Highlights
-
•
Trabeculectomy is a major surgery for the treatment of glaucoma.
-
•
Preoperative brimonidine use incurs a 3-fold increase in trabeculectomy failure.
-
•
Failure rate in 1 year was 12% vs. 5% with and without brimonidine use.
Purpose
To evaluate the role of preoperative glaucoma medication in the surgical outcomes of trabeculectomy.
Design
Retrospective observational cohort study.
Participants
A total of 501 eyes of adult glaucoma patients who underwent primary trabeculectomy.
Methods
Using data from a single academic center, we identified adult trabeculectomy patients by procedure codes between January 1, 2015, and March 21, 2022. Preoperative and postoperative electronic medical records, up to 3 years, were extracted and included demographics, diagnoses, intraocular pressure (IOP), and medications. Preoperative medications were matched to 43 unique formulations, incorporating all concentration variants, brand names, and generic equivalents. Data accuracy was validated with a manual chart review.
Main Outcome Measures
Surgical success was defined by IOP between 6 and 15 mm Hg or greater than 20% reduction from baseline without reoperation. Surgical failure from high IOP was determined by IOP > 15 mm Hg or < 20% reduction from baseline on 2 consecutive visits, or reoperation due to high IOP.
Results
Preoperative brimonidine was associated with an increased risk of high IOP trabeculectomy failure (hazard ratio [HR] 2.87; p =.002), as was higher baseline IOP (HR: 1.33; p =.014). Other topical agents, such as beta blocker, prostaglandin, or carbonic anhydrase inhibitors, age, sex, race, or glaucoma severity, did not show an increased or decreased hazard of high IOP surgical failure. At 3 years, survival analysis showed the probability of success from high-IOP failure was 81.9% in the brimonidine group versus 93.36% in the non-brimonidine group ( p <.00, log-rank test).
Conclusions
Brimonidine is associated with a near 3-fold increase in trabeculectomy failure from high IOP. Further study is needed to understand the underlying mechanisms and to optimize preoperative medication.
Introduction
Glaucoma is the leading cause of irreversible blindness worldwide and is projected to affect 111.8 million people by 2040. Lowering intraocular pressure (IOP) is the main intervention, which can be achieved through medication or surgery. Trabeculectomy is often reserved for patients whose glaucoma cannot be controlled by medication alone or who need a lower target IOP compared to what other interventions are able to achieve. Many patients undergoing trabeculectomies have been on chronic maximal tolerated topical glaucoma medications, which have been implicated in impacting surgical outcomes. ,, Preventing early fibrosis and subsequent surgical failure of trabeculectomy is critical in improving patient outcomes. Studies have found that the use of glaucoma medications induces inflammation in conjunctival tissues, tightens orbital structures, and is associated with a higher rate of trabeculectomy failures. ,,, However, previous studies evaluating the effect of glaucoma medication on trabeculectomies have several limitations. Some studies were performed prior to 1996 before major drug classes like alpha-agonist and prostaglandin analog became widely available. , Other studies did not cf the effect of different classes of medication, but instead either investigated a single class of medication , or reported the cumulative medication effect without differentiating between them. ,, This study aims to address this gap by examining the effect of the most commonly used glaucoma medications and the trabeculectomy outcomes. This study utilized a single institutional dataset and employed methods we developed to ensure the highest accuracy of medication data, including extracting the medication list at key clinical points of care and validating through chart review. By examining the risks associated with each class of glaucoma medication on trabeculectomy, this study aims to help clinicians optimize pre-operative medication management to improve surgical outcomes.
METHODS
This study was approved by the Oregon Health & Science University (OHSU) Institutional Review Board (IRB) (STUDY00027118) for conducting local chart reviews at Casey Eye Institute at OHSU. All research adhered to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki. Informed consent was not required due to the retrospective nature of this study.
Patient Selection
This retrospective study examined patients aged 18 years or older with all types of glaucoma and varying severities who underwent primary trabeculectomy on maximally tolerated medical therapy in a single academic center at Casey Eye Institute, OHSU, from January 1, 2015, to March 21, 2022. Patients were identified using the current procedural terminology (CPT) code for trabeculectomy (CPT 66170), excluding trabeculectomy with a previous scar (CPT 66172). Other exclusion criteria included: (1) age under 18 years old; (2) prior glaucoma surgery, such as trabeculectomy (CPT 66170), trabeculectomy with previous scar (66172), aqueous shunt implantation (CPT 66180), aqueous shunt revision (66184, 66185), or trabeculectomy revision (CPT 66250); (3) less than 3 months of follow-up; (4) incomplete medication data. In our institution, eyes with substantial conjunctival scarring preferentially received aqueous shunt surgery rather than trabeculectomy. Other non-glaucoma ocular surgeries (e.g., corneal or retinal surgery) were not excluded.
