Doppelgänger dilemma: Leiomyoma versus uveal melanoma





Abstract


Background


Ciliary body tumors can remain undetected and achieve large dimensions. Pigmented ciliary body tumors include: melanoma, leiomyoma and melanocytoma, however correct diagnosis may require tissue diagnosis with immunohistochemical stains.


Case presentation


Two men presented with identical ciliochoroidal tumors. Both had darkly pigmented dome-shaped anterior uveal masses, exudative retinal detachments and transillumination shadowing. Ocular PET-CT imaging revealed that both were metabolically active consistent with a diagnosis of cancer. However, immunohistochemical examination revealed one a leiomyoma and the other melanoma.


Conclusion


Uveal leiomyoma can be an indistinguishable doppelgänger to ciliochoroidal melanoma, where the diagnosis can only be established by immunohistopathology.


Introduction


Uveal leiomyoma is a rare benign tumor of neural crest cell origin which can be clinically indistinguishable from a uveal melanoma. A recent study reviewed 80 published cases of ocular leiomyoma from 1899 to 2019 and found that pigmented cilio-choroidal tumors clinically diagnosed as large uveal melanoma were most commonly treated by enucleation. However, despite confounding clinical similarities, these 2 tumors have very different prognoses. Though both can cause secondary retinal detachment, macular edema and even extraocular extension, leiomyomas are benign tumors which do not metastasize. Herein, we present 2 anterior uveal tumors which are clinically identical. These doppelgänger ciliary body lesions highlight that pre-enucleation differentiation may not be possible clinically, the need for a high index of suspicion, and use of histopathology with immunohistochemical analysis to achieve the correct diagnosis.


Case presentation


Two patients presented to us with ciliochoroidal tumors with nearly identical clinical presentation. The first patient was a 30-year-old male referred for evaluation of a ciliary body tumor in his right eye. The second patient was a 45-year-old male with a 3-month history of blurred vision in the left eye and a similar ciliary body tumor with nearly equivalent epidemiologic and clinical features ( Table 1 ).



Table 1

Comparative clinical and imaging features for 2 patients with large cilio-choroidal tumors.
























































Feature Patient 1 Patient 2
Age 30 years 45 years
Gender Male Male
Race Middle-Eastern Hispanic
Chief Complaint OD metamorphopsia OS blurred vision
Best Corrected Visual Acuity 20/20 OU 20/20 OU
Anterior Segment examination


  • Episcleral sentinel vessels



  • Trace anterior chamber cell, Posterior subcapsular cataract



  • No iris neovascularization




  • Episcleral sentinel vessels



  • Quiet anterior chamber



  • Posterior subcapsular cataract



  • No iris neovascularization

Intraocular pressure 16 mm Hg 14 mm Hg
Gonioscopy


  • No tumor or neovascularization in angle



  • Focal narrowing of angle




  • No tumor or neovascularization in angle



  • Focal narrowing of angle

Dilated fundus examination


  • Large, dome-shaped nasal brown mass with overlying vessels arising from the ciliary body



  • Inferior serous detachment




  • Large, dome-shaped temporal brown mass with overlying vessels arising from the ciliary body



  • Inferior serous detachment

Transscleral ophthalmic transillumination Blocked light transmission Blocked light transmission
High frequency ultrasound imaging (35 MHz)


  • Low-medium internal reflectivity



  • Extending to the iris root, but not into the anterior segment



  • More than 3 clock hours of ciliary body were involved



  • No ring-shaped tumor




  • Low-medium internal reflectivity



  • No anterior segment extension



  • More than 3 clock hours of ciliary body were involved



  • No ring-shaped tumor

Low frequency B-scan ultrasound (12 MHz)


  • Dome-shaped, moderately low reflective choroidal tumor



  • Largest basal dimension: 18.6 mm



  • Tumor height: 11.1 mm



  • No extrascleral extension



  • Retinal detachment




  • Dome-shaped, moderately low reflective choroidal tumor



  • Largest basal dimension: 18.2 mm



  • Tumor height: 13.3 mm



  • No extrascleral extension



  • Retinal detachment

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Jul 10, 2021 | Posted by in OPHTHALMOLOGY | Comments Off on Doppelgänger dilemma: Leiomyoma versus uveal melanoma

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access