Endoscopic Brow Lift
Marc H. Hohman
INTRODUCTION
The periorbital area is essential for nonverbal facial expression and communication, and critical to social engagement. With advancing age, the eyebrows descend due to gravitational forces, loss of elasticity of the scalp and forehead tissue, and repeated muscle contraction. These changes, combined with the development of vertical and horizontal rhytides of the central forehead and glabella, result in a tired, heavy, crowded, or even “angry” appearance. In patients with significant lateral hooding, visual field deficits are commonplace. Loss of volume also occurs, transforming a youthful, oval face into a more rectangular or deflated one.
To rejuvenate the upper third of the face effectively, a surgeon must place the eyebrow in an ideal position, and even restore lost volume when indicated, while maintaining harmony with the upper eyelids and minimizing surgical scarring and distortion of the hairline.
The endoscopic brow lift has become a well-established technique in upper facial rejuvenation. First described by Isse in 1992, it is preferred by patients and surgeons alike due to decreased length of the incision, less scarring, decreased risk of numbness, decreased bleeding, and a more rapid recovery when compared to traditional coronal or trichophytic approaches.
HISTORY
Prior to undertaking any cosmetic or functional procedure, the patient’s motivation for surgery and expectations must be discussed. Having the patient look into a mirror, describe the specific changes he or she would like to effect, allows the surgeon to determine the patient’s goals and tailor a suitable surgical plan.
Patients with brow ptosis often present with concerns of a tired, heavy, or angry appearance. They may report dissatisfaction with deep glabellar or forehead rhytides. If severe lateral hooding or eyelid ptosis is present, the patient will likely complain of visual field restriction. Frequently, patients request only upper blepharoplasty and fail to recognize the contribution of brow ptosis to the aging face.
The surgeon should inquire about previous surgical, traumatic, or minimally invasive treatments, such as neuromodulators or injectable fillers, which may affect the clinical examination. All previous orbital and periorbital surgeries should be documented, especially blepharoplasty, which may predispose the patient to postoperative lagophthalmos if aggressive brow lifting is performed.
Systemic diseases predisposing the patient to adverse outcomes should be identified during the initial consultation. Particular attention should be directed toward underlying thyroid disease, allergic symptoms, or recurrent episodes of eyelid edema suggestive of blepharochalasis. One should also make note of autoimmune diseases such as Sjögren’s, rheumatoid arthritis, or myasthenia gravis. Perhaps most importantly, any history of xerophthalmia should be identified, because the surgical plan may require alteration to avoid exacerbation of the problem.
PHYSICAL EXAMINATION
In order to perform an endoscopic brow lift successfully, it is critical for the surgeon to have a precise understanding of facial anatomy and brow aesthetics as they relate to the clinical examination. The brow itself is a structure consisting of thick hair-bearing skin just superior to the thin skin of the upper eyelid. In general terms, the ideal male brow overlies the bony supraorbital ridge. The ideal female brow, as classically presented by Westmore, begins with the medial brow along the vertical plane of the alar-facial junction and ends laterally at an oblique line drawn from the lateral alar point through the lateral canthus (Fig. 7.1). The medial and lateral ends of the eyebrow are nearly level on a horizontal plane, but there is a variable degree of aesthetic arch between them. Location of the ideal brow apex has ranged from above the lateral limbus to the lateral canthus with current ideals resting somewhere in-between. There is a range of aesthetic ideals across ethnic groups, but the general differences between the ideal male and female brow positions remain fairly consistent. The brow is a naturally hair-bearing area, and variations in aesthetic taste may also affect the amount and location of the hair in this region. However, the location of the anatomical brow is determined solely by the position of the thick soft tissue and not by the presence or pattern of hair. This is important as it is the shape of the eyebrow that is a greater determinant of brow aesthetics than the elevation of the brow in relation to the orbital rim.
The patient should be examined with the head aligned in the Frankfort horizontal plane and the eyes in primary gaze. Brow ptosis appears as soft tissue overhanging the orbital rim, usually most prominent laterally. This causes the eyes to appear aged and tired. The examiner should note the skin texture, skin color, and position of the eyebrows. Many patients with dermatochalasis or brow ptosis compensate by elevating the brows. This results in prominent transverse forehead rhytides (Fig. 7.2).