Data Collection
Preoperative and postoperative electronic medical records were extracted and included age at the time of the surgery, sex (per patient self-report), race, and glaucoma diagnosis, baseline IOP, postop IOP, and all active glaucoma medications. We obtained and processed glaucoma medications using the following methods. First, we extracted patients’ glaucoma medication from their electronic medical records on the day of surgery under “Pre-op”. This medication list was manually reviewed by our pre-operative nursing staff and verbally confirmed with the patients prior to surgery, and therefore was highly accurate. Subsequently, the medication list was matched to 43 unique medication IDs to ensure all formulation percentages, brand names, and generic names were included. Post-operative medications were similarly extracted and processed. We used a manual chart review of patients’ progress notes to identify and exclude medication errors, such as incomplete records or failed discontinuation. Next, combination medications were re-coded using the medication class to exclude duplicate medications. Finally, glaucoma medications were categorized into seven drug classes based on their pharmacologic mechanisms: prostaglandin analogues, beta-blockers, topical and oral carbonic anhydrase inhibitors, alpha-agonists, Rho-kinase inhibitors, nitric oxide donors, and cholinergic agonists. Medication classes with fewer than 15 patients were excluded from analysis due to insufficient sample size for reliable statistical estimation. These included cholinergic agonist (pilocarpine, n = 10), Rho-kinase inhibitor (netarsudil, n = 11), and nitric oxide donor (latanoprostene, n = 3). After all the patients’ medication data had been completely processed, we validated the accuracy of our methodology by randomly selecting forty patients for chart review, which showed that the medication data was 100% consistent with the medical records. When both eyes of a patient underwent trabeculectomy, only the first-operated eye was included to ensure independent observations.
Outcome Measures
The primary outcome evaluated surgical results over a 3-year postoperative period. To minimize misclassification due to early postoperative optimization, outcomes were assessed only on follow-up visits occurring at or after postoperative month 3, consistent with definitions used in major glaucoma surgical trials. Surgical failure due to elevated IOP was defined as IOP > 15 mm Hg or < 20% reduction from baseline on 2 consecutive follow-up visits, or requiring reoperation due to high IOP. Qualified surgical success was defined as IOP between 6 and 15 mm Hg or ≥ 20% IOP reduction from baseline, without persistent hypotony (IOP ≤ 5 mm Hg on 2 consecutive follow-up visits) or requiring reoperation for hypotony-related complications. This IOP criterion was used rather than a higher IOP target used by other studies due to our clinical observation that many trabeculectomy patients require this level of target IOP to be considered a success.
Statistical Analysis
We analyzed continuous variables using Welch’s t-test, which accounts for unequal variances between groups. For continuous variables that did not meet normality assumptions, we applied the Mann-Whitney U test. Categorical variables were compared using the Chi-squared test when expected cell counts were adequate, and Fisher’s exact test when cell counts were sparse (i.e., expected frequencies < 5). For ordinal exposure categories, including analyses evaluating a potential dose–response or monotonic trend (number of glaucoma medications), we used the Cochran–Armitage trend test. To evaluate time-to-event outcomes, we constructed Kaplan-Meier survival curves and used the log-rank test to cf survival distributions between groups.
We fitted Cox proportional hazards regression models to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs (CIs) for factors associated with surgical failure. Candidate covariates tested in the multivariable model included age at surgery, baseline intraocular pressure (IOP), medication class, glaucoma severity, number of glaucoma medications, race, and sex. Covariates were selected based on clinical relevance. Variables with sparse category levels (<15 observations) were recategorized, and we also confirmed that there were no near-constant variables (a single level with > 95% prevalence or variance < 5% of the mean). We assessed multicollinearity among covariates by calculating variance inflation factors (VIFs), with VIF > 5 indicating potential collinearity concerns. Because medication class indicators and total medication count are inherently correlated, we performed a separate Cox model in which medication burden was represented as the number of preoperative glaucoma medications excluding brimonidine, rather than including multiple medication-class indicators, to evaluate the association between medication burden and high IOP failure while minimizing collinearity with brimonidine exposure. We also evaluated predictors of surgical failure due to hypotony using multivariable Cox regression, with the same candidate covariates and variable-selection rules described above.
The proportional hazards assumption was tested using scaled Schoenfeld residuals, both globally and for individual covariates. To investigate potential effect modification, we introduced multiplicative interaction terms between key covariates and assessed their significance using likelihood ratio tests. We retained interaction terms with p -values <.05 in the final model.
All statistical tests were 2-sided and considered p -values <.05 statistically significant with data processing and statistical analyses using Python (version 3.10.1) and R (version 4.2.3).
