Endoscopic-Assisted Repair of Superior Canal Dehiscence




Superior canal dehiscence (SCD) is a bony defect of the superior canal that can cause vestibular and/or auditory symptoms. Surgical repair of SCD provides effective relief from symptoms, and the middle fossa craniotomy approach with binocular microscopy offers direct visualization and surgical access to the arcuate eminence. However, for SCDs located along the downsloping tegmen medial to the peak of the arcuate eminence, a direct light of sight may be obscured, rendering visualization with traditional microscopy difficult. The endoscope is the ideal adjunct in middle fossa craniotomy approach SCD surgery and offers a safe, effective means to identify and repair arcuate eminence defects hidden from microscopic view.


Key points








  • Middle fossa craniotomy (MFC) and transmastoid approaches are the most common surgical techniques to repair superior canal dehiscence (SCD). The advantage of the MFC approach is direct visualization and surgical access to the SCD without the need for drilling the skull base in most cases.



  • Endoscopes provide a superior view (compared with binocular microscopy) of arcuate eminence defects using a MFC approach, especially medial dehiscences that are found along the downsloping tegmen.



  • Improved visualization of arcuate eminence defect using the endoscope is achieved with a minimally invasive skin, soft tissue and craniotomy approach, with reduced temporal lobe retraction, and avoidance of drilling overlying bony ridges that obscure the line of sight.



  • Endoscopes provide superior transillumination of the skull base and localization of blue-lined superior canals, which is important when repairing symptomatic “near dehiscence” SCD.



  • Massachusetts Eye and Ear radiologic classification of SCD and surrounding skull base topography is helpful in preoperative planning and can anticipate the need for an endoscopic-guided repair.






Introduction


First characterized by Minor and colleagues in 1998, superior canal dehiscence (SCD) is a bony defect of the superior canal that is associated with vestibular and/or auditory dysfunction. Classic symptoms associated with SCD syndrome (SCDS) include aural fullness, pulsating tinnitus, autophony, and conductive hyperacusis (hearing one’s own voice, footsteps, and/or eye movements in the affected ear) and dizziness or vertigo evoked by loud sounds (Tullio phenomenon) or Valsalva maneuver (Hennebert sign). Symptoms can vary widely among patients with SCDS, and not all patients with these defects have symptoms.


The concept of a pathologic mobile “third window” of the inner ear (the oval and round windows being the first two) is widely accepted as the explanation for SCDS pathophysiology. Based on this concept, it is hypothesized that a third window allows for transmission of fluid pressure between the intralabyrinthine space and the cranial vault. With this alternative path of low impedance, acoustic flow entering from the oval window is shunted toward the dehiscence causing hearing loss and deflection of the superior canal cupula away from the ampulla (ampullofugal) resulting in the stimulation of the affected superior canal. Conversely, straining or Valsalva against closed glottis can lead to labyrinthine fluid flow away from the dehiscence and toward the ampulla (ampullopetal) resulting in inhibition of the superior canal ampulla. Dizziness and vertigo can arise from either condition. Hypersensitivity to sounds and vibrations conducted through the body is a common feature of SCDS and is thought to be part of the third window phenomenon, but the underlying mechanism is still a subject of ongoing research.


Conservative management is adequate for most patients with SCDS, but for patients with severe symptoms, surgical repair is a feasible option. Microscopic-assisted middle fossa craniotomy (MFC) is a widely used technique to repair SCDs because it is well-established and safe. Alternatively, some surgeons favor a less invasive transmastoid approach to either directly repair the dehiscence (through a tegmen defect created from the mastoid area) or indirectly isolating the dehiscence (by creating labyrinthotomies on either side of the SCD and then plugging the canal). At the Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary (MEEI) we believe that the transmastoid approach is ideal for SCDs associated with the superior petrosal sinus ( Fig. 1 E ) and revision cases, where the MFC approach is often complicated by prior attempts to repair the defect directly.




Fig. 1


Radiologic classification of patients with SCD based on defect location. ( Left column ) Schematic of defect location relative to the ampullated end of the superior canal. ( Right Column ) Computed tomography images in the plane of Pöschl of corresponding defects. ( A ) Intact superior semicircular canal (SSC). ( B ) Dehiscence near the ampullated end of the SSC, often on the lateral upslope of the arcuate eminence. ( C ) Dehiscence of the superior tip of the SSC, corresponding with the peak of the arcuate eminence. ( D ) Dehiscence along the posterior limb of the superior canal, often on the medial downslope of the arcuate eminence. ( E ) Superior petrosal sinus (SPS)-associated SCD. ( F ) An unusual case of two dehiscences along a single superior canal: arcuate eminence defect with a “near dehiscence” SSC associated with the SPS.

( Adapted from Lookabaugh S, Kelly HR, Carter MS, et al. Radiologic classification of superior canal dehiscence: implications for surgical repair. Otol Neurotol 2015;36(1):120; with permission.)


The MFC approach with binocular microscope provides excellent visualization of the lateral skull base and direct surgical access to the SCD, which is essential to ensuring adequate repair of the entire defect. However, a subset of patients with SCDS has unfavorable skull base topography and visualizing the defect under the microscopic is challenging ( Fig. 2 ). Rigid endoscopes provide a superior view of the medial skull base and defects “hidden” from the microscopic view ( Fig. 3 ). We now favor a small craniotomy approach for SCD repairs using endoscopes as an adjunct when necessary. This article discusses (1) the diagnosis of SCD, (2) the preoperative evaluation of SCD with an emphasis on patient selection and radiologic classification, (3) the MEEI endoscopic-assisted surgical technique to repair SCD via MFC, and (4) pearls and pitfalls with this approach.




Fig. 2


Anatomic location of superior canal dehiscence on preoperative computed tomography scans can help anticipate the need for the endoscope during middle fossa craniotomy repair. High-resolution computed tomography: coronal views of temporal bone. ( A ) Defect is located at the peak of the arcuate eminence ( arrow ). Middle fossa craniotomy using the binocular microscope should provide adequate visualization of the entire defect. ( B ) Defect along the downsloping tegmen medial to the peak of the arcuate eminence ( arrow ). Microscopy could not visualize any portion of this defect. A 30° endoscope was used to identify and repair the dehiscence in this case.

( From Carter MS, Lookabaugh S, Lee DJ. Endoscopic-assisted repair of superior canal dehiscence syndrome. Laryngoscope 2014;124(6):1465; with permission.)



Fig. 3


Intraoperative image of arcuate eminence defect with a 30° endoscope following middle fossa craniotomy. Right ear, 30° endoscopy demonstrates an arcuate eminence bony defect. Note the blue-lined region toward the ampulla ( upper left ) and exposure of the endosteum and/or the membranous labyrinth of the arcuate eminence. The Rosen knife in the image is 2 mm in diameter.

( Adapted from Carter MS, Lookabaugh S, Lee DJ. Endoscopic-assisted repair of superior canal dehiscence syndrome. Laryngoscope 2014;124(6):1467; with permission.)




Introduction


First characterized by Minor and colleagues in 1998, superior canal dehiscence (SCD) is a bony defect of the superior canal that is associated with vestibular and/or auditory dysfunction. Classic symptoms associated with SCD syndrome (SCDS) include aural fullness, pulsating tinnitus, autophony, and conductive hyperacusis (hearing one’s own voice, footsteps, and/or eye movements in the affected ear) and dizziness or vertigo evoked by loud sounds (Tullio phenomenon) or Valsalva maneuver (Hennebert sign). Symptoms can vary widely among patients with SCDS, and not all patients with these defects have symptoms.


The concept of a pathologic mobile “third window” of the inner ear (the oval and round windows being the first two) is widely accepted as the explanation for SCDS pathophysiology. Based on this concept, it is hypothesized that a third window allows for transmission of fluid pressure between the intralabyrinthine space and the cranial vault. With this alternative path of low impedance, acoustic flow entering from the oval window is shunted toward the dehiscence causing hearing loss and deflection of the superior canal cupula away from the ampulla (ampullofugal) resulting in the stimulation of the affected superior canal. Conversely, straining or Valsalva against closed glottis can lead to labyrinthine fluid flow away from the dehiscence and toward the ampulla (ampullopetal) resulting in inhibition of the superior canal ampulla. Dizziness and vertigo can arise from either condition. Hypersensitivity to sounds and vibrations conducted through the body is a common feature of SCDS and is thought to be part of the third window phenomenon, but the underlying mechanism is still a subject of ongoing research.


Conservative management is adequate for most patients with SCDS, but for patients with severe symptoms, surgical repair is a feasible option. Microscopic-assisted middle fossa craniotomy (MFC) is a widely used technique to repair SCDs because it is well-established and safe. Alternatively, some surgeons favor a less invasive transmastoid approach to either directly repair the dehiscence (through a tegmen defect created from the mastoid area) or indirectly isolating the dehiscence (by creating labyrinthotomies on either side of the SCD and then plugging the canal). At the Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary (MEEI) we believe that the transmastoid approach is ideal for SCDs associated with the superior petrosal sinus ( Fig. 1 E ) and revision cases, where the MFC approach is often complicated by prior attempts to repair the defect directly.




Fig. 1


Radiologic classification of patients with SCD based on defect location. ( Left column ) Schematic of defect location relative to the ampullated end of the superior canal. ( Right Column ) Computed tomography images in the plane of Pöschl of corresponding defects. ( A ) Intact superior semicircular canal (SSC). ( B ) Dehiscence near the ampullated end of the SSC, often on the lateral upslope of the arcuate eminence. ( C ) Dehiscence of the superior tip of the SSC, corresponding with the peak of the arcuate eminence. ( D ) Dehiscence along the posterior limb of the superior canal, often on the medial downslope of the arcuate eminence. ( E ) Superior petrosal sinus (SPS)-associated SCD. ( F ) An unusual case of two dehiscences along a single superior canal: arcuate eminence defect with a “near dehiscence” SSC associated with the SPS.

( Adapted from Lookabaugh S, Kelly HR, Carter MS, et al. Radiologic classification of superior canal dehiscence: implications for surgical repair. Otol Neurotol 2015;36(1):120; with permission.)


The MFC approach with binocular microscope provides excellent visualization of the lateral skull base and direct surgical access to the SCD, which is essential to ensuring adequate repair of the entire defect. However, a subset of patients with SCDS has unfavorable skull base topography and visualizing the defect under the microscopic is challenging ( Fig. 2 ). Rigid endoscopes provide a superior view of the medial skull base and defects “hidden” from the microscopic view ( Fig. 3 ). We now favor a small craniotomy approach for SCD repairs using endoscopes as an adjunct when necessary. This article discusses (1) the diagnosis of SCD, (2) the preoperative evaluation of SCD with an emphasis on patient selection and radiologic classification, (3) the MEEI endoscopic-assisted surgical technique to repair SCD via MFC, and (4) pearls and pitfalls with this approach.




Fig. 2


Anatomic location of superior canal dehiscence on preoperative computed tomography scans can help anticipate the need for the endoscope during middle fossa craniotomy repair. High-resolution computed tomography: coronal views of temporal bone. ( A ) Defect is located at the peak of the arcuate eminence ( arrow ). Middle fossa craniotomy using the binocular microscope should provide adequate visualization of the entire defect. ( B ) Defect along the downsloping tegmen medial to the peak of the arcuate eminence ( arrow ). Microscopy could not visualize any portion of this defect. A 30° endoscope was used to identify and repair the dehiscence in this case.

( From Carter MS, Lookabaugh S, Lee DJ. Endoscopic-assisted repair of superior canal dehiscence syndrome. Laryngoscope 2014;124(6):1465; with permission.)



Fig. 3


Intraoperative image of arcuate eminence defect with a 30° endoscope following middle fossa craniotomy. Right ear, 30° endoscopy demonstrates an arcuate eminence bony defect. Note the blue-lined region toward the ampulla ( upper left ) and exposure of the endosteum and/or the membranous labyrinth of the arcuate eminence. The Rosen knife in the image is 2 mm in diameter.

( Adapted from Carter MS, Lookabaugh S, Lee DJ. Endoscopic-assisted repair of superior canal dehiscence syndrome. Laryngoscope 2014;124(6):1467; with permission.)




Diagnosis of superior canal dehiscence


The diagnosis of SCDS encompasses a detailed clinical history, comprehensive head and neck examination, audiometric testing (with stapedius reflex), vestibular evoked myogenic potential (VEMP) testing, and high-resolution temporal bone computed tomography (CT). Differential diagnoses to consider include otitis media with effusion, vestibular migraines, Meniere disease, benign paroxysmal positional vertigo, and patulous eustachian tube dysfunction. If the patient has unilateral SCDS (or a less symptomatic contralateral ear), 512-Hz tuning fork testing usually lateralizes to the affected ear. The Dix-Hallpike test is typically normal unless the patient also has benign paroxysmal positional vertigo. Loud sounds (eg, from a Barany noise box), pneumatic otoscopy (or formal fistula testing), and Valsalva maneuver may trigger nystagmus, which can be enhanced by using Frenzel goggles to suppress visual fixation.


Audiometric Testing


Pure tone audiometry is an important component of the diagnostic work-up and should always include stapedial reflex testing, and bone conduction (BC) thresholds at −5 and −10 dB to test for “supranormal” bone conduction. A low frequency (<2 kHz) air-bone gap of 20 to 30 dB caused by a combination of increased air conduction (AC) hearing threshold and supranormal BC threshold is typical. Stapedius reflex testing is important because it can help separate SCDS from ossicular fixation or discontinuity, which can both cause low-frequency air-bone gap in the absence of overt middle ear disease on otoscopy examination. In SCDS, the stapedius reflex is usually present, but absent in ossicular fixation (eg, otosclerosis) and ossicular discontinuity (unless the disruption is proximal to the stapedial tendon).


Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potential


Cervical (cVEMP) or ocular (oVEMP) VEMP are essential diagnostic tests in the assessment of patients suspected to have SCDS. cVEMPs test the vestibulospinal reflex mediated through the saccule and the inferior vestibular nerve. A loud auditory stimulus induces an ipsilateral inhibition to the tonic sternocleidomastoid muscle activity recorded on an electromyogram. oVEMP (invoked by head tap or AC sound stimulus) is an excitatory electromyography response of the contralateral inferior oblique muscle and is driven by utricular otolith activation and superior vestibular nerve via the vestibulo-ocular pathway. In SCDS, patients have abnormally low thresholds on cVEMP testing and elevated amplitudes on oVEMP testing. This is thought to reflect increased transmission of pressure through the vestibule. However, not all patients with symptomatic SCD have abnormal VEMP findings.


Diagnostic Imaging


High-resolution CT imaging of the temporal bone is key in the diagnosis and surgical planning of SCD repair. CT scans are known to overestimate the presence of SCD because very thin bone over the superior canal can appear absent. To improve interpretation of CT scans for SCD, in addition to coronal and axial views, CT images should be reformatted to include Pöschl (“P” for parallel to superior canal, see Fig. 1 ) and Stenvers (transverse view of superior canal) views, which offer additions angles to examining the superior canal. MRI of the brain may be obtained to rule out central causes of vestibular symptoms and to assess the intracranial anatomy along the skull base because middle fossa neoplasm have been found eroding into the superior canal in rare cases.

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Mar 28, 2017 | Posted by in OTOLARYNGOLOGY | Comments Off on Endoscopic-Assisted Repair of Superior Canal Dehiscence

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access