Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Tissues Compatible with Supernumerary Extraocular Muscles





Purpose


To determine by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) the prevalence and anatomy of anomalous extraocular muscle (EOM) bands.


Design


Prospective, observational case series.


Methods


High-resolution, multipositional, surface coil orbital MRI was performed using T1 or T2 fast spin echo weighting with target fixation control under a prospective protocol in normal adult subjects and a diverse group of strabismic patients between 1996 and 2009. Images demonstrating anomalous EOM bands were analyzed digitally to evaluate their sizes and paths, correlating findings with complete ophthalmic and motility examinations.


Results


Among 118 orthotropic and 453 strabismic subjects, 1 (0.8%) orthotropic and 11 (2.4%) strabismic subjects exhibited unilateral or bilateral orbital bands having MRI signal characteristics identical to EOM. Most bands occurred without other EOM dysplasia and coursed in the retrobulbar space between rectus EOMs such as the medial rectus to lateral rectus, from superior to inferior rectus, or from 1 EOM to the globe. In 2 cases, horizontal bands from the medial rectus to lateral rectus muscles immediately posterior to the globe apparently limited supraduction by collision with the optic nerve. All bands were too deep to be approached via conventional strabismus surgical approaches.


Conclusions


Approximately 2% of humans exhibit on MRI deep orbital bands consistent with supernumerary EOMs. Although band anatomy is nonoculorotary, some bands may cause restrictive strabismus.


The normal human orbit contains 6 extrinsic oculorotary extraocular muscles (EOMs), the levator palpebrae superioris muscle, and the orbicularis oculi muscle. Abnormalities of the EOMs are believed to be rare. Numerical aberrations of the EOMs have been reported, consisting of both absences of rectus and oblique EOMs as well as supernumerary bands resembling EOMs. Sparse case reports exist describing these supernumerary EOMs, most of which have been discovered after death or during surgery. Sacks published one of the first reports describing anomalous EOM bands discovered by cadaveric dissection.


Imaging of anomalous EOM bands has been limited because of their small dimensions as well as irregular courses and orientations. Indeed, until recently, EOMs themselves were difficult to characterize by imaging alone. EOM activity was inferred indirectly from clinical examinations, force generation testing, and electromyography. However, recent advances in orbital imaging with high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) have clarified noninvasively the functional orbital anatomic features of living patients. Within the last decade, MRI has been able to demonstrate directly EOM locations, sizes, contractility, and innervation. Demer and associates illustrated the usefulness of high-resolution MRI in detecting hypoplasia and misdirection of cranial nerves, as well as neurogenic EOM atrophy in strabismus caused by cranial nerve palsies. In addition, MRI has been used to detect structural changes in Brown syndrome as well as widespread orbital dysinnervation in congenital fibrosis of the extraocular muscles. It seems reasonable to anticipate that anomalies in orbital anatomic features would be more likely discovered by MRI than by cadaveric dissections.


Herein, we demonstrate the usefulness of high-resolution orbital MRI in detecting and characterizing supernumerary EOM bands. We present a series of cases in which high-resolution MRI disclosed anomalous EOMs having a wide variety of morphologic features and discuss the potential clinical impact of these bands on ocular motility.


Methods


Between December 1, 1996, and December 31, 2009, a total of 118 orthotropic volunteers and 453 strabismic patients underwent high-resolution orbital imaging under a prospective protocol designed to optimize image resolution using the best available methods at the time. We selected for detailed analysis those cases with evidence of anomalous EOMs. Written informed consent was obtained prospectively according to a protocol approved by the Institutional Review Board of the University of California, Los Angeles, and in conformity with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act. All subjects underwent complete ophthalmic examinations, including visual acuity assessment, stereopsis, slit-lamp and funduscopic examination, and cycloplegic or manifest refraction, or both.


High-resolution orbital MRI was performed using T1 or T2 fast spin echo weighting using a 1.5-T scanner (Signa; General Electric, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA). A surface coil technique was used for obtaining high-resolution orbital MRI with 2- to 3-mm image planes as described previously. Images always were obtained in quasicoronal planes perpendicular to the long axes of each orbit, as well as in other planes as appropriate to individual findings. Each orbit of alert subjects was scanned during fixation of a central target by the corresponding eye; subjects too young for cooperation were scanned under general anesthesia. Digital MRI images were converted into a spatially calibrated, 8-bit tagged image file format with the use of locally developed software and were quantified with the program Image J (Rasband WS. ImageJ. United States National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland; http://rsb.info.nih.gov.easyaccess2.lib.cuhk.edu.hk/ij/ , 1997–2009).


