Prognostic significance of p16 in squamous cell carcinoma of the larynx and hypopharynx




Abstract


Purpose


To evaluate the prognostic significance of p16 expression among patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the larynx (LSCC) and hypopharynx (HSCC).


Methods


The medical records of all patients with locally advanced, non-metastatic LSCC/HSCC were reviewed. p16 INK4A (p16) protein expression was evaluated on pathological specimens by immunohistochemistry (IHC), and the Kaplan–Meier method was used to estimate overall survival (OS) and locoregional control (LRC). In select cases, p16 expression was correlated to high-risk and low-risk HPV genotypes using in situ hybridization (ISH).


Results


Thirty-one patients (23 LSCC; 8 HSCC) were identified. Seventeen (54.8%) patients were p16 negative; 14 (45.2%) were p16-positive. The primary treatment modality was radiation therapy for 22 (71.0%) patients and surgery for 9 (29.0%). Nineteen (61.3%) patients were evaluated for high-risk HPV and low-risk HPV genotypes by IHC, of whom 2 (10.5%) patients were positive for high-risk HPV and 1 (5.3%) was positive for low-risk HPV. For high-risk HPV, the positive predictive value (PPV), sensitivity, and specificity of p16 was 20.0%, 100%, and 52.9%. There was no significant difference in the 2-year actuarial rates of OS (91% vs. 64%, p = 0.34) or LRC (51% vs. 46%, p = 0.69) between the p16-positive and p-16 negative patients.


Conclusion


In this small cohort of 31 LSCC and HSCC patients, p16 was not a significant predictive of either LRC or OS. Furthermore, p16 was poorly correlated with HPV genotyping as identified by ISH.



Introduction


The recognition of human papillomavirus (HPV) as a prognostic biomarker for patients with oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma is an important development in the field of head and neck cancer. Studies have shown that HPV-associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma has its own unique pathogenesis, epidemiology, and clinical features . Moreover, patients with HPV-positive oropharyngeal carcinoma have markedly improved outcomes . In a large prospective trial of patients treated by chemoradiation, Fakhry et al. demonstrated that HPV-positive oropharyngeal cancer patients have at least half the risk of death when compared to their HPV-negative counterparts , and a subsequent meta-analysis of 37 studies demonstrated that HPV-positive oropharyngeal cancer patients have a 28% reduced risk of death compared to patients who are HPV-negative .


In the routine clinical setting, HPV status is determined by the surrogate biomarker p16 INK4A (p16), a cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor, which becomes up-regulated in HPV-infected cells when the viral oncogene E7 inactivates the tumor suppressor Rb (retinoblastoma protein). Studies have convincingly shown that p16 protein overexpression can be used as a prognostic biomarker for oropharyngeal cancer, since p16 is independently correlated to improved overall survival and local control . The effect of p16 overexpression on prognosis in non-oropharyngeal head and neck cancer, however, has not been fully evaluated. There has been especially limited data regarding p16 expression and its significance in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC) and in hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (HSCC). The aims of the present study were two-fold: 1) to investigate whether p16 expression correlated to HPV status on pathological specimens and 2) to determine whether p16 status predicted for outcomes in patients treated at our institution with LSCC and HSCC.





Methods and materials



Patients


The medical records of all patients with head and neck cancer who presented to a single institution from 2009 to 2014 were retrospectively reviewed in an attempt to identify cases of LSCC and HSCC. Only patients with known p16 status were included in this analysis. Approval was obtained from the institutional human investigations committee prior to collection of all patient information. All patients were treated definitively with either primary surgery or intensity-modulated radiation therapy. Pre-treatment workup consisted of standard history and physical examination including direct laryngoscopy as well as positron emission tomography (PET). Patients who presented for palliative treatment and/or with known distant metastases were excluded. Thirty-one patients: 23 LSCC and 8 HSCC patients satisfied all inclusion criteria and continued on for further chart analysis.


Among all 31 cases, 22 patients were treated with primary radiation therapy (13 of whom received concurrent chemotherapy, typically using a platinum-based regimen), and 9 patients were treated by primary surgery. Of the 9 patients treated with primary surgery, 8 (89%) received adjuvant radiotherapy and 4 (44%) received adjuvant chemoradiation, typically utilizing single-agent cisplatin. The median radiation dose was 66 Gy (range, 60–70 Gy) using conventional fractionation. Doses to prophylactically-treated nodal regions ranged from 54 Gy to 63 Gy. Treatment is further summarized in Table 1 .



