Diagnostic efficacy of different methods in the assessment of adenoid hypertrophy




Abstract


Objective


This study was designed for better understanding of the role of different methods of nasal endoscopy in the assessment of adenoid hypertrophy and comparing them with lateral neck radiography and patients’ symptoms.


Subjects and method


From August 2007 until January 2009, in the otolaryngology ward of a tertiary referral center, 89 patients who had symptoms related to chronic mouth breathing participated in this study. History of the symptoms related to adenoid hypertrophy was obtained from them. In addition, all patients underwent nasal endoscopy and lateral nasopharynx x-ray. The clinician who did nasal endoscopy was blinded to information about clinical data and x-ray and vice versa. Afterward, the relationship between symptoms and each diagnostic procedure was evaluated.


Results


Patients had a mean age of 9.47 ± 4.68 years. In the evaluation of the relationship between symptoms grading and grading in lateral neck radiography, this relationship was significant about snoring. Furthermore, there was a significant relationship between the endoscopic size of adenoid and number of the episodes of acute otitis media. The sum of symptoms grading had a significant relationship with the size of adenoid in lateral neck x-ray, but not in nasal endoscopy.


Conclusion


The results of the present study indicated that both radiography and nasal endoscopy could define the relationship between adenoid hypertrophy and associated symptoms and therefore are complementary. Between them, despite the popularity of nasal endoscopy, radiography can serve as a better planning tool.



Introduction


The adenoid is one of the important parts of the Waldeyer ring that is located in the nasopharyngeal area. Because of its special location, especially regarding the posterior choanae and eustachian tube, it can be the etiology of many health problems of childhood.


An untreated adenoid hypertrophy may lead to obstructive sleep apnea, ear problems, failure to thrive, pulmonary hypertension, and craniofacial anomalies .


Therefore, adenoidectomy is a common surgical procedure of childhood, despite careful surgical selection of patients for operation nowadays .


However, in a patient with adenoid hypertrophy symptoms, diagnosis can be challenging. There are different recommendations for the diagnosis of adenoid hypertrophy such as lateral neck x-ray, videofluoroscopy, palpation, and nasal endoscopy ; but the role of each one is a controversial issue .


After widespread use of nasal endoscopy, some authors claimed that it could be a better modality for diagnosis .


This study was designed for better understanding of the role of different methods of nasal endoscopy in the assessment of adenoid hypertrophy and comparing them with lateral neck radiography and patients’ symptoms.





Subjects and method



Study subjects


From August 2007 to January 2009, in the otolaryngology ward of a tertiary referral hospital (Imam Khomeini hospital), 96 patients were selected among children who had symptoms related to chronic mouth breathing such as snoring, nasal obstruction, and sleep apnea (at least 3 months before diagnosis) and who did not have the following: tonsillar hypertrophy (grade II and more), age older 3 years, septal deviation, allergic rhinitis, choanal atresia, craniofacial anomaly, inflammatory disease of the airway (in the past 2 weeks), history of previous surgery, current medical treatment, and neuromuscular disorders.


Among 96 patients who participated in this study, 7 (7.2%) patients refused to undergo diagnostic nasal endoscopy and were therefore excluded from the study. The rest of the patients were 50 (56.2%) boys and 39 (43.8%) girls. The age distribution of patients is summarized in Fig. 1 .




Fig. 1


Patients’ age distribution.



Ethical approval


The protocol of this study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Tehran University of Medical Science. Detailed information about the study was given to the participants’ parents, and a written informed consent was obtained from each one. All aspects of the study were conducted according to the Declaration of Helsinki.



Variable measurement


Demographic data, history of snoring, recurrent pharyngitis, nasal obstruction, sleep apnea, and recurrent acute otitis media were recorded. History was taken from parents or children themselves if they were reliable. Each symptom (depending on severity) was categorized into 4 groups according to patients’ or their parents’ statements. The details of the classification are as follows: snoring (grade 0 = absent, grade 1 = 1–2 night[s] per week, grade 2 = 3–5 nights per week, grade 3 = 6–7 nights per week), nasal obstruction (chronic mouth breathing) (grade 0 = absent, grade 1 = one fourth to one half of a day, grade 2 = one half to three fourths of a day, and grade 3 = three fourths to all of the day), sleep apnea (grade 0 = absent, grade 1 = 1–2 night[s] per week, grade 2 = 3–5 nights per week, and grade 3 = 6–7 nights per week), otitis media (grade 0 = absent, grade 1 = 1–3 episode[s] per year, grade 2 = 4–6 episodes per year, and grade 3 = >6 episodes per year), and recurrent pharyngitis (grade 0 = absent, grade 1 = 1–3 episode[s] per year, grade 2 = 4–6 episodes per year, and grade 4 = >6 episodes per year). All symptoms scores were analyzed separately, and the relationship between the sum of all scores and other variables was also evaluated.


All patients underwent tympanometry.





Subjects and method



Study subjects


From August 2007 to January 2009, in the otolaryngology ward of a tertiary referral hospital (Imam Khomeini hospital), 96 patients were selected among children who had symptoms related to chronic mouth breathing such as snoring, nasal obstruction, and sleep apnea (at least 3 months before diagnosis) and who did not have the following: tonsillar hypertrophy (grade II and more), age older 3 years, septal deviation, allergic rhinitis, choanal atresia, craniofacial anomaly, inflammatory disease of the airway (in the past 2 weeks), history of previous surgery, current medical treatment, and neuromuscular disorders.


Among 96 patients who participated in this study, 7 (7.2%) patients refused to undergo diagnostic nasal endoscopy and were therefore excluded from the study. The rest of the patients were 50 (56.2%) boys and 39 (43.8%) girls. The age distribution of patients is summarized in Fig. 1 .




Fig. 1


Patients’ age distribution.



Ethical approval


The protocol of this study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Tehran University of Medical Science. Detailed information about the study was given to the participants’ parents, and a written informed consent was obtained from each one. All aspects of the study were conducted according to the Declaration of Helsinki.



Variable measurement


Demographic data, history of snoring, recurrent pharyngitis, nasal obstruction, sleep apnea, and recurrent acute otitis media were recorded. History was taken from parents or children themselves if they were reliable. Each symptom (depending on severity) was categorized into 4 groups according to patients’ or their parents’ statements. The details of the classification are as follows: snoring (grade 0 = absent, grade 1 = 1–2 night[s] per week, grade 2 = 3–5 nights per week, grade 3 = 6–7 nights per week), nasal obstruction (chronic mouth breathing) (grade 0 = absent, grade 1 = one fourth to one half of a day, grade 2 = one half to three fourths of a day, and grade 3 = three fourths to all of the day), sleep apnea (grade 0 = absent, grade 1 = 1–2 night[s] per week, grade 2 = 3–5 nights per week, and grade 3 = 6–7 nights per week), otitis media (grade 0 = absent, grade 1 = 1–3 episode[s] per year, grade 2 = 4–6 episodes per year, and grade 3 = >6 episodes per year), and recurrent pharyngitis (grade 0 = absent, grade 1 = 1–3 episode[s] per year, grade 2 = 4–6 episodes per year, and grade 4 = >6 episodes per year). All symptoms scores were analyzed separately, and the relationship between the sum of all scores and other variables was also evaluated.


All patients underwent tympanometry.





Evaluation



Nasal endoscopy


Nasal endoscopy (using 2.7-mm Karl Störz [Germany] 0 rigid endoscope) was used to obtain a full choanal image by the same physician in all evaluations. Before performing nasal endoscopy, topical anesthesia and vasoconstriction were administered in all patients using a topical solution composed of 5% Xylocaine (Osveh, Teheran, Iran) and 0.5% phenyl ephedrine without any sedation.


The amount of obstruction was categorized using 2 methods: the first one was through dividing the amount of obstruction to the full choanal surface that was expressed in 4 grades (grade 0 = 0–25%, grade 1 = 25–50%, grade 2 = 50–75%, grade 3 = 75–100%). The second method was according to the anatomical relationship between surrounding anatomical structures such as torus tubarius, vomer, and the soft palate (grade 0 = none, grade 1 = torus tubarius, grade 2 = torus tubarius and vomer, and grade 3 = vomer and soft palate) .


Nasal endoscopy was recorded using a DVD recorder. Afterward, only images of the adenoid were captured with a camera (Störz telecam). Pictures used for the calculation of the occupied parts were the pictures of the adenoid in which a full view of choana could be seen. A special software was designed to calculate the occupied portion of choana with adenoid to the full surface of it using images in which all parts of adenoid could be evaluated. This software can be downloaded for free from our Web site ( www.tums.ac.ir ).

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Aug 25, 2017 | Posted by in OTOLARYNGOLOGY | Comments Off on Diagnostic efficacy of different methods in the assessment of adenoid hypertrophy

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access