Femtosecond Laser Flap Creation



Femtosecond Laser Flap Creation


Paul J. Bryar

David R. Hardten

Michael Vrabec



The femtosecond laser represents a significant advance in the field of refractive surgery. Mechanical microkeratomes were the only instruments available for flap creation in the early days of LASIK. In 2001, the FDA approved the first femtosecond laser for the LASIK flap. The use of the femtosecond laser has steadily increased since then. By 2010, over 50% of the LASIK procedures in the United States were performed with the femtosecond laser. Significant improvements in femtosecond technology have occurred over the last decade. In addition to flap creation, the lasers can be used to create channels for intrastromal rings, and can be used for keratoplasty and cataract surgery. IntraLase Corporation of Irvine, California, developed the first commercially available femtosecond laser. Lasers that are FDA approved and currently in use at this time include: Abbott Medical Optics IntraLase FS and iFS, Alcon WaveLight FS200, Carl Zeiss Meditec VisuMax, Technolas Perfect Vision 520F, and Ziemer Ophthalmic Systems Femto LDV.


▪ Laser Physics

The femtosecond laser is a focusable infrared laser similar to the Nd-YAG (neodymium-yttrium-aluminum-garnet) laser used for the posterior capsulotomy procedure; however, this laser delivers ultrashort laser pulses, firing in the femtosecond duration range (100 × 10-15 second). The advantage of a femtosecond laser is that the extremely short laser pulse of focused energy causes minimal thermal damage or disruption in adjacent tissues. This adjacent disruption in the corneal stroma has been measured and extends out on the order of 1 µm. The femtosecond laser pulse vaporizes small amounts of tissue by the process of photodisruption. The vaporized tissue forms an intrastromal cavitation bubble of microplasma, which is composed of water and carbon dioxide. Focusing the laser energy at a specified tissue depth and placing successive laser spots in close proximity to one another, multiple bubbles are created in a lamellar corneal dissection plane. Some lasers create the dissection plane using a raster (zigzag) line pattern, while others use a spiral pattern. The laser-controlled software can be programmed by the surgeon to create lamellar, axial (side cut), or pocket cuts in a wide range of depths and diameters. Typically after the lamellar cut has been completed, the side cut is created with a series of vertically placed spots along the flap edge.

Significant advances have been made with femtosecond technology over the last decade. First generation femtosecond lasers had repetition rates of approximately 15 kHz, and flap creation could take 60 to 90 seconds. Some current generation lasers operate in the 150 to 200 kHz range and have flap creation time of <10 seconds. Other lasers such as the Ziemer Femto LDV use very high pulse rate in the MHz range with lower energy per pulse. Despite the differences in laser dynamics and parameters from one laser to another, there
are basic principles and practices that are applicable to all femtosecond lasers. The rest of the chapter will focus on the important clinical concepts that can be applied to any femtosecond laser platform used for LASIK flap creation.


▪ Advantages & Disadvantages of Femtosecond Lasers

The selection of candidates for LASIK with a femtosecond laser is similar in many respects to that for the blade microkeratome. First and foremost is patient safety, followed by the ability to meet patient expectations. However, femtosecond technology may expand the limits of candidacy for LASIK surgery. The advantages and disadvantages of the femtosecond laser for flap creation are summarized in Table 5.1.

Various studies have demonstrated that when compared to mechanical microkeratomes, femtosecond lasers create flaps with more predictable thickness. Femtosecond lasers can also create thinner flaps. The ability to create thinner flaps combined with tighter variance between expected and actual flap thickness may allow more patients with relatively thin corneas or highly myopic patients to undergo the procedure. Intraoperative pachymetry in such cases is still recommended prior to excimer ablation to ensure adequate residual stromal bed thickness.








TABLE 5.1 Summary of the Advantages and Disadvantages of Femtosecond Laser Flap Creation

































Advantages


Disadvantages


Greater predictability of flap thickness; ability to create thinner flaps


High cost


Greater predictability of flap diameter


Need to acquire new skills


Flap creation independent of corneal contour or corneal diameter


Increased risk of inflammation (DLK)


Reduced incidence of button hole, partial flap, and intraoperative abrasion


TLSS or Good Acuity Plus Photosensitivity (GAPP); also Peripheral light spectrum phenomenon/Rainbow glare


Ability to retreat in the event of a suction break


OBL may interfere with excimer ablation


Epithelial sloughing of the flap is unlikely


Rarely intracameral bubbles can interfere with laser tracking, delaying surgery


Increased flap adherence long term reduces risk of traumatic flap displacement


Increased flap adherence makes flap lift for retreatment long term more difficult


Less bleeding from corneal neovascularization


Not suited to LASIK after RK or PK due to increased flap manipulation and potential wound disruption


Creation of a more planar flap



Femtosecond lasers also create more predictable flap diameters and shapes compared to flaps created with a microkeratome. With a mechanical microkeratome, patients with steeper corneas are at a higher risk for a buttonhole flap or a wider than anticipated flap diameter. Patients with flat corneas are at a higher risk for free flap or a smaller than anticipated flap diameter. With femtosecond lasers, the above mentioned complications are unlikely to occur even in patients with contours at the upper and lower ends of the normal range. Patients with smaller corneas can be treated with less risk of invading the sclera, because of the ability to better adjust flap diameter. Additionally, femtosecond lasers create flaps with a more desirable planar configuration and uniform thickness. Flaps created with a microkeratome have a meniscus shape with the flap periphery being thicker than the center (see Fig. 5.1). Most blade microkeratomes create thinner flaps on the second eye when the same blade is used for both eyes. They also create thinner flaps in thinner corneas and thicker flaps in thicker corneas. This is not the case with the femtosecond laser.

Jun 5, 2016 | Posted by in OPHTHALMOLOGY | Comments Off on Femtosecond Laser Flap Creation

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access