Anterior Segment: Cornea and External Diseases



Anterior Segment: Cornea and External Diseases


Ayad A. Farjo MD

Qais A. Farjo MD



Herpes Simplex Virus Eye Disease of the Anterior Segment


Introduction and Epidemiology

Herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) constitutes the vast majority of herpetic ocular infections of the anterior segment. Diagnosis is typically made clinically, although serologic and molecular testing is available.1,2 Humans are the only natural reservoir, and an estimated 50% to 80% of the adult population has antibodies to HSV-1.3 After primary infection by HSV, which typically manifests with nonspecific upper respiratory symptoms, the virus may achieve latency in the trigeminal ganglion. Any structure in the anterior segment can be involved and the infection presents, sometimes simultaneously, in several major forms: blepharoconjunctivitis, infectious epithelial keratitis, neurotrophic keratopathy, stromal keratitis, endotheliitis, iridocyclitis, and trabeculitis.

There is considerable variation in the literature regarding the incidence, presentation, and recurrences of herpetic keratitis, which may be the result of differing study populations, disease definitions, length of follow-up, and/or other factors. In the United States, estimates from a relatively homogenous white population in the upper Midwest indicated the prevalence to be 149 per 100,000 population, with an incidence of 8.4 per 100,000 personyears.4 Bilateral involvement is less common, usually associated with atopy or other systemic immunosuppression and, depending on the definition used, can range from 3% to 12%.3,5 In one study, primary ocular HSV presented as infectious epithelial keratitis in 15% of patients and stromal keratitis in only 2% of patients.6 Another study found that initial episodes involved the eyelids or conjunctiva in 54% of cases, the superficial cornea in 63%, the deep cornea in 6%, and the uvea in 4%.4 In susceptible individuals, recurrence of the virus can lead to blinding keratitis or uveitis. In patients who suffered from primary ocular HSV followed up from 2 to 15 years, 32% had recurrences, with 51% of those patients having multiple recurrences,7 but most of the recurrences did not involve the cornea. Recurrence rates for any form of ocular HSV have been estimated at 9.6% at 1 year, 22.9% to 33% at 2 years, 36% to 40% at 5 years, and 63.2% at 20 years.4,8,9,10

The Herpetic Eye Disease Studies (HEDS) I and II were a set of six trials, supported primarily by the National Eye Institute of the United States National Institutes of Health (NEI/NIH), whose goals were to answer clinical questions about the treatment and recurrence of HSV keratitis and uveitis (see Tables 4.1, 4.2, 4.3, 4.4, 4.5 and 4.6). The studies were well designed and monitored, with intervention by the Data and Safety Monitoring Committee in three of the trials. One systematic review (see Table 4.7) details the available therapeutic interventions for infectious epithelial keratitis.11 Taken together, the HEDS and systematic review provide valuable insight into the clinical management of HSV keratitis (see Table 4.8).

Infectious Epithelial Keratitis. The initial phase of HSV-1 epithelial disease presents as minute corneal vesicles that stain negatively with fluorescein dye.1 This may progress to a dendritic keratitis (see Fig. 4.1), a geographic
keratitis (see Fig. 4.2), or a marginal keratitis with limbitis (see Fig. 4.3). Although these conditions may resolve spontaneously without therapy, antiviral therapy is generally indicated to accelerate resolution. Rates of healing appear equivalent between acyclovir (ACV), trifluridine, and vidarabine.11 Debridement alone does not appear effective, but in conjunction with antiviral therapy may speed epithelial healing rates.11 The addition of a 3-week course of oral ACV to trifluridine was found by the HEDS epithelial keratitis trial (EKT) (Table 4.4) to provide no additional benefit in epithelial healing rates or prevention of stromal keratitis or iridocyclitis.12








TABLE 4.1 The Herpetic Eye Disease Studies (HEDS) I—The Herpetic Eye Disease Studies-Stromal Keratitis, Not on Steroid Trial (HEDS-SKN)



































































Study question


Efficacy of topical corticosteroids in treating herpes simplex stromal keratitis in conjunction with topical trifluridine


Study design


Prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled trial. Nine clinical centers and a data coordinating center



Inclusion/exclusion criteria


1.


