Purpose
To determine the serum concentrations of bevacizumab and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in infants with retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) who received intravitreal bevacizumab; and to determine whether the changes in the serum concentration of bevacizumab were significantly correlated with the serum concentration of VEGF after intravitreal bevacizumab.
Design
Case series.
Methods
Eleven infants (4 girls and 7 boys) with ROP were studied. They received 0.25 mg or 0.5 mg of intravitreal bevacizumab to either 1 eye (unilateral cases) or both eyes (bilateral cases) with vascularly active ROP. Serum samples were collected before and 1 day, 1 week, and 2 weeks after the intravitreal bevacizumab. The serum concentrations of bevacizumab and VEGF were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and the correlation in the serum levels between the 2 was determined.
Results
The serum concentration of bevacizumab before and 1 day, 1week, and 2 weeks after a total of 0.5 mg of intravitreal bevacizumab was 0 ng/mL, 195 ± 324 ng/mL, 946 ± 680 ng/mL, and 1214 ± 351 ng/mL, respectively. The serum bevacizumab level before and 1 day and 1 week after a total 1.0 mg of intravitreal bevacizumab was 0 ng/mL, 248 ± 174 ng/mL, and 548 ± 89 ng/mL, respectively. The serum concentration of VEGF before and 1 day, 1 week, and 2 weeks after a total of 0.5 mg intravitreal bevacizumab was 1628 ± 929 pg/mL, 427 ± 140 pg/mL, 246 ± 110 pg/mL, and 269 ± 157 pg/mL, respectively. There was a significant negative correlation ( r = −0.575, P = .0125) between the serum concentration of bevacizumab and VEGF when a total of 0.25 mg or 0.5 mg of bevacizumab was injected.
Conclusions
These results indicate that bevacizumab can escape from the eye into the systemic circulation and reduce the serum level of VEGF in infants with ROP. Continued extensive evaluations of infants are warranted for possible effects after intravitreal bevacizumab in ROP patients.
Retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) is the leading cause of infant blindness, especially in developed countries. Retinal photocoagulation of the peripheral avascular retina is commonly used to treat eyes with ROP without retinal detachment, and scleral buckling or vitrectomy is used in ROP eyes with retinal detachment. Recently, early vitrectomy has been used to treat eyes with ROP to obtain favorable functional and structural outcomes. However, some of the ROP eyes have high vascular activity, and vitrectomy in these eyes usually results in poor surgical outcomes.
For such cases with high vascular activity, we have performed vitrectomy combined with a preoperative intravitreal injection of an antibody against vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). VEGF is the main growth factor responsible for angiogenesis and is considered to be the primary angiogenic factor that mediates retinal neovascularization in eyes with ROP. Studies of patients with stage 4 ROP showed that the vitreous concentration of VEGF in eyes with vascularly active ROP was significantly higher than in eyes with vascularly inactive ROP, and anti-VEGF therapy has been shown to be effective in reducing the angiogenic activity in eyes with ROP.
Bevacizumab (Avastin; Genentech Inc, South San Francisco, California, USA) is a recombinant humanized monoclonal antibody that is directed against all isoforms of VEGF. Many studies have reported on the effectiveness of intravitreal bevacizumab on neovascular disorders, for example, age-related macular degeneration, proliferative diabetic retinopathy, neovascular glaucoma, and ROP. In addition, the results of a randomized clinical trial that compared intravitreal bevacizumab as monotherapy with laser therapy in the treatment of ROP have been published. As intravitreal bevacizumab was shown to be of significant benefit compared to laser therapy in zone I stage 3+ ROP, the use of intravitreal bevacizumab in the treatment of ROP is likely to be more common in the near future. However, there are also studies that have reported that intravitreal bevacizumab had adverse systemic effects. These adverse effects (for example, systemic thrombotic events and hypertension) are similar to the ones reported after intravenous administration of bevacizumab for cancer treatments. Although no systemic adverse event has been reported after intravitreal bevacizumab in eyes with ROP, the serum concentration of bevacizumab after intravitreal bevacizumab has not been determined.
Thus, the purpose of this study was to determine the serum concentrations of bevacizumab and VEGF in ROP infants who received intravitreal bevacizumab.
