Therapeutic effect of combined steroid–lipoprostaglandin E1 for sudden hearing loss: a propensity score-matched analysis




Abstract


Objectives


The aim of this study is to analyze the synergistic effect of combined steroid–lipoprostaglandin E1 for the treatment of sudden hearing loss.


Methods


A prospective observational, non-randomized study with a historical cohort was performed at a university hospital. Between 2005 and 2012, 421 patients with idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss were enrolled in this study and treated with combined steroid–lipoprostaglandin E1 treatment. Additionally, 132 patients were prospectively enrolled and treated with steroid treatment alone between January 2013 and March 2014. After performing a propensity score-matched analysis, final hearing levels and the degree of recovery were compared according to treatment options.


Results


A total of 240 patients were enrolled after propensity score-matching, with 180 patients classified as combined steroid–lipoprostaglandin E1 treatment group (group I) and 60 patients as steroid treatment alone group (group II). The final hearing level (35.56 ± 34.64 dB) in group I was not significantly different from that in group II (34.64 ± 24.67 dB) ( p < 0.05). Logistic regression analysis revealed that the combined treatment did not influence recovery, and the probability of recovery was 1.881 times higher in the absence of dizziness (95% confidence interval: 1.022–3.464, p = 0.042), and 1.026 times higher in patients with better hearing in healthy ears (95% confidence interval: 1.010–1.041, p = 0.001).


Conclusion


Compared to steroid treatment alone, combined steroid–lipoprostaglandin E1 treatment failed to improve sudden hearing loss.



Introduction


Many factors are known to influence sudden hearing loss, including the loss of wave V detection as assessed by auditory brainstem response (ABR), sex, age, the time from onset to treatment, audiogram patterns, the presence of tinnitus, the absence of vertigo, normal hearing in the opposite ear, magnetic resonance imaging, and the severity of initial hearing loss .


Recent guidelines state that corticosteroids can be administered as an initial or optional therapy for sudden hearing loss . However, because there are few treatment options, it is currently the most commonly prescribed drug for sudden hearing loss. In addition, current guidelines recommend against prescribing antivirals, thrombolytic, vasodilators, vasoactive substances, or antioxidants to patients with sudden hearing loss.


Alprostadil is composed of prostaglandin E1 (PGE1) incorporated into lipid microspheres, which can accumulate at the site of vascular lesions . It is designed to prevent the rapid destruction of PGE1, such that its various biological actions, such as vasodilation, inhibition of platelet aggregation, and cyto-protection, can occur . Moreover, it is hypothesized that alprostadil could be used for the treatment of sudden hearing loss associated with vascular disorders, because its vasodilator activity may support recovery . However, the therapeutic effects of alprostadil remain unclear.


In this study, we hypothesized that steroid treatment combined with alprostadil injection may be a superior treatment for sudden hearing loss than steroid treatment alone. To reduce bias, we collected data from patients treated with steroids alone prospectively, and compared the data with propensity score-matched (PSM) historical cohorts.





Material and methods



Patients


In this study, we prospectively enrolled 132 patients who complained of an acute onset of unilateral idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss (ISSNHL) within 7 days, and showed a mean hearing level greater than 30 dB between January 2013 and March 2014. All patients were treated with steroids alone. Age, gender, presence of diabetes or hypertension, presence of tinnitus and/or dizziness, interval between onset and treatment, initial hearing level, and final hearing level at three months from the initial visit were documented. Following a medical chart review, we gathered data from 421 patients who were diagnosed with unilateral ISSNHL and were treated with a combination of steroids and alprostadil injection between January 2005 and December 2012.


The following patients were excluded in order to exclude the possibility of Meniere’s disease or another autoimmune disease: patients with an age of less than 15 years; patients with concomitant vestibular schwannoma, meningitis, myelitis, vasculopathy, or neuropsychiatric disease; patients who could not be observed for at least 3 months; and patients with a history or recurrence of sudden hearing loss, or fluctuating symptoms including tinnitus, ear fullness, and dizziness during the study period. The Institutional Review Board of University Hospital approved this study.