Active HSV stromal keratitis, diagnosed clinically, with no topical steroids in the preceding 10 d




2.


Age over 12 y




3.


No active HSV epithelial keratitis




4.


No prior keratoplasty of the involved eye




5.


Not pregnant



Interventions


1.


All patients received topical trifluridine as prophylaxis




2.


Randomized to treatment with topical prednisolone phosphate 1% drops or topical placebo drops. Schedule started with eight drops/d for 1 wk and tapered over 10 wk so that patients received one drop/d of 0.125% prednisolone for last 3 wk. Placebo drops were given using the same schedule



Primary outcome measure


Time to the development of treatment failure in corticosteroid and placebo groups during the 26-wk period of examination


Major findings


1.


Faster resolution of stromal keratitis and fewer treatment failures with prednisolone phosphate therapy




2.


Delay in initiation of corticosteroids did not affect eventual visual outcome at 26 wk




3.


The trial was terminated before the completion of the planned enrollment due to a statistically significant difference in the primary outcome between treatment groups, no convincing evidence of increased recurrence in either group, and little chance that additional data would alter the study conclusions


Unanswered questions


It is unclear whether a longer treatment schedule, in conjunction with oral antiviral coverage, would have shown a benefit over placebo


HSV, herpes simplex virus.









TABLE 4.2 The Herpetic Eye Disease Studies (HEDS) I—The Herpetic Eye Disease Studies-Stromal Keratitis, on Steroid Treatment (HEDS-SKS)










































































Study question


Evaluation of the efficacy of oral ACV in treating herpes simplex stromal keratitis in patients receiving concomitant topical corticosteroids and trifluridine


Study design


Prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled trial. Eight clinical centers and a data coordinating center



Inclusion/exclusion criteria


1.


Active HSV stromal keratitis, diagnosed clinically, already being treated with topical steroids




2.


Age over 12 y




3.


No active HSV epithelial keratitis




4.


No prior keratoplasty of the involved eye




5.


Not pregnant



Interventions


1.


All patients received topical trifluridine as prophylaxis




2.


Randomized to either 400 mg five times/d ACV (200 mg capsules) for 10 wk or identical frequency of placebo capsules




3.


Prednisolone phosphate 1% drops or topical placebo drops. Schedule started with eight drops/d for 1 wk and tapered over 10 wk so that patients received one drop/d of 0.125% prednisolone for the last 3 wk



Primary outcome measure


Time to the development of treatment failure in ACV and placebo groups during the 26-wk period of examination



Secondary outcome measures


1.


Proportion of patients who were treatment failures at 16 wk



2.


Proportion of patients whose stromal keratitis had resolved at 16 wk



3.


Best-corrected visual acuity at 26 wk and change from randomization


Major findings


Over 16 wk, no difference between treatment groups suggesting no apparent benefit to adding oral ACV to corticosteroid + trifluridine


Unanswered questions


In the absence of topical antiviral therapy, one would expect oral ACV to have benefit


ACV, acyclovir; HSV, herpes simplex virus.










TABLE 4.3 The Herpetic Eye Disease Studies (HEDS) I—The Herpetic Eye Disease Studies Iridocyclitis, Receiving Topical Steroids (HEDS-IRT)

































































Study question


Evaluate the efficacy of oral ACV in treating herpes simplex iridocyclitis in conjunction with topical corticosteroids and trifluridine


Study design


Prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled trial. Eight clinical centers and a data coordinating center



Inclusion/exclusion criteria


1.


Active iridocyclitis, with HSV diagnosed clinically or with the presence of serum antibodies




2.


Age over 12 y




3.


No active HSV epithelial keratitis




4.


No prior keratoplasty of the involved eye




5.


