Stromal Corneal Dystrophies






Definition


An inherited, bilateral disorder in which an abnormal substance accumulates in the cornea.




Key Features





  • Characteristically bilateral.



  • Progressive.



  • Isolated to the cornea.





Associated Features





  • Usually autosomal dominant.



  • Not associated with systemic disease, with rare exceptions.





Introduction


Corneal dystrophy is classically bilateral, progressive, and isolated to the cornea. The disorder is generally inherited, usually in a dominant fashion, and often appears clinically to involve only one layer of the cornea. With the progressive identification of genes involved in these entities, a better pathophysiological understanding and ultimately better treatment will be developed. Epithelial and endothelial dystrophies are discussed in their respective chapters.


The stromal dystrophies are classified as such because they appear to accumulate material predominantly in the stroma. As was noted in Chapter 4.19 this categorization is, however, arbitrary because many of the stromal dystrophies also involve Bowman’s layer and the epithelium. The genetic understanding of these disorders makes this classification even less appropriate. Many of these conditions ultimately will be classified and named by their specific biochemical defects ( Table 4.20.1 ). The classification of corneal dystrophies has recently been reviewed in 2015 and standardized by an international committee and published as “The International Classification of Corneal Dystrophies (IC3D).”



TABLE 4.20.1

Corneal Dystrophies Due to Keratoepithelin Gene Defects




























Dystrophy Defect
Reis–Bückler’s Arg555Gly, Arg124Leu, Arg555Gln
Thiel–Behnke Arg124Leu (other families chromosome 10)
Lattice I Arg124Lys
Lattice IIIA Arg124Thr, Pro501Thr
Lattice IV Leu527Arg
Granular I Arg555Trp, Arg124Ser
Granular II (Avellino) Arg124His




Gelatinous Drop-Like Dystrophy


Gelatinous drop-like dystrophy was previously categorized as stromal but is now considered an epithelial/subepithelial dystrophy, as described in the most recent IC3D classification.




Lattice Dystrophy Type I


Genetics


This disorder is autosomal dominant, with mutation in the transforming growth factor-β–induced ( TGFBI ) gene, resulting in abnormal keratoepithelin production at locus 5q31. The most common mutation is at codon 124, where arginine is replaced by cysteine.


Ocular Manifestations


Rod-like glassy opacities appear in the anterior stroma in the first or second decade and become denser over time, resulting in linear, often branching opacities ( Figs. 4.20.1 and 4.20.2 ). These opacities are most dense anteriorly and centrally, with a clear zone in the periphery. The lines are relatively fine, as opposed to the more ropy opacities seen in lattice dystrophy type III. Although this disorder is bilateral, it can be asymmetrical.




Fig. 4.20.1


Lattice Dystrophy Type I.

This patient has very fine, rod-like opacities in the anterior stroma.



Fig. 4.20.2


Lattice Dystrophy Type I.

Denser, ropier opacities than those shown in Fig. 4.20.1 .


Clinical Presentation


Patients often present in their first and second decades with pain and decreased vision. Recurrent erosions are common and, over time, can lead to anterior stromal haze that can limit vision. Patients often need corneal transplantation by their fourth decade.


Pathology


Histopathologically, dense deposits are seen in the stroma. These stain with Congo red, periodic acid–Schiff (PAS), and Masson’s trichrome ( Fig. 4.20.3 ). Dichroism and birefringence are seen with polarized light and fluorescence is seen with thioflavin-T. All of these findings are characteristic for amyloid, a β-pleated protein structure. The amyloid appears to be distinct from that seen in lattice dystrophy type II. Descemet’s membrane and the endothelium are normal. Electron microscopy shows extracellular masses of fine, electron-dense randomly aligned fibrils characteristic of amyloid protein.




Fig. 4.20.3


Lattice Dystrophy Type I.

Histopathology using Congo red stain shows the amyloid accumulations throughout the stroma (arrows) .


Treatment


Initial treatment consists of soft contact lenses for corneal epithelial erosions. Phototherapeutic keratectomy may be a good option to treat anterior visually significant deposits, although epithelial healing may be delayed, and recurrences may occur. When visual acuity decreases significantly, deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) is the procedure of choice because it has a benefit over penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) in minimizing the risk of rejection. Epithelial cells are thought to be the source of these deposits, and although PKP has not shown statistically significant results, presence of transplanted limbal stem cells may have fewer recurrences. Recently, investigators have been studying the efficacy of fibronectin drops after corneal epithelium debridement in improving visual acuity in this condition.




Genetics


This disorder is autosomal dominant, with mutation in the transforming growth factor-β–induced ( TGFBI ) gene, resulting in abnormal keratoepithelin production at locus 5q31. The most common mutation is at codon 124, where arginine is replaced by cysteine.




Ocular Manifestations


Rod-like glassy opacities appear in the anterior stroma in the first or second decade and become denser over time, resulting in linear, often branching opacities ( Figs. 4.20.1 and 4.20.2 ). These opacities are most dense anteriorly and centrally, with a clear zone in the periphery. The lines are relatively fine, as opposed to the more ropy opacities seen in lattice dystrophy type III. Although this disorder is bilateral, it can be asymmetrical.




