Reply




We appreciate Dr Cooke’s comments and interest in the Infant Aphakia Treatment Study (IATS) population for comparison of intraocular lens (IOL) calculation formula performance. We also appreciate his assistance in accessing some of the additional formulae. The table shows absolute prediction errors for the IATS eyes using the manufacturer’s A-constant. Of the 4 additional formulae examined (bold), T2 had the smallest mean and median absolute prediction error.



Table

Absolute Prediction Error by Intraocular Lens Calculation Formula using Manufacturer Constants














































Formula (n=43) Absolute Predictor Error (Diopters)
Mean ± SD a Median ( a )
Haigis (n=33) 3.5 ± 2.2 3.5 (1.4, 5.1)
Hoffer Q 2.6 ± 2.0 2.1 (0.7, 4.0)
Holladay 1 1.7 ± 1.3 1.2 (0.7, 2.5)
Holladay 2 1.9 ± 1.5 1.4 (0.6, 2.9)
Olsen (n=33) 2.2 ± 1.7 1.6 (0.9, 3.3)
SRK/T 1.4 ± 1.1 1.3 (0.3, 2.1)
SRK II 2.4 ± 1.8 2.2 (0.9, 3.6)
T2 1.3 ± 1.0 1.1 (0.5, 2.0)
Universal 3.0 ± 2.2 2.8 (1.1, 4.7)

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Jan 8, 2017 | Posted by in OPHTHALMOLOGY | Comments Off on Reply

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access