Not pregnant



Intervention


1.


All patients received topical trifluridine as prophylaxis




2.


Randomized to either ACV 400 mg five times/d (200 mg capsules) for 10 wk or an identical frequency of placebo




3.


Prednisolone phosphate 1% drops or topical placebo drops. Schedule started with eight drops/d for 1 wk and tapered over 10 wk so that patients received one drop/d of 0.125% prednisolone for the last 3 wk



Primary outcome measure


Time to the development of treatment failure in ACV and placebo groups during the 26-wk period of examination


Major findings


1.


Treatment failures occurred at a higher rate in the placebo group compared with the ACV group, but trial too small to be statistically significant


2.


Trial stopped due to slow recruitment (only 50 of planned 104 patients enrolled over 4 y)


Unanswered questions


Unclear benefit of adding ACV to corticosteroid + trifluridine


ACV, acyclovir; HSV, herpes simplex virus.










TABLE 4.4 The Herpetic Eye Disease Studies (HEDS) II—The Herpetic Eye Disease Studies-Epithelial Keratitis Trial (HEDS-EKT)













































































Study question


Determine whether early treatment of HSV epithelial keratitis ulceration with oral ACV prevents blinding complications of stromal keratitis and iridocyclitis


Study design


Prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled trial. One national coordinating center, 8 regional coordinating centers, 60 clinical sites (university- and community-based practices)



Inclusion/exclusion criteria


1.


Dendritic or geographic epithelial ulceration clinically consistent with HSV with less than 1 wk onset




2.


Age over 12 y




3.


No active HSV stromal keratitis or iritis




4.


No prior keratoplasty or refractive surgery of the involved eye




5.


Not pregnant or nursing




6.


No history of immune dysfunction or immunosuppression



Intervention


1.


Patients received topical trifluridine 1% drops eight times/d until epithelial ulcerations resolved, then decreased to four times/d for 3 d and stopped (Three patients were treated with vidarabine 3% ointment due to trifluridine allergy)




2.


Randomized to either ACV 400 mg five times/d (200 mg capsules) for 3 wk or identical frequency of placebo



Primary outcome measure


Time to the development of first occurrence of HSV stromal keratitis or iridocyclitis in the study eye


Major findings


1.


Recruitment stopped at 287 of planned 502 patients because of lack of any suggestion of efficacy of treatment protocol




2.


No benefit from the addition of oral ACV to treatment with trifluridine in preventing stromal keratitis or iritis




3.


Risk of stromal keratitis or iridocyclitis was low in the year following an episode of epithelial keratitis treated with trifluridine alone (7% if first episode, 26% if multiple episodes)




4.


At 3 wk of treatment, 99% of epithelial keratitis had resolved


Unanswered questions


Can oral ACV be used instead of trifluridine? Would a longer duration of therapy with ACV have shown a benefit? Should these patients receive long-term oral ACV?


ACV, acyclovir; HSV, herpes simplex virus.









TABLE 4.5 The Herpetic Eye Disease Studies (HEDS) II—The Herpetic Eye Disease Studies-Acyclovir Prevention Trial (HEDS-APT)
























































Study question


Determine efficacy of oral ACV in preventing recurrent HSV eye infection in patients with previous episodes of herpetic eye disease


Study design


Prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled trial. One national coordinating center, 8 regional coordinating centers, 60 clinical sites (university-and community-based practices)



Inclusion/exclusion criteria


1.


Any kind of ocular HSV infection (blepharitis, conjunctivitis, keratitis, or iridocyclitis) in preceding year. Inactive infection and untreated for at least 30 d




2.


Age over 12 y




3.


No prior keratoplasty of the involved eye




4.


Not pregnant



Intervention


1.


Randomized to either ACV 400 mg two times/d (200 mg capsules) for 1 y or identical frequency of placebo



Primary outcome measure


Time to first recurrence of any type of HSV eye disease in either eye


Major findings


1.