Fig. 4.20.1


Lattice Dystrophy Type I.

This patient has very fine, rod-like opacities in the anterior stroma.



Fig. 4.20.2


Lattice Dystrophy Type I.

Denser, ropier opacities than those shown in Fig. 4.20.1 .




Clinical Presentation


Patients often present in their first and second decades with pain and decreased vision. Recurrent erosions are common and, over time, can lead to anterior stromal haze that can limit vision. Patients often need corneal transplantation by their fourth decade.




Pathology


Histopathologically, dense deposits are seen in the stroma. These stain with Congo red, periodic acid–Schiff (PAS), and Masson’s trichrome ( Fig. 4.20.3 ). Dichroism and birefringence are seen with polarized light and fluorescence is seen with thioflavin-T. All of these findings are characteristic for amyloid, a β-pleated protein structure. The amyloid appears to be distinct from that seen in lattice dystrophy type II. Descemet’s membrane and the endothelium are normal. Electron microscopy shows extracellular masses of fine, electron-dense randomly aligned fibrils characteristic of amyloid protein.




Fig. 4.20.3


Lattice Dystrophy Type I.

Histopathology using Congo red stain shows the amyloid accumulations throughout the stroma (arrows) .




Treatment


Initial treatment consists of soft contact lenses for corneal epithelial erosions. Phototherapeutic keratectomy may be a good option to treat anterior visually significant deposits, although epithelial healing may be delayed, and recurrences may occur. When visual acuity decreases significantly, deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) is the procedure of choice because it has a benefit over penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) in minimizing the risk of rejection. Epithelial cells are thought to be the source of these deposits, and although PKP has not shown statistically significant results, presence of transplanted limbal stem cells may have fewer recurrences. Recently, investigators have been studying the efficacy of fibronectin drops after corneal epithelium debridement in improving visual acuity in this condition.




Systemic Amyloidosis With Corneal Lattice


Genetics


Locus 9q34 mutation in gelsolin protein is involved in actin modulation.


Ocular Manifestations


Often classified as lattice dystrophy type II, this is part of the systemic disorder familial amyloid polyneuropathy type IV (Finnish type), also known as Meretoja’s syndrome. In this disorder, fine lattice lines extend to the limbus and are not related to corneal nerves, although the sub-basal nerve density is reduced. Patients may have increased risk of glaucoma and also can present with facial weakness with lid lag.


Systemic associations include multiple cranial neuropathies and systemic amyloid deposition.


Patient Presentation


Patients often present with this condition during routine examinations. Visual disturbance is less compared with that in lattice dystrophy type I, and recurrent erosions are less frequent. Patients also can present with lid lag and corneal exposure.


Pathology


The pathology is similar to that of lattice dystrophy type I.


Treatment


Treatment, if necessary, is the same as for lattice dystrophy type I, although additional consideration must be given to the risk of corneal exposure from facial neuropathy. Animal studies on gene silencing therapy hold promise.


Other Lattice Dystrophies


Multiple subtypes of lattice dystrophy have been described based on genotypical and phenotypical variations, especially as the genetics of those with atypical features are further explored. Lattice dystrophy types III, I/III, and IV and the polymorphic variant have delayed onset at age greater than 40 years and have thicker, ropy lattice lines. Type IIIA has identical changes but has more recurrent erosions. Many of these variants are geographically restricted.




Genetics


Locus 9q34 mutation in gelsolin protein is involved in actin modulation.




Ocular Manifestations


Often classified as lattice dystrophy type II, this is part of the systemic disorder familial amyloid polyneuropathy type IV (Finnish type), also known as Meretoja’s syndrome. In this disorder, fine lattice lines extend to the limbus and are not related to corneal nerves, although the sub-basal nerve density is reduced. Patients may have increased risk of glaucoma and also can present with facial weakness with lid lag.


Systemic associations include multiple cranial neuropathies and systemic amyloid deposition.




Patient Presentation


Patients often present with this condition during routine examinations. Visual disturbance is less compared with that in lattice dystrophy type I, and recurrent erosions are less frequent. Patients also can present with lid lag and corneal exposure.




Pathology


The pathology is similar to that of lattice dystrophy type I.




Treatment


Treatment, if necessary, is the same as for lattice dystrophy type I, although additional consideration must be given to the risk of corneal exposure from facial neuropathy. Animal studies on gene silencing therapy hold promise.




Other Lattice Dystrophies


Multiple subtypes of lattice dystrophy have been described based on genotypical and phenotypical variations, especially as the genetics of those with atypical features are further explored. Lattice dystrophy types III, I/III, and IV and the polymorphic variant have delayed onset at age greater than 40 years and have thicker, ropy lattice lines. Type IIIA has identical changes but has more recurrent erosions. Many of these variants are geographically restricted.