Table 1

Patient Treatment History.
























































N %
Primary radiotherapy (N = 22) 22 71
Concurrent chemotherapy 13 59
Induction Docetaxel, Cisplatin, 5-Flourouracil;
Carboplatin
1 8
Platinum-based 6 46
Cetuximab 2 15
Platinum-based and Cetuximab 4 31
Primary surgery (N = 9)
Open operation 5 56
TORS/TLM 4 44
Adjuvant chemotherapy 4 44
Platinum-based 3 75
Cetuximab 1 25



Data collection


Clinical characteristics noted included age, race, gender, tumor site, tobacco use, alcohol use, ECOG performance status, tumor location, T-stage, N-stage, and other oncologic history. Age was examined as a continuous variable. Tobacco exposure included cigarettes, cigars, pipes, chewing tobacco, and snuff. Tobacco use included the patient’s lifetime history of current, former, or never users. For former smokers, years since cessation were also recorded. Tobacco cumulative exposure was recorded in pack–years and grouped by exposure into two categories of <10 pack–years and ≥10 pack–years . Due to the small sample size, the continuous variable of pack–year history was stratified into these three categories. Alcohol exposure included beer, wine, or liquor (One drink is equivalent to a 12 oz beer, 4 oz. wine, or 1.5 oz of liquor). The patient’s lifetime history reflected current, former, or never users of alcohol >7 drinks/week. Alcohol cumulative exposure was positive for moderate use if >7 drinks/week or heavy use if >14 drinks/week.



Laboratory studies


Standard patient care at our institution has included testing for p16 expression through immunohistochemistry (IHC) or HPV infection through in situ hybridization (ISH) in HNSCC. All patients included in this study were previously evaluated for p16 expression from a tumor biopsy or surgical resection. The positivity of p16 and HPV status was recorded based on the clinical pathology report.


Immunohistochemistry testing for p16 expression followed the protocol supplied by the Ventana CINtec p16INK4a Histology Kit #9517. Immunohistochemistry was performed on the Leica Bond III autostainer using Leica ancillary reagents. Anti-P16 monoclonal antibody clone E6H4 immunostaining involved heat-induced epitope retrieval in High pH-EDTA buffer for 20 min, primary antibody incubation for 15 min, and application of Leica Refine (DAB) detection kit. Slides were counterstained with Refine hematoxylin. The p16 immunohistochemistry stain was considered positive if nuclear and cytoplasmic staining was greater than 70% of the cells .


HPV in situ hybridization was performed on the Ventana Ultra autostainer using DNA probes and ancillary reagents from Ventana Medical Systems up until July 9, 2014. Subsequent HPV ISH cases were sent to Integrated Oncology using the same Ventana method. The Ventana INFORM® HPV III probe set was used including the low-risk genotypes 6 and 11 and high-risk genotypes 16, 18, 31, 33, 35, 39, 45, 51, 52, 56, 58, and 66. A DNA probe was also run to assess integrity of tissue DNA. In situ hybridization for high-risk and low-risk HPV genotypes was considered positive when nuclear-specific staining was detected with all others were recorded as negative.



Statistical analysis


The following definitions were used for statistical analyses: overall survival was the time between initial treatment and the date of death from any cause. Locoregional failure was the time between initial treatment and the date of first local or regional recurrence as detected by radiologic imaging or clinical examination. Distant failure was the time between initial treatment and the date of first local or regional recurrence as detected by radiologic imaging or biopsy. Patients who were living at the last date of follow-up without recurrence were censored at the last date of follow-up. The Kaplan–Meier method was used to estimate overall survival (OS) and locoregional control (LRC) through a 48 month study period. The overall survival and locoregional failure-free survival estimates were reported for 12 and 24 months with 95% confidence intervals for all patients together and stratified by p16 status. The log rank test was used to determine predictors for locoregional failure.





Methods and materials



Patients


The medical records of all patients with head and neck cancer who presented to a single institution from 2009 to 2014 were retrospectively reviewed in an attempt to identify cases of LSCC and HSCC. Only patients with known p16 status were included in this analysis. Approval was obtained from the institutional human investigations committee prior to collection of all patient information. All patients were treated definitively with either primary surgery or intensity-modulated radiation therapy. Pre-treatment workup consisted of standard history and physical examination including direct laryngoscopy as well as positron emission tomography (PET). Patients who presented for palliative treatment and/or with known distant metastases were excluded. Thirty-one patients: 23 LSCC and 8 HSCC patients satisfied all inclusion criteria and continued on for further chart analysis.


Among all 31 cases, 22 patients were treated with primary radiation therapy (13 of whom received concurrent chemotherapy, typically using a platinum-based regimen), and 9 patients were treated by primary surgery. Of the 9 patients treated with primary surgery, 8 (89%) received adjuvant radiotherapy and 4 (44%) received adjuvant chemoradiation, typically utilizing single-agent cisplatin. The median radiation dose was 66 Gy (range, 60–70 Gy) using conventional fractionation. Doses to prophylactically-treated nodal regions ranged from 54 Gy to 63 Gy. Treatment is further summarized in Table 1 .



Table 1

Patient Treatment History.
























































N %
Primary radiotherapy (N = 22) 22 71
Concurrent chemotherapy 13 59
Induction Docetaxel, Cisplatin, 5-Flourouracil;
Carboplatin
1 8
Platinum-based 6 46
Cetuximab 2 15
Platinum-based and Cetuximab 4 31
Primary surgery (N = 9)
Open operation 5 56
TORS/TLM 4 44
Adjuvant chemotherapy 4 44
Platinum-based 3 75
Cetuximab 1 25



Data collection


Clinical characteristics noted included age, race, gender, tumor site, tobacco use, alcohol use, ECOG performance status, tumor location, T-stage, N-stage, and other oncologic history. Age was examined as a continuous variable. Tobacco exposure included cigarettes, cigars, pipes, chewing tobacco, and snuff. Tobacco use included the patient’s lifetime history of current, former, or never users. For former smokers, years since cessation were also recorded. Tobacco cumulative exposure was recorded in pack–years and grouped by exposure into two categories of <10 pack–years and ≥10 pack–years . Due to the small sample size, the continuous variable of pack–year history was stratified into these three categories. Alcohol exposure included beer, wine, or liquor (One drink is equivalent to a 12 oz beer, 4 oz. wine, or 1.5 oz of liquor). The patient’s lifetime history reflected current, former, or never users of alcohol >7 drinks/week. Alcohol cumulative exposure was positive for moderate use if >7 drinks/week or heavy use if >14 drinks/week.



Laboratory studies


Standard patient care at our institution has included testing for p16 expression through immunohistochemistry (IHC) or HPV infection through in situ hybridization (ISH) in HNSCC. All patients included in this study were previously evaluated for p16 expression from a tumor biopsy or surgical resection. The positivity of p16 and HPV status was recorded based on the clinical pathology report.


Immunohistochemistry testing for p16 expression followed the protocol supplied by the Ventana CINtec p16INK4a Histology Kit #9517. Immunohistochemistry was performed on the Leica Bond III autostainer using Leica ancillary reagents. Anti-P16 monoclonal antibody clone E6H4 immunostaining involved heat-induced epitope retrieval in High pH-EDTA buffer for 20 min, primary antibody incubation for 15 min, and application of Leica Refine (DAB) detection kit. Slides were counterstained with Refine hematoxylin. The p16 immunohistochemistry stain was considered positive if nuclear and cytoplasmic staining was greater than 70% of the cells .


HPV in situ hybridization was performed on the Ventana Ultra autostainer using DNA probes and ancillary reagents from Ventana Medical Systems up until July 9, 2014. Subsequent HPV ISH cases were sent to Integrated Oncology using the same Ventana method. The Ventana INFORM® HPV III probe set was used including the low-risk genotypes 6 and 11 and high-risk genotypes 16, 18, 31, 33, 35, 39, 45, 51, 52, 56, 58, and 66. A DNA probe was also run to assess integrity of tissue DNA. In situ hybridization for high-risk and low-risk HPV genotypes was considered positive when nuclear-specific staining was detected with all others were recorded as negative.



Statistical analysis


The following definitions were used for statistical analyses: overall survival was the time between initial treatment and the date of death from any cause. Locoregional failure was the time between initial treatment and the date of first local or regional recurrence as detected by radiologic imaging or clinical examination. Distant failure was the time between initial treatment and the date of first local or regional recurrence as detected by radiologic imaging or biopsy. Patients who were living at the last date of follow-up without recurrence were censored at the last date of follow-up. The Kaplan–Meier method was used to estimate overall survival (OS) and locoregional control (LRC) through a 48 month study period. The overall survival and locoregional failure-free survival estimates were reported for 12 and 24 months with 95% confidence intervals for all patients together and stratified by p16 status. The log rank test was used to determine predictors for locoregional failure.

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Aug 23, 2017 | Posted by in OTOLARYNGOLOGY | Comments Off on Prognostic significance of p16 in squamous cell carcinoma of the larynx and hypopharynx

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access