Methods
The fundus of infants with ROP was examined with a slit lamp and contact lens (Volk Quad Pediatric Lens; Volk Optical Inc, Mentor, Ohio, USA) under general anesthesia. During the examinations, fundus photographs and fluorescein angiograms were taken with a RetCam 120 digital fundus camera (Clarity Medical Systems, Inc, Pleasanton, California, USA). The stage of the ROP was based on the International Classification of Retinopathy of Prematurity. The ROP eyes were also classified into 3 groups according to the vascular activity: highly vascular-active ROP, moderately vascular-active ROP, and mildly vascular-active ROP. The eyes with highly vascular-active ROP initially received 0.25 mg or 0.5 mg of intravitreal bevacizumab and underwent 23-gauge pars plicata vitrectomy without cannula system. The surgery was performed within 1 week after the injection when considered to be necessary.
Blood samples were collected before and 1 day, 1 week, and 2 weeks after the intravitreal bevacizumab. This schedule was based on the data from animal experiments demonstrating that the maximum blood level of bevacizumab is achieved about 1 to 2 weeks after the intravitreal bevacizumab. The blood samples were collected in sterile tubes by an anesthesiologist or a neonatologist and centrifuged at 5000 rpm for 10 minutes until a clear separation between serum and the cell components was seen. The serum was transferred to sterile tubes and stored at −80 C until the assay.
The serum concentration of bevacizumab was measured with an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kit (Protein Detector ELISA Kit; Kirkegaard & Perry Laboratories, Inc, Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA), according to the manufacturer’s protocol and also according to an earlier report with slight modifications. Briefly, microwell plates (Immuno 96 MicroCell solid plates; Nunc, Roskilde, Denmark) were coated with recombinant human VEGF 165 (PeproTech, Rocky Hill, New Jersey, USA) at a concentration of 1.0 μg/mL for 1 hour at room temperature (100 μL/well). After blocking the wells to reduce nonspecific binding, 100 μL of each sample and different concentrations of the standard were added to the plates. A standard curve was prepared with bevacizumab ranging from 1 ng/mL to 5000 ng/mL. The bound bevacizumab was made visible with 0.1 μg/mL of horseradish peroxidase–goat anti-human IgG (H+L) conjugate prepared by the ELISA kit. The optical density was determined at 405 nm with an absorption spectrophotometer (ARVO MX ; PerkinElmer Japan, Kanagawa, Japan). The background absorbance was subtracted from all values. This assay measures the free bevacizumab, and all measurements were performed twice according to the manufacturer’s recommendation.
The serum concentration of VEGF was measured with an ELISA kit for human anti-VEGF (R & D Systems, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The anti-VEGF kit can detect the 121 and 165 isoforms of VEGF. The minimum detectable level of the test was 9.0 pg/mL for VEGF. The optical density was determined at 450 nm with the absorption spectrophotometer with the correction wavelength set at 540 nm. The assay was also performed in duplicate.
Statistical analyses were performed using the SPSS software (Sigma Stat; Systat Software, Inc, San Jose, California, USA). Data are presented as the means and standard deviations. If the data were normally and equally distributed, 1-way repeated-measures analysis of variance was used to compare 3 or more matched groups, followed by the Holm-Sidak method to detect significant differences between each set of data. If the data were not normally or equally distributed, Friedman repeated-measures analysis of variance on ranks was performed to compare 3 or more matched groups, followed by Dunn’s method to detect significant differences between each set of data. The significance of differences between 2 groups was determined by t tests if the data were normally and equally distributed and by the Mann-Whitney rank sum test if not normally distributed. The correlation between 2 parameters was determined by the Spearman rank order correlation because the residuals were not normally distributed with constant variance. A P value less than .05 was considered to be statistically significant.
Results
Eleven infants (4 girls and 7 boys) with highly vascular-active ROP were studied. The demographics of the patients are summarized in Table 1 . Three patients received intravitreal bevacizumab in 1 eye and the other 8 received intravitreal bevacizumab in both eyes. The mean gestational age of the infants was 25 weeks (range, 23–27 weeks), and the mean body weight at birth was 660 grams (range, 332–1042 grams). All of the infants had received laser photocoagulation of the peripheral avascular retina before the intravitreal bevacizumab. The mean postmenstrual age of the infants at the time of intravitreal bevacizumab was 38 weeks (range, 32–51 weeks), and the mean body weight at the time of the intravitreal bevacizumab was 1720 grams (range, 940–2600 grams). In Patients 6, 8, 9, and 11 with stage 3 ROP, vitrectomy was not performed after the intravitreal bevacizumab because of the reduction of vascular activities. In the remaining patients, vitrectomy was performed 0 to 6 days after the intravitreal bevacizumab.