Treatment


All patients were hospitalized for one week, and an initial dose of oral methylprednisolone (48 mg, MPD) was administered for 4 days. The dose was tapered 8 mg every 2 days . After interviewing patients, additional intratympanic dexamethasone (IT-DEX) injections were administered as a salvage treatment or concurrently with oral MPD treatment in case of insufficient recovery. IT-DEX was administered three times over 2 weeks by tilting the patients’ heads to the contra-lateral side at approximately 45°. Before the injection, all patients were instructed to maintain this posture for 30 min and not to swallow at all during this time . Each patient received 0.5 mL of dexamethasone (5 mg/mL, Yuhan Corp., Korea) through the antero-superior quadrant of the tympanic membrane by an otologist using a 26-gauge spinal needle and a 1-mL syringe.


A retrospective analysis of alprostadil treatment data collected between 2005 and 2012 was performed. A combined continuous infusion of 10 μg/d alprostadil (5 μg/mL, Tanabe Mitsubishi Pharma, Japan) was applied for 7 days with oral MPD treatment.



Classification


We classified the patients into two groups. Group I patients corresponded to the historical cohort that visited the university hospital between 2005 and 2012 and that received combination therapy. Group II patients were enrolled prospectively between January 2013 and March 2014, and demonstrated more than 30 dB of hearing loss in three sequential frequencies by initial pure tone audiometry. Group II patients were treated with steroid treatment alone, including IT-DEX.



Calculations of hearing and assessment of recovery


Pure tone averages (PTAs) were calculated using the arithmetic mean of the hearing levels at whole frequencies (250 Hz, 500 Hz, 1 kHz, 2 kHz, 4 kHz, and 8 KHz). For assessment of improvement, initial and final hearing levels were classified into six groups: normal (PTA ≤ 25 dB), mild (25 < PTA ≤ 40 dB), moderate (40 < PTA ≤ 70 dB), severe (70 < PTA ≤ 90 dB), and profound (90 < PTA) . Improvement was defined as positive changes in hearing after treatment, whereas no change or worsening of hearing was defined as no improvement . For measurement of recovery, calculations were performed using four types hearing recovery formula and compared using a receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve based on the predictability of improvement. The four measurements used were hearing improvement rates (HIRs) , PTA recovery percentages , relative gain (RG) , and Siegel’s criteria . HIRs were calculated as the hearing gain divided by the initial hearing difference between the affected side and the healthy side, multiplied by 100 . The PTA recovery percentage was calculated as difference between initial inter-aural PTA difference and final inter-aural PTA difference, divided by initial inter-aural PTA difference, and then multiplied by 100 . The RG was calculated as the hearing gain divided by the initial PTA of the affected side, multiplied by 100 . By analyzing the ROC curve, the best hearing formula for predicting recovery was chosen among these four methods and the cut-off value was calculated.



Statistical analyses


Independent t -tests were used to assess the differences between groups. Chi-squared analysis was conducted to compare the differences between nominal variables. Estimations used in the propensity score included: (1) the age, sex, accompanying hypertension and diabetes, presence of tinnitus or dizziness, initial hearing levels of lesions and healthy sides, IT-DEX treatment as covariates; (2) treatment assignment (group I or II) as the outcome variable; and (3) logistic regression was performed, and propensity scores were calculated. The 3:1 nearest-neighbor method was utilized for matching. Next, a test of the balance of the covariates was performed, and the treatment effects were finally compared using paired t -tests. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software (ver. 18.0, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) and R Commander Plug-in for the EZR Package (RcmdrPlugin.EZR), and a p -value of < 0.05 was considered significant .





Material and methods



Patients


In this study, we prospectively enrolled 132 patients who complained of an acute onset of unilateral idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss (ISSNHL) within 7 days, and showed a mean hearing level greater than 30 dB between January 2013 and March 2014. All patients were treated with steroids alone. Age, gender, presence of diabetes or hypertension, presence of tinnitus and/or dizziness, interval between onset and treatment, initial hearing level, and final hearing level at three months from the initial visit were documented. Following a medical chart review, we gathered data from 421 patients who were diagnosed with unilateral ISSNHL and were treated with a combination of steroids and alprostadil injection between January 2005 and December 2012.