Asymmetric transverse forehead rhytides may indicate asymmetric brows or ptosis. To determine the natural brow position, the patient should close his or her eyes and fully relax the forehead. The examiner should then apply gentle downward traction on the brow to simulate the effect of gravity, releasing the brow and then instructing the patient to reopen his or her eyes slowly and without raising the eyebrows. Often times, for those patients with frontalis muscle hyperactivity, the examiner may need to place his or her hand on the patient’s forehead to keep the brow in a neutral position. This maneuver frequently exposes brow ptosis and upper eyelid dermatochalasis, as well as upper eyelid ptosis, if present. Palpation of the supraorbital rim is useful in determining the amount of brow ptosis present. It is important to remember that many female patients alter the quantity or pattern of brow hair, but this does not affect the position of the anatomical brow. The astute surgeon determines where the true brow is positioned during preoperative evaluation. Mobility of the forehead can be assessed with the glide test, in which the examiner manually elevates the brow to the desired position; the point of maximal elevation is then planned according to the patient’s needs, generally at or lateral to the lateral limbus. Lastly, temporal hollowing should be noted in case volume augmentation needs to be performed concurrently.
The surgeon should note the position of the hairline using the Norwood’s or Ludwig’s classification system. The distance from the upper brow to the anterior hairline should be about 5 cm, and the distance from the midpupil to the inferior brow border should be approximately 25 mm. The distance between the medial brows
should approximate the distance between the medial canthi. Asymmetries should be documented and demonstrated to the patient preoperatively. Failure to recognize asymmetry prior to surgery may result in inadequate correction and patient dissatisfaction.
should approximate the distance between the medial canthi. Asymmetries should be documented and demonstrated to the patient preoperatively. Failure to recognize asymmetry prior to surgery may result in inadequate correction and patient dissatisfaction.
The texture and quality of the eyelid skin should be examined. The presence of webbing, scars, and lesions should be noted in addition to assessment of excessive skin, muscle, adipose tissue, or ptotic lacrimal glands. Accurate evaluation of the upper and lower eyelids must be completed with the brow in neutral position. The lateral canthal angle should be sharp, with the lateral canthus positioned roughly 2 mm above the medial canthus. The upper eyelid crease should be located 9 to 12 mm from the central lid margins for females and 8 to 10 mm for males. Patients with brow ptosis frequently also have excess eyelid skin, which can easily be addressed with upper lid blepharoplasties immediately following endoscopic brow lift.
Recognition of eyelid asymmetry is critical when identifying those patients with ptosis. There are many causes of eyelid ptosis, but it frequently results from dehiscence of the levator aponeurosis and presents with a decreased upper margin reflex distance 1 (MRD1). The MRD1 is the distance from the corneal light reflex to the upper eyelid margin and is usually between 3 and 4.5 mm. Disinsertion of the levator aponeurosis also results in a higher lid crease with a deepened superior sulcus. Patients typically have asymmetric brow positions with deep transverse rhytides on the affected side due to excessive frontalis activity. With an MRD1 of less than 2 mm, visual field obstruction is typically present, and ptosis repair should be considered and discussed with the patient.
The lower lid should be inspected for entropion, ectropion, and excessive laxity. The position of the globe should be assessed because a proptotic globe may cause the eyelid skin to appear retracted and predispose the patient to lagophthalmos. A retracted globe may result in pseudoptosis. Whenever malposition of the globe is noted, surgical intervention should be delayed until the appropriate etiology is identified and addressed.
Assessment of dry eyes is important in all patients undergoing brow or eyelid surgery. A simple way to screen for dry eyes is to inquire if the patient uses moisturizing eye drops. If dry eye symptoms are present, tear production should be evaluated with the Schirmer’s test. If aqueous tear film deficiency is found, dry eye symptoms may require further evaluation and treatment prior to surgery. Patients with significant eye symptoms or findings should undergo a formal assessment by an ophthalmologist prior to any elective periorbital procedure.
Assessment of the cranial nerves should be performed with particular attention to the frontal and zygomatic branches of the facial nerve and the sensory status of the first branch of the trigeminal nerve. In the event
that facial nerve dysfunction is identified, consideration should be given to performing either a unilateral brow lift on the affected side or an asymmetric brow lift. The goal should be to bring the paretic brow within 3 to 4 mm of the normal side’s height, ideally spitting the difference between repose and elevated positions, which will minimize the appearance of asymmetry.
that facial nerve dysfunction is identified, consideration should be given to performing either a unilateral brow lift on the affected side or an asymmetric brow lift. The goal should be to bring the paretic brow within 3 to 4 mm of the normal side’s height, ideally spitting the difference between repose and elevated positions, which will minimize the appearance of asymmetry.
At the conclusion of the physical examination, preoperative photography should be performed, both for surgical planning and medicolegal documentation. Review of the photographs prior to surgery will often reveal subtle findings, such as asymmetry in brow position, thickness, or shape, that were not apparent on initial physical examination. The following views are photographed, zoomed in on the periorbital region, and zoomed out to frame the whole face: frontal view in repose, frontal view with eyes closed gently, frontal view looking upward, and frontal view with brows elevated; the same views should be documented in profile. All photographs should be taken in the Frankfort horizontal plane for the sake of consistency of perspective.
INDICATIONS
Brow ptosis
Lateral eyelid hooding secondary to brow ptosis
Forehead and glabellar rhytides
Visual field deficits
CONTRAINDICATIONS
Those patients with uncontrolled ocular disease or systemic health problems predisposing them to anesthetic risk should not undergo surgery.
Those patients with unrealistic expectations or who anticipate secondary gains are not good candidates for cosmetic surgery.
Caution is advised in those patients who have a history of trauma to the forehead or prior forehead reconstruction.
PREOPERATIVE PLANNING
The preoperative plan should be clearly documented, and appropriate photography should be obtained prior to surgery. Standard preoperative photography is described above. These photos may be posted in the operating room for reference.
Preoperative counseling of the patient should include a discussion of the risks and benefits of the procedure, as well as the concerns that are anticipated to arise postoperatively. While the operation is not particularly painful, there will be mild edema and potentially some periorbital ecchymosis. Despite making all five of the incisions within the hair, the risk of infection is low. Occasionally, there can be hair loss at the incision sites, or the hairline may recede slightly. Nerve injury, both sensory and motor, temporary and permanent, has been described, but the risk is low. Many patients do, however, note persistent discomfort at the sites of implant placement, if implants are used for suspension. I advise patients to avoid palpating the implants, which usually allows tenderness to abate. Dissatisfaction with the procedure due to asymmetry or other complaints is rare.
Surgical Anatomy
The soft tissues of the forehead can be divided into five aesthetic subunits: central forehead, lateral temporal units, and eyebrows. The bony landmarks of the zygomatic arches, orbital rims, and nasal root represent the lower anatomic boundaries, while a natural hairline represents the upper limits. The temporal line divides the lateral forehead from the temporal regions, and the orbital rim serves as a consistent marker in the evaluation of brow ptosis.
An understanding of subunit interrelation is essential for conceptual planning as well as surgical outcome. The central forehead is a direct extension of the scalp and is layered, from superficial to deep, with skin, connective tissue, galea aponeurotica, loose areolar tissue, and periosteum. The first three layers of the central forehead are tightly held together, in contrast to the loosely attached skin and fascia of the temporal region. Within the soft tissues overlying the supraorbital ridges is a confluence of muscular insertions, which include the paired frontalis, orbicularis oculi, corrugator supercilii, procerus, and depressor supercilii muscles. The interplay of these muscles is responsible for the wide array of brow expressions as well as the associated observed changes with aging.
The galea aponeurotica separates along the superior origin of the frontalis muscle to form the superficial and deep galeal planes. These planes envelop the muscles along their anterior and posterior surfaces and extend to the lower forehead. Along the brow region, numerous fibrous septa from the frontalis muscles penetrate the thin superficial galea and interdigitate into the orbicularis oculi, procerus, and the overlying dermis. The frontalis muscle is the primary elevator of the brow, and contraction of this muscle produces transverse forehead rhytides.
There are numerous eyebrow depressors: the orbicularis oculi, the depressor supercilii, the procerus, and the corrugator supercilii, all of which are superficial to the frontalis. The orbicularis oculi muscle serves as a powerful lateral brow depressor due to the lack of a corresponding muscular elevator to oppose it. It is located just deep to the skin, making it a very superficial muscle, particularly the palpebral portion, which underlies the thinnest skin of the body. Repeated contraction of the orbicularis results in thin lateral rhytides, which are often referred to as “crow’s feet.” More medially, a smaller muscle—which some consider to be a part of the orbicularis oculi—is the depressor supercilii, a brow depressor that is frequently the target of chemodenervation in order to provide a “chemical brow lift.” Deep to the orbicularis oculi at the glabella, the procerus muscle originates from the nasal bones and upper lateral cartilages and has vertically oriented fibers that insert into the dermis. The procerus causes inferior and medial displacement of the medial eyebrow with resultant horizontal rhytides in the glabella and upper nasal radix. The corrugators superciliorum are paired muscles originating from the superomedial orbital rims and lying just deep to the procerus. Their fibers are obliquely oriented and insert into the medial eyebrow dermis. They pull the brow medially and inferiorly, resulting in the vertical and oblique glabellar rhytides commonly termed “frown lines.” Deep to the corrugators are the terminal fibers of the frontalis, which overly the pericranium. The periorbita and the pericranium merge to form the orbital septum, which originates from a fibrous ring around the periphery of the orbit known as the arcus marginalis. This ligamentous structure serves to anchor the periorbital soft tissues to the underlying bone, limiting their mobility when acted upon by muscles such as the frontalis.