important, as many causes of visual impairment are amenable to treatment when detected during critical developmental periods. ,, However, pediatric vision care access remains uneven. ,, Children from low-income households and those experiencing insurance instability have higher odds of unmet vision care needs, and access to preventive services is strongly influenced by the availability and effectiveness of school-based vision screening programs. ,, Disruptions to these programs, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic, have been associated with declines in pediatric vision screening and follow-up, potentially exacerbating existing disparities.

Immigrant families may face overlapping barriers that affect both adult and pediatric access to vision care. Prior national analyses suggest that immigrant adults are less likely to utilize optometry services and that children in immigrant households are less likely to receive recommended vision screening. , However, limited contemporary evidence has examined how these disparities differ between adults and children, or how duration of US residence and language use with healthcare providers shape access to preventive eye care. Using data from the 2023 National Health Interview Survey, this study evaluates nativity-based disparities in vision care access among US-born and foreign-born adults and children, with the goal of clarifying age-specific mechanisms underlying immigrant vision care disparities.

METHODS

Data were obtained from the 2023 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS), an annual, nationally representative survey of the civilian, noninstitutionalized US population conducted by the National Center for Health Statistics. NHIS employs a multistage probability sampling design incorporating clustering, stratification, and unequal selection probabilities. Public-use files contain no personally identifiable information; therefore, this study was considered exempt from institutional review board review as determined by the Florida State University Office for Human Subjects Protection. The study was adherent to the tenets in the Declaration of Helsinki.

The analytic sample included 29,522 adults and 7692 children. Adults missing nativity or required survey design variables were excluded. Children missing nativity were excluded, and the “ever had a vision test” outcome was restricted to those aged ≥5 years because younger children were not asked this item. Because NHIS collects outcomes and covariates on different subsamples with varying item-level completeness, analytic sample sizes differed across models. Exact denominators for each outcome are reported in Tables 1 to 6 . Figures 1 and 2 demonstrate the inclusion process used for the analytic sample.

TABLE 1

Adult Participant Characteristics by Nativity

Characteristics Category Total Adults ( n ) US-Born ( n ) Foreign-Born ( n ) US-Born (%) Foreign-Born (%) P Value
Demographics Sex Male 12,923 10,801 2122 49.3 47.4 .13
Female 15,360 12,781 2579 50.7 52.6
Missing 5 4 1 0 0
Race/ethnicity Non-Hispanic White 18,851 17,881 970 73 17.4 –
Non-Hispanic Black 2979 2585 394 12 9.2
Hispanic 4199 2124 2075 10.4 47.4
Non-Hispanic Asian 187 183 4 0.7 0.1
Non-Hispanic Other/Multiple 2072 813 1259 3.9 25.9
Socioeconomic characteristics Education Less than HS 2395 1498 897 7.4 23.1 –
HS/GED 7132 6130 1002 27.5 23.1
Some college/AA 7842 7016 826 31.8 18.7
Bachelor’s degree 6561 5472 1089 20.7 19.9
>Bachelor’s degree 4234 3380 854 12.2 14.3
Missing 124 90 34 0.5 1
Poverty ratio <0.50 811 619 192 2.6 4.1 <.001
0.50-<1.00 875 667 208 2.7 4
1.00-<1.25 1239 940 299 3.5 6.4
1.25-<1.50 1092 834 258 3.3 5.9
1.50-<2.00 1465 1152 313 4.7 7.4
2.00-<3.00 1229 997 232 4.2 5.8
3.00-<4.00 1365 1121 244 4.3 5.5
4.00-<5.00 2359 1971 388 8.2 9.1
>5.00 2451 2082 369 8.9 8
Not reported 1924 1655 269 7.4 6
Missing 13,478 11,548 1930 50.2 37.7
Region Northeast 4334 3535 799 16.5 19.5 –
Midwest 6250 5731 519 23.2 10.3
South 10,516 8847 1669 39 36.4
West 7188 5473 1715 21.4 33.7
Insurance status Insured 26,299 22,368 3931 93.8 80.9 <.001
Uninsured 1918 1161 757 5.9 18.7
Missing 71 57 14 0.4 0.3
Private insurance Yes 17,371 14,783 2588 65.2 53.7 <.001
No 10,812 8715 2097 34.3 45.9
Missing 105 88 17 0.5 0.4
Medicaid Yes 3631 2877 754 13.9 17.1 <.001
No 24,588 20,648 3940 85.8 82.7
Missing 69 61 8 0.3 0.2
Medicare Yes 9688 8650 1038 25.9 17.4 <.001
No 18,518 14,870 3648 73.7 82.2
Missing 82 66 16 0.4 0.4
Vision-only SSP Yes 7802 6693 1109 30 21.7 <.001
No 20,181 16,622 3559 68.6 77.5
Missing 305 271 34 1.4 0.8
Barriers to care Language at doctor English 2926 1249 1677 6.7 34.3 –
Non-English 1105 81 1024 0.4 25
Missing 24,257 22,256 2001 92.9 40.7
Delay care due to no reliable transportation (<12 mo) Yes 1934 1603 331 6.6 7 .031
No 26,160 21,842 4318 92.6 91.8
Missing 194 141 53 0.7 1.2
Delay medical care due to cost (<12 mo) Yes 1864 1507 357 6.9 8.3 .023
No 26,409 22,067 4342 93 91.6
Missing 15 12 3 0.1 0.1
Unmet medical need due to cost (<12 mo) Yes 1658 1300 358 5.9 8.4 <.001
No 26,614 22,276 4338 94.1 91.5
Missing 16 10 6 0 0.1
Vision outcomes Eye exam (<12 mo) Yes 15,944 13,570 2374 54.1 48 <.001
No 12,316 9991 2325 45.8 52
Missing 28 25 3 0.1 0.1
Vision difficulty No difficulty 22,735 18,753 3982 80.4 84 <.001
Any difficulty 5546 4827 719 19.6 16
Missing 7 6 1 0 0
Wears glasses/contact lenses Yes 19,098 16,382 2716 65.5 53.6 <.001
No 9189 7203 1986 34.5 46.4
Missing 1 1 0 0 0
Nativity Nativity US-born 23,586 23,586 0 – – –
Foreign-born 4702 0 4702 – –
Years in the US (foreign-born) <1 – – 49 – 1.1 –
1-<5 – – 348 – 8.3
5-<10 – – 499 – 11.2
10-<15 – – 373 – 8.4
>15 – – 3305 – 68.1
Unknown – – 128 – 2.8
Weighted mean age (y): All adults: 48.2 (SD 18.6); US-born: 48.1 (SD 19.2); foreign-born: 48.7 (SD 16.3); P value =.10

Percentages represent survey-weighted column percentages unless otherwise specified. P values were calculated using survey-weighted chi-square tests for categorical variables and survey-weighted t tests for continuous variables. Language spoken with a healthcare provider was assessed only among respondents who reported seeing a healthcare provider in the past 12 months. Missing values are shown where applicable and were excluded from percentage calculations. Years in the United States are reported for foreign-born participants only. All analyses account for the complex sampling design of the NHIS.

GED = General Educational Development; HS = high school; NHIS = National Health Interview Survey; SD = standard deviation; SSP = supplemental security plan.

FIGURE 1

STROBE flow diagram for adult analytic sample.

Sep 20, 2026 | Posted by in OPHTHALMOLOGY | Comments Off on Vision Care Disparities by Nativity Among US Adults and Children: An Analysis of the 2023 National Health Interview Survey

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access