The following patients were excluded in order to exclude the possibility of Meniere’s disease or another autoimmune disease: patients with an age of less than 15 years; patients with concomitant vestibular schwannoma, meningitis, myelitis, vasculopathy, or neuropsychiatric disease; patients who could not be observed for at least 3 months; and patients with a history or recurrence of sudden hearing loss, or fluctuating symptoms including tinnitus, ear fullness, and dizziness during the study period. The Institutional Review Board of University Hospital approved this study.



Treatment


All patients were hospitalized for one week, and an initial dose of oral methylprednisolone (48 mg, MPD) was administered for 4 days. The dose was tapered 8 mg every 2 days . After interviewing patients, additional intratympanic dexamethasone (IT-DEX) injections were administered as a salvage treatment or concurrently with oral MPD treatment in case of insufficient recovery. IT-DEX was administered three times over 2 weeks by tilting the patients’ heads to the contra-lateral side at approximately 45°. Before the injection, all patients were instructed to maintain this posture for 30 min and not to swallow at all during this time . Each patient received 0.5 mL of dexamethasone (5 mg/mL, Yuhan Corp., Korea) through the antero-superior quadrant of the tympanic membrane by an otologist using a 26-gauge spinal needle and a 1-mL syringe.


A retrospective analysis of alprostadil treatment data collected between 2005 and 2012 was performed. A combined continuous infusion of 10 μg/d alprostadil (5 μg/mL, Tanabe Mitsubishi Pharma, Japan) was applied for 7 days with oral MPD treatment.



Classification


We classified the patients into two groups. Group I patients corresponded to the historical cohort that visited the university hospital between 2005 and 2012 and that received combination therapy. Group II patients were enrolled prospectively between January 2013 and March 2014, and demonstrated more than 30 dB of hearing loss in three sequential frequencies by initial pure tone audiometry. Group II patients were treated with steroid treatment alone, including IT-DEX.



Calculations of hearing and assessment of recovery


Pure tone averages (PTAs) were calculated using the arithmetic mean of the hearing levels at whole frequencies (250 Hz, 500 Hz, 1 kHz, 2 kHz, 4 kHz, and 8 KHz). For assessment of improvement, initial and final hearing levels were classified into six groups: normal (PTA ≤ 25 dB), mild (25 < PTA ≤ 40 dB), moderate (40 < PTA ≤ 70 dB), severe (70 < PTA ≤ 90 dB), and profound (90 < PTA) . Improvement was defined as positive changes in hearing after treatment, whereas no change or worsening of hearing was defined as no improvement . For measurement of recovery, calculations were performed using four types hearing recovery formula and compared using a receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve based on the predictability of improvement. The four measurements used were hearing improvement rates (HIRs) , PTA recovery percentages , relative gain (RG) , and Siegel’s criteria . HIRs were calculated as the hearing gain divided by the initial hearing difference between the affected side and the healthy side, multiplied by 100 . The PTA recovery percentage was calculated as difference between initial inter-aural PTA difference and final inter-aural PTA difference, divided by initial inter-aural PTA difference, and then multiplied by 100 . The RG was calculated as the hearing gain divided by the initial PTA of the affected side, multiplied by 100 . By analyzing the ROC curve, the best hearing formula for predicting recovery was chosen among these four methods and the cut-off value was calculated.



Statistical analyses


Independent t -tests were used to assess the differences between groups. Chi-squared analysis was conducted to compare the differences between nominal variables. Estimations used in the propensity score included: (1) the age, sex, accompanying hypertension and diabetes, presence of tinnitus or dizziness, initial hearing levels of lesions and healthy sides, IT-DEX treatment as covariates; (2) treatment assignment (group I or II) as the outcome variable; and (3) logistic regression was performed, and propensity scores were calculated. The 3:1 nearest-neighbor method was utilized for matching. Next, a test of the balance of the covariates was performed, and the treatment effects were finally compared using paired t -tests. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software (ver. 18.0, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) and R Commander Plug-in for the EZR Package (RcmdrPlugin.EZR), and a p -value of < 0.05 was considered significant .

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Aug 23, 2017 | Posted by in OTOLARYNGOLOGY | Comments Off on Therapeutic effect of combined steroid–lipoprostaglandin E1 for sudden hearing loss: a propensity score-matched analysis

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access