Oral ACV reduced by 41% the probability that any form of herpes of the eye would return in patients who had the infection in the previous year


2.


Oral ACV reduced stromal recurrence by 50% among patients who had stromal keratitis in the past year


3.


Oral ACV reduced the incidence of epithelial keratitis from 11% to 9% and the incidence of stromal keratitis from 13% to 8%


4.


Four percent of patients in the ACV group and 9% in placebo group had more than one recurrence


Unanswered questions


When does one discontinue ACV?


ACV, acyclovir; HSV, herpes simplex virus.










TABLE 4.6 The Herpetic Eye Disease Studies (HEDS) II—The Herpetic Eye Disease Studies recurrence factor study (HEDS-RFS)














































Study question


Determine the role of external factors (ultraviolet light or trauma) and behavioral factors (e.g., stress) on ocular recurrences of HSV eye infections and disease


Study design


Prospective, multicenter trial. Fifty-eight clinical centers and a data coordinating center



Inclusion/exclusion criteria


1.


History of HSV ocular infection within the preceding year




2.


Age over 18 y and immunocompetent



Intervention


Questionnaire completed every Sunday for 52 wk to track acute and chronic stressors



Primary outcome measure


Development of recurrent HSV ocular disease


Major findings


1.


Higher levels of psychological stress were not associated with an increased risk of recurrence




2.


No association was found between any of the other exposure variables and recurrence




3.


When an analysis was performed including only the recurrences for which the exposure week log was completed late and after symptom onset, there was a clear indication of retrospective overreporting of high stress and systemic infection


Unanswered questions


What are the risk factors for HSV recurrence?


HSV, herpes simplex virus.










TABLE 4.7 Herpes Simplex Virus












































































Therapeutics


Topical antivirals


1.


Increase healing rates of epithelial keratitis


2.


No significant differences between vidarabine, trifluridine, ganciclovir, or ACV


Topical interferons


1.


Increase healing rates of epithelial keratitis


Topical corticosteroids


1.


Reduce stromal inflammation and lessen the duration of stromal keratitis


2.


May induce epithelial keratitis if not given concomitantly with an antiviral


Oral ACV


1.


Effective in treating epithelial and stromal keratitis


2.


Long-term oral ACV (400 mg twice daily) is effective in preventing recurrence of HSV keratitis


3.


May offer additional benefit to patients with HSV iridocyclitis


4.


Does not offer any additional ocular benefit to immunocompetent patients already on trifluridine for the treatment of epithelial or stromal keratitis


Treatment recommendations for disease subsets


Dendritic or geographic epithelial keratitis


1.


Treatment with a topical or an oral antiviral is sufficient


2.


For initial episodes, long-term ACV usage is unnecessary for most patients


3.


For patients with a history of multiple recurrences, long-term oral ACV prophylaxis may be more valuable


Stromal keratitis


1.


Resolution of symptoms is more rapid with corticosteroids


2.


Recurrence is reduced with long-term oral ACV prophylaxis


3.


If topical steroids are used, many patients require greater than 10 wk of therapy


Iridocyclitis


1.


It is unclear whether short-term high-dose oral ACV is beneficial, but there are few negative side effects and there is a suggestion of benefit to this regimen


Corneal Transplantation


1.


Oral ACV prophylaxis appears to reduce HSV recurrence and improve graft survival


ACV, acyclovir; HSV, herpes simplex virus.


Topical ganciclovir ophthalmic ointment has been demonstrated to have noninferiority compared with topical trifluridine,13,14,15 with some studies suggesting a trend to better tolerance and faster epithelial healing when compared with topical trifluridine.14,16 In spite of the injury invoked by episodes of disease activity, most patients affected will have a final visual outcome that remains acceptable.4