To measure lengths of anomalous EOM bands, adjacent image sets were resliced along the paths taken by the bands. The cross-sectional area of each anomalous EOM band was computed using the area function of the ImageJ program after manually outlining the band’s thickest portion. Cross-sectional areas of the rectus EOMs were measured similarly at their thickest portions. To avoid confounding the measurements by contractile changes in extraocular muscle size induced by varying eye position, measurements were obtained in central gaze. To compare the prevalence of the anomalous EOM bands between the strabismic population and nonstrabismic population, the Fisher exact test was performed using GraphPad Prism for Windows (GraphPad Prism 5, Version 5.01, 2007; Graphpad Software, La Jolla, California, USA).


Results


From December 1996 through December 2009, a total of 118 normal subjects without strabismus and 453 strabismic subjects underwent high-resolution orbital MRI. Twelve of these subjects were identified who had a band consistent with 1 or more supernumerary EOMs. Bands had intensities equivalent to that of typical EOMs. Eleven of these subjects had underlying strabismus, giving a prevalence of supernumerary EOM bands in strabismic subjects of 2.4% and in normal subjects of 0.8%, a difference that was not statistically significant ( P = .48).


In the Table , the anomalous EOM bands’ sizes and courses are tabulated, as well as the cross-sectional areas of the rectus EOM in the corresponding orbits. Three subjects had supernumerary EOM bands connecting the vertical rectus muscles, 4 patients had bands connecting the horizontal rectus EOMs, 1 subject had a band connecting the lateral rectus (LR) muscle to inferior rectus (IR) muscle, 1 subject had a band coursing from the IR muscle to the globe, and 3 subjects had bands connecting the levator palpebrae superioris muscle to the superior oblique (SO) muscle. In all cases, the anomalous EOM band had a smaller cross-sectional area than each of the corresponding rectus EOMs.



TABLE

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Measurements of Extraocular Muscles




























































































































































































Case No. Age (yrs) Sex Underlying Condition Eye Muscle Band Course Band Length (mm) Cross-section (mm 2 )
Band SR MR IR LR
1 1.3 M CFEOM type III both eyes Right Temporal edges of SR and IR 17.1 7.1 31.4 37.1 27.1 32.0
1 1.3 M CFEOM type III both eyes Left Temporal edges of SR and IR 16.6 5.7 30.8 42.3 32.8 33.0
2 61 M SO palsy left eye, INO both eyes Left Temporal edges of SR and IR 14.9 3.1 44.2 34.5 35.5 35.8
3 16 F Partially accommodative V esotropia Right Temporal edges of SR and IR 17.6 3.4 35.7 38.7 30.2 32.0
4 60 M Thyroid ophthalmopathy Left Central portion of MR to superior edge of LR 19.2 4.0 42.7 51.4 46.3 43.5
5 18 M Normal subject Right Central portions of MR and LR 16.9 4.2 42.6 37.1 24.6 42.4
6 38 F Familial monocular vertical gaze deficiency Right Inferior edges of MR and LR 14.7 6.3 27.4 45.8 14.8 42.4
7 1.8 M CFEOM type III both eyes Left Inferior edges of MR and LR 12.8 5.2 8.13 17.5 6.14 24.7
8 56 M Left hypertropia Right LR to IR 13.0 3.5 41.1 35.3 27.6 41.4
9 35 F Infantile esotropia Left Supertemporal course from IR to temporal globe equator 15.3 3.6 35.3 25.1 27.3 45.3
10 14 M Duane syndrome right eye, type III Left Nasal course from SR-LPS to SO near trochlea 7.7 4.6 26.9 42.6 33.5 37.4
11 52 F Duane syndrome both eyes, type III Left Nasal edge of SR-LPS to SO near trochlea 10.8 2.1 24.2 27.0 23.6 36.6
12 38 M Duane syndrome right eye, type I Left Nasal edge of SR-LPS to SO near trochlea 7.2 3.0 24.8 24.7 27.1 17.7

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Jul 16, 2021 | Posted by in OPHTHALMOLOGY | Comments Off on Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Tissues Compatible with Supernumerary Extraocular Muscles

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access