Granular Corneal Dystrophy Type I


Genetics


This disorder is autosomal dominant, with mutation in the TGFBI gene at locus 5q31.


Ocular Manifestation


Previously called Groenouw’s dystrophy type I , granular corneal dystrophy is characterized by the presence of discrete opacities in the corneal stroma that do not extend to the limbus, and the intervening stroma is clear. The opacities have irregular crumb-like or flake-like shapes and are whitish or slightly glassy in appearance ( Fig. 4.20.4 ). The pattern within a given family appears to be consistent. No systemic associations are known.




Fig. 4.20.4


Granular Dystrophy.

Note the more crumb-like opacities in this patient who has sufficient clear cornea to have normal acuity.


Patient Presentation


Many patients have no symptoms, whereas some patients develop recurrent erosions. In the fifth decade or later, some patients develop visual difficulties as the opacities become prominent in the superficial stroma. Anterior stromal opacities tend to be much more visually significant than posterior stromal opacities.


Pathology


Histopathological findings show red staining ( Fig. 4.20.5 ) with Masson’s trichrome stain without Congo red staining. Electron microscopy shows electron-dense, rod-like deposits and microfibrils, which are present in keratocytes as well as epithelial cells. The material is thought to be phospholipid.




Fig. 4.20.5


Granular Corneal Dystrophy.

Masson’s trichrome staining shows accumulation of hyaline material in the corneal stroma and beneath the epithelium.


Treatment


Because the superficial deposits are often the most visually significant, vision often improves with excimer ablation and does not impair future keratoplasty. Patients who require keratoplasty do well, and DALK is the procedure of choice. Granules do recur superficially in the graft, at times in a swirling pattern that suggests the epithelium is the source of the deposits. There are a few case reports of concurrent limbal stem cell transplantations with improved long-term outcomes.




Genetics


This disorder is autosomal dominant, with mutation in the TGFBI gene at locus 5q31.




Ocular Manifestation


Previously called Groenouw’s dystrophy type I , granular corneal dystrophy is characterized by the presence of discrete opacities in the corneal stroma that do not extend to the limbus, and the intervening stroma is clear. The opacities have irregular crumb-like or flake-like shapes and are whitish or slightly glassy in appearance ( Fig. 4.20.4 ). The pattern within a given family appears to be consistent. No systemic associations are known.




Fig. 4.20.4


Granular Dystrophy.

Note the more crumb-like opacities in this patient who has sufficient clear cornea to have normal acuity.




Patient Presentation


Many patients have no symptoms, whereas some patients develop recurrent erosions. In the fifth decade or later, some patients develop visual difficulties as the opacities become prominent in the superficial stroma. Anterior stromal opacities tend to be much more visually significant than posterior stromal opacities.




Pathology


Histopathological findings show red staining ( Fig. 4.20.5 ) with Masson’s trichrome stain without Congo red staining. Electron microscopy shows electron-dense, rod-like deposits and microfibrils, which are present in keratocytes as well as epithelial cells. The material is thought to be phospholipid.




Fig. 4.20.5


Granular Corneal Dystrophy.

Masson’s trichrome staining shows accumulation of hyaline material in the corneal stroma and beneath the epithelium.




Treatment


Because the superficial deposits are often the most visually significant, vision often improves with excimer ablation and does not impair future keratoplasty. Patients who require keratoplasty do well, and DALK is the procedure of choice. Granules do recur superficially in the graft, at times in a swirling pattern that suggests the epithelium is the source of the deposits. There are a few case reports of concurrent limbal stem cell transplantations with improved long-term outcomes.




Granular Corneal Dystrophy Type 2


A dystrophy that combines features of both granular and lattice dystrophies has been described, with the majority of the original patients coming from the Avellino region of Italy. This is also referred to as Avellino granular dystrophy .


Genetics


This disorder autosomal dominant, with mutation in the TGFBI gene at locus 5q31.


Ocular Manifestations


Patients have granular deposits in the anterior stroma along with lattice-like lines deeper within the stroma. These lines rarely cross and are whiter than lattice corneal dystrophy. A gray subepithelial haze may develop centrally after repeat corneal erosions and can affect visual acuity.


Patient Presentation


Similar to granular corneal dystrophy type I, patients often present with decreased vision over time and may have epithelial erosions. Homozygotes have worse symptoms compared with heterozygotes.


Pathology


Histopathology shows superficial, discrete, red granular deposits with Masson’s trichrome stain, as well as mid-to-deep stromal fusiform deposits with the typical Congo red and other stains characteristic of lattice dystrophy type I.


Treatment


Treatment is the same as for granular and lattice dystrophies. These individuals, even heterozygotes, are at high risk of aggressive recurrence of deposits predominantly in the interface if they undergo laser in situ keratomilieusis (LASIK). Although surface ablation by itself can lead to mild exacerbation, it may improve vision and delay corneal transplantation, with heterozygotes doing better than homozygotes.

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Oct 3, 2019 | Posted by in OPHTHALMOLOGY | Comments Off on Stromal Corneal Dystrophies

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access