Malignant Melanoma



Malignant Melanoma





The update of the manuscript written on the subject of malignant melanoma for the third edition of Orbital Tumors (1994) was largely based on a publication of Lorenz Zimmerman (1986). Zimmerman had long been interested in the ophthalmologic aspects of malignant melanoma. His tome on the subject contained 124 references of which 26% (34/124) have the name of Zimmerman as author or coauthor. This 29-page report included heterogeneous information on the subject written before 1986 and combined it with his own research. The result was the most factual information on the subject up to 1986. Our 40-year (1948 to 1987) review of the site of origin, age, sex, treatment, and follow-up of the 43 patients seen at Mayo Clinic is reprinted in Table 12.1.

In this chapter, we will try to update the information on the management, course, prognosis, and so on of malignant melanoma, which has evolved since our third edition. Our chief interest is the primary orbital melanoma but also includes pertinent data concerning cases with orbital extension from the uveal tract, paranasal sinuses, epibulbar and conjunctival surfaces, adnexal structures of the eyelid and face, and metastatic tumor.


Primary Tumor

In the present timeframe of our update review (1988 to 1997), we have not encountered a primary orbital malignant melanoma. Probably, the most informative publication in this period is that of Tellada et al. (1996). They studied 21 cases from the file at the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology. The mean age at diagnosis was 42 years (range 15 to 84 years). There was an associated intraorbital blue nevus (see Figs. 12.1 and 12.2) in 19 patients (90%), and in 10 patients (47.5%) there was some form of congenital melanosis. All patients were of the white race. The male-to-female ratio was approximately 3:1 (16 men, 5 women). Histopathologically, 11 (52%) tumors were of the mixed cell type and 10 (48%) were spindle cell tumors. Risk factors for poor prognosis in their series were associated with mixed cell type histology and high mitotic content. They conclude that primary orbital melanomas are similar to uveal melanomas with respect to prognostic indicators.

Single case reports in the literature during the current period are: Loffler and Witschel (1989) (M 27); Rice and Brown (1990) (F 17); Shields et al. (1993) (M 70); Ijiri et al. 2000 (F 5). Two tumors of the above group originated from a cellular blue nevus. The other two were thought to be de novo. In none of the four cases was there any accessory pigmentation in the orbital soft tissues. Histologically, two tumors were of the spindle cell type; one was a mixed epithelioid–spindle cell tumor, and one was predominantly epithelioid type. At the time of presentation, two of these cases were thought to have an orbital vascular tumor. In one of the latter, the orbital mass had the imaging characteristics of a varix. In the 5-year-old child, repeated episodes of subconjunctival hemorrhage were noted.


Secondary Tumors from an Intraocular Source

In the third edition of this text, and as noted in the preceding text, we listed 23 patients with an orbital extension from an intraocular malignant melanoma. We tabulated the age, sex, treatment, and follow-up of these patients over the 40-year period from 1948 to 1987. In all but three of these cases, an enucleation or evisceration of one eye had previously been performed. Such patients were aware their eye contained either a tumor or a malignant melanoma. In these cases, the suspicions of both patient and physician for recurrent tumor were confirmed. Most of these patients sought consultation because of the need for frequent adjustments of their prosthesis over a period of several months. An occasional patient also noted some discoloration of his/her eye socket. Rarely, the initial manifestation of orbital recurrence was associated with swelling of the eyelids and orbital pain, a likely indication of hemorrhage or necrosis within the neoplasm. In all these patients, an orbital mass other than an orbital implant was palpable. The age range of these patients was 16 to 84 years; the average age was 60.6, and the follow-up range

was 3 months to 20 years. The sex ratio was 12 women and 11 men. We now add six cases to this group of secondary melanomas seen in the last decade (1988 to 1997) of our 50-year statistical survey. These included two men, ages 50 and 65, and four women, ages 74, 75, 81, and 85. Follow-up time for this group of six patients was too short to make any statement concerning the effect of treatment on prognosis.








Table 12.1 Orbital Malignant Melanoma: Site of Origin, Age, Sex, Treatment, and Follow-up, 1948–1987





























































































































































































































































































































Age Sex Treatment Status Follow-up
Primary (N = 4)
   Orbit 13 Male Complete excision L + W 29 y
   Orbit 34 Female Complete excision L + W 8 y
   Orbit 49 Male Partial excision Dcd 22 m
   Orbit 62 Female Partial excision Dcd 9 m
Secondary (N = 35)
   Eye 16 Male Excision and radiotherapy L + W 20 y
   Eye 29 Female Radiotherapy Dcd 10 m
   Eye 42 Male Exenteration Dcd 4 y
   Eye 46 Male Exenteration L + M 2 y
   Eye 48 Female Exenteration Dcd 4 y
   Eye 53 Male Exenteration Dcd* 62 m
   Eye 54 Male Exenteration Dcd 14 m
   Eye 57 Female Exenteration Dcd 3 y
   Eye 59 Male Exenteration Dcd* 14 y
   Eye 62 Female Exenteration Dcd 67 m
   Eye 64 Female Exenteration Dcd 6 m
   Eye 67 Female Exenteration L 33 m
   Eye 67 Male Radiotherapy and partial excision L + T 2 y
   Eye 67 Female Subtotal exenteration and radiotherapy Dcd* 91 m
   Eye 67 Female Exenteration and radiotherapy Dcd 18 m
   Eye 68 Female Exenteration Dcd 7 m
   Eye 69 Male Exenteration Dcd 3 m
   Eye 69 Female Exenteration Dcd 14 m
   Eye 69 Female Exenteration Dcd 15 m
   Eye 76 Male Radiotherapy Dcd Cause?
   Eye 80 Male Partial excision Dcd* 4 y
   Eye 82 Male Biopsy L + M 21 m
   Eye 84 Female Exenteration Dcd Cause?
   Antrum 45 Female Electrocoagulation Dcd 1 y
   Antrum 50 Male Exenteration No follow-up
   Antrum 62 Female Exenteration Dcd 15 m
   Nasal cavity 62 Male Exenteration Dcd 20 m
   Ethmoid sinus 63 Male Radium implants Dcd 14 m
   Epibulbar 48 Male Biopsy No follow-up
   Caruncle 50 Male Exenteration Dcd 1 y
   Conjunctiva 52 Male Partial excision and radiotherapy Dcd 62 m
   Conjunctiva 71 Male Radiotherapy and subtotal exenteration Dcd 9 y
   Conjunctiva 80 Male Subtotal exenteration Dcd 22 m cause?
   Eyelid 77 Male Multiple excision radiotherapy and exenteration Dcd* 14 m
   Upper face 68 Male Radical extirpations, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy Dcd 11 y
Metastatic (N = 4)
   Back 36 Male Incomplete excision, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy Dcd 5 m
   Back 64 Male Biopsy Dcd 2 m
   Groin 69 Female Radiotherapy and biopsy Dcd 22 m
   Nasal septum 92 Male Exenteration Dcd 20 m
L + W, living without known recurrence or metastasis; Dcd, death from tumor; Dcd *, death from cause other than tumor; L + M, living with metastasis; L, living but no data concerning status of tumor; L + T, living with tumor at original site; Cause?, cause of death not known.

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Jun 21, 2016 | Posted by in OTOLARYNGOLOGY | Comments Off on Malignant Melanoma

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access