RESULTS
Of the 662 eyes that underwent primary trabeculectomy between January 1, 2015, and March 21, 2022, 62 were excluded due to incomplete medication data or fewer than 3 months of follow-up. A total of 99 patients underwent bilateral trabeculectomy. To avoid inter-eye correlation, only the first-operated eye from each patient was included in the analysis. Accordingly, the final study cohort consisted of 501 eyes from 501 unique patients. Based on the above-mentioned criteria, 407 eyes (81.2%) had surgical success while 52 eyes (10.4%) had surgical failure within 3 years due to high IOP, and 42eyes (8.38%) had persistent hypotony.
Table 1 summarizes demographic characteristics, baseline ocular parameters, glaucoma diagnosis, disease severity, and preoperative medication use between failure. The cohort was predominantly white (85.0%) and female (53.3%) with primary open-angle glaucoma (68.4%). There were no significant differences for demographics, baseline IOP, glaucoma diagnosis and severity, and number of glaucoma medications between the success and failure groups.
Table 1
Baseline Demographics and Clinical Characteristics By Surgical Outcome
| Overall ( n = 501) | Surgical Success ( n = 407) | Failure from High IOP ( n = 52) | Failure from Hypotony ( n = 42) | P -values (High IOP; Hypotony) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age | 68.27 ± 13.56 | 68.84 ± 12.73 | 64.15 ± 18.31 | 67.79 ± 14.00 | .179;.850 |
| Baseline IOP | 20.64 ± 8.49 | 20.35 ± 8.49 | 23.98 ± 8.04 | 19.37 ± 8.31 | .000*;.439 |
| Sex | .031*;.050 | ||||
| Female | 267 (53.3%) | 229 (56.3%) | 21 (40.4%) | 17 (40.5%) | |
| Race | .024*;.803 | ||||
| White | 429 (85.0%) | 353 (86.7%) | 39 (75.0%) | 37 (88.1%) | |
| Others | 72 (15.0%) | 54 (13.3%) | 13 (25.0%) | 5 (11.9%) | |
| Glaucoma diagnosis | .108;.168 | ||||
| POAG | 343 (68.4%) | 279 (68.6%) | 36 (69.2%) | 28 (66.7%) | |
| PACG | 10 (2.0%) | 10 (2.5%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | |
| PXG | 31 (6.2%) | 28 (6.95%) | 2 (3.8%) | 1 (2.4%) | |
| Pigmentary glaucoma | 11 (2.2%) | 9 (2.2%) | 0 (0%) | 2 (4.8%) | |
| Low-tension glaucoma | 50 (10.0%) | 38 (9.3%) | 4 (7.7%) | 8 (19%) | |
| Secondary glaucoma | 24 (4.8%) | 21 (5.29%) | 2 (3.8%) | 1 (2.4%) | |
| Congenital glaucoma | 9 (1.8%) | 6 (1.5%) | 1 (1.9%) | 2 (4.8%) | |
| Other Glaucoma | 23 (4.6%) | 16 (3.9%) | 7 (13.5%) | 0 (0%) | |
| Glaucoma Severity | .193;.338 | ||||
| Severe | 245 (48.9%) | 206 (50.6%) | 21 (40.4%) | 18 (42.9%) | |
| Mild to Moderate | 256 (51.1%) | 201(49.4%) | 31 (59.6%) | 24 (57.1%) | |
| Glaucoma Medication | |||||
| Alpha Agonist (Brimonidine) | 243 (48.5%) | 188(46.2%) | 37 (71.1%) | 18 (42.9%) | .000*;.679 |
| Beta Blockers | 365 (72.8%) | 300 (73.7%) | 36 (69.2%) | 29 (69.0%) | .492;.516 |
| Prostaglandin | 391 (78.0%) | 326 (80.1%) | 36 (69.2%) | 29 (69.0%) | .071;.094 |
| Carbonic Anhydrase inhibitor | 305 (67.9%) | 276 (67.8%) | 36 (69.2%) | 29 (69.0%) | .837;.870 |
| Number of Meds | .494;.369 | ||||
| #0 | 34 (6.8%) | 25 (6.1%) | 4 (7.7%) | 5 (11.9%) | |
| #1 | 55 (11.0%) | 46 (11.3%) | 4 (7.7%) | 5 (11.9%) | |
| #2 | 87 (17.4%) | 72 (17.7%) | 6 (11.5%) | 9 (21.4%) | |
| #3 | 189 (37.7%) | 156 (38.3%) | 23 (44.2%) | 10 (23.8%) | |
| #4 | 136 (27.1%) | 106 (26.5%) | 15 (28.8%) | 13 (31.0%) |
Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel
Full access? Get Clinical Tree