Patient | Sex | Eye/Stage | Intravitreal Bevacizumab (mg) | Gestational Age (Weeks) | Body Weight at Birth (g) | Postmenstrual Age at Intravitreal Bevacizumab (Weeks) | Body Weight at Intravitreal Bevacizumab (g) | Time of Intravitreal Bevacizumab to Vitrectomy (Days) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Male | Right/5 | — | 24 | 753 | — | 1820 | Not applicable |
Left/4A | 0.5 | 36 | 2 | |||||
2 | Male | Right/4B | — | 23 | 611 | — | 2490 | 1 |
Left/4A | 0.5 | 39 | 1 | |||||
3 | Female | Right/4A | 0.5 | 23 | 492 | 37 | 1354 | 3 |
Left/4A | 0.5 | 37 | Not applicable | |||||
4 | Male | Right/5 | 0.5 | 24 | 332 | 38 | 1384 | 2 |
Left/4A | 0.5 | 38 | 2 | |||||
5 | Male | Right/4A | 0.5 | 23 | 686 | 41 | 2098 | 2 |
Left/3 | 0.5 | 41 | Not applicable | |||||
6 | Female | Right/3 | 0.5 | 26 | 826 | 33 | 1214 | Not applicable |
Left/3 | 0.5 | 33 | Not applicable | |||||
7 | Female | Right/3 | 0.25 | 25 | 768 | 41 | 2600 | Not applicable |
Left/4B | — | — | 0 | |||||
8 | Male | Right/3 | 0.25 | 27 | 454 | 51 | 2151 | Not applicable |
Left/3 | 0.25 | 51 | Not applicable | |||||
9 | Male | Right/3 | 0.25 | 26 | 828 | 35 | 1476 | Not applicable |
Left/3 | 0.25 | 35 | Not applicable | |||||
10 | Female | Right/3 | 0.25 | 23 | 472 | 38 | 940 | 6 |
Left/5 | 0.25 | 38 | 6 | |||||
11 | Male | Right/3 | 0.25 | 27 | 1042 | 32 | 1398 | Not applicable |
Left/3 | 0.25 | 32 | Not applicable |
The average serum levels of bevacizumab before and 1 day, 1 week, and 2 weeks after a total of 0.5 mg of intravitreal bevacizumab were 0 ng/mL, 195 ± 324 ng/mL, 946 ± 680 ng/mL, and 1214 ± 351 ng/mL, respectively ( Figure 1 , Table 2 ). In Patients 2, 8, 9, 10, and 11, the serum bevacizumab levels were significantly different ( P = .008) before and 1 day and 1week after the intravitreal bevacizumab, and the serum bevacizumab level at 1 week after the intravitreal bevacizumab was significantly higher ( P < .05) than that before the intravitreal bevacizumab.
Patient/Sex | Eye/Stage | Total Dosage of Intravitreal Bevacizumab (mg) | Serum Level of Bevacizumab (ng/mL) | Serum Level of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (pg/mL) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Before Intravitreal Bevacizumab | 1 Day After Intravitreal Bevacizumab | 1 Week After Intravitreal Bevacizumab | 2 Weeks After Intravitreal Bevacizumab | Before Intravitreal Bevacizumab | 1 Day After Intravitreal Bevacizumab | 1 Week After Intravitreal Bevacizumab | 2 Weeks After Intravitreal Bevacizumab | |||
1/Male | Right/5 | 0.5 | 0 | 23 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Left/4A | ||||||||||
2/Male | Right/4B | 0.5 | 0 | 31 | 81 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Left/4A | ||||||||||
3/Female | Right/4A | 1.0 | 0 | 206 | 665 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Left/4A | ||||||||||
4/Male | Right/5 | 1.0 | 0 | 396 | 513 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Left/4A | ||||||||||
5/Male | Right/4A | 1.0 | 0 | 19 | 560 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Left/3 | ||||||||||
6/Female | Right/3 | 1.0 | 0 | 372 | 453 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Left/3 | ||||||||||
7/Female | Right/3 | 0.25 | 0 | 11 | 113 | NA | 418 | 303 | 301 | NA |
Left/4B | ||||||||||
8/Male | Right/3 | 0.5 | 0 | 33 | 1204 | NA | 603 | 227 | 106 | NA |
Left/3 | ||||||||||
9/Male | Right/3 | 0.5 | 0 | 36 | 610 | 844 | 1140 | 515 | 208 | 129 |
Left/3 | ||||||||||
10/Female | Right/3 | 0.5 | 0 | 841 | 1905 | 1255 | 2110 | 433 | 331 | 439 |
Left/5 | ||||||||||
11/Male | Right/3 | 0.5 | 0 | 209 | 928 | 1542 | 2660 | 533 | 337 | 239 |
Left/3 |