Stromal Keratitis and Endotheliitis Manifestations of HSV-1 stromal disease include immune stromal keratitis (see Fig. 4.4) and necrotizing keratitis. While the latter is potentially devastating in the acute period, immune stromal keratitis leads to corneal
blindness through a chronic relapsing and remitting course (see Fig. 4.5). Endotheliitis can accompany stromal keratitis and manifests with microcystic corneal edema and keratic precipitates (Fig. 4.4). The value of corticosteroid treatment of stromal keratitis was assessed in the HEDS stromal keratitis, not on the steroid (SKN) trial (Table 4.1).17 The main conclusion was that a 10-week course of topical corticosteroid treatment contributes to a faster visual recovery, although a delay in therapy does not affect final visual outcome at 6 months. The major question that remains unanswered by this study was whether a 10-week course was sufficient. Half of the patients in the corticosteroid group of the study who “failed treatment” did so in the 6 weeks after discontinuation of the topical steroid. Currently, in clinical practice, topical steroids may be continued for many months, and perhaps indefinitely at low dosages and frequencies, often in conjunction with chronic oral ACV therapy. Although the final visual outcome was not affected by delay in treatment, it should be noted that 76% of the placebo group failed treatment, and 72% of the placebo group that showed visual improvement was eventually treated with topical corticosteroids. In fact, by 16 weeks after randomization, the total duration of topical corticosteroid usage was similar in both the placebo and corticosteroid groups. It is important to note, however, that 22% of patients had resolution of stromal keratitis with only topical antiviral treatment.








TABLE 4.8 Interventions for Herpes Simplex Virus Epithelial Keratitis








































Study question


Compare the effects of various treatments for dendritic or geographic herpes simplex virus epithelial keratitis.


Study design


Systematic review



Inclusion/exclusion criteria


1.


Comparative clinical trials that assessed 1 and/or 2-wk healing rates of topical ophthalmic or oral antiviral agents and/or physical or chemical debridement in people with active epithelial keratitis




2.


Age over 18 y and immunocompetent



Intervention


Sources searched for relevant studies were the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials—CENTRAL, MEDLINE (1966 to August 2002), EMBASE (1980 to August 2002), LILACS (up to 2002), Index Medicus (1960-1965), Excerpta Medica Ophthalmology (1960-1973), reference lists of primary reports and review articles, and conference proceedings pertaining to ocular virology



Primary outcome measure


Interventions were compared by the proportions of participants healed at 7 d and at 14 d after trial enrollment


Major findings


1.


Compared with idoxuridine, the topical application of vidarabine, trifluridine, or acyclovir generally resulted in a significantly greater proportion of participants healing within 1 wk of treatment


2.


Insufficient placebo-controlled studies were available to assess debridement and other physical or physicochemical methods of treatment


3.


Interferon was very useful combined with debridement or with another antiviral agent such as trifluridine


Unanswered questions


Is debridement useful in treating herpes simplex virus epithelial keratitis?







FIGURE 4.1 Dendritic herpes simplex virus keratitis.






FIGURE 4.2 Geographic herpes simplex virus keratitis.







FIGURE 4.3 Herpes simplex virus limbitis and marginal keratitis.






FIGURE 4.4 Pretreatment stromal keratitis and endotheliitis (A) with microcystic corneal edema (B). Posttreatment with topical steroids and oral acyclovir (C).







FIGURE 4.5: Chronic stromal keratitis leading to lipid keratopathy (A). The lipid will be slowly reabsorbed with prolonged disease inactivity (B).

Iridocyclitis and Trabeculitis. HSV iridocyclitis and trabeculitis are uncommon conditions. The HEDS iridocyclitis, receiving topical steroid (IRT) trial (Table 4.3) was stopped because of low recruitment, with only 50 of the planned 104 patients recruited over 4 years.18 These conditions can occur concomitantly with other forms of HSV infections, as noted in the HEDS-SKN trial in which 34% and 16% of the eyes with stromal keratitis had concomitant iridocyclitis and trabeculitis, respectively. The iridocyclitis can be either granulomatous or nongranulomatous. Intraocular pressure (IOP) increase from trabeculitis, when stromal keratitis or iridocyclitis is present, may easily be misinterpreted as being a steroid-induced glaucoma. In fact, HSV should be included in the differential diagnosis of any iridocyclitis associated with increase in IOP. Owing to its small sample size, the HEDS-IRT trial (Table 4.3) suffered from low recruitment, between the ACV and placebo groups in the rates of treatment failure in patients treated with corticosteroids and trifluridine. There was a trend, however, toward a reduction of treatment failures in patients treated with oral ACV.


