Enucleation



Enucleation


Arthika Chandramohan, MD, MPH

Dilraj S. Grewal, MD

Prithvi Mruthyunjaya, MD, MHS



PREOPERATIVE CONSIDERATIONS

Indications for enucleation in children are rare, but most commonly include the following1:



  • Blind, painful eye


  • Following severe trauma (ie, irreparable open globe injury; concern for risk of sympathetic ophthalmia)


  • Intraocular tumor (specifically as primary or secondary treatment for retinoblastoma)


  • Rarely congenital or progressive phthisis bulbi (ie, chronic poorly controlled uveitis from juvenile idiopathic arthritis). Unexplained phthisis bulbi should be investigated for retinoblastoma.


Surgical Planning



  • Have a detailed discussion with patient’s parents or guardian regarding the goals of the enucleation (ie, tumor staging, prevention of sympathetic ophthalmia, pain control), and plans for postoperative steps for reconstruction with an ocularist.


  • Select device for severing the nerve (ie, snare, curved enucleation scissors +/− Wells enucleation spoon).


  • Select type of implant (ie, porous implants are more commonly used in developed countries2 vs. nonporous implants; Table 37.1 describes more commonly used implants).


SURGICAL PROCEDURE: ENUCLEATION (VIDEO 37.1)



  • Ensure that the correct eye is marked and draped using a redundant check system among multiple team members to eliminate the possibility of removing the wrong eye. Once the patient is under general anesthesia, the nonsurgical eye is taped closed by the surgeon.


  • In cases where the select eye is not readily identifiable externally (ie, intraocular tumors, posterior globe rupture) prior to surgical incision, indirect ophthalmoscopy or repeat B-scan ultrasound is performed to ensure that the appropriate eye is being removed.









    TABLE 37.1. Various Available Orbital Implants




























    Implant Type


    Implant Material


    Benefits


    Drawbacks


    Nonporous


    Glass


    Acrylic


    Silicone




    • Improved prosthesis movement with myoconjunctival technique (each muscle sutured to respective fornix) compared to porous implants3




    • Muscle reattachment to a scleral shell rather than the implant itself can result in implant displacement and migration



    • Higher rates of extrusion and infection4


    Porous


    Hydroxyapatite


    Synthetic hydroxyapatite


    Bioceramic


    Medpor




    • Provide improved implant movement because of direct attachment of extraocular muscles to the implant



    • Associated with less migration, extrusion, and lower risks of infection5




    • More expensive



    • More prone to implant exposure6 and postoperative inflammation


    Other


    Dermis fat graft




    • Maintains orbital bone growth with soft tissue volume expansion over time



    • Can be used with implant in older children (>5 years old)7




    • Can result in contracted fornices and cosmetically significant enophthalmos4 (though less common in children) when used independently



    No implant




    • Allows for follow-up of tumor extension prior to implant placement (can also stage implant placement at a later date)




    • No prevention of socket contraction or stunted orbital bone development resulting in poor orbital cosmesis and development

    Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

    Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

May 10, 2021 | Posted by in OPHTHALMOLOGY | Comments Off on Enucleation

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access