Adenoid cystic carcinoma of the base of tongue: A population-based study




Abstract


Background


The objective was to assess demographic and survival patterns in patients with adenoid cystic carcinoma of the base of tongue.


Methods


Patients were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database from 1973 through 2012 and were categorized by age, gender, race, historical stage A, and treatment. Incidence and survival were compared with Kaplan Meier curves and mortality hazard ratios.


Results


A total of 216 patients were included. After adjusting for age, gender, race and tumor-directed treatment, patients over the age of 70 years had a significantly increased mortality [HR = 2.847, 95% CI (1.499, 5.404) p = 0.0014]. Furthermore mortality among patients with distant disease was significantly increased [HR = 2.474 95% CI (1.459, 4.195) p = 0.00008].


Conclusion


By examining the largest collection of patients we have demonstrated that there is a significant difference in mortality based on both the age at diagnosis and in the setting of distant disease.



Introduction


In 1859 Billroth identified the first case of Adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) and called it ‘cylindroma’ . Almost a hundred years later, Foote and Frazell named this condition ACC . Nearly 2–3% of all malignant tumors of the head and neck are ACC and it occurs in both major and minor salivary glands . The most common intraoral site for minor salivary gland tumors is the hard palate, followed by the base of tongue (BOT) . Studies on ACC of the head and neck have shown that ACC of the tongue accounts for 3.4 to 11.8%, with the BOT being the site of origin in about 8.8% . ACC is one of the most unpredictable tumors of the head and neck and one of the reasons for this is its propensity for perineural spread, which is seen in up to 46% . Due to this neurotropism, it is far more difficult to treat ACC in comparison to other malignancies as there is a higher chance of positive surgical margins . Other characteristic features of ACC include its slow growth and development of late distant metastasis (DM), sometimes even years after treatment of the primary tumor. These metastases most often occur in the lungs, but can also be seen in bones, brain, liver, scalp, thyroid, spleen, kidneys, omentum and pancreas . Due to perineural invasion, DM and an increased recurrence rate, ACC shows poor long-term prognosis . More specifically, ACC of the tongue is more likely to be associated with a higher risk of metastasis due to its rich lymphatics and blood supply. All of this makes ACC of the BOT a unique entity compared to other head and neck malignancies, however despite being the second most common site for ACC in the head and neck, its survival outcomes are sparsely known. Therefore, in order to better understand and prognosticate the disease we conducted a study to analyze the demographics and survival of ACC of the BOT in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database.





Materials and methods


This study did not involve interaction with human subjects or use of personal identifying information since it was based on public use de-identified data from the SEER database. Informed consent was not needed for the study. The authors acquired Limited-Use Data Agreements from SEER.



Cohort definition


National Cancer Institute’s Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) Program was used for obtaining data. The SEER Program is the principal source for cancer statistics and represents 28% of the US population. The currently operating 18 SEER registries were utilized to procure information on demographics, incidence and survival. SEER data was collected and reported using data items and codes as documented by the North American Association of Central Cancer Registries (NAACCR) . All neoplasms reported to the SEER Program since 2001 have been coded using the International Classification of Diseases for Oncology, 3rd edition (ICD-O-3) and those diagnosed prior to 2001 have been recoded to this classification.


Invasive malignancies classified as adenoid cystic carcinomas (ICD-O-3 codes 8200/3) originating from BOT were included. Cases were excluded from the analyses if they were identified from death certificates only, were of unknown age, or were not confirmed histologically. All patients with ACC of the BOT reported during the study period from 1973 to 2012 were characterized according to age, gender, race, marital status, grade, historical stage A, year of diagnosis and tumor-directed treatment. Marital status was classified into married, single (which included never married, separated, divorced and widowed) and unknown. Grade was classified into well differentiated, moderately differentiated, poorly differentiated and undifferentiated. Tumor-directed therapy was grouped into 4 categories: surgery alone, radiation alone, combined modality (surgery and radiation) and unknown treatment.


Cancer staging has changed tremendously from 1970s to the present years; TNM has only been available in the SEER database since 2004. Hence, we used the “SEER historic stage A” for staging, since it covered the entire study period. It groups cancer cases as localized, regional, distant, or unstaged based on the following definition




  • Stage of localized cancer – Cancer that is limited to the organ of origin with no evidence of spread beyond it.



  • Stage of regional cancer – Cancer that has spread beyond the organ of origin (primary site) to surrounding lymph nodes, organs or tissues with no spread to distant organs.



  • Stage of distant cancer – Cancer that has spread beyond organ of origin to distant lymph nodes, organs or tissues remote from the organ of origin.



  • Unstaged cancer – Not enough information to indicate a stage.




Statistical analysis


Incidence rates by sex and race were calculated for the entire study period, and expressed as the number of cases per 1,000,000 individuals per year, along with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Rate ratios (RRs) along with 95% CIs were utilized to compute the gender and race differences . The survival of patients with ACC was analyzed using several methods, and the total follow-up was extended to 20 years post diagnosis. A 5, 10, 15, and 20-year cumulative observed survival (OS) defined as the proportion of patients who survived beyond a given interval was calculated. Then the relative survival (RS) obtained by dividing OS among cancer patients by the expected survival in the general population with the same age, race, and sex characteristics was computed. The survival analyses excluded cases that represented second or later primary cancer, unlike frequency analyses, which included all records. Patients known to be alive but with no documentation of their survival time were excluded (resulting in a total population of n = 187). The 5, 10, 15, and 20-year OS and RS estimates were evaluated overall, as well as by gender, race and stage. The follow-up data for survival analyses extended through to the end of 2012.


Survival analysis according to historical stage A and tumor-directed treatment was determined over a 10-year interval, while the follow-up for survival analyses by decade was limited to 5-years to allow comparisons between earlier and later intervals. We constructed Kaplan-Meier curves with corresponding log-rank (Mantel-Cox) tests in order to determine the statistical significance of patient survival according to historical stage A and type of therapy. Additionally, we used multivariable Cox proportional hazard models to examine the association between survival and various patient-related, disease-related and treatment-related characteristics with the primary focus on disease stage and treatment type. The results of these multivariable models are expressed as adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and are reported along with the corresponding 95% CIs and p -values. All p -values were determined to be significant if < 0.05. All data was analyzed using SAS version 9.3 (SAS institute Inc. Cary, NC) and SEER*Stat version 8.2.1 (National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Md) statistical software packages.





Materials and methods


This study did not involve interaction with human subjects or use of personal identifying information since it was based on public use de-identified data from the SEER database. Informed consent was not needed for the study. The authors acquired Limited-Use Data Agreements from SEER.



Cohort definition


National Cancer Institute’s Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) Program was used for obtaining data. The SEER Program is the principal source for cancer statistics and represents 28% of the US population. The currently operating 18 SEER registries were utilized to procure information on demographics, incidence and survival. SEER data was collected and reported using data items and codes as documented by the North American Association of Central Cancer Registries (NAACCR) . All neoplasms reported to the SEER Program since 2001 have been coded using the International Classification of Diseases for Oncology, 3rd edition (ICD-O-3) and those diagnosed prior to 2001 have been recoded to this classification.


Invasive malignancies classified as adenoid cystic carcinomas (ICD-O-3 codes 8200/3) originating from BOT were included. Cases were excluded from the analyses if they were identified from death certificates only, were of unknown age, or were not confirmed histologically. All patients with ACC of the BOT reported during the study period from 1973 to 2012 were characterized according to age, gender, race, marital status, grade, historical stage A, year of diagnosis and tumor-directed treatment. Marital status was classified into married, single (which included never married, separated, divorced and widowed) and unknown. Grade was classified into well differentiated, moderately differentiated, poorly differentiated and undifferentiated. Tumor-directed therapy was grouped into 4 categories: surgery alone, radiation alone, combined modality (surgery and radiation) and unknown treatment.


Cancer staging has changed tremendously from 1970s to the present years; TNM has only been available in the SEER database since 2004. Hence, we used the “SEER historic stage A” for staging, since it covered the entire study period. It groups cancer cases as localized, regional, distant, or unstaged based on the following definition




  • Stage of localized cancer – Cancer that is limited to the organ of origin with no evidence of spread beyond it.



  • Stage of regional cancer – Cancer that has spread beyond the organ of origin (primary site) to surrounding lymph nodes, organs or tissues with no spread to distant organs.



  • Stage of distant cancer – Cancer that has spread beyond organ of origin to distant lymph nodes, organs or tissues remote from the organ of origin.



  • Unstaged cancer – Not enough information to indicate a stage.




Statistical analysis


Incidence rates by sex and race were calculated for the entire study period, and expressed as the number of cases per 1,000,000 individuals per year, along with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Rate ratios (RRs) along with 95% CIs were utilized to compute the gender and race differences . The survival of patients with ACC was analyzed using several methods, and the total follow-up was extended to 20 years post diagnosis. A 5, 10, 15, and 20-year cumulative observed survival (OS) defined as the proportion of patients who survived beyond a given interval was calculated. Then the relative survival (RS) obtained by dividing OS among cancer patients by the expected survival in the general population with the same age, race, and sex characteristics was computed. The survival analyses excluded cases that represented second or later primary cancer, unlike frequency analyses, which included all records. Patients known to be alive but with no documentation of their survival time were excluded (resulting in a total population of n = 187). The 5, 10, 15, and 20-year OS and RS estimates were evaluated overall, as well as by gender, race and stage. The follow-up data for survival analyses extended through to the end of 2012.


Survival analysis according to historical stage A and tumor-directed treatment was determined over a 10-year interval, while the follow-up for survival analyses by decade was limited to 5-years to allow comparisons between earlier and later intervals. We constructed Kaplan-Meier curves with corresponding log-rank (Mantel-Cox) tests in order to determine the statistical significance of patient survival according to historical stage A and type of therapy. Additionally, we used multivariable Cox proportional hazard models to examine the association between survival and various patient-related, disease-related and treatment-related characteristics with the primary focus on disease stage and treatment type. The results of these multivariable models are expressed as adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and are reported along with the corresponding 95% CIs and p -values. All p -values were determined to be significant if < 0.05. All data was analyzed using SAS version 9.3 (SAS institute Inc. Cary, NC) and SEER*Stat version 8.2.1 (National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Md) statistical software packages.





Results


The demographic information of individuals included in this study is delineated in Table 1 . In total, 221 patients with ACC of the BOT were identified in the 18 SEER registries from 1973 through to the end of 2012. Out of this sample population, 216 were proven histologically positive. Subsequently, the entire study population was grouped into four decades with 49.07% diagnosed between 2003 and 2012. 52.77% of individuals were between the ages of 55 and 74 years at the time of diagnosis. Females accounted for 56.94% of cases, 84.72% included individuals defined racially as white and 60.64% were married at the time of diagnosis. Approximately 45% of the cases received combined modality treatment (CMT) with surgery and radiation. 94 of the 97 cases in this group had surgery followed by adjuvant radiation, while the rest in this group underwent radiation followed by surgery. 27.31% had radiation alone, while 17.59% had surgery alone as treatment. In the 2003–2012 timeframe it was observed that more than half of the patients (53.77%) received CMT and the proportion of patients treated with single modality treatment protocols were at their lowest compared to the previous decades.



Table 1

Characteristics of patients with Adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) of the base of tongue (BOT) by decade by Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) (18 SEER registries, 1973–2012).
















































































































































































































Patient characteristics 1973–2012 (Total) 1973–1982 1983–1992 1993–2002 2003–2012
No. of cases (%) 216(100.0) 24(11.11) 31(14.35) 55(25.46) 106(49.07)
Age [N(%)]
25–34 years 03(01.38) 00(00.00) 00(00.00) 02(03.63) 01(00.94)
35–44 years 22(10.18) 01(04.16) 02(06.45) 08(14.54) 11(10.37)
45–54 years 35(16.20) 06(25.00) 04(12.90) 12(21.81) 13(12.26)
55–64 years 57(26.38) 08(33.33) 06(19.35) 12(21.81) 31(29.24)
65–74 years 57(26.38) 07(29.16) 08(25.80) 14(25.45) 28(26.41)
75–84 years 35(16.20) 02(08.33) 08(25.80) 05(09.09) 20(18.86)
85 + years 07(03.20) 00(00.00) 03(09.67) 02(03.63) 02(01.88)
Gender [N(%)]
Males 93(43.05) 10(41.66) 16(51.61) 19(34.54) 48(45.28)
Females 123(56.94) 14(58.33) 15(48.38) 36(65.45) 58(54.71)
Race [N(%)]
Whites 183(84.72) 23(95.83) 28(90.32) 42(76.36) 90(84.90)
Blacks 21(09.72) 01(04.16) 03(09.67) 05(09.09) 12(11.32)
Others 09(04.16) 00(00.00) 00(00.00) 07(12.72) 02(01.88)
Unknown 03(01.38) 00(00.00) 00(00.00) 01(01.81) 02(01.88)
Marital status [N(%)]
Single 76(35.18) 07(29.16) 14(45.16) 16(29.09) 39(36.79)
Married 131(60.64) 17(70.83) 17(54.83) 36(65.45) 61(57.54)
Unknown 09(04.16) 00(00.00) 00(00.00) 03(05.45) 06(05.66)
Stage [N(%)]
Localized 71(32.87) 10(41.66) 14(45.16) 17(30.90) 30(28.30)
Regional 86(39.81) 08(33.33) 10(32.25) 25(45.45) 43(40.56)
Distant 51(23.61) 04(16.66) 06(19.35) 09(16.36) 32(30.18)
Unstaged 08(03.70) 02(08.33) 01(03.22) 04(07.27) 01(00.94)
Treatment [N(%)]
Combined modality 97(44.90) 07(29.16) 15(48.38) 18(32.72) 57(53.77)
Surgery alone 38(17.59) 11(45.83) 06(19.35) 11(20.00) 10(09.43)
Radiation alone 59(27.31) 06(25.00) 08(25.80) 20(36.36) 25(23.58)
Unknown 22(10.18) 06(25.00) 02(06.45) 08(14.54) 06(05.66)

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Aug 23, 2017 | Posted by in OTOLARYNGOLOGY | Comments Off on Adenoid cystic carcinoma of the base of tongue: A population-based study

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access