Introduction
Cancer of the tongue is most common in 60- to 70-year-old male drinkers and smokers but is also encountered in much younger and older individuals without a history of smoking or ethanol use. Most cancers of the tongue are squamous cell carcinomas, which arise on the lateral aspect of the tongue and exhibit a propensity for early spread to the lymph nodes of the neck. Early stage cancers (stages 1 and 2) are equally well controlled with surgery or radiation; however, surgery is associated with less long-term side effects. For advanced cancer, multiple treatment modalities, most commonly surgery followed by radiation, are usually necessary.
In evaluating a patient with a newly diagnosed cancer of the tongue, several questions must be addressed prior to surgery: (1) How extensive is the cancer, and can it be removed through the mouth? (2) Has the cancer spread to the lymph nodes of the neck, and what type of neck dissection, if any, should be undertaken? (3) After the cancer is removed, should the defect be reconstructed?
The office examination and selected radiographic studies are important in assigning an initial tumor stage. The physical examination provides important information regarding the local extent of the cancer, both in its size and depth. Lymph node metastases can often be detected by careful palpation of the neck. Imaging studies such as computed tomography (CT) scans or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) may identify invasion of the deep muscles of the tongue and small cervical lymph node metastases not appreciated on office examination alone, improve the accuracy of the initial tumor staging, and facilitate the development of a treatment plan.
Most early stage cancers of the tongue can be managed by means of a partial glossectomy and a neck dissection ( Fig. 28.1A and B ). A larger, deeply infiltrating cancer may require greater exposure than that achieved through the mouth alone. A transcervical delivery or mandibulotomy may be necessary for an oncologically sound extirpation. Larger resections are also more likely to require surgical reconstruction, most often with microvascular transfer of soft tissue from the forearm or thigh to enhance healing and postoperative function. A neck dissection may be omitted in small tongue cancers with minimal invasion but is recommended for thicker cancers even in the absence of clinical or radiographic evidence of lymph node metastases, due to the high frequency of micrometastatic disease. In a large randomized study, patients without detectable metastases prior to surgery who underwent elective neck dissection at the time of the surgery for cancer of the tongue had improved overall and cancer-related survival than those who waited until signs of metastatic disease became clinically evident. Neck dissection is more effective earlier in the course of the disease. Additional treatment such as radiation and chemotherapy is added based on the final pathologic review of the resected surgical specimen. Lymphoscintigraphy with sentinel lymph node biopsy effectively identifies micrometastases when performed by experienced surgeons and may be considered as an alternative to a selective neck dissection for cN0 oral cancer in some cases. However, while the survival benefit of selective neck dissection in this setting has been confirmed in a randomized clinical trial, the equivalence of sentinel lymph node biopsy to neck dissection has not.
The overall recurrence rate and survival after surgery for early stage cancer are favorable, with 85% to 90% 5-year rates of cancer-free survival reported. The presence of metastasis to lymph nodes in the neck decreases cancer-free survival rate by 50%, providing justification for additional treatment to improve outcome.
Key Operative Learning Points
- 1.
Preoperative staging helps in developing a suitable surgical treatment plan. Patients with stage 1 to 2 cancer of the tongue are usually managed with a partial glossectomy and selective neck dissection, including levels I, II, III, and possibly IV. Sentinel lymph node biopsy may be considered as an alternative in select cases, as noted previously.
- 2.
Inspection and palpation usually differentiate thin, minimally invasive cancers of the tongue (and those less than 2 to 3 mm thick) from more deeply infiltrating cancers that are associated with higher rates of cervical lymph node metastases.
- 3.
Locally advanced cancers, particularly those classified as T4, with deep muscle invasion often require greater exposure than that afforded by a transoral approach. Transcervical delivery or manibulotomy may be needed. Bone invasion by cancer is an indication for a segmental mandibulectomy.
- 4.
Imaging with CT or MRI scan confirms deep infiltration of tongue muscles ( Fig. 28.2B ) and is more accurate than clinical examination alone in identifying cervical metastases. The presence of metastatic cancer on imaging clinically upstages the cancer and requires a comprehensive rather than a selective neck dissection.
- 5.
Infiltrative cancers may be more extensive than appreciated on inspection alone. Intraoperatively, the use of palpation to define the clinical extent of the cancer is critical in achieving an adequate resection margin and preventing incising into the cancer and a positive margin.
- 6.
Most T1 and many T2 cancers of the oral tongue may be left open to heal without specific reconstruction (see Fig. 28.1B ). Significant extension onto the ventral tongue and floor of the mouth suggests the need for reconstruction with a radial forearm fasciocutaneous flap or a split-thickness skin graft. For larger cancers requiring a hemiglossectomy or a subtotal glossectomy, microvascular soft tissue transfer is usually employed to enhance long-term function.
- 7.
A close or positive margin is best managed if identified at the time of the initial surgery. Suspicion of a close or positive margin should prompt a complete, circumferential, peripheral, and deep margin assessment. Blue dye is used to ink the surgical defect on the patient side. An additional layer of soft tissue measuring 2 to 4 mm thick is excised and oriented, representing the new margin. A complete margin assessment will diminish the likelihood of a false negative margin and improve local control.
- 8.
Careful ligation of the lingual artery at the posterior lateral glossectomy wound site may diminish the likelihood of a severe postoperative hemorrhage.
Preoperative Period
History
- 1.
History of present illness
- a.
The duration of an abnormal lesion on the tongue is a key element in the patient history. Was the abnormality found by the patient, a dentist, or on routine clinical examination? Has a biopsy been done?
- b.
Associated symptoms and signs provide additional information about the abnormality.
- 1)
Is the ulcer or mass tender? The quality, timing, and duration of pain should be described. Cancer-related pain is dull and persistent over weeks or months, often described as “a sore.” Is there associated otalgia, suggesting referred pain from deep infiltration
- 2)
Is there associated dysphagia? Has there been a change in the consistency of the diet? Has there been weight loss? Cancers associated with a greater symptom burden prior to treatment are associated with worse survival, independent of initial tumor staging.
- 3)
Presence of dysarthria
- 4)
Presence of a neck mass
- 1)
- c.
Prior therapies or treatments and use of pain medication
- d.
Risk factors for tongue cancer, including current and prior smoking and ethanol use—particularly the amount
- a.
- 2.
Past medical history
A complete past medical, surgical, and social history is a mandatory part of any preoperative assessment. Medical comorbid conditions can affect a patient’s tolerance for surgery. In particular, symptoms of pulmonary and cardiac disease must be elicited. Detailed history of alcohol and tobacco use must be carefully reviewed. The social support available to a patient must also be assessed, as this will have a great impact on the patient’s rehabilitation after surgery.
Physical Examination
- 1.
Oral cavity (see Fig. 28.1A )
- a.
Size and depth of the cancer
- b.
Exophytic, infiltrative. or ulcerated cancer
- c.
Deviation of the tongue (see Fig. 28.2A )
- d.
Cancer extension to the floor of mouth
- e.
Presence and condition of dentition
- f.
Presence of trismus
- g.
Invasion of the mandible—via direct extension or by means of tooth sockets
- a.
- 2.
Oropharynx
- a.
Base of tongue extension on palpation
- a.
- 3.
Nasal cavity and nasopharynx
- a.
Mirror examination or endoscopy
- a.
- 4.
Larynx and hypopharynx
- a.
Mirror examination or endoscopy
- a.
- 5.
Neck
- a.
Cervical lymphadenopathy, including nodal size and level
- a.
Cancer of the tongue may appear as a beefy red patch or ulceration but can also originate in an area of leukoplakia (see Fig. 28.1A ). Finger palpation of the area may suggest submucosal infiltration and extension. Deviation of the tongue suggests infiltration of the hypoglossal nerve or deep extrinsic muscle invasion (see Fig. 28.2A and B ). A hard mass may be palpable under normal appearing mucosa of the ventral area and base of the tongue. Larger size and greater depth of invasion are associated with a higher risk of nodal metastases. Lateralized tongue cancers usually spread to the ipsilateral neck; however, as the cancer approaches the midline, the risk of contralateral metastases increases. Involvement of the anterior floor of mouth and base of tongue involvement are associated with higher frequencies of bilateral or contralateral lymph node metastases and prompt bilateral neck dissection.
Imaging
- 1.
Chest radiograph
- 2.
CT scan with intravenous contrast or MRI with gadolinium is indicated if deep muscle (extrinsic) muscle involvement or cervical metastatic disease is suspected. CT scans should be obtained if there is a concern about bone invasion.
Indications
- 1.
T1-T2 oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma
- 2.
Other tumors or cancers originating in the oral tongue
Contraindications
- 1.
Patient does not consent
- 2.
Locally advanced cancer—most T3 to T4 cancers require a hemiglossectomy or subtotal glossectomy
- 3.
Unacceptable medical comorbidities
- 4.
Poor functional status
- 5.
Lack of social support
Preoperative Preparation
- 1.
Chest radiograph and neck imaging as indicated
- 2.
Evaluate alcohol use history and consider formal detoxification for patients with a high alcohol intake and a history of delirium tremens.
- 3.
Tobacco cessation counseling for active smokers.
- 4.
Discontinue antiplatelet drugs if possible.
- 5.
Type and screen is not usually necessary.
- 6.
Medical or anesthesia preoperative evaluation
- 7.
Dental evaluation with extraction as needed
- 8.
Review all medical records, especially biopsy and scans from outside hospitals
- 9.
Consent
Speech and swallowing outcomes are best if patients adhere to speech and swallowing exercises after surgery. Consent for surgery should include counseling regarding the need for postoperative rehabilitation. Exercises to prevent trismus and preserve tongue mobility as well as neck and shoulder mobility are most effective if started prior to the development of chronic dysfunction. Routine perioperative consultation with speech pathology and physical therapy may enhance adherence with standard postoperative rehabilitation recommendations.