Medical registries: Factors impacting clinician engagement






Introduction


Medical registries are systematic collections of health-related data for specific patient populations, procedures, diseases or healthcare resources. Despite their critical importance in healthcare and research, the utility of these registries is often limited by poor clinician engagement; defined as the investment of clinicians in a registry’s mission, manifesting as planning, implementation, and continual input and evaluation. We systematically review the literature to identify factors affecting clinician engagement in medical registries.



Results


45 articles were identified for inclusion ( Supplementary Files 1 and 2 ). Consistent with the study’s focus, poor clinician engagement emerged as a significant barrier to optimal registry use across the reviewed literature. Among the included studies, a range of key contributory factors were identified ( Table 1 ). These include managerial, data management, technological, legal/regulatory, disease and patient factors.



Table 1

Factors impacting the success of medical registries.








































































































Category Factor n Studies
Managerial Insufficient funding 25 Behera, Johnson, Mandavia, Pop, Tyson, St-Louis, Bommakanti, Stey, Kates, O’Reilly, Nwomeh, Rosenkrantz, Sawe, Surodina, Stanimirovic, Mandavia, Gao, Rakhost, Ozoilo, Zullig, Morsy, Bentley, Helfrich, Schwamm, Cameron
Infrastructure 8 Johnson, Pop, Tyson, O’Reilly, Nwomeh, Surodina, Ozoilo, Schwamm
Inadequate staff training programs 14 Berea, Pop, St-Louis, Bommakanti, Kates, Nwomeh, Sawe, Azadmanjir, Surodina, Egholm, Tilney, Zullig, Helfrich, Cameron
Inadequate time for training 7 Johnson, Tilney, Mandavia, Eldh, Bentley, Helfrich, Cameron
Lack of clinical workspace 1 Bentley
Lack of managerial interest/ motivation 12 Mandavia, Rosenkrantz, Sawe, Surodina, Egholm, Korngut, Chin, Grove Krause, Morsy, Bentley, Sehgal, Gabbay
Limited participation of key stakeholders 8 Mandavia, Pop, Rosenkrantz, Surodina, Stanimirovic, Gullig, Korngut, Grove Krause
Data Management Incomplete data sets 26 Behera, Mandavia, Tyson, St-Louis, Bommakanti, Kates, O’Reilly, Viviani, Zehtabchi, Rosenkrantz, Azadmanjir, Surodina, Mowafi, Egholm, Mandavia, Gao, Ozoilo, Gullig, Hume, Chin, Bernal-Gonzalez, Luong, Schwamm, Gabbay, Cameron, Roder
Poorly defined data collection methods 21 Johnson, Mandavia, St-Louis, Stay, Viviani, Zehtabchi, Nwomeh, Rosenkrantz, Azadmanjir, Surodina, Mowafi, Egholm, Ozoilo, Eldh, Zullig, Hume, Luong, Schwamm, Sehgal, Gabbay, Cameron
Unstandardised data 16 Pop, St-Louis, O’Reilly, Viviani, Zehtabchi, Nwomeh, Egholm, Stanimirovic, Mandavia, Rakhorst, Bernal-Gonzalez, Grove Krause, Schwamm, Sehgal, Cameron, Roder
Technological Poor interoperability with existing IT systems 11 Behera, Lu, Nwomeh, Sawe, Surodina, Egholm, Stanimirovic, Gao, Chin, Grove Krause, Cameron
Inappropriate software 7 Lu, Surodina, Egholm, Korngut, Chin, Morsy, Luong
Updates / maintenance 8 Johnson, Pop, Tyson, O’Reilly, Nwomeh, Surodina, Ozoilo, Schwamm
Legal/ Regulatory Confidentiality 14 Pop, St-Louis, Viviani, Lu, Surodina, Stanimirovic, Mandavia, Rakhorst, Andrew, Korngut, Chin, Luong, Bentley, Cameron
Lack of operational guidelines 14 Pop, Tyson, St-Louis, Bommakanti, Kates, O’Reilly, Lu, Nwomeh, Surodina, Mowafi, Stanimirovic, McBride, Morsy, Schwamm
Disease Diversity of disease course 3 Nwomeh, Andrew, Bernal-Gonzalez
Limited access to diagnostic tools 3 Bommakanti, Kates, Luong
Patient Administration of enrolment 9 Tilney, Korngut, Bentley, Nwomeh, Zullig, Johnson, Lu, Mowafi, Kates
Burden of follow up 1 Korngut

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Apr 20, 2025 | Posted by in OPHTHALMOLOGY | Comments Off on Medical registries: Factors impacting clinician engagement

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access