Prevention of Recurrence

It had been previously demonstrated in a small, prospective randomized series that oral ACV reduced recurrences of HSV keratitis and improved graft survival after penetrating keratoplasty (PKP).19 The reduction in recurrence rate was confirmed by the HEDS ACV prevention trial (APT) (Table 4.5) and yielded, perhaps, the most important results from the HEDS. It demonstrated that not only was oral ACV 400 mg, taken twice daily, able to reduce the recurrence rate of any form of ocular HSV compared with placebo, it also reduced nonocular recurrences.20 Given that recurrent stromal keratitis leads to progressive corneal scarring and potential corneal blindness, it was clinically significant that oral ACV reduced stromal recurrence by 50% among patients who had stromal keratitis in the previous year.

Lingering questions remain, such as whether a lower dosage would have been equally efficacious or whether a higher dosage would be more successful in preventing recurrences.21 Likewise, the end point for treatment with oral ACV remains unclear, as recrudescence occurs upon discontinuation of the medication.22 As the HEDS-EKT demonstrated a low risk of developing stromal keratitis or iridocyclitis after a primary episode of epithelial keratitis, it does not seem necessary to begin therapy, perhaps lifelong, with oral ACV in these patients. Additionally, ACV prophylaxis may be relatively cost-ineffective and a theoretic model for treatment, targeting patients with stromal keratitis, found no increase in cost-effectiveness compared with targeting any patient with a history of HSV ocular disease.23 Long-term treatment may therefore be best reserved for patients with recurrent disease or
cases in which visual acuity is already threatened or compromised.

Although long-term oral ACV therapy was found helpful in the HEDS-APT, other HEDS trials could not definitely elicit a benefit of high-dose short-term therapy with oral ACV in patients already taking trifluridine 1% drops concomitantly. In the HEDS stromal keratitis, on steroid treatment (SKS) trial (Table 4.2), no apparent benefit of a 10-week course of oral ACV (400 mg five times daily) was found over placebo.24 Likewise, the HEDS-IRT and HEDS-EKT (Tables 4.3 and 4.4, respectively) trials did not find significant advantages in using short-term courses of oral ACV in conjunction with trifluridine. It should also be noted that in the HEDS, some patients had recurrences in spite of treatment with oral ACV and/or topical trifluridine.


Risk Factors

On the basis of the study of 260 patients enrolled in the HEDS-SKN, HEDS-SKS, and HEDS-IRT trials, it was suggested that during treatment for stromal keratouveitis, there was a greater risk of recurrent epithelial keratitis in nonwhite patients and patients with a previous history of HSV epithelial keratitis.25 Identifying potential triggering factors for HSV ocular disease was attempted by the HEDS recurrence factor study (RFS). The goal was to ascertain whether any specific external or behavioral factors such as psychological stress, exposure to sunlight, menstrual cycle, contact lens wear, or eye injury could be determined as definitive risk factors. From self-reported questionnaires, high stress did not appear to be associated with recurrence.26 Likewise, none of the other factors studied were noted to be associated with recurrence; however, this trial had limited power to detect true differences between these factors. In addition, measures such as “sunlight exposure” proved difficult to quantitate. Interestingly, a recall bias was observed in patients who had onset of symptoms, but did not complete their exposure log in a timely manner, with overreporting of high stress and systematic infection.


Alternative Therapies and Future Directions

Development of better diagnostic and therapeutic options for HSV, and other herpesviruses, remains essential, given the morbidity of these viruses and the chronic nature of these infections. It is unknown as to how many cases of ocular HSV are undiagnosed or misdiagnosed. Likewise, although oral ACV is assumed to be an effective treatment for most patients, ACV-resistant HSV strains have been found in 7% of immunocompromised individuals.27 As such, various medical and alternative therapies are under investigation. There is mixed evidence on the usage of oral or topical forms of lysine in the management of herpes labialis.28,29 A proposed mechanism of action is that high intracellular concentrations of lysine competitively inhibit arginine, which is necessary for HSV reproduction.30 Currently, there are no available topical ophthalmic preparations of lysine. If there is a beneficial effect from oral lysine supplementation, it will likely need to be administered as a chronic treatment at high dosages (1,000-3,000 mg/day) to help prevent recurrences. There have been some studies that have demonstrated efficacy of topical light-activated rose bengal in the reduction of extracellular herpes viral quantization, but more limited effects on intracellular viral load.31,32 Considering the relatively innocuous nature of rose bengal, this may be a useful adjunct to current therapies, especially for HSV keratitis unresponsive to standard treatment. Other drugs that inhibit the ability of HSV to enter noninfected cells may offer hope for prevention of disease acquisition.33

Virus-specific Th1 cytokines and active innate immunity can prevent HSV recurrence.34 This knowledge has been incorporated into vaccine strategies and one vaccine reduced the clinical symptoms of primary HSV-2 infection by over 70%, but only in women who were both HSV-1 and HSV-2 seronegative.34,35,36 Although there are still no clinical vaccines available for HSV and significant challenges remain, these results suggest the eventual development of more effective options. Through a better understanding of the biology of HSV, either new medications or
vaccines should be able to interfere with the acquisition of the primary infection or recurrence of the infection or possibly eradicate the virus altogether.


Corneal Transplantation


Indications and Epidemiology of Penetrating Keratoplasty

The annual rate of corneal transplantation in the United States had slowly declined from 1991 until 2005 and has since dramatically rebounded.37 In 2011, with 79 member U.S. eye banks reporting, there were 46,196 corneal transplants performed in the United States with increasing numbers of tissue being exported and harvested internationally. However, this increase appears to be mostly in endothelial keratoplasty procedures as the number of PKPs has been steadily declining and amounted to 21,620 in 2011. It is expected that the total number of endothelial keratoplasty procedures will surpass PKP in 2012 or 2013.

Studies on the indications for PKP vary depending on the time frame assessed, classifications used, region of origin, and specific practice-style sampled.38 For example, in the United States, keratoconus (KC) is now the leading indication for PKP as endothelial causes of corneal dysfunction are now treated with endothelial keratoplasty instead.37 Worldwide, the trends also appear to be shifting,39 with greater adoption of deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty than in the United States.40,41,42

KC continues to be an important indication for corneal transplantation worldwide (see Fig. 4.6). The prevalence and incidence, as well as disease severity, appear to vary with ethnicity. In the United Kingdom, patients aged 10 to 44 with an Asian origin had a prevalence of 229 per 100,000 as compared with 57 per 100,000 in white patients.43 In the same age group, Asians had an annual incidence of 19.6 per 100,000 versus 4.5 per 100,000 in white patients. Age at diagnosis and age at corneal transplantation were also lower in Asians. In the United States, the prevalence of KC in a mainly white population was 54.5 per 100,000, with an annual incidence of 2.0 per 100,000.44 The disease process tends to be bilateral and asymmetric, with roughly 50% of clinically normal fellow eyes progressing to KC over a 16-year time span.45 Occasionally, breaks occur in the Descemet’s membrane, leading to corneal hydrops (see Fig. 4.7), which then resolves with associated corneal scarring. Although mechanical factors may play a role in its development, KC is felt to have a genetic origin based in part on studies examining the videokeratography of family members with KC.46,47,48,49






FIGURE 4.6 Penetrating keratoplasty for keratoconus with a double-running suture technique. Larger donor grafts are commonly used and arcus senilis, as in this photograph, may be evident.






FIGURE 4.7 Keratoconus with hydrops.


The Collaborative Longitudinal Evaluation of Keratoconus (CLEK) study (see Table 4.9) is a prospective observational study intended to describe the clinical course of KC and identify predisposing or protective factors influencing the severity and progression of the disease. It is primarily funded by the NEI/NIH and conducted mainly through academic optometric sites. In published results, KC has been found to be bilateral and asymmetric with a greater asymmetry and corneal steepening in patients with a history of eye rubbing
or ocular trauma.50 Not unexpectedly, this trial has found that corneal scarring in KC is also significantly associated with decreased high- and low-contrast visual acuity.51 Perceived visual function in the CLEK study, as measured by the NEI Visual Function Questionnaire, has been found to be disproportionately lower than measured visual acuity.52 This is similar to a previous article suggesting that the best predictors of patient satisfaction after PKP were subjective outcomes rather than objective measures such as visual acuity.53 Importantly, the CLEK study has confirmed that younger age, corneal scarring, steeper corneas, decreased best-corrected Snellen acuity, reduced visual function, and decreased contact lens comfort had a greater risk of progression to PKP over 8 years of follow-up.54 While the CLEK study has contributed to the understanding of KC, it is unclear whether it is possible to generalize the patient population being studied to ophthalmology practices or different ethnic populations. Likewise, the role of PKP continues to evolve with the advent of corneal collagen cross-linking and deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty.








TABLE 4.9 Collaborative Longitudinal Evaluation of Keratoconus (CLEK)















































































Study question


1.


Describe the clinical course of KC




2.


Describe relationships among its visual and physiological manifestations, including high- and low-contrast visual acuity, corneal curvature, slit lamp findings, cornea scarring, and quality of life




3.


Identify risk factors and protective factors that influence the severity and progression of KC


Study design


Prospective, multicenter (15 clinical optometry centers), observational study of 1,209 KC patients



Inclusion/exclusion criteria


1.


12 y or older



2.


Irregular cornea as determined by keratometry, retinoscopy, or direct ophthalmoscopy in at least one eye




3.


Vogt’s striae, Fleischer’s ring, or corneal scarring characteristic of KC in at least one eye




4.


Available for 3 y of follow-up




5.


Ineligible if they had bilateral corneal transplants or bilateral nonkeratoconic eye disease (cataract, intraocular lens, macular disease, or optic nerve disease other than glaucoma)



Intervention


Annual examinations for 3 y



Outcome measures


Visual acuity, patient-reported quality of life, manifest refraction, keratometry, photodocumentation of central corneal scarring, photodocumentation of the flattest contact lens that just clears the cornea, slit lamp biomicroscopy, corneal topography, photodocumentation of rigid gas-permeable lens fluorescein staining pattern if patient is wearing them


Major findings


1.


Over an 8-y period of follow-up, 11.8% of study participants, without previous PKP, had a PKP in one or both eyes. Risk factors for progression to PKP were younger age at baseline, corneal scarring, best-corrected Snellen acuity worse than 20/40, and corneas steeper than 52 D


2.


KC patients with more severe disease are also more asymmetric in disease status


3.


Corneal scarring in KC is significantly associated with decrease in high- and low-contrast visual acuity


4.


Corneal scarring is associated with corneal staining, contact lens wear, Fleischer’s ring, a steeper cornea, and increasing age


5.


KC is not associated with increased risk of connective tissue disease


Unanswered questions


1.


These patients were recruited from optometric centers and may not be applicable to patients seen in ophthalmology practices as most patients in the study had mild to moderate KC




2.


KC in the United States may not have a similar course as elsewhere in the world and disease severity may differ by race


HSV, herpes simplex virus; KC, keratoconus; PKP, penetrating keratoplasty.

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Aug 2, 2016 | Posted by in OPHTHALMOLOGY | Comments Off on Anterior Segment: Cornea